Friday, September 28, 2018

Arch Of Baal

This is weird. A replica of the “Arch of Baal” was erected in DC one day before Kavanaugh’s show trial.

The future of the U.S. Supreme Court is literally hanging in the balance, and many believe that it is quite odd that this ancient pagan symbol has been put up at this precise moment in time.  According to the official website of the Institute for Digital Archaeology, the Arch of Palmyra was unveiled on the National Mall on September 26th, and it will remain there until September 29th.  You can view a photograph of the arch standing directly in front of the U.S. Capitol building right here.  Just one day after this arch was put up, Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford testified before Congress.  Perhaps this is all just a “giant coincidence”, but things of this importance usually don’t happen by accident.
The elite deeply understand that symbols have power, and the fact that the Arch of Baal has been placed directly across from the U.S. Capitol is highly significant.
Jonathan Cahn, the author of The Paradigm, has pointed out that Baal was a god of power, fertility and child sacrifice.  In this video, he makes a very strong connection between what was going on during the era of Baal worship and what is taking place in America right now.
The Arch of Baal (née the Arch of Palmyra) was originally built and located in Syria, and destroyed by ISIS in 2015. Maybe it’s not so odd that the group responsible for this replica world tour have planted it in DC at this moment in time, given its connection to the current unpleasantness in Syria,  our globohomo elites really are satanic.

CIA Mind Control at work - Questions we should be asking in MSM and in Senate

Global Intel Hub (Zero Hedge Exclusive 9/24/2018) -- Atlanta, GA -- The hearing about potential Supreme Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh is still going on, but the hearings have clearly missed 90% of key material facts that as always - as we have explained in our books Splitting Pennies and Splitting Bits, the world is not as it seems; and certainly, not ever - as seen on TV.  The peculiar thing about this particular political circus is that the GOP is allowing this to happen, as if there's nothing they can do to allow the left to manipulate the masses before the elections coming up, all we need after a victimized woman by an old, respectable white man is another school shooting, this time with a white rich kid holding the gun at a minority school.  Having said that, if you do have children at public schools, it might be worth considering home schooling or private school at least until the swamp is drained, if it ever will be (or consider a remote rural public school where staging such events is less likely).  As these deep-state nut jobs will stop at nothing to acheive their ends, which seem simple but evil: vindicate the Soros - Clinton Mafia (which is a multi-family 'faction 2' power center that goes well beyond Bill & Hillary) and in the process destroy Trump and everything connected to it. 
Why wasn't this 'accuser' vetted, as one would be in a court case?  This is after all the 'judiciary committee' we know the answer to that, this is political theater of the worst kind.  However if this were a court case, and the complaining witness were to undergo cross-examination and deposition, they should ask the following questions:
  • What is Dr. Ford's relationship with the CIA, and with her father?
    • The importance of noting the CIA banking connections of Ralph G. Blasey Jr., this report explains, is due to the outbreak of what is now known as the “CIA Bank War”—and whose start of, in 1982, a CIA seized from publication news report (Declassified in Part-Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/05: CIA-RDP90-00965R00150010-7) describes as: “This is Wall Street, the center of the international banking system, a system on the edge of a crisis so severe that the Central Intelligence Agency is preparing drastic measures.  Something must be done to avert the breakdown of the Free World’s monetary system.
  • Who paid for her lawyer, lie detector test, and other items related to her testimony?  
  • Was she offered a book deal?
  • What is Dr. Ford's association with the Soros foundation, directly or indirectly?
  • What is her role in Stanford's CIA Internship program?
  • What is the association with Frederick_T._Melges and specifically, did they collaborate on work involving mind control, memory, and time while at Stanford, or a CIA think tank, or any other time?
  • What is the explanation that no other witness can testify to verify the statements of what happened that night, combined with the lack of other physical evidence, and even evidence to the contrary? (Such as Brett Kavanaugh's diary/journal he kept)
  • What are the political associations of Dr. Ford, specifically are there direct connections to the Democratic party and Hillary Clinton, including but not limited to when Clinton was the Secretary of State ? (For those of you who don't know, the State Department is the political cover for CIA operations globally.)
This staged, orchestrated, and artificial testimony is no doubt the creation of deep-state actors connected to Soros/Clinton/CIA et. al.  The GOP doesn't want to mention MKUltra in a public hearing as this would take things in an entirely different direction.  If this was a court, it is highly doubtful that a jury would convict Kavanaugh based on he said she said with no evidence for the complaining witness but an overwhelming amount of evidence for the defense.  Not only the hundreds of character letters of support, the diaries/journals, and all the work Dr. Ford has done over the years on mind control as a qualified and practicing Dr. of Psychiatry; but the fact that Kavanaugh has actually worked for the Federal Governement and the White House specifically on a number of occasions and has gone through a Congressional confirmation many times - why now?  Something is fishy here, just as it was proven that several of the 'victims' of Trump were actually paid actors, the mere accusation is enough to cast doubt on the whole topic.  And this accusation isn't from a poor helpless child, it is from a Dr. of Psychiatry that has authored more than 50 papers on the topics of behavioral science, including topics of great interest to the CIA such as:
Ford has written about the cognitive affect of the September 11 terrorist attacks, too. She and her co-authors wrote, “[Our] findings suggest that there may be a range of traumatic experience most conducive to growth and they also highlight the important contributions of cognitive and coping variables to psychological thriving in short- and longer-term periods following traumatic experience.”
Finally, why is the GOP so defenseless as to allow such a show to occur, which will do much greater damage to the mind of the Sheeple than it will to actually affect the appointing of Judge Kavanaugh or not.  Whether he is appointed or not, the damage to the minds of the masses is done - this further polarizes an already polarized country divided between the 'sane' and the 'insane.'

Research & References
Source 1 Source 2

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

“encourage homosexuality; make women work; contaminate the water.”

In 1969, Planned Parenthood had a planned population control agenda waiting to be implemented in the West.

1969: Jewish Vice-President of Planned Parenthood sends proposals for population control to Bernard Berelson, Jewish head of the population council: “encourage homosexuality; make women work; contaminate the water.”

Twelve strange coincidences

Webster's defines the word coincidence as:
1: the act or condition of coinciding : correspondence
2: the occurrence of events that happen at the same time by accident but seem to have some connection ; also : any of these occurrences

For the past several years, my passion has been to study the Kennedy assassination. The amount of coincidences that I've uncovered are staggering. Many coincidences are probably just that: coincidences. The sheer volume and magnitude gives even the skeptic in me pause. Below are some of the more juicy ones.

1. The Strange Tale of Jerry Owen, the Walking Bible
Jerry Owen went to the LAPD on 5 June 1968 to tell the police he had met Sirhan Sirhan. Sirhan had asked him to meet him at the Ambassador Hotel (the place where Sirhan shot RFK) on 4 June 1968 (the night Sirhan shot RFK). The LAPD balked at Owen's story because Owen had a long rap sheet.

