Showing posts with label elon musk is a network field officer of cunts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elon musk is a network field officer of cunts. Show all posts

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Self-Driving Cars And Deciding Who Lives And Dies - Sacrificing Your Family For The "Greater Good"

by DB

Can you afford $250,000.00 for a self-driving car that is controlled remotely by some bureaucrat? You can? Wow, then I guess you get to have one in the near future, because this is where all this electric, self-driving car noize is heading. This isn't speculation or fear mongering, they flat out say so every chance these Elon Musk types get in front of a microphone. Musk and other shills like him, constantly spew this global warming BS save the planet crap without letup.

For the rest of us, it's a bike or a bus. 

Tell me, how do you do grocery shopping on a bike? Or visit your sister who lives 300 miles away? How about pick up the kids at three different schools on a bike or bus? Or take little Janey to band practice? Guess what, you don't. These activities are OVER for them. And for you, too, libtard-safe-space-sanctuary idgit.

And that's what they want. You crammed into mega-cities you can never, ever leave. How about taking two hours to get to work ten miles away on a bus that stops at every corner, usually filled with white hating migrant and minority thugs who often as not, are going to rob you and beat the living hell out of you. They never mention that part of reality. Oh hell no.

And little by little, they are passing legislation that limits gas cars to the point they are finally outlawed. Except for rich people and politicians, they get to go anywhere.

And if you think this is some futuristic kind of thing, think again. This is already on the Agenda 21 planning outlines being implemented in every state, county, and city all over this country, especially in California. And the leftist safe space mental midgets think this is all great.

Riiiiiight.

This is all about taking away our rights and free will to move about as we wish, whenever we wish, to wherever we wish.

These electric cars don't go very far, take hours to recharge-which costs more than gas to charge-and the cars themselves cost what a HOUSE USED TO COST 20 YEARS AGO. And these plastic P.O.S carts have a nasty tendency to explode, because lithium is unstable and the cell structure is designed to be light, for weight savings, making the odds of being burned alive, very likely, the more you drive the plastic turd.

1 in 3 people who enable self-driving feature of Tesla cars (cost of $8,000.00 to enable, wow) are in near fatal, or totally fatal accidents caused by the "kill the driver" software feature of stupidville.


But what does that matter? Think how much virtue signalling you can do with your other liberal tard friends with a shitbox that needs all night to charge and has an average range of 150 miles. In my county alone THERE IS ONLY ONE CHARGING STATION FOR THESE CRAP MOBILES. And it's in a bad part of town...that's got to be by design, cracker mofo. And happy day, because these shitboxes start at 100,000.00 per car, basic model, not counting insurance, and upgrades so that damn thing will work.

But that's not the fun part. The best part  is, as hackers have demonstrated all over YouTube, is how EASY IT IS TO HACK AND REMOTELY CONTROL EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE CAR WHILE YOU ARE DRIVING IT. Like slamming on the brakes at 80 miles per hour, or steering the plastic turd into a tree or a parked car. Or turning off the engine, locking the doors, and hard righting the steering wheel while on the freeway. All of this is possible. And not only with electric shitboxes, but also with most ANY modern car made after 2013.

Your life and lives, are in the hands of others.

What if you are a person who speaks out against the NWO or  police abuse or govt wrong-doing. How easy is it for the Blackwater ops people to slam you into a telephone pole against your will at midnight, to end you? they did this to Michael Hastings and many other whistle blowers.

So, go ahead and push for this satanic, leftist Hillary witch tech and when your life turns to absolute shit, you have no one to blame but you and your gay friends who praised this ugly, freedom robbing direction.  And, in the future, I hope every one of you liberal shit bags gets the living hell beat out of you on the city bus, because it was YOU that voted and encouraged, and programmed young children into believing this was going to save the planet.

And you are total idiots. Just look up lithium mining and its total devastation to those areas they strip mine in south america and Africa. It looks like an atomic bomb went off. They have to strip one surface acre of land to get ONE POUND of lithium. ONE POUND. And how about all that electricity you suck into your stupid batteries? 80 % of all power generated in the world is done by COAL BURNING PLANTS...not very clean.

