NANCY PELOSI'S HUSBAND

Not MAGA, but FAGA.

Deep Dive on Pelosi SRA event

So the wife of Paul Pelosi's attacker claimed in a blog post that David DePape was involved in Satanic abuse of their mutual children.

Notable findings so far:
Gypsy is currently serving prison time for violating a restraining order against one of her son's friends who she also claimed was suffering from Satanic abuse. His name is Phoenix and she claimed his mother Raven was involving him in some kind of ritual abuse. Apparently, Phoenix was goth and a cutter.

IG of Raven
https://www.instagram.com/goatfeathers13/

Gypsies Blogs which include her legal documents:
http://www.mynakedtruth.tv/2020/02/gypsy-taub-jailed/
https://gypsytaubjailed.blogspot.com/

Lefty protest outside Pelosi’s house
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2021/10/31/18846021.php

Gypsy Taub Bio
http://www.jerrygarciafamilyclinic.org/bio.html

Gypsy meditated on channeled entity called Lazaris
https://www.lazaris.com/about/

Gypsy Taub Sentencing Hearing Notes
http://www.mynakedtruth.tv/2022/10/sentencing-hearing-november-4-2021-part-1/

Daughter’s website
https://web.archive.org/web/20210127002250/http://intigonzalez.com/about/

Daughter’s bio of mom
https://gypsytaubjailed.blogspot.com/2020/05/activist-gypsy-taub-bio.html?m=1

The drug Hunter claimed Muskie was being treated with was a little-known root called Tabernanthe Iboga or Ibogaine.

https://theplaidzebra.com/hunter-s-thompson-spread-rumor-presidential-candidates-drug-addiction-taken-seriously/

Twatfag digs on Depape Blog
https://twitter.com/CobraKel/status/1586420364564828160

Gypsy Taub Porn Site
https://web.archive.org/web/20220325013313/http://www.lustfulgoddess.com/public/main.php

Guccifer 2.0 Pelosi Goat Hill Pizza
https://themillenniumreport.com/2016/11/guccifer-2-0-is-nancy-pelosis-goat-hill-pizza-restaurant-a-front-company-used-to-funnel-money-to-the-democrats/

FBI quickly puts up fake "manifesto" blog that never existed prior to the alleged attack.

Satanists have an actual terror organization going around firebombing pregnancy centers and they're threatening bombings and actual murder of mothers with children in publicif Roe is overturned.

This - put up an "its ok to be white" poster and you get federal charges the next day and doxed by every slug in the world. Threaten terrorism openly on twitter and firebomb pediatrician offices with pigs blood at midnight with your nasty troon coven and you get a free pass from local law and the FBI. Nothing to see, move along.

Antifa is firebombing pediatrician and birthing clinics and threatening doctors who deliver babies with murder, including their families. Nothing happens to them. Ever

Just say abortion is evil and wrong and you get put on a white racism watch list by the SPLC, ADL, JDL, and FBI, even if you are black. FACT. State your intentions to defend such sites from these satanic killers and the moment you step outside your door the FBI will be there to arrest you; as they've done.

PSY OP SPOOK GROUP "PATRIOT FRONT" BUSTED AT PRIDE EVENT

They then got their mugs posted very nicely and clearly, as if this photo was canned and ready to go like Chef Boyardee.

The CIA/FBI should have chosen a better name than "patriot front", which means the group was fronting for something.

May I present: Your guide to FBI/CIA spooks, patsies and undefined.

Feds and narcs

 jstone

FBI Uses Surveillance "Air Force" To Monitor US Citizens, AP Finds

In the wake of the violent protests, looting, and riots that shook Baltimore to its core and left parts of the city smoldering in late April, Benjamin Shayne — who had just sat down in his backyard to enjoy a radio broadcast of an Orioles game — inadvertently uncovered a secret FBI aerial surveillance program when he noticed a small plane circling overhead and asked Twitter if anyone could explain the aircraft’s low, circular flight pattern. As it turned out, one of Shayne’s followers had some answers:

@scanbaltimore It's registered to NG Research: http://t.co/mCWpUzvndp
For some other info: http://t.co/cbCehxiCS0 pic.twitter.com/eGXFIKXCgr

— Pete Cimbolic (@pete_cimbolic) May 3, 2015

That exchange would culminate in a Washington Post article which outlined the “aerial support” provided to the Baltimore Police Department by the FBI. 
We went on to take a closer look and, in “Meet The FBI’s Secret Eye In The Sky Overseeing The Baltimore Riots”, we postulated that the Cessna’s monitoring the riots may have been equipped with night vision equipment provided by Persistent Surveillance Systems, a company which has worked with the Baltimore PD in the past. Here’s a schematic (via WaPo):

On the heels of the revelations, AP followed up and has much more on the FBI’s aerial surveillance program.
Via AP:

The FBI is operating a small air force with scores of low-flying planes across the country carrying video and, at times, cellphone surveillance technology — all hidden behind fictitious companies that are fronts for the government, The Associated Press has learned.

