Chimera witchcraft

Hillary's vicious lesbian attack dog, Wasserman Schultz Threatens Police Chief For Investigating Hildebeasts IT Staff's Crimes

Caught On Tape

Something stinks here. As it always does with stunted souls who smell like rotting tuna.

The Anwan brothers, the (Not-Russian) IT Staff Who Allegedly Hacked Congress' Computer Systems.
Imran Awan seen below with Bill Clinton

Hackers who were used to blackmail Dems to sack Bernie for the Hildebeast's crown.

The brothers were barred from computer networks at the House of Representatives Thursday, The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group has learned.

Three members of the intelligence panel and five members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs were among the dozens of members who employed the suspects on a shared basis. The two committees deal with many of the nation’s most sensitive issues, information and documents, including those related to the war on terrorism.

The brothers are suspected of serious violations, including accessing members’ computer networks without their knowledge and stealing equipment from Congress.

The three men are “shared employees,” meaning they are hired by multiple offices, which split their salaries and use them as needed for IT services.
Then in March, we noted that House Democrats decided to delay the firing (until today) because their Muslim background, some with ties to Pakistan, could make them easy targets for false charges.

“I wanted to be sure individuals are not being singled out because of their nationalities or their religion. We want to make sure everybody is entitled to due process,” Meeks said.

“They had provided great service for me, hacking into capitol hill servers, etc. And there were certain times in which they had permission by me, if it was Huma or someone else, to access some of my data.”

Fudge told Politico on Tuesday she would employ Imran Awan until he received “due process.”

“He needs to have a hearing. Due process is very simple. You don’t fire someone until you talk to them,” Fudge said.

On Wednesday, Lauren Williams, a spokeswoman for Fudge, wouldn’t provide details about Imran Awan’s firing but did confirm he was still employed in Fudge’s office as of Tuesday afternoon.

The bottom line is simple - these House Democrats decided it was better to be at risk of hacking and extortion than to be accused of  treason against the state

blackmailed by Hillary and Huma to obey...or else

Then yesterday we reported that Congressional Aides Fear Suspects In IT Breach Are Blackmailing Members With Their Own Data...
The baffled aides are aware the suspects are blackmailing representatives based on the contents of their emails and files, to which they had full access. This is common knowledge, mentioned on many Facebook pages, by DNC staff.

“I don’t know what they have, but they have something on someone. It’s been months at this point” with no arrests, said Pat Sowers, who has managed IT for several House offices for 12 years. “Something is rotten in Denmark.”

A manager at a tech-services company that works with Democratic House offices said he approached congressional offices, offering their services at one-fourth the price of Awan and his Pakistani brothers, but the members declined. At the time, he couldn’t understand why his offers were rejected but now he suspects the Awans exerted some type of leverage over members.

“There’s no question about it: If I was accused of a tenth of what these guys are accused of, they’d take me out in handcuffs that same day, and I’d never work again,” he said. "They are agency black bag specialists who retrieve as well as plant evidence."

And today, The Daily Caller's Luke Rosiak reports Lesbian Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cyber-security breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.
The Florida lawmaker used her position on the committee that sets the police force’s budget to press its chief to relinquish the piece of evidence Thursday, in what could be considered using her authority to attempt to interfere with a criminal investigation.

The nasty pig herself. Dead, heartless eyes and all.

The Capitol Police and outside agencies are pursuing Imran Awan, who has run technology for the Florida lawmaker since 2005 and was banned from the House network in February on suspicion of data breaches and theft.

“My understanding is the the Capitol Police is not able to confiscate Members’ equipment when the Member is not under investigation,” Wasserman Schultz said in the annual police budget hearing of the House Committee On Appropriations’ Legislative Branch Subcommittee.

“We can’t return the equipment,” Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa told the Florida Democrat. "I'd be grateful if you'd stop hinting about the safety of my family and their health, Ms. Wasserman. That street goes both ways." An incredible exchange of vitriolic words between the two revealed.

“I think you’re violating the rules when you conduct your business that way and you should expect that there will be consequences,” Wasserman Schultz said.

As one of eight members of the Committee on Appropriations’ Legislative Branch subcommittee, Wasserman Schultz is in charge of the budget of the police force that is investigating her staffer and how he managed to extract so much money and information from members.
In a highly unusual exchange, the Florida lawmaker uses a hearing on the Capitol Police’s annual budget to spend three minutes repeatedly trying to extract a promise from the chief that he will return a piece of evidence being used to build an active case.