These are facts your retarded group of addled brained panzies never consider. Ever.

As the establishment continues to declare that the era of “self-driving” cars is upon us, many Americans have been left wondering what the privacy implications for such a tremendous change in society will end up being.

Now, with the very real possibility that, in the event of an accident, these cars would literally make the decision between who dies and who lives, Americans have even more to worry about when it comes to handing over control of their vehicle to a supercomputer.
According to multiple reports, the cars themselves are being designed to make so-called “moral” decisions which, in other words, means that the programming would essentially allow say a car full of people to crash rather than a school bus.
USA Today reports:
Consider this hypothetical:

It’s a bright, sunny day and you’re alone in your spanking new self-driving vehicle, sprinting along the two-lane Tunnel of Trees on M-119 high above Lake Michigan north of Harbor Springs. You’re sitting back, enjoying the view. You’re looking out through the trees, trying to get a glimpse of the crystal blue water below you, moving along at the 45-mile-an-hour speed limit.

As you approach a rise in the road, heading south, a school bus appears, driving north, one driven by a human, and it veers sharply toward you. There is no time to stop safely, and no time for you to take control of the car.

Does the car:
A. Swerve sharply into the trees, possibly killing you but possibly saving the bus and its occupants?
B. Perform a sharp evasive maneuver around the bus and into the oncoming lane, possibly saving you, but sending the bus and its driver swerving into the trees, killing her and some of the children on board?
C. Hit the bus, possibly killing you as well as the driver and kids on the bus?
The article goes on to say that the above question is one that is no longer theoretical as upwards of $80 billion have been invested in the sector with companies such as Google, Uber, and Tesla all racing to get their self-driving cars onto a road near you.
Interestingly, the USA Today report, as well as those quoted within it, seems to outwardly worry that the questions surrounding self-driving cars will cause Americans to shun them and continue to drive cars operated by actual humans who can choose whether or not they wish to save their own family or someone else’s if an accident were to take place. Clearly there is an agenda at play here.
The article continued:
Whether the technology in self-driving cars is superhuman or not, there is evidence that people are worried about the choices self-driving cars will be programmed to take.

[…]

Last month, Sebastian Thrun, who founded Google’s self-driving car initiative, told Bloomberg that the cars will be designed to avoid accidents, but that “If it happens where there is a situation where a car couldn’t escape, it’ll go for the smaller thing.”

But what if the smaller thing is a child? According to the Rand corporation, Fuck em, let them die.

How that question gets answered may be important to the development and acceptance of self-driving cars.

Azim Shariff, an assistant professor of psychology and social behavior at the University of California, Irvine, co-authored a study last year that found that while respondents generally agreed that a car should, in the case of an inevitable crash, kill the fewest number of people possible regardless of whether they were passengers or people outside of the car, they were less likely to buy any car “in which they and their family member would be sacrificed for the greater good.”
All in all the entire report is a must-read, especially when you consider that we are now directly talking about allowing either private companies or the government to decide whether or not ourselves or our families are worthy of being saved in a car accident.




Saturday, November 25, 2017

Tesla is a double-dealing huckster for the Agenda 21 aspect of the NWO

Elon Musk stepped on stage at Tesla’s product-launch event earlier this month, he knew the market’s confidence in Tesla’s brand had sunk to an all-time low since he took over the company a decade ago. So, he resorted to a tactic that should be familiar to anybody who has been following the company: Blather and Bullshit, the hallmarks of a grifter con artist.

While the event was ostensibly scheduled to introduce Tesla’s new semi-truck – a model that won’t make it’s market debut for another two years, assuming Tesla sticks to its product-roll out deadline – Musk had a surprise in store: A new model of the Tesla Roadster that, he bragged, would be the fastest production car ever sold.

Not only impossible, but a proven flat out lie.