Owen had knowledge of the case that was not available to the public. He said he was going to sell Sirhan a horse for $300. Sirhan was arrested with $300 on him. Sirhan also had worked as a stable hand was an aspiring jockey. And Adir Sirhan, his brother, told the police, Sirhan had $300 on him to buy a horse.

The LAPD disregarded Owen's story that he had picked up a hitchhiker (Sirhan) who wanted to buy a horse. The story Owen gave the police was hardly convincing. It stands to reason, Owen was lying about how he met Sirhan but was genuinely scared. Thus, Owen was hiding something.

Credible witnesses gave testimony that they saw Sirhan and Owen together in the weeks leading up to the assassination. Owen knew Sirhan better than he let on.

Owen claimed he had all 31,173 verses of the Bible memorized. He, therefore, gave himself the immodest title, "Walking Bible". He had a televion show on which he carried out his Christian ministry. Shortly after starting this show (in 1969), he was arrested for shoplifting. The television station decided to break their contract with Owen and cancel his show. He sued them for breach of contract and damages.

At the trial (in 1976), Owen brought a character witness: a woman named Gail Aiken. Aiken was with Owen when he was caught shoplifting and was a member of his congregation.

And she was the sister of Arthur Bremer, the man who shot George Wallace.

Owen was friendly with Sirhan and with Bremer's sister??????? That's quite the coincidence! One man is the friend of Robert Kennedy's killer and the minister of George Wallace's assassin's sister. Could just be a coincidence, right?

Enter: Edgar Eugene Bradley. According to "Who's Who in the JFK Assassination" by Michael Benson, Bradley was identified as a man pretending to be a Secret Service officer on the grassy knoll when JFK was killed. He was indicted for his complicity in the JFK assassination by New Orleans DA Jim Garrison but Governor Reagan didn't honor the extradition request. Witnesses put Bradley with David Ferrie (Lee Oswald's associate). By 1969, Bradley was working for the rightwing preacher Rev. Carl McIntire.

And on 2 July 1968, Jerry Owen gave the following sworn statement:
Question: Jerry, you say you know Edgar Eugene Bradley of North Hollywood, that you met Dr. Carl McIntyre's company?
Answer: Yes, I met him. I know that he was affiliated with Dr. McIntyre.

Owen is connected to Sirhan, Bremer's sister and to man indicted for conspiracy to kill JFK. It's a small world.

2. George Herbert Walker Bush's bedfellows
The first Presidential election I can really remember is Carter versus Reagan in 1980. I was watching television with my mom when a campaign ad came on. A gentleman was being interviewed about his feelings towards Ronald Reagan. The gentleman was eulogizing Reagan, telling the world how great Reagan would be. He told the interviewer he was definitely supporting Reagan and that Reagan was the man for the job.

Then my mom turned to the tv and said, "Of course you're voting for Reagan. If he wins, you'll be Vice President." I looked. Sure enough, the man in question was VP hopeful George Bush.

It always struck me as odd that Bush would eulogize Reagan in this fashion. I mean, Mondale never professed his love of Carter. It wasn't until I was an adult and I had researched this matter that I understood.

George H W Bush and Reagan hated each other--at least they did during the primaries. The Republican primary of 1980 was more acrimonious than the primary between George W Bush and John McCain. When Reagan won the nomination, he picked everyone but Bush to be his running mate. But Nelson Rockefeller was dead. And Gerald Ford gave Reagan conditions. This left only Bush. Reagan reluctantly accepted Bush's support.

Ronald Reagan took the oath of office on 20 January 1981. He was shot in the chest on 30 March 1981, only two months later. He survived the assassin's bullet, barely. The assassin was John Hinckley Jr.

John Hinckley Sr. was an oil businessman from Texas--like Bush. He was also Bush's neighbor in Houston for many years. He was also a partner of Bush's in some oil deals. And he openly endorsed Bush over Reagan during the primaries.

And his kid shot Reagan two months after Reagan took the oath of office.

Scott Hinckley, John Jr's brother, was a business partner of Neil Mallon Bush, George H W Bush's son (and George W Bush's brother). On the day of the assassination, Scott and Neil had dinner plans.

Now this could be a coincidence: Bush hates Reagan but assumes the role of running mate. The son of one of Bush's friends shoots Reagan a couple of months later. Like the "Jerry Owen knows Bremer's sister" story above, this could just be coincidence.

Enter: George De Mohrenschildt. De Mohrenschildt was an aristocratic White Russian who was an oil businessman. He had numerous dealings with Bush and those in Bush's orbit.

And he was Lee Harvey Oswald's best friend.

In 1962 and early 1963, De Mohrenschildt found Oswald a place to stay, a job and introduced him to lots of people. He even introduced him to the people who got him the job at the Texas School Book Depository.

In 1976, the House Select Committee on Assassinations was reopening the JFK case. De Mohrenschildt wrote a letter to CIA Director George Bush asking for help. Later on, Congress called De Mohrenschildt to testify. The day before he was supposed to testify, De Mohrenschildt was found dead of an apparant suicide. On his body was found an address book with Bush's phone and address information.

Bush was friendly with the Hinckleys and then John Hinckley shoots Reagan. Bush was business partners with De Mohrenschildt. And De Mohrenschildt was Oswald's best friend. This is quite the coincidence. It's a really small world.

3. E Howard Hunt: Master spy or modern day Benedict Arnold?
E Howard Hunt was a CIA man since the 1950's. President Truman appointed Averell Harriman to be US Ambassador to Mexico (Harriman was Prescott Bush's closest business partner). Harriman went to Mexico and brought Hunt with him to be his "press aide", i.e., "spy".

Howard Hunt and Bernard Barker founded the Cuban Revolutionary Council (CRC), anti-Castro group that was an umbrella for all anti-Castro groups in America. Guy Banister, an ex-FBI man, headed up the Council's New Orleans chapter. The building where he held the CRC was the same building Lee Harvey Oswald used to distribute pro-Castro leaflets. Through this connection, DA Jim Garrison established his case (which would spawn the movie JFK).

E Howard was CIA station chief of Mexico City when Lee Harvey Oswald went to Mexico City in September 1963 (two months before JFK was shot).

Hunt was part of the preparation for the Bay of Pigs invasion. He trained Cubans for the invasion. When the invasion failed, Kennedy fired his boss, CIA Director Allen Dulles.

The planning for the Bay of Pigs invasion took place in Guatemala. Hunt supervised this training. George De Mohrenschildt, coincidentally, took a walking tour of Guatemala at this time.

Two weeks before Kennedy was assassinated, the President of South Vietnam Diem was assassinated. A cable was forged stating Kennedy was behind the Diem assassination. The person who forged this cable was E Howard Hunt.