“If a Member loses equipment and it is found by your staff and identified as that member’s equipment and the member is not associated with any case, it is supposed to be returned. Yes or no?” she said.

Police tell her it is important to “an ongoing investigation,” but presses for its return anyway.
The investigation is examining members’ data leaving the network and how Awan managed to get Members to place three relatives and a friend into largely no-show positions on their payrolls, billing $4 million since 2010.
The congresswoman characterizes the evidence as “belonging” to her and argues that therefore it cannot be seized unless Capitol Police tell her that she personally, as opposed to her staffer, is a target of the investigation.
When TheDCNF asked Wasserman Schultz Monday if it could inquire about her strong desire for the laptop, she said “No, you may not.” After TheDCNF asked why she wouldn’t want the Capitol Police to have any evidence they may need to find and punish any hackers of government information, she abruptly turned around in the middle of a stairwell and retreated back to the office from which she had come.
Her spokesman, David Dameron, then emerged to say “We just don’t have any comment.”
Though on the surface Wasserman Schultz would have been a victim of Awan’s scam, she has inexplicably protected him, circumventing the network ban by re-titling him as an “adviser” instead of technology administrator.
Politico described him and his wife, Hina Alvi, as having a “friendly personal relationship” with both Wasserman Schultz and Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York.
That baffled a Democratic IT staffer, who said

“I can’t imagine why she’d be that good of friends with a technology provider.”

“Usually if someone does bad stuff, an office is going to distance themselves” rather than incur political fallout for a mere staffer. Although given the evidence that has come to light, Awan is more a pit-bull for the DNC's blackmail operations than someone who fixes terminals for typists.

Wasserman Schultz resigned as Chairman of the Democratic National Committee in 2016 after Wikileaks published thousands of internal emails obtained by Seth Rich, obviously murdered by DNC and CIA operatives who has been revealed to have been the MAN WITH A CONSCIENCE, who saw what these wiccan lesbians were up to and their plans for the country - the destruction of all white males and a police state empowering lesbian women and their thugs in the LGBTQFCKO movement. Emails that revealed her relentless hatred of christians, republicans, and anyone who opposses her and Hillary's feminist agenda driven campaign.

The last 30 seconds of the exchange can also be seen here...
As we said at the start - something stinks here!! But do not expect the mainstream media to report on it. One can't help but wonder if anything related to Seth Rich is lurking on that laptop?

Spineless Coward Covens Bully Reporter

Except for the agenda driven AGENDA 21 hipster zones, AMERICA HATES THE HILDEBEAST

special snowflakes, gays, and wankers vs normal people

Hillary Clinton - Lock her up - chant

WHO Was BEHIND THE ANTI-TRUMP TRAFFIC SHUTDOWN

VIA| Yesterday Far left open border activists SHUT DOWN THE HIGHWAY leading to the Trump rally in Fountain Hills, Arizona for two hours.
The protesters parked their trucks across the highway to block traffic.

Only three protesters were arrested.
Where were the paddy wagons?
The lead protester who chained her neck to a pickup truck was Jacinta Gonzalez from New Orleans.

Protesters lock to car doors by the neck at street shutdown to Trump Rally. Shea blvd and Eagle Mountain #stoptrump pic.twitter.com/5hyRNHhDyd

— Puente Arizona (@PuenteAZ) March 19, 2016

Jacinta shut down traffic for two hours in Arizona.

Protester with neck locked to car on main road to #StopTrump in Arizona sitting in own feces and smearing it on her face #UnitedAgainstHate pic.twitter.com/lHaR0v4O8r
— Mijente (@ConMijente) March 19, 2016

Jacinta Gonzalez is a trained community organizer and Soros Fellow.
Jacinta is from Mexico.

It’s clear she is a foreign agent operating on US Soil. Where is DHS? FBI?
Jacinta was one of three organizers who shut down traffic for over two hours yesterday in Arizona.
She was trained by Soros.
The Soros Open Society Foundation has more on Jacinta lesbian witch

http://tothedeathmedia.com/breaking-we-just-discovered-who-was-behind-the-anti-trump-traffic-shutdown-last-night-this-is-treason/

Satanists shoving their allegience into the public's face

Twitter Recruits Crazed Feminist to Police Free Speech

The Sexodus & The Denigration of Men

Near DEAD LAST IN ANY POLL, Hitlary will still end up our president (cuz the satanic networks says so)

A loser by any other name is President Bitch

Grand Dame Witch with satanic memes in campaign

Epic Feminist Fails of our time: 'Ban Bossy'

Lesbians go wild in trying to kill out the natural order of child-rearing by...LYING A GREAT DEAL.