Musk made similarly lofty claims about the battery life and performance of both vehicles. The Tesla semi-trucks, he said, would be able to travel for 500 miles on a single charge. The roadster could clock a staggering 620 – more than double the closest challenger.

There was just one problem, as Tesla fans would later find out, courtesy of Bloomberg: None of it was true. Like with most of his BS announcements, he tells amazing whoppers, without blanching, then gets the tax payer to pay for his operating costs. Like his fake space program. There are videos on the internet of his so-called shuttle rockets exploding over the Atlantic, while the devils at NASA and Musk, claim it was a successful flight of supplies to their fictional space station.

The shit piles so high with these people you need stream wader boots to slog through it all.

In fact, many of the promises defy the capabilities of modern battery technology.
Elon Musk knows how to make promises - all he does is make promises, lie, and piles more lies to cover his other lies - A TRUE CON ARTIST SUPREME. Even by his own standards, the promises made last week while introducing two new Tesla vehicles—the heavy-duty Semi Truck and the speedy Roadster—are monuments of envelope pushing total bullshit.

To deliver, according to close observers of battery technology, Tesla would have to far exceed what is currently thought possible. Ever. And it would require car frames twice the size of modern vehicles to carry the weight, off setting any gains made by his alleged magical batteries. And liberal virtue signalling suckers buy these plastic turd mobiles as fast as they can. That's how gullible and retarded the Hillary crowd is.

Take the Tesla Semi: Musk vowed it would haul an unprecedented 80,000 pounds for 500 miles on a single charge, then recharge 400 miles of range in 30 minutes. That would require, based on Bloomberg estimates, a charging system that's 10 times more powerful than one of the fastest battery-charging networks on the road today—Tesla’s own Superchargers.

The diminutive Tesla Roadster is promised to be the quickest production car ever built. But that achievement would mean squeezing into its tiny frame a battery twice as powerful as the largest battery currently available in an electric car.

These claims are so far beyond current industry standards for electric vehicles that they would require either advances in battery technology or a new understanding of how batteries are put to use, said Sam Jaffe, battery analyst for Cairn Energy Research in Boulder, Colorado. In some cases, experts suspect Tesla might be banking on technological improvements between now and the time when new vehicles are actually ready for delivery.

“He is flat out a liar,” Jaffe said. “I think they left something out of the public reveal that would have explained how these numbers work. Because they don't. And never will."
While Jaffe seems inclined to give Tesla the benefit of the doubt, there’s little, if anything, in Musk’s recent behavior to justify this level of credulity. In recent months, Musk has repeatedly suffered the humiliation of seeing his lies and half-truths exposed. For example, the self-styled “visionary” claimed during the unveiling of the Model 3 Sedan that he would have 1,500 copies of the new model ready for customers by the end of the third quarter. Instead, the company managed a meager 260 models as factory-line workers at its Fremont, Calif. factory struggled to assemble the vehicles by hand as the Model 3 assembly line hadn’t been completed.

Increasingly agitated customers who placed deposits with Tesla back in March 2016 have begun asking for refunds, only to be chagrined by the company’s sluggish response. While nobody in the mainstream press has (somewhat bafflingly) made the connection, Tesla revealed earlier this month that it burned an unprecedented $1.4 billion of cash during the third quarter - or roughly $16 million per day - despite Elon Musk's assurance that Tesla had its "all-time best quarter" for Model S and X deliveries.

And let’s not forget the fiasco surrounding Tesla’s autopilot software. Musk has repeatedly exaggerated its performance claims. And customers who paid more than $8,000 for a software upgrade more than a year ago have been repeatedly disappointed by delays and sub-par performance. Auto pilot in Tesla cars tend to kill its users, over and over again. A little point the media and government tend to ignore. Why?

Musk’s exaggerations about the Tesla Roadster were particularly egregious.
Tesla claims that its new $200,000 Roadster is the quickest production car ever made, clocking zero to 60 in 1.9 seconds. Even crazier is the car’s unprecedented battery range: some 620 miles on a single charge. That's a longer range than any battery-powered vehicle on the road—almost twice as long as Tesla's class-leading Model S and Model X.