On 15 May 1972, in Laurel, Maryland, Arthur Bremer shot George Wallace. One of Nixon's senior staffers (Charles Colson) ordered E Howard Hunt to go to Bremer's apartment and plant George McGovern's campaign literature there. Hunt said he refused. However, the FBI did find Bremer's diary. This diary, which would inspire the movie "Taxi Driver" and John Hinckely Jr.'s obsession with Jodie Foster, was too articulately written to be authored by Bremer. Howard Hunt, before he was in the CIA, was an English major. He was an author who had written several spy novels.

On 17 June 1972, four Cubans and one American broke into the Democratic National Headquarters in the Watergate Hotel. The Cubans were anti-Castro exiles who were veterans of the Bay of Pigs invasion. One of the Cubans was Bernard Barker (see above). And the mastermind of this break-in was E Howard Hunt.

Woodward and Bernstein's investigation of the Watergate break-in would eventually lead to Nixon's resignation. They were able to tie the break-in to Nixon through E Howard Hunt. Hunt was still on the White House payroll at the time of the break-in.

In 1978, during the House Select Committe on Assassinations hearings, the CIA released a memo stating they were cutting their ties to Hunt because of Hunt's involvement in the Kennedy assassination.

So, to sum it up: E Howard Hunt is tied to Prescott Bush's closest ally Averell Harriman. He has several ties to Lee Harvey Oswald. He hated Kennedy so much he forged a cable implicating Kennedy for Diem's murder. He more than likely broke into Bremer's apartment to plant evidence. He masterminded the Watergate break-in. And the CIA decided to cut him loose because he was involved in the Kennedy assassination.

How does one have this many intriguing connections? Sheer coincidence...?

4. Nixon's Ascension to Power
Richard Milhous Nixon, our 37th President, will always be remembered as the man who resigned the Presidency. His connections to the Watergate burglary would eventually unravel his adminstration. While Watergate may have toppled Nixon, what enabled this son of a grocer to rise to our country's highest office?

There have been eight men who were President or who were running for President that have been shot.
1. Abe Lincoln
2. James Garfield
3. William McKinley
4. Teddy Roosevelt
5. John Kennedy
6. Robert Kennedy
7. George Wallace
8. Ronald Reagan

Of these eight men, four ran against Nixon! FOUR! And Nixon's ascension to higher office was a corollary of three of these assassinations. John Kennedy ran against Nixon in 1960. He was killed in 1963. Robert Kennedy ran against him in 1968. He was killed in 1968. George Wallace ran against him in 1972. He was shot and paralyzed in 1972. (Ronald Reagan ran against Nixon in 1968 and was shot in 1981. Unlike the other three, his shooting did not directly lead to Nixon taking office).

Perhaps the farm Nixon grew up on in Whittier, California produced pixie dust along with lemons. Most politicians are not the beneficiaries of such serendepity as to ascend to higher office through coincidental assassinations.

Is this a coincidence?

In 1947, Congressman Richard Nixon was in the Committe on un-American Activities. This Congressional Committe was part of the notorious Red Scare. Nixon's rise to power would be based upon his anti-Communist credentials. He cut his teeth here. Due to his tenacious performance at the Alger Hiss trial and on the Committee on un-American Activities, Nixon would be selected by Eisenhower to be Vice President.

Below is an FBI memo from 1947 (which was released to the public in 1975). The document says, "It is my sworn testimony that one Jack Rubenstein of Chicago noted as a potential witness for the hearings on UnAmerican Activities is performing information functions for the staff of Congressman Richard Nixon, Republican of California. It is requested Rubenstein not be called for open testimony in the aforementioned hearings."

Jack Rubenstien moved from Chicago to Dallas in the 50's. He shortened his name to Jack Ruby. On 24 November 1963, he walked into the Dallas Police Stations, which was overcrowded with cops and reporters, and shot Lee Harvey Oswald.

According to the 1947 memo, Richard Nixon was using Jack Ruby as a contact. Then Ruby turns up in Dallas and kills Oswald, preventing a trial from ever taking place.

On 22 Novemeber 1963, the day Kennedy was killed in Dallas, Nixon was leaving Dallas. He spent the previous day in a meeting with some movers and shakers. In attendance were J Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI, Nixon aide Bebe Rebozo and Dallas oil baron Clint Murchison.

Dallas was a hostile town. In October 1963, US Ambassador to the UN Adlai Stevenson was accosted in Dallas. The mayor of Dallas at the time was Earle Cabell. Cabell's brother, Charles Cabell was in charge of the Bay of Pigs invasion; Kennedy fired him after that debacle. It is unclear what Hoover, Murchison and Nixon discussed at their Dallas meeting. Given Murchison's and Hoover's open hostility towards Kennedy, the conversation could have been political. Given the open hostility of Dallas towards Kennedy and his adminstration, the locale of this meeting is intriguing.
Clint Murchison Sr. had oil businesses all over the Caribbean. He was also an avid horse racing fan. As such he owned some race tracks in California. By strange coincidence, Murchinson's employees included George Demohrenschildt and Sirhan Sirhan. De Mohrenschildt was Oswald's best friend; Sirhan Sirhan was a stable boy at Murchinson's Del Mar Race Track before he fired three bullets into Robert Kennedy.
In 1968, Nixon barely defeated Vice President Hubert Humphries in the Presidential election. While Humphries was wounded by the failures of LBJ, Nixon only beat him by a small margin. The reason: Alabama Governor George Wallace had run as a dark horse. Wallace carried several states in the South, sniping voters from Nixon. Nixon feared a Wallace candidacy in 1972 because it compromised his Southern strategy. On 15 May 1972, Arthur Bremer fired a fusilade of bullets into a crowd, leaving Wallace paralyzed for life. Wallace could not longer campaign for President.
In the weeks leading up to the Wallace shooting, Bremer, a Milwaukee native, was stalking Wallace. These stalking included a trip on the Lake Michigan Ferry from Milwaukee to Ludington. Witnesses put a man with a striking resemblance to G Gordon Liddy with Bremer on the ferry. Newsreels of the Wallace shooting show a man with Liddy's appearance in the background. Liddy was a part of Nixon's Committe to REElect the President (Creep). He was also a long time associate of E Howard Hunt.
After the Wallace shooting, Nixon's senior staffer Chuck Colson order Hunt to plant George McGovern's campaign literature in Bremer's Milwaukee apartment. Hunt claims he refused the assignment. However, the FBI did find McGovern's campaign literature in Bremer's apartment. Also, the "assassin's diary" was found--a book purportedly written by Arthur Bremer detailing his obsession with killing a political figure. This book would later inspire the movie "Taxi Driver" which in turn would inspire John Hinckley Jr's obsession with Jodie Foster. Bremer's scholastic achievements would suggest this assassin's diary was beyond his capabilities. E Howard Hunt, however, had authored several books and had majored in English in college.
To sum up:
  1. In 1947, Nixon used Jack Ruby as an information source; in 1963 Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald
  2. Nixon held a meeting in Dallas the day before Kennedy was killed in Dallas. In attendance was Clint Murchison, a strong Nixon supporter and anti-Kennedy oil man.
  3. Murchison's employees included Oswald's best friend (De Mohrenschildt) and Robert Kennedy's assassin (Sirhan Sirhan).
  4. Nixon had ties to Arthur Bremer, the man who shot George Wallace
  5. Nixon's rise to power was only possible because JFK and RFK were dead and because Wallace was paralyzed. No other person in American history has been so fortunate as to rise to power over the bodies of their slain enemies as Richard Milhous Nixon.
5. What happens when you question the Warren Commission's findings?
On 22 November 1963, John Kennedy was killed. On 24 November 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald was dead. No trial would take place because the prime suspect was already dead. The American people would not tolerate the murder of their President without a trial. Thus, Lyndon Johnson formed a blue ribbon committee to investigate JFK's murder. This committee, known as the Warren Commission, would write 27 volumes on the subject. Their conclusion: Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK without political motive; the assassination was not part of a conspiracy; Jack Ruby shot Oswald without political motive; his murder was not part of a conspiracy.

