 | |
| We see through your fake Hillary and this skank 2.0 hasn't a chance, even with your Diebold machine rigging. |
big Tech: Your trial balloon was a waste of time. You can only do what you did last time, albeit haphazardly, which was to rig the voting machines. Do that and we'll be very unhappy.
Not a chance in hell you can convince anyone to vote for those crazies; do I need say the Democrats? Not in a million years; you can kill the rallies; you can't kill the yard signs & motivation to keep winning. You want to take the financial hit for this risk, be our guest?
Next objective, put you and mainstream media out of our your misery, Click-click-boom bitches.
anonymous
Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,
Psychologist Robert Epstein says that Big Tech is planning to use “subliminal methods” in the upcoming election that could shift up to 15 million votes and cost Trump the presidency.
 |
| mind control central, wholly owned by the CIA |
After the 2016 presidential election, Epstein surmised that search engine bias shifted 2-3 million votes in Hillary Clinton’s favor, and he warns that the number in 2020 could be five times that amount.
A leak of Google emails to the Wall Street Journal back in 2018 already exposed how Google engineers had sought to investigate how they could manipulate a user’s “ephemeral experiences” to change their mind on the Trump travel ban.
“Ephemeral experiences are those fleeting ones we have every day when we view online content that’s generated on-the-fly and isn’t stored anywhere: newsfeeds, search suggestions, search results, and so on,” writes Epstein.Google, Twitter and Facebook have complete control over what is seen and what is allowed to go viral, Epstein emphasizes, making it completely pointless to produce political ads if you cannot prevent algorithmic manipulation.
“No authority can go back in time to see what search suggestions or search results you were shown, but dozens of randomized, controlled, double-blind experiments I’ve conducted show that such content can dramatically shift opinions and voting preferences. See the problem?”
“If our own tech companies all favor the same presidential candidate this year—and that seems likely—I calculate that they can easily shift 15 million votes to that candidate without people knowing and without leaving a paper trail,” warns Epstein.He also notes how the the “technological elite” Eisenhower warned about in his 1961 farewell address is now in control, underscored by the fact that “95 percent of donations from tech companies and their employees go to Democrats.”
Epstein says the only way to prevent all this is aggressive monitoring of algorithmic manipulation.
“When bias is detected that has the potential to shift votes, it needs to be reported immediately to the media, the Federal Election Commission, members of Congress, and other authorities,” he writes.Despite highlighting the issue for years, Republicans have done next to nothing to address social media censorship and algorithm manipulation. Numerous major boosters of President Trump during the 2016 election have also been completely banned on social media.
“That will force the tech execs to back off; if they don’t, they’ll be risking humiliation, fines, and, quite possibly, criminal prosecution.”
Pointing out that the margin of victory in many nationwide races is as little as 5 per cent, Epstein cautions, “Republicans, in general, are likely to lose.”
Epstein also emphasized that given his knowledge about what Big Tech are planning, he is “not suicidal.”
This is particularly noteworthy given that the psychologist previously suggested that his wife’s fatal car crash may not have been accidental.
Dr. Robert Epstein discusses his groundbreaking work confirming President Eisenhower's prophetic speech in his 1961 farewell address warning of the rise of a technological elite that could rule the government in an undetectable fashion, what some call friendly fascism, totalitarian democracy, technocracy, or unseen dictatorship.
His research demonstrates how Google and Big Tech can invisibly shift tens of millions of votes in elections in the U.S. and around the world. He fears for his own personal safety because of the power that Google not only wields but exercises.
He thinks 2020 will be a turning point which will determine whether nations retain their democracies or whether we'll see a sweep of candidates put in office by Big Tech companies that could lead us toward a Chinese-style dystopian system shaped by "social credits" or other such totalitarian elements.