To achieve such power and range, Musk said the tiny Roadster will need to pack a massive 200-kilowatt-hour battery. That’s twice the size of any battery Tesla currently has on the road. Musk has previously said he won't be making the packs bigger on the Model S and Model X because of space constraints. So how can he double the pack size in the smaller Roadster?

BNEF’s Morsy has a twofold answer. First, he expects Tesla will probably double-stack battery packs, one on top of the other, beneath the Roadster's floor. That creates some engineering problems for the battery-management system, but those should not be insurmountable. Still, Morsy said, the batteries required would be too large to fit in such a small frame.

“I really don’t think the car you saw last week had the full 200 kilowatt hours in it,” Morsy said. “I don’t think it’s physically possible to do that right now."
$200,000.00 for a plastic electric car that has a realistic range-given its frame size and ability to support the weight of its highly toxic lithium battery-of 70 miles. But, you can bet the satanic Hildebeast crowd will buy them hand over fist just to push this whole agenda 21 slavery agenda down the rest of the world's throats.

Tell me, Elon, how many satanic rape rituals have you attended at Bohemian Grove? How many young boys did you rape and murder, covered in blood. It was 3 wasn't it? It was. Does the world know you are a NAMBLA donation vector? Why do you try to hide this part of your life from your public persona? Let's face it...you are a lying, two-faced grifter who murders in satanic rituals and were rewarded by being the Zuckerberg of automobiles. Do your sex partners know you have three venereal diseases and are impotent?

Is it possible that, thanks to incremental improvements in battery density and cost, Musk somehow manages to hit these lofty targets? Perhaps, though, as Bloomberg points out, the fact that Musk is basing these claims on a set of projections that haven’t yet been realized is hardly confidence inspiring.
To be sure, there’s an important caveat to Musk’s claims. While they may be staggeringly exaggerated, there’s still the possibility that incremental improvements in battery technology will make these targets more feasible by the time the models hit the market.
Again, Musk may be banking on the future. While Tesla began taking deposits on the Roadster immediately—$50,000 for the base model—the first vehicles won't be delivered until 2020. Meanwhile, battery density has been improving at a rate of 7.5 percent a year, meaning that by the time production starts, packs will be smaller and more powerful, even without a major breakthrough in battery chemistry.

“The trend in battery density is, I think, central to any claim Tesla made about both the Roadster and the Semi,” Morsy said. “That’s totally fair. The assumptions on a pack in 2020 shouldn’t be the same ones you use today."
However, in its analysis of the feasibility of Musk’s claims, Bloomberg overlooked one crucial detail: Back in August, the company's veteran director of battery technology, Kurt Kelty, unexpectedly resigned to "explore new opportunities," abruptly ending a tenure with the company that stretched for more than a decade, and comes at a critical time for Elon Musk.
Kelty’s resignation – part of an exodus of high-level executives that is alarming in and of itself - hardly inspires confidence in Tesla’s ability to innovate. We’ve noticed a trend with Tesla: The more the company under delivers, the more Musk over promises. The main and obvious definable quality of a con man and huckster. Call them on their BS, and they just spew more BS. The only reason Tesla stock is so high is because many Federal reserve banks constantly buy up Tesla stock to drive the prices up, creating an illusion of a company that is doing well and is going places. Tesla is a Bernie Madoff business scam, that is the main direction of Agenda 21 -  Cars that don't go very far, cost so much only the rich can afford them, and are completely controlled by remote so anyone breaking from the plan will be dealt with violently, ala Michael Hastings. Within ten years, all new cars will be over priced versions of this plastic pile of shit.

In our opinion, this is not a sustainable business strategy.  What it is, is a public persona of con artistry that bunko squads warn people about who promise the moon, and you end up with empty wallets. Especially the tax payer.