This ponderous encyclopedia is composed of 19,141 pages! To read this body of work would intimidate the typical American. Perhaps that was by design.

There were seven senior members of the Warren Commission.

Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Hale Boggs, US Representative (D), Louisana
John Sherman Cooper, Senator (R), Kentucky
Allen W Dulles, former director of the CIA
Gerald R Ford, US Representative (R), Michigan
John McCloy, President of the World Bank
Richard Russell, Senator (D), Georgia

LBJ asked Earl Warren to head this commission. Warren refused twice. Then Hoover gave Johnson some information about a trip Warren took to Mexico. When LBJ gave Warren these details, Warren began to cry. He said, "I'll do it. I'll do whatever you ask." So it seems Johnson had to blackmail Warren to get him to agree to be a part of this commission.

The commission members were all busy, powerful men with one exception: Allen Dulles. Dulles was a powerful man until Kenendy fired him after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Kennedy told his advisors he felt like the CIA had lied to him about the whole operation. He demanded Dulles's resignation. Dulles had a lot of time on his hands when the commission was doing its investigation. Therefore, the brunt of the investigation was performed by Dulles and those close to him. Because Kennedy fired Dulles, the choice of Dulles as a senior member of the Warren Commission is a curious one. Dulles had an axe to grind--no one disputes this.

In the 1970's, Congress would investigate CIA abuses (the Rockefeller Commission and the Church Committee). The CIA's involvement in foreign assassinations and their ties to organized crime were made known. As a Warren Commission member, Dulles was in a position to stave off these investigations in the 1960's--at least postponing them for a decade. Also, if the CIA was involved in domestic assassinations (like JFK's), certainly Dulles would not allow the investigation to pursue these leads.

The other members of the Warren Commission are mostly Congressman (Cooper, Boggs, Ford and Russell). McCloy was a cabinet member for LBJ and Kennedy. Of these, Hale Boggs was the last member to official endorse the magic bullet theory (the theory that one bullet caused seven wounds in Kennedy and Connally). Once he finally accepted the magic bullet theory, the Commission's conclusions could be made public.

Hale Boggs was a Democrat from Louisana, like DA Jim Garrison. Garrison was the only person to bring a trial to court for the assassination of John Kennedy. Garrison opened his investigation after having a conversation with Russell Long, Senator from Louisana. Certainly Senator Long, Representative Boggs and DA Garrison knew each other since they were all prominent Democrats from Louisana.

During the 1970's, Congress would reopen the JFK assassination in what was called the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). This committe along with the Rockefeller Commission and the Church Committee, were born out of American concerns over their government. With JFK, RFK and MLK dead and with American involvement in Vietnam reaching dizzying heights, Americans were distrustful of their government. This, along with Garrison's trial (1968-1969), would make Americans demand more accountability from their representatives.

Representative Boggs was on his way to being Speaker of the House in 1972. As a former member of the Warren Commission, his input would have been the spear tip of these investigations. And because Boggs was a Louisana Democrat like Garrison, perhaps Boggs could be convinced the Warren Commission had gotten in wrong.

Then Hale Boggs disappeared. No one has seen him since 16 October 1972. His body has never turned up.

George De Mohrenschildt, Lee Oswald's best friend, was called to testify before the HSCA. In the years between his Warren Commission testimony and the hearings for the HSCA, De Mohrenschildt implied there was a conspiracy and/or a cover up. The day before he was to testify, he committed suicide.

When Jim Garrison opened his investigation into the JFK assassination, two names kept popping up: Guy Banister and David Ferrie. Many witnesses testified they saw Oswald with these men and that Oswald worked out of Banister's New Orleans office in 1963. In 1964, right before the Warren Commission's report was released, Banister died of natural causes. Before Garrison's case went to court, David Ferrie committed suicide. (Coincidentally, the Warren Commission mentions Guy Banister and David Ferrie exactly zero times--despite being 19,141 pages long).

Police Officer Roger Craig, who was on the scene in Dallas on 22 November 1963, gave testimony completely contrary to that of the Warren Commission's conclusions. He committed suicide in 1975.

Shortly after Kennedy had been shot, a Dallas Police officer by the name of J D Tippit was killed in the Dallas suburbs. The Warren Commission concluded this killing was by Oswald who was attempting to escape. One witness to the Tippit killing was Warren Reynolds. He refused to identify Oswald as the killer. He was shot in the head but survived.

Another witness to the Tippit killing was Domingo Benavides. He had a brother who looked like him considerably. His brother, Eddy Benavides, was murdered. The crime remains unsolved. Benavides' father-in-law, J W Jackson, was not satisfied with the police effort into this crime--the Benavides family has always believed the killing was a result of mistaken identity. A man broke into Jackson's house and shot him.

Gary Underhill was a CIA man who claimed he knew who killed JFK. He committed suicide in 1964.

Delila Walle was an employee of Jack Ruby's. She told people she was working on a book of what she knew about the assassination. Her husband of 24 days killed her.

Albert Bogard was a car salesman. He testified before the Warren Commission that Oswald came to his dealership and test drove a car on 9 November 1963. Since the Warren Commission concluded that Oswald was not able to drive a car, Bogard's testimony was troubling. After giving his testimony, Bogard was hospitalized following a brutal beating. In 1966, Bogard committed suicide. (Coincidentally, Bogard's coworker, Jack Lawrence, borrowed a car on 21 November 1963. The car was found on the Grassy Knoll. He was arrested but released 24 hours later. He quit his job at the Downtown Lincoln-Mercury dealership the next day).

It seems to me that if you disagree with the Warren Commission you usually die of murder or suicide. Could just be a coincidence, though.