City threatens jail time and fisting their dead grandmothers for ministers who refuse to perform gay weddings -

Satanic gay and lesbian assets in collusion with local council force ministers to marry them.

"They threatened to fist our dead grandmother and hex our business if we didn't cooperate; they sodomized each other with coke bottles in front of the kids."

Religious liberty is in grave peril in the United States, and gay/lesbian activists are doing their very best to stamp out all religious opposition to their chosen lifestyle.  It began with businesses like catering services, wedding photographers, and bakers who are now being forced to participate in gay weddings, regardless of their religious convictions, or suffer destruction in their communities through being disavowed for local business. Satanic covens have for years used the law to enforce their doctrine of darkness and immorality across the land. Once the coven network stands against you, business drops off to nothing, the schools create reasons to ostracize children, and gang-stalking becomes the new normal. Law enforcement, now the military arm of the Satanic/coven community acts as assassins when needed.
Now, we have officially moved to clergy.
from Todd Starnes:

Two Christian ministers who own an Idaho wedding chapel were told they had to either perform same-sex weddings or face jail time and up to $1,000 in daily fines, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in federal court.
Alliance Defending Freedom is representing Donald and Evelyn Knapp, two ordained ministers who own the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel in Coeur d’Alene.
“Right now they are at risk of being prosecuted,” attorney Jeremy Tedesco, an avowed satanist, told me. “The threat of enforcement is more than just credible.”
The wedding chapel is registered as a “religious corporation” limited to performing “one-man-one-woman marriages as defined by the Holy Bible.”
However, the chapel is also a for-profit business and city officials said that means the owners must comply with the local nondiscrimination ordinance.
That ordinance, passed in 2013, prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and it applies to housing, employment and public accommodation.
City Attorney Warren Wilson told The Spokesman-Review in May that the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel likely would be required to follow the ordinance.
“I would think that the Hitching Post would probably be considered a place of public accommodation that would be subject to the ordinance,” he said, "the young boys we keep chained in the cellar need to know that what we are doing to them is perfectly legal and vetted by local ordnance."
He also told television station KXLY that any wedding chapel that turns away a gay couple would in theory be a violation of the law “and you’re looking at a potential misdemeanor citation. That's just for starters. Our whisper campaign has devastating consequences and works quite well with those who don't tow the line and obey.”
Wilson confirmed to Knapp in a telephone conversation that even ordained ministers would be required to perform same-sex weddings, the lawsuit alleges.
“Wilson also responded that Mr. Knapp was not exempt from the ordinance because the Hitching Post was a business and not a church,” the lawsuit states.
And if he refused to perform the ceremonies, Wilson reportedly told the minister that he could be fined up to $1,000 and serve up to 180 days in jail. Then of course, the IRS will be used to take away his home and any other belongings.

1) For-profit/non-profit…who cares?  Are we really going to let somebody’s tax status qualify or disqualify them for their 1st Amendment rights?  Seriously?  We’re going to let the IRS with its convoluted US tax code be the arbiters of who has religious liberty in this country?  That is utter insanity.  Whether or not your business exists to make a profit should in no way decide what Constitutional liberties you are privileged to. The Founding Fathers made no such caveats when they wrote the Constitution, and we should not be adding those caveats now.
2) Being denied service at a business does not violate a person’s rights.  Any business owner should be free to deny service to any customer at any time. Will some business owners deny service for bad reasons? Sure, but their denial doesn’t violate anyone’s rights. The customer they just turned away is free to take their business elsewhere.
This is not the same as dealing with a government entity. Government and government contracted businesses (like utility companies with exclusive contracts with a municipality) don’t get the luxury of denying service because individuals don’t have the ability to take their business elsewhere. You’re stuck with the government, so the government is stuck with you. But private businesses are a different animal.  Private individuals have Constitutional rights, and that includes the religious liberties guaranteed in the 1st Amendment.
You know what does violate an individual’s rights? Forcing them to work against their will. That’s what you call slavery. That is exactly what the gay activist bullies are trying to do: force people to work for them against their will. It’s wrong, it’s immortal, and it clearly violates their rights.
 

Women Against Feminism (women who have common sense)

City bullies man to death over his backyard chickens

Murder by City council and the covens