The planes' surveillance equipment is generally used without a judge's approval, and the FBI said the flights are used for specific, ongoing investigations. The FBI said it uses front companies to protect the safety of the pilots and aircraft. It also shields the identity of the aircraft so that suspects on the ground don't know they're being watched by the FBI.

In a recent 30-day period, the agency flew above more than 30 cities in 11 states across the country, an AP review found.

The FBI claims the program is "not secret" and does not aim to collect "mass surveillance", but as we discussed in depth in the article linked above (and as you can see from the graphic), it's difficult to believe that the equipment on the planes is powerful enough to be of use to the FBI but somehow not capable of the types of mass surveillance that the planes over Baltimore were capable of. More from AP:

"The FBI's aviation program is not secret," spokesman Christopher Allen said in a statement. "Specific aircraft and their capabilities are protected for operational security purposes." Allen added that the FBI's planes "are not equipped, designed or used for bulk collection activities or mass surveillance."



But the planes can capture video of unrelated criminal activity on the ground that could be handed over for prosecutions.

Some of the aircraft can also be equipped with technology that can identify thousands of people below through the cellphones they carry, even if they're not making a call or in public. Officials said that practice, which mimics cell towers and gets phones to reveal basic subscriber information, is rare.

AP discovered the names of many of the shell companies the FBI has used to conduct the operation and in an ironic twist, the government asked the news agency not to reveal the names because then the Bureau would simply have to create new companies, a process which would cost taxpayers money. In other words: "if you reveal this information to taxpayers, it will cost them."

U.S. law enforcement officials confirmed for the first time the wide-scale use of the aircraft, which the AP traced to at least 13 fake companies, such as FVX Research, KQM Aviation, NBR Aviation and PXW Services.

During the past few weeks, the AP tracked planes from the FBI's fleet on more than 100 flights over at least 11 states plus the District of Columbia, most with Cessna 182T Skylane aircraft. These included parts of Houston, Phoenix, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, Minneapolis and Southern California.

The FBI asked the AP not to disclose the names of the fake companies it uncovered, saying that would saddle taxpayers with the expense of creating new cover companies to shield the government's involvement, and could endanger the planes and integrity of the surveillance missions. The AP declined the FBI's request because the companies' names — as well as common addresses linked to the Justice Department — are listed on public documents and in government databases.

At least 13 front companies that AP identified being actively used by the FBI are registered to post office boxes in Bristow, Virginia, which is near a regional airport used for private and charter flights. Only one of them appears in state business records.

The moral of the story: if you're ever in your backyard relaxing and listening to a baseball game and happen to notice a Cessna making concentric circles overhead remember, it's not paranoia if they're really watching you.

AS WE NOTICE FREQUENTLY WHEN OUT HIKING OR BIKING OR CAMPING.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-03/fbi-uses-surveillance-air-force-monitor-us-citizens-ap-finds

FBI wanted access to a hotel guest's room without ...

Refreshing News: FBI wanted access to a hotel guest's room without ...: The FBI wanted access to a hotel guest's room without a warrant. So agents broke his Internet connection, and then posed as Internet t...

CIA FBI joint hit on King using Cuban assetts they used with JFK

http://www.american-buddha.com/martin.orderskill.16.htm

WikiLeaks Volunteer Was a Paid Informant for the FBI

On an August workday in 2011, a cherubic 18-year-old Icelandic man named Sigurdur “Siggi” Thordarson walked through the stately doors of the U.S. embassy in Reykjavík, his jacket pocket concealing his calling card: a crumpled photocopy of an Australian passport. The passport photo showed a man with a unruly shock of platinum blonde hair and the name Julian Paul Assange.