6. Where were you when Kennedy was killed?
"I suppose really the only two dates that most people remember where they were was Pearl Harbor and the death of president Franklin Roosevelt." --John F. Kennedy
It has become a cliche. If you were alive when Kennedy was killed, you remember where you were on 22 November 1963.
Unless you happen to be Richard Nixon, George H W Bush or E Howard Hunt.
Richard Nixon told two different stories about how he learned about the JFK assassination. Nixon said he first learned about the Kennedy assassination while in a cab in New York. However, a UPI photograph taken as Nixon left New York's Idlewild airport shows Nixon as being "shocked" at learning JFK was dead. Thus, he knew about the assassination before the cab ride.
Nixon had spent 21 November 1963 and the morning of the 22nd in Dallas. In addition to his business duties (the bottler's convention), he met with some rightwing groups. The discussions that took place are not known but all the players (J Edgar Hoover, Clint Murchison, et al) were rabid critics of Kennedy.
Nixon's long time friend at Pepsi was a man named Donald Kendall. Kendall was running Pepsi's foreign operations when he received the following correspondence from Nixon in June 1963:
Dear Don
In veiw of our discussion yesterday morning with regard to Cuba. I thought you might like to see a opy of the speech I made before the American Society of Newspaper Editions in which I direted remarks toward this problem.

When I return from Europe I am looking forward to having a chance to get a further fill-in with regard to your experiences on the Bay of Pigs incident.
Donald Kendall had no experiences in the Bay of Pig incident. And Nixon and Kendall were quite close. Why would they be discussing the Bay of Pigs in 1963 when it took place two years earlier? Wouldn't they have discussed it in the days and weeks following the failed invasion? And what insight could Kendall, a Pepsi executive, offer Nixon, the former Vice President, about the Bay of Pigs?
On 20 June 1972, three days after the Watergate break-in, Nixon told his chief of staff Bob Haldeman to cover up the break-in. Specifically, he told him to have the CIA assuage the FBI to stop its investigation because the break-in was a CIA operation that will "open the whole Bay of Pigs thing". Haldeman claims in his book The Ends of Power that the Bay of Pigs references were about the Kennedy assassination.
It is in this light, that Nixon's note to Kendall makes sense. Kendall was in charge of Pepsi's foreign operations. The sugar used in Pepsi's products had come from Cuba until Castro nationalized the industries. Was Kendall part of a group that wanted Castro gone so he could reinstate Cuba's pre-Castro plantations?
Nixon's appearance in Dallas on the day of Kennedy's murder is also suspicious. The bottler's convention took the largest venue (the Market Hall). This venue was rented well in advance so that JFK would have to use the second largest venue in Dallas: the Trade Mart. There are only two paths from Love Airfield to the Trade Mart that go through downtown Dallas; and one goes past the Texas School Book Depository.
Considering Nixon was in Dallas on business and considering the references to the Bay of Pigs, it seems strange that Nixon would give two different stories about where he was when Kennedy was assassinated.
Like Nixon, George H W Bush was in Dallas on 22 November 1963. And like Nixon, he can't seem to get his story straight.
Bush was the head of the Harris County Republican party at this time. He was also campaigning for Congress. Within an hour of the JFK assassination, Bush called a friend of his at the FBI. He told the FBI a volunteer at the Harris County Republican office (James Parrot) had made threats on Kennedy's life. Bush also told his FBI contact that he himself was in Tyler, Texas at the time and was on his way to Dallas.
However, James Parrot had an air tight alibi for the Kennedy killing: he was with one of Bush's employees at the time! In fact, Bush had told his employee, Kearney Reynolds, to go look on Parrot just before the assassination occured! Why would Bush waste the FBI's time with a bogus tip?
The reason: to establish an alibi for himself. Parrot's alibi was Bush's employee Kearney Reynolds; and Bush's alibi was the Parrot tip. An FBI report was created stating Bush was in Tyler, Texas. However, the evidence of Bush being in Dallas is irrefutable.
In fact, it's even possible Bush was at the Texas School Book Depository!
In all his memoirs, Bush barely makes any mention of his whereabouts on that day. His wife's memoirs for 22 November 1963 are intriguing.
Barbara Bush claims she was writing a letter "home" when she got the news of Kennedy's assassination. Included in her memoirs are excerpts from the letter. There are several things wrong with this picture.
1. She signed the letter "Bar". Certainly her children would not call her Bar.
2. She and George were only on the road for a few days. They would be home before the letter arrived.
3. The letter seems to be written for adults to read. Except for George W who wasn't even home (he was at boarding school), all of her kids were 10 years old or younger. Why would she have mundane small talk to her young children?
The letter seems to be providing cover. Along with the FBI report that says George Bush was in Tyler, Texas (simply because he said he was), the Bushes have cover for 22 November 1963.
One intersting coincidence to go along with the above mentioned items: Lyndon Johnson was also in Dallas that day. Since he was the Vice President, he was in the motorcade. Thus, Lyndon Johnson, George Bush and Richard Nixon, three future Presidents, were all in Dallas the day Kennedy was killed in Dallas.
E Howard Hunt
The mastermind of Watergate, the man who forged the cable implicating Kennedy in the assassination of Diem and the man who probably wrote Bremer's diary, E Howard Hunt, was in Dallas on 22 November 1963.
And, like Nixon and Bush, he could never keep his story straight about where he was at that day.
During the House Select Committee on Assassinations, a CIA memo was released stating that the CIA was cutting its ties to Hunt because Hunt was involved in the JFK assassination. A small rightwing paper called Spotlight published the story. Hunt sued for libel.
When Hunt took the stand, he told contradictory stories about where he was at on that day. He said the article in Spotlight had done damage to his family--his kids were asking if he was in fact involved in the assassination. When asked where he was at on 22 November 1963, he said he was home in Virginia watching the news with his kids. Then why would his kids think he was guilty of the assassination if he was with them at the time?

