Their Goal is to label all violent deaths of brown race people, Muslims
and Jews as Acts of Terror by “White Supremacist Patriots”, including
deaths in the past. Thus target white people as terrorists.
By Joe Jarvis
Via The Daily Bell
To authorize dedicated domestic terrorism offices within the
Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation to analyze and monitor domestic
terrorist activity and require the Federal Government to take steps to
prevent domestic terrorism.
That’s the text of a bill introduced in Congress on February 2nd called the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2018.
The FBI defines domestic terrorism as “U.S.-based movements that espouse extremist ideologies of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature, unless they are leftists.”
But what is an extremist ideology? It’s easy to see on one end of the
spectrum, once violence happens. But the FBI sees the progression as
“crossing the line from First Amendment protected rights to committing
crimes to further their political agenda.”
It sounds like they are saying speaking out is a precursor to terrorism. Exercising rights is suspicious.
The bill makes repeated reference to “patriot” groups as well as “anti-government militias.”
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, in 2015, for the first
time in 5 years, the number of hate groups in the United States rose by
14 percent. The increase included a more than twofold rise in the number
of Ku Klux Klan chapters, but no mention of the thousands of Jihadi enclaves springing up all over America. No mention of all the violent Antifa groups who assault Christians and white people randomly. These are NOT perceived as threats...if you can believe that. The number of anti-government militias and
“patriot” groups also grew by 14 percent in 2015. No militia groups have grown. If anything, people have abandoned them since Trump was elected.
The problem is that one government agency already targeted innocent people based on their affiliation to the word “patriot.”
The IRS targeted Tea Party Patriots for scrutiny and intimidation by asking intrusive questions far out of the purview of tax collectors.
Now government policing agencies want to associate “patriots” and
militias with the KKK and other racist groups. This bill throws out a
large net, and innocent people are going to get caught up in it.
“Anti-government militias” and white supremacists should absolutely
not be under the same label. They have entirely different motivations.
The militias are defensive, seeking to protect themselves from
government abuse.
History has proven the need for a robust check on government military and policing power.
In fact without militia-like entities, Cliven Bundy and his family may be in prison or dead right now.
Yet Bundy was recently cleared after
extensive corruption of the FBI and Bureau of Land Management was revealed in their attempts to prosecute Cliven Bundy. We know
these agencies are politically motivated. We know they often have ulterior motives for targeting people.
The government pushes this bill as a response to 77 deaths by
domestic extremists in the USA since September 11, 2001, and 255 deaths
from right-wing extremists since 1993.
In 1993 alone the government killed 77 people in one incident during the Waco siege!
Without Bundy’s “militia” they would have done the same to him and his family, as testimony revealed.
So-called “anti-government militias” seem like a better way to keep
people safe than new powers for the Department of Homeland Security.
Antifa vs. White Supremacists
It shouldn’t be a problem that the bill targets white supremacists.
They are after all responsible for violence, including the tragic
killing spree carried out by Dyan Roof on a church congregation.
But “Trump supporter” is now synonymous with “white supremacist” to the mainstream media.How often do you hear people throw out the charge of “racism!” when something has nothing to do with race?
Antifa is a far-left group of fascists that call themselves
anti-fascists. They ironically claim to be against fascism while
destroying property and violently attacking anyone who disagrees with
them. But all too often protesters are grouped in with these rioters.
The bill cites these two extremist caricatures. But they apply these
monikers to much broader segments of the population than they actually
encompass.
For example, a protest–protected free speech–may quickly be
labeled an Antifa riot or a white supremacist rally because of the
affiliation of 1% of the protesters.
These relatively tiny groups are being magnified by the media.
And it is difficult to get exact numbers on the movements.
But the Antifa facebook page has a worldwide following of under
282,000. With 2.2 billion active users, that is less than one-tenth of
one percent of Facebook users that show support for Antifa.
