 |
| Don't say an F'n word, or you go to jail |
 |
| Head of Vogue Magazine...no wonder women dress like freaks |
Via The Daily Bell
A Belgian court fined a man €3,000 ($3,700) for telling a female
police officer that she should do a job more “adapted to women.”
It is the first time that anyone has been convicted of sexism under a new Belgian law.
The driver was found guilty of three charges: contempt of a police
officer, making threats and sexist remarks in public, and a serious
violation of another person’s dignity because of her gender.
He was warned that if he failed to pay the fine, a prison term of a month would be imposed.
“This is the first time we have used this law to prosecute someone,”
said Gilles Blondeau, spokesman for the public prosecutor’s office. “It
is quite common for people arrested by the police to insult and
threaten. But to personally blame a policewoman because of her sex is
different.” …
Under the law, any behaviour expressing “contempt towards a person,
because of their sexuality” or treating a person as “inferior or as
reduced essentially to their sexual dimension“, which entails a serious
attack on their dignity is punishable by up to a year in prison and/or a
fine.
 |
| I'm a witch and we got all the laws changed to destroy white men. |
But how weak must people be when they need a law to protect their
feelings? It is almost as if some women think they need the state and
their guns to protect them because women are unable to protect
themselves.
 |
| And the women called 911 |
That is an actual sexist attitude. It seems to suggest women are too frail to fend off mere words.
A strong self-assured woman would not need the law to retaliate against men who insult or offend her.
The fact that this criminalizes speech against a public official is even more concerning.
It doesn’t matter how rude, nasty, or offensive someone is, the right to free speech is more important.
You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.
from a reader
-------------------------------------------
What about the oh-so-catty words of women, aimed at
other women, sometimes by women in positions of authority in the many
98%-to-100%-mom-staffed, discriminatory, female-dominated workplaces?
This is protected EU speech.
Here’s how it goes in the USA.
Women often try to bully out the
female “non culture fits” in the many workplaces, staffed with 100% or close to 100% women.
Women do this for a variety of reasons, including 1) pushing out the
hardworking and high-selling competition in sales-related jobs and 2)
shoving out the few childless women who don’t fit in the frequently
absentee mom gangs in the many female-dominated back-office jobs “voted
best for moms” to keep the lid on their crony absenteeism collusion.
Women with unearned income for womb productivity often use “mean words” to bully out the
women
with no unearned income from spouses / ex spouses / monthly welfare and
child-tax-credit welfare up to $6,444, hoisting up their low wages.
Women use “mean words” like weapons, bullying non-culture-fit
women into quitting the crony-mom-absenteeism-gang jobs before they are
eligible for Unemployment Compensation, which covers rent between
low-wage jobs.
Many “non-culture-fit” females, working in catty, female-dominated
industries, never get a dime of the UC that they pay into, while many of
these culture-fit absentee bully moms, working part time to stay below
the earned-income limit for welfare, are showered with 100%-free,
non-contributory monthly welfare that covers their rent and
groceries and child tax credits up to $6,444.
Thanks to witholding and their now-doubled refundable $6,444
(max) child tax credits, their paychecks are higher, even though they —
and many of the married moms, too — often bound out the workplace door
every afternoon, leaving behind phones ringing off the hook with paying
customers, leading to unmet quotas, month after month, especially since
they likewise take off whole days and whole weeks beyond their PTO and
pregnancy leave.
Well-vacationed moms-in-charge often fire the female “non culture
fits” who come to work every day, stay the whole day and meet the
account-generation and account-retention numbers every month, while
keeping the back-watching, frequently absentee culture-fit moms whose
sales and account-retention numbers are low, but who squeal with delight
at the Halloween Dress-Up Day festivities and during the parking lot
Family Day Picnic. They churn the high-selling “non culture fits” after
they get their bonus numbers up.
Do the counts in Belgium punish female managers who, in the middle of
a meeting in a corporate back office, say “The prize for the
baby-mommy-look-alike-bulletin-board decorating contest is getting X
childless, female employee down in the floor and smearing Vaseline all
over her shiny, exfoliated face?”
How’s that for degrading?
Does the goverment fine female (mom) managers who interview
childless, non-culture-fit females by letting them know, as the female
non culture fit sits down to interview and before a word is
uttered, that “we have 17 women in here (MOMS), and we
HAVE to have someone who fits in!”
Momma managers in a company with a big goverment contract due to
being a “woman-owned” business dud that to me without batting an
eyelash.
It is typical. It is the norm in female-dominated industries.
In the USA, it is okay to discriminate if you do it in reverse,
discriminating against men, or if you narrow your discrimination
categories within the blanket of gender.
How about being told—after getting ready for an hour, driving for an
hour, waiting for an hour, filing out a bunch of forms with every type
of information in the world for an hour and answering an hour’s worth of
canned hoop-jumping interview questions—that, for this low-wage office
job, we hire “women with somethin’ comin in’ from spouses or ex spouses
or government due to womb productivity, which hoists up the low wages for
the 100% female employees.
You need a spousal income that pays your rent, child support that
covers rent or free food, free rent, free electricity, monthly cash
assistance and a child tax credit up to $6,444 for womb productivity
out of wedlock to get this female-dominated, low-paying office job,
woman.
How about being told by a female hiring manager in an interview that “I can see what you are, and YOU just don’t know what it is like to raise two boys.”
Translation: Despite your college degree, four relevant licenses and 3
years of experience, including experience doing the very thing we do
here, and with high numbers when dealing with one of our biggest clients
in another business, YOU definitely won’t fit in our back-watching mom-protection gang of frequently absentee, womb-productive female discriminators.