7. The General Walker Story
General Edwin Anderson Walker was a radical rightwing Army general. He got into hot water with Kennedy when it was reported that Walker was indoctrinating his troops with propaganda from the John Birch Society. Walker would eventually retire to Dallas where he was active in right wing circles during 1963.
On 10 April 1963, Walker was in his home completing his tax return when a bullet was fired into his house. The bullet missed him but only narrowly. Walker was not injured by the shot.
The Dallas Police investigated the shooting but no arrests were made. After Lee Harvey Oswald was dead, evidence was turned up that Oswald was Walker's would-be assassin.
The case against Oswald was two-fold: his wife's testimony and a scrapbook Oswald kept. Marina Oswald told the authorities that Oswald confessed the shooting to her. She gave other supporting details about how Oswald went to Walker's house at least one time before the shooting in order to case the place. She said Oswald wanted to wait until Wednesday night (10 April) because the church next to Walker's house held services on Wednesday nights; Oswald believed a full church parking lot would be a cover for him. She supplied the authorities with Oswald's scrapbook--which was nothing short of an orgy of incriminating evidence. Oswald's scrapbook had photos of Walker's house, thus proving that Oswald was obsessed with Walker. With Marina's testimony, the Dallas Police closed the file on the Walker shooting.
The above summary is more or less what all the official books say about the Walker shooting. Even Vincent Bugliosi's 1,600 page magna opus Reclaiming History doesn't go into much greater detail than what you see above. Sure, Bugliosi spends three or four pages discussing Oswald's itenerary with Walker's itenerary so the reader will see their timelines side-by-side. Anyone reading his book would simply slam the case shut on Oswald as if there was no other pertinent evidence.
But this is not the case.
On 8 April 1963, two days before the Walker shooting, Robert Surrey (an associate of Walker's) saw two men walking around Walker's house "peeking in the house". Surrey knew Walker was not at home so he immediately recognized this as a suspicious situation. Surrey snuck around to the car in the driveway, presumably belonging to one of the two prowlers. Surrey told the police that the car (a 1963 Ford) didn't have a license plate. He went into the glove compartment to see the registration. There was no registration. Surrey decided to follow the car after the men left since he was not able to identify the car or the driver in any way.
He followed the car into downtown Dallas when he lost them. The unregistered, unlicensed driver suspected he was being followed, said Surrey, and the mystery driver was able to elude him.
On the night of the shooting, Walter Coleman (a neighbor of Walker's) heard the gunshot. He immediately looked over the fence and saw two men fleeing the scene. The men ran into two separate cars that were parked in the church parking lot. Walker told the police that he too saw two cars fleeing the church parking lot in the moments following the shooting. Recall that Marina said Oswald wanted to use the church as a cover for his activities.
Surrey reported he saw two men prowling around Walker's house two nights before the shooting. This incident must be related to the Walker shooting! It's inconceivable that two men would case a house then two nights later an unrelated shooting took place at that house. In addition, Coleman reported seeing two men fleeing the scene the night of the shooting. The conclusion is inescapable: there were two men involved in the Walker shooting. And the implications of this are staggering.
There are two possibilities: a) Oswald had an accomplice in the shooting of a political figure in Dallas in April of 1963; b) two men other than Oswald were involved in the Walker shooting. These two implications are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. Either Oswald had an accomplice or he was framed. The entire case against a conspiracy is fractured by the Walker shooting. Is it any wonder that Bugliosi doesn't cover any of these details in his 1,600 book, instead relegating and then dismissing these details in the end notes (which are on a CD)?
And what about the scrapbook? The authorities uncovered Oswald's scrapbook which had a surveilliance photo of Walker's house. This is what tipped off the authorities that Oswald was involved in the Walker shooting in the first place. The photograph is depicted below.

Notice anything strange about this picture? Take a closer look at the back of the car.

The area where the license plate should be has been ripped out!
When the Warren Commission asked Marina about this picture, she stated firmly that the photo had no such hole in it at the time Oswald showed it to her. Yet the FBI stated the hole was definitely present when they confiscated the photograph. Bugliosi concludes that Marina must be mistaken. Here are some excerpts of what Bugliosi says.
"The hole in the photograph is not confined to the small license plate area. It is a very large hole, encompassing almost one-third of the rear trunk area."
"It is likely that the hole was accidentally torn out by someone, perhaps even Oswald."
Bugliosi tries to minimize the impact of this doctored photo by suggesting the rip accidental and not confined to the license plate area. Am I crazy? When I see this photograph I see a doctored photograph--someone's attempt to not have their vehicle linked to a photograph in Oswald's possession.

Monday, September 24, 2018

Home Your Territory The Shows Newscasts Live Stream TV First Nations woman killed by train in Toronto was a witness in murder trial

First Nations woman killed by train in Toronto was a witness in murder trial

By Kenneth Jackson
APTN National News
A First Nation woman who was struck and killed by a freight train in Toronto Tuesday night was also a witness in a murder investigation and had allegedly been receiving death threats about testifying according to people close to her.
Terra Gardner is believed to have been hit on the tracks near Young Street and Summerhill Avenue at about 10:25 p.m. close to a popular spot where people are known to drink by the tracks. Two other people are believed to have been with her at the time of her death.
Gardner had been receiving death threats and was being called a rat for providing information in the Toronto homicide of First Nations man Leo Buswa in 2010.
Buswa was beaten Aug. 29 that year and died a month later in hospital.
Last month Gardner testified at the preliminary trial of Blake Paul, of Moose Factory, Ont., who is accused of second-degree murder. Paul was arrested in 2012 in Cape Breton, N.S.
Gardner apparently was reluctant to testify and she was warned by officials that if she didn’t testify she would be held in custody until the trial, scheduled for later this year, according to Doug Johnson Hatlem, a street pastor with Sanctuary, an organization in Toronto that helps struggling people.
“They did not give her adequate protection for testifying…in a major murder trial where she is being called a rat and being threatened and we had to literally beg to get her a second night in a hotel and she was testifying for five straight days,” said Johnson Hatlem. “They just wanted to give her the first night. She’s homeless. She’s vulnerable.”
It’s not immediately known if Gardner’s death is being treated as suspicious by Toronto police but it’s leaving some to question the timing of the death.
“That’s a potential,” said Johnson Hatlem. “It also could have been an accident. We don’t know that yet but given the circumstances if this isn’t treated at least a little bit suspicious it’s going to be really, really maddening.”
Originally from Nigigoonsiminikaaning First Nation, located 40 km east of Fort Frances, Ont., Gardner was living in Toronto. She often went to Sanctuary for help.
On her Facebook page dozens of people expressed sorrow upon learning of her death.
“I just don’t want to believe it’s true and then I keep seeing everyone post about you being gone,” said one person. “The waves of sorrow are small right now but, I can feel them growing and it hurts more and more when I think I wont be able to walk do the street and see that beautiful smile of yours or get one of those super awesome hugs.”
Police said they couldn’t release any information.

Young Homeless Girl was hit by a Train and Died Shortly After This Inter...

Homeless woman died shortly after this interview. Her death could have b...

Homeless Veteran Lives in His Car in Los Angeles

Los Angeles Homeless Man Shares the Harsh Reality of Skid Row

Saturday, September 22, 2018

Fukushima Radiation Found In Napa Valley Wines

Believe it or not, one well-known way of authenticating the vintage of a certain wine without having to open it is to check how much nuclear fallout it contains. Now, the pioneer of that technique has used it to determine that radiation from the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant meltdown and disaster in Japan made its way into wines from California's Napa Valley.
The vintage of many wines can be verified and fakes outed by measuring their cesium 137 content with a gamma detector and then comparing the measurement against the known levels of the radioactive isotope in the atmosphere in a given year from nuclear tests and accidents like Chernobyl. After a few decades without any tests or accidents, Fukushima provided a new marker.
A team from the French National Center for Scientific Research and the University of Bordeaux including Philippe Hubert, who developed the method over 20 years ago, decided to check a series of California wines from between 2009 and 2012 for cesium 137, which was released in significant amounts from Fukushima and traveled across the Pacific on the wind.