Thordarson was long time volunteer for WikiLeaks with direct access to Assange and a key position as an organizer in the group. With his cold war-style embassy walk-in, he became something else: the first known FBI informant inside WikiLeaks. For the next three months, Thordarson served two masters, working for the secret-spilling website and simultaneously spilling its secrets to the U.S. government in exchange, he says, for a total of about $5,000. The FBI flew him internationally four times for debriefings, including one trip to Washington D.C., and on the last meeting obtained from Thordarson eight hard drives packed with chat logs, video and other data from WikiLeaks.



http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/06/wikileaks-mole/

New York Times openly admits domestic terror plots masterminded by the FBI - STAGING FALSE FLAGS TO KEEP UP THE SCARE

NaturalNews) If it seems as though the FBI is making a large number of terror busts these days, maybe it's because the agency itself is at least partly responsible for hatching the plots. That has some political observers wondering if the FBI's strategies are making the best use of the nation's limited counterterrorist resources.




In recent months, FBI agents have arrested suspects who were planning a range of terrorist attacks, from shooting Stinger missiles at military aircraft to driving vanloads of explosives into crowded events. But these amazing cases might not have ever been made if the FBI itself wasn't themselves planning the attacks.



A number of these cases were profiled recently in a New York Times op-ed column, which noted that the so-called plots were devised by an agency that seems to be operating as if the nation is so devoid of legitimate threats that it needs to manufacture some in order to seem relevant.



Withstanding legal scrutiny, but still questionable



Consider the case of Oregon college student Mohamed Osman Mohamud. He thought about using a car bomb to attack a well-attended, festive Christmas tree-lighting ceremony in Portland. The FBI gave him a van packed with inert explosives consisting of some real, but inactive, detonators and six 55-gallon drums, along with a gallon of diesel fuel. An FBI agent even drove the van. When Mohamud called the cell phone number that was supposed to trigger the explosion, nothing explosive happened, except that he got arrested.



Was Mohamud seriously considering such an attack prior to the FBI involvement? If so, could he have put it together by himself? Was he working with someone else the FBI doesn't know about who is more of a legitimate threat?



It's hard to say. Obviously Mohamud was at least having bad thoughts, and that's disconcerting in and of itself (though not criminal). But if the FBI had not manufactured an attack, would he have gone through with anything?



Mohamud's case is far from the only one manufactured by the FBI, and it is certainly not the only one that has held up in court. In fact, such operations are not only legal but they are a common counterterrorism tactic employed by the agency in the post-9/11 world. Terror defendants most often try to claim entrapment, but they also most often lose because the law says as long as they showed at least some intent to commit a terrorist act, even if tempted to do so by undercover agents, they are guilty.



Using even the weak-minded to make a case



"Many times," says Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman, "suspects are warned about the seriousness of their plots and given opportunities to back out." But, the Times report indicates recorded conversations show that the warning is not always given, and that in some cases suspects are even encouraged to continue.



Inventing such cases isn't as easy as, say, manufacturing a sting operation where an alleged drug dealer or arms trafficker sells to an undercover agent. That's because those kinds of crimes occur regularly in the United States.

But David Raskin, a former federal prosecutor told the Times, "There isn't a business of terrorism in the United States, thank God."



"You're not going to be able to go to a street corner and find somebody who's already blown something up," he said. "So the goal is to find someone who isn't engaged in terrorism yet but is looking for a real terrorist who could provide them with an opportunity."



You can sometimes get the impression that maybe the FBI is operating off of some sort of counterterrorism quota. Consider one of the most recent cases of thwarting a planned attack:



Of five so-called anarchists who were arrested for ostensibly planning to destroy a bridge in Ohio in late April, three of them had documented mental health issues. One was even talked out of committing suicide in February, right before he was enticed to join in the plot by an FBI informant.



Sources:



http://www.nytimes.com

FBI can't find its GPS bugs? Right...

The FBI Can’t Find Many of Its GPS Trackers Now That They’re Turned Off
The US Supreme Court had outlawed the warrantless use of GPS trackers so the FBI complied by shutting down all its devices but now is apparently having trouble actually retrieving the hardware. Because the GPS units are turned off. And the FBI has no idea where they are unless they're on.

The Court ruled in U.S. v. Jones that the Federal Bureau use of unwarranted vehicle-based GPS tracking units was illegal on the grounds that the practice violated the 4th Amendment—specifically that the act represented a search and constituted trespassing. The FBI complied and nixed its 3,000 currently active GPS tracking devices but that's where the problem lies.

Turns out the FBI can't locate the devices unless they're active. The Agency so determined to retrieve its toys that it has petitioned the court to briefly turn the devices back on for the sole purpose of finding and retrieving the hardware. I bet they wish they'd just bothered with those warrants now.

Just because it's illegal for the feds to do this, doesn't mean they will stop spying on people. They always have, will, and will do whatever they want, to whomever they want.