As for white supremacists, according to ADL:
During the recent surge of right-wing extremist activity in the
United States that began in 2009, white supremacists did not grow
appreciably in numbers, as anti-government extremists did, but existing
white supremacists did become more angry and agitated, with a consequent
rise of serious white supremacist violence.
See what they did there?
While admitting that the white supremacist numbers haven’t grown,
they associate “anti-government extremists” with racist hate groups.
Given that they claim this right-wing extremism grew in 2009, they are
likely referring to Tea Party groups. To them, being pro-limited
government, and anti-government oppression equals “anti-government
extremist.”
Government Incitement
Skeptics think the government actually created or radicalized Antifa
and white supremacist groups. This allows them to associate peaceful
protesters on the left and the right with actual violent extremists. By
radicalizing tiny elements of groups who have good reason to protest the
government, they create strawmen to argue against and use to justify
bills like the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.
They can’t outlaw peaceful protests. But they can insert violent
extremists–or agent provocateurs–into every rally, and use that as an
excuse to shoot tear gas and call in the riot police.
A 2014 report from Human Rights Watch found government agents are directly involved in most high profile US terror plots.
The FBI often targeted particularly vulnerable people, including
those with intellectual and mental disabilities and the indigent. The
government, often acting through informants, then actively developed the
plot, persuading and sometimes pressuring the targets to participate,
and provided the resources to carry it out…
The US has also made overly broad use of material support charges,
punishing behavior that did not demonstrate an intent to support
terrorism. The courts have accepted prosecutorial tactics that may
violate fair trial rights, such as introducing evidence obtained by
coercion, classified evidence that cannot be fairly contested, and
inflammatory evidence about terrorism in which defendants played no part
– and asserting government secrecy claims to limit challenges to
surveillance warrants.
In
one case, they charged a man with material support for providing
military gear to terrorists because he had waterproof socks in his
luggage. That's how messed up the satanic democrats and Law enforcement is now.
Domestic Terrorism
A Huffington Post article draws concern about the increase in white supremacist domestic terrorism. In 2017 white supremacists murdered 18 people, while in 2016 white supremacists killed only 7.
Every one of those deaths is a tragedy. But with such small numbers,
the statistics tell us nothing. Any given American has an effective
0.000006% chance of becoming the murder victim of a white supremacist.
Two victims in those statistics were the parents of the killer’s
ex-girlfriend, who had convinced their daughter to break up with her
racist boyfriend. Again, I am not minimizing the horror white
supremacists inflict on those around them.
But it is misleading to classify that as a domestic terrorist attack.
And it seems unlikely that a dedicated domestic terrorism office within
the Department of Homeland security would have prevented it.
To be clear, I am not concerned about the government targeting white
supremacists. The problem is labeling people white supremacists in order
to monitor them. For instance, the bill uses right-wing extremist and
white supremacist almost interchangeably. And then it throws in some
“anti-government”.
Well, they might very well consider being against the government’s violence “anti-government.”
Comparatively, it is amazing that they are concerned about
387 people killed by domestic terrorists over
the last decade (Note: this Huffington Post number is higher than
government figures because it includes domestic attacks attributed to
foreign movements like ISIS).
They left out the biggest domestic terrorist organization of all.
Conveniently, no government organization tracks the number of people
killed by the police.
But the Washington Post has tracked American police killings since 2015.
In 2015-2017 American police killed a total of 2,945 people. It took only
three years for police to kill more than
seven times the number of people killed in all domestic terrorist attacks in the last
ten years.
All Boiled Down:
The actual threat of domestic terrorism is greatly exaggerated, unless you are a jihadist.
Federal law enforcement already engages in entrapment tactics, which
would likely expand under the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act. The
government’s propensity towards violence is actually a larger threat to
Americans than domestic terrorism. Their targeting blurs the lines
between peaceful activists/ concerned citizens and Antifa/ white
supremacists.
To protect innocent people exercising free speech and freedom of
expression from intrusive surveillance and targeting by dangerous
government organizations,
this bill should be rejected.
You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.
All government and big corporation workers must endure these awful hate sessions.
They’re pretty much the same.