To get an accurate measurement, the wines were opened and reduced to ash.
"It seems there is an increase in activity in 2011 by a factor of 2," reads a paper by the team uploaded to Cornell's ArXiv pre-print server, meaning that levels of cesium 137 in California wine appears to have doubled right after Fukushima.
No need for cabernet fans to freak out, as the levels found are still considered extremely low, and as far as I've heard the wines were not found to be fakes.
I've covered science, technology, the environment and politics for outlets including CNET, PC World, BYTE, Wired, AOL and NPR. I currently produce the Warm Regards podcast and I've written e-books on Android and Alaska. I began covering Silicon Valley for the now defunct...

The Daily Messenger: The Lusitania, Woodrow Wilson, and the Deceptions ...

The Daily Messenger: The Lusitania, Woodrow Wilson, and the Deceptions ...: Just a few of the 4 MILLION ROUNDS OF ENDFIELD .303 BRITISH ROUNDS FOUND IN THE HOLD OF THE LUSITANIA. We were lied to in order that we wo...

This Man's Incredible Story Proves Why Due Process Matters In The Kavanaugh Case

Submitted by James Miller of The Political Insider
Somewhere between the creation of the Magna Carta and now, leftists have forgotten why due process matters; and in some cases, such as that of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, they choose to outright ignore the judicial and civil rights put in place by the U.S. Constitution.
In this age of social media justice mobs, the accused are often convicted in the court of public opinion long before any substantial evidence emerges to warrant an investigation or trial. This is certainly true for Kavanaugh. His accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, cannot recall the date of the alleged assault and has no supporting witnesses, yet law professors are ready to ruin his entire life and career. Not because they genuinely believe he's guilty, but because he's a pro-life Trump nominee for the Supreme Court.
It goes without saying: to "sink Kavanaugh even if" Ford's allegation is untrue is unethical, unconstitutional, and undemocratic. He has a right to due process, and before liberals sharpen their pitchforks any further they would do well to remember what happened to Brian Banks.
In the summer of 2002, Banks was a highly recruited 16-year-old linebacker at Polytechnic High School in California with plans to play football on a full scholarship to the University of Southern California. However, those plans were destroyed when Banks's classmate, Wanetta Gibson, claimed that Banks had dragged her into a stairway at their high school and raped her.
Gibson's claim was false, but it was Banks's word against hers. Banks had two options: go to trial and risk spending 41 years-to-life in prison, or take a plea deal that included five years in prison, five years probation, and registering as a sex offender. Banks accepted the plea deal under the counsel of his lawyer, who told him that he stood no chance at trial because the all-white jury would "automatically assume" he was guilty because he was a "big, black teenager."
Gibson and her mother subsequently sued the Long Beach Unified School District and won a $1.5 million settlement. It wasn't until nearly a decade later, long after Banks's promising football career had already been tanked, that Gibson admitted she'd fabricated the entire story.
Following Gibson's confession, Banks was exonerated with the help of the California Innocence Project. Hopeful to get his life back on track, he played for Las Vegas Locomotives of the now-defunct United Football League in 2012, and signed with the Atlanta Falcons in 2013. But while Banks finally received justice, he will never get back the years or the prospective pro football career that Gibson selfishly stole from him.
Banks's story is timely, and it serves as a powerful warning to anyone too eager to condemn those accused of sexual assault. In fact, a film about Banks's ordeal, Brian Banks, is set to premiere at the Los Angeles Film Festival next week.

James Woods Suspended From Twitter Over Satirical Meme That Could "Impact An Election"

Outspoken conservative actor James Woods has been suspended from Twitter over a two-month-old satirical meme which very clearly parodies a Democratic advertisement campaign.
The offending tweet from July 20, features three millennial-aged men with "nu-male smiles" and text that reads "We're making a Woman's Vote Worth more by staying home." Above it, Woods writes "Pretty scary that there is a distinct possibility this could be real. Not likely, but in this day and age of absolute liberal insanity, it is at least possible."
Soy Boys embarrassing men everywhere by acting the fool
According to screenshots provided by an associate of Woods', Twitter directed the actor to delete the post on the grounds that it contained "text and imagery that has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election."
In other words, James Woods, who has approximately 1.72 million followers, was suspended because liberals who don't identify as women might actually take the meme seriously and not vote. 
In a statement released through associate Sara Miller, Woods said "You are a coward, @Jack," referring to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. "There is no free speech for Conservatives on @Twitter."
Earlier this month, Woods opined on the mass-platform ban of Alex Jones, tweeting: "“I’ve never read Alex Jones nor watched any of his video presence on the internet. A friend told me he was an extremist. Believe me that I know nothing about him. That said, I think banning him from the internet is a slippery slope. This is the beginning of real fascism. Trust me."
Nu-males everywhere non-threateningly smirk at Woods' bad fortune...
Gay boys...not men

(h/t Adan Salazar @ Infowars, Twitchy)


THE Evidence and The True Face of The Shroud Film part 3

Friday, September 21, 2018

Kavanaugh Sex Scandal Exposed!

Kavanaugh Accusation An Orchestrated Hit Involving Fmr Anita Hill Adviser

An audio recording purportedly from a July conference call suggests that Christine Blasey Ford's sexual assault accusation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh wasn't simply a reluctant claim that Diane Feinstein sat on until the 11th hour.
The recording features Ricki Seidman - a former Clinton and Obama White House official and Democratic operative who advised Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings, and who was revealed on Thursday as an adviser to Ford by Politico.

Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were both teenagers, is being advised by Democratic operative Ricki Seidman.
Seidman, a senior principal at TSD Communications, in the past worked as an investigator for Sen. Ted Kennedy, and was involved with Anita Hill’s decision to testify against Supreme Court Nominee Clarence Thomas. -Politico
"While I think at the outset, looking at the numbers in the Senate, it’s not extremely likely that the nominee can be defeated," says Seidman. "I would absolutely withhold judgement as the process goes on. I think that I would not reach any conclusion about the outcome in advance."
What's more, the recording makes clear that even if Kavanaugh is confirmed, Democrats can use the doubt cast over him during midterms.
"Over the coming days and weeks, there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee... whether or not it ultimately defeats the nominee, it will help people understand why it's so important that they vote and the deeper principles that are involved in it."

The satanic whores hate Christians.


THE Evidence and The True Face of The Shroud Film part 2


Satanic left and the gay agenda

from the internet

When my daughter was 10, I told her that when the hormones took over, boys would lie, cheat, steal, or even chew off their arm to have sex with her.  That, because she was slim and "hot" she would be spared the worst of it for a while, because hot chicks generally intimidate most boys their age. But, when she got to be 13 or 14, older boys and men would target her. I repeated to her over and over that she was beautiful, brilliant, loved, and that her parents would support her and trust her her entire life, and nothing she could do would change that. That if she decided she liked girls more than boys, she was free to try that road, but we truly hoped she would not let a couple of bad experiences with idiot boys make her believe all men were pigs. We made a few mistakes as parents, and it was remarkable to see how quickly and clearly they were reflected in our children's behavior. The message was clear - parents need to explain the parameters of sexuality, give their children the benefit of complete and unbiased information, express their own preferences not as edicts but as hopes, and short circuit the educational system's message that everything is "normal" and that a predilection towards actual biological norms is neither a micro-aggression nor an effort to control. Her school did me a huge favor when they so mishandled one situation that she recognized the concerted effort of the LBGTQ community to "de-normalize" straight behavior, and took offense at their patent manipulation of young minds.

