 |
| Since the new design change, these babies are flying death traps and BOEING KNOWS IT. |
1. Oversees the air traffic controllers that were criminally destroying evidence with the 9/11 attack details on that day?
2. Refuses to acknowledge or disclose details pertaining to the use of WMD via chemtrail poisoning via the OMEGA SQAUDRON?
3. Partnered with Boeing/Honeywell on the uninterruptible autopilot dangerously exposing all passengers to remote hijacking , terrorism and death?
This case was already solved if every detail isn't disclosed publicly I'll start to disclose it as future stories as posted. What is it with the corporate/government incompetence, negligence, complicity and criminality? And why are there never any arrests?
"The Boeing 737 and the Airbus 320 types are single aisle planes with some 150 seats. Both are bread and butter planes sold by the hundreds with a good profit. In 2010 Airbus decided to offer its A-320 with a New Engine Option (NEO) which uses less fuel. To counter the Airbus move Boeing had to follow up. The 737 would also get new engines for a more efficient flight and longer range. The new engines on the 737 MAX are bigger and needed to be placed a bit different than on the older version. That again changed the flight characteristics of the plane by giving it a nose up attitude.
The new flight characteristic of the 737 MAX would have require a retraining of the pilots. But Boeing's marketing people had told their customers all along that the 737 MAX would not require extensive new training. Instead of expensive simulator training for the new type experienced 737 pilots would only have to read some documentation about the changes between the old and the new versions.
To make that viable Boeing's engineers had to use a little trick. They added a 'maneuver characteristics augmentation system' (MCAS) that pitches the nose of the plane down if a sensor detects a too high angle of attack (AoA) that might lead to a stall. That made the flight characteristic of the new 737 version similar to the old one.
But the engineers screwed up.
The 737 MAX has two flight control computers. Each is connected to only one of the two angle of attack sensors. During a flight only one of two computer runs the MCAS control. If it detects a too high angle of attack it trims the horizontal stabilizer down for some 10 seconds. It then waits for 5 seconds and reads the sensor again. If the sensor continues to show a too high angle of attack it again trims the stabilizer to pitch the plane's nose done.
MCSA is independent of the autopilot. It is even active in manual flight. There is a procedure to deactivate it but it takes some time.
One of the angle of attack sensors on the Indonesian flight was faulty. Unfortunately it was the one connected to the computer that ran the MCAS on that flight. Shortly after take off the sensor signaled a too high angle of attack even as the plane was flying in a normal climb. The MCAS engaged and put the planes nose down. The pilots reacted by disabling the autopilot and pulling the control stick back. The MCAS engaged again pitching the plane further down. The pilots again pulled the stick. This happened some 12 times in a row before the plane crashed into the sea.
To implement a security relevant automatism that depends on only one sensor is extremely bad design. To have a flight control automatism engaged even when the pilot flies manually is also a bad choice. But the real criminality was that Boeing hid the feature.
Neither the airlines that bought the planes nor the pilots who flew it were told about MCAS. They did not know that it exists. They were not aware of an automatic system that controlled the stabilizer even when the autopilot was off. They had no idea how it could be deactivated."
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/03/boeing-the-faa-and-why-two-737-max-planes-crashed.html
Boeing, being part of the Illumnait NWO baby killer crowd, fired most of their most intelligent engineers in the last few years and replaced them. They brag about it. Okeeday.
Canada has announced a nationwide ban on Boeing 737 MAX flights
in its airspace, citing “new data” linking two deadly crashes. Info from
the US federal database revealed pilots have long been complaining
about the plane’s issues.
In a statement to the press, Transport Minister Marc Garneau announced that the “new data” influencing the decision came from “validated satellite tracking,”
and that it suggested similarities between the two crashes involving
the new Boeing jet. Although the data was sufficient to justify shutting
down Canadian airspace to all flights involving the commercial jet, the
minister stressed it was too soon to draw any conclusions.