A young boy (12) developed a crush on an attractive girl in his class. He brought a flower to school one day, and handed it to her in the hallway, with a note that said "I think you are really nice." Evidently when he handed it to her with his right hand, he placed his left hand on her elbow. Because the boy was overweight, she was mortified. Her friends teased her. So, she went to her homeroom teacher and complained.

Earlier that year, a boy had touched another boy on his shoulder and said "I think I like you." Disgusted, that boy had likewise reported the incident to the homeroom teacher.
Well, the straight fat kid got suspended, and a notation put on his file that he had acted in a "predatory" manner. He was warned that any more "unwanted or uninvited aggression" would mean expulsion. He was sent to see a school therapist once a week for two months to learn about "appropriate and inappropriate" behaviors.

The second boy, evidently uncertain about his developing sexuality, was treated quite differently. He was immediately brought to LBGTQ "counseling" where he was assigned an adult gay male advisor with whom he could discuss his feelings any time. A singer, he was invited to join the school's "Gay Chorus" and to come to group counseling with "other gay students" all the way through 18 year-olds, where they were encouraged to not just discuss but "explore" their new sexual identity. When he told his mother what had happened, and that guys were making out during "counseling" she went down to the school and wound up getting so heated in argument with the head of school that they were turning her boy into a homosexual that they threw her out, and called her a homophobe and bigot. She wound up having to move her son to another school in a different district. By the next year he had a girlfriend and great grades to boot.

The Russian criticisms of the feminization of Christian culture are founded on false pretenses, but they are not wrong. The gay community has turned schools into recruiting grounds, and anyone who objects is ostracized. Like religion, sexuality should be kept as far out of school meddling as possible. Those are matters between parents and children, and if that is dysfunctional, friends and community resources. But, the authority relationship between school and children has no place extolling the virtues of "choices" by young children. If a 12-year-old wants to drive, we don't toss him the keys to the F-350 and set him loose with an "advisor."

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Deep State Unmasked: Leaks at HHS; DOJ Official Resists "From Inside" an...

California Sanctuary: Its just dandy

California: People Quietly Disappearing

Trump Delighted After North Korea Pledges To Dismantle Key Missile Facilities

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has proven in the past that he would be willing to say anything to keep South Korea and the US at the bargaining table, even if he doesn't intend to follow through. And just a few weeks after President Trump canceled a planned visit to North Korea by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Kim on Wednesday announced that he would allow international monitors to enter the country and observe the dismantling of the North's nuclear reactor in Yongbyon, its primary source of nuclear fuel, amid a raft of other bilateral promises including plans for the North and South to field a joint team at the Tokyo Summer Olympics in 2020 while seeking a joint bid to host the 2032 Summer Olympics.
While Moon heralded this announcement as an important breakthrough in attaining a "nuclear-free" North Korea,it's worth noting that the North has promised to close down Yongbyon before - going as far back as 2007, according to NPR.
In addition to Yongbyon, the North promised observed shutdowns of its missile engine testing site and launch pad in the Northwestern town of Dongchang-ri. However, the significance of shuttering these two facilities is not clear, according to Reuters, and suspicions remain that these shutdowns could be easily reversed.
Satellite image of the North's nuclear facility at Yongbyon (courtesy of TASS)
Experts who spoke with Reuters said the US shouldn't read too much in to these gestures.
Seo Yu-suk, a research manager at the Institute of North Korean Studies in Seoul, said the facilities at Dongchang-ri and Yongbyon are "almost obsolete" and the North has mobile missile launchers that are easier to use and harder to detect, while there are likely covert sites elsewhere.
What's more, satellite images and other evidence released in recent months have found evidence that North Korea has continued clandestine work on its nuclear program. Though the North promised it would reveal the locations of many of these hidden facilities and mobile launchers as part of the deal.
But that didn't stop President Trump from chiming in on twitter to praise the agreement as "very exciting!"
During what was Moon's third visit to the North since relations between the two warring neighbors began to thaw earlier this year, defense ministers for the North and South reached a sweeping agreement to suspend military flights near the heavily armed border between the two countries at the 38th Parallel, disarm border guards at the Panmujon border village and draw down some soldiers from the demilitarized zone. Both countries will establish "buffer zones" between the coastline and maritime borders to lower the risk of accidental military clashes. Moon is expected to remain in the North through Thursday.
Here's more from RT:
As part of the military agreement, the neighbors will halt border drills from November 1, Yonhap reports. South Korean Defense Minister Song Young-moo and North Korea’s No Kwang-chol also agreed to stop military flights in the vicinity of the demarcation line. In addition, the agreement envisions setting up a buffer zone in the Yellow Sea and suspending maritime drills.
As a clear sign of mutual trust, the Pyongyang military agreement also calls for the withdrawal of soldiers from the demilitarized zone and disarming the servicemen keeping watch at Panmunjom border village. The nations also agreed that each would close eleven border guard posts by the end of 2018.
The Koreas’ armed forces will establish and operate a "joint military committee" to discuss the implementation of the military agreement on a "permanent basis," Moon Jae-in noted.
Kim praised the agreement as an important step toward "lasting peace."
Speaking to the press on the outcome of Moon's visit to North Korea, Kim noted that the "agreement at Pyongyang summit will advance an era of peace, prosperity." Kim especially noted that the military agreement will help to denuclearize the peninsula and reach a lasting peace.
Beyond Kim's nuclear promises, the two countries have also agreed that Kim will soon travel to South Korea for what will be the first visit by a North Korean head of state to the South. Meanwhile, the White House has said that arrangements are underway for Kim to visit the US.
The Koreas also agreed to begin reconnecting railways and roads linking the two countries within this year. They also plan to restart work at a joint factory park in the North border city of Kaesong and tours to North Korea's Mount Kumgang resort once certain conditions have been met to ensure that the North is working toward denuclearization.
According to Reuters, some worry these projects would violate UN sanctions - which would be a major benefit for Kim, we imagine, because it would signal that he can slowly wrest concessions from the West by standing his ground and continuing to express a "willingness" to negotiate. The North has a long history of making overtures for peace, only to resort back to hostility once it received international aide or some other carrot, per NPR.
Even so, lasting rapprochement between the two Koreas have proven elusive in the past, with hopes for peace degenerating into renewed recriminations and saber rattling following two previous summits in 2000 and 2007.
And while it's still unclear what actions the US will take in response to this, that didn't stop Moon from heralding this latest "breakthrough" as moving toward a "land of peace without nuclear weapons and nuclear threats"
But as the old saying goes, proof is in the pudding. Many analysts will remain wary of the North's sincerity until the last nuke is removed from the country.