Tuesday, October 27, 2020
You're Gonna Bury All Of Us': Whistleblower Describes Brazen Biden-China Dealings In Explosive Interview With Tucker Carlson
Former Biden insider Tony Bobulinski - a registered Democrat who's donated to Democrats - just gave a smoking gun interview to Fox News' Tucker Carlson on Tuesday, where he described his dealings with the Biden family in their bid to do business with China.
Bobulinski says that "Joe Biden and his family is compromised," after describing dealings that included purchasing a portion of a Russian state-owned energy company.
In May, 2017, Bobulinski agreed to spearhead a deal between the Bidens and a CCP-linked Chinese company - meeting with Hunter Biden and Rosemont Seneca partner Rob Walker "multiple times," and meeting with former Vice President Joe Biden twice.
Text messages obtained by @FDRLST show Hunter Biden personally arranging a meeting with his business partners and Joe Biden to discuss a major deal with CEFC, a Chinese energy company. The meeting occurred at the Beverly Hilton in L.A. in early May. Texts are from May 2, 2017. pic.twitter.com/nrSZC9vrtf— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 22, 2020
Bobulinski described a May 2nd meeting at the Los Angeles Beverly Hilton with Hunter and Jim Biden. A short while later, Joe Biden reportedly showed up to the meeting "because they were sort of, wining and dining me, and presenting the strength of the Biden family to get me more engaged" in their China deal with CEFC "both in the United States and around the world."
Tony Bobulinski: "I didn’t request to meet Joe. They requested that I meet with Joe ... They were putting their entire family legacy on the line. They knew exactly what they were doing. They were dealing with a Chinese-owned enterprise."pic.twitter.com/hXDqQl76Ui— Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) October 28, 2020
Tony Bobulinski: I asked James Biden point blank at the Peninsula Hotel about how they were structuring all these deals and getting away with it without putting Joe Biden’s career at risk.— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 28, 2020
“James Biden said, ‘Plausible deniability,’” Bobulinski said.
This is maybe THE clip from this interview.— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) October 28, 2020
Bobulinski to #Tucker: "I remember looking at Jim Biden in saying how are you guys getting away with this? Like, aren't you concerned? And he looked at me and he laughed a little bit and said. 'plausible deniability.'" pic.twitter.com/GMDL1JNZtB
"There was no other reason for me to be in that bar meeting Joe Biden then to discuss what I was doing with his family's name and the Chinese."
Tony Bobulinski on Tucker says it is a "blatant lie" when Joe Biden says he had no knowledge of his son's business dealings:— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) October 28, 2020
"There was no other reason for me to be in that bar meeting Joe Biden then to discuss what I was doing with his family's name and the Chinese." pic.twitter.com/famy4WaxOk
When Hunter Biden's laptop became national news - Rep. Adam Schiff suggested it was Russian disinformation, implying that he was a Russian asset. Bobulinsky made it explicitly clear that he would go public if Schiff didn't retract his Russia smear - to which Biden family adviser Rob Walker said "You're just gonna bury all of us."
In Tucker Carlson's interview with Hunter Biden's ex-business partner Tony Bobulinski, they play a tape of Rob Walker, a self-described Biden family representative, telling him "you're just gonna bury all of us" if he went through with his plan to go public on business dealings pic.twitter.com/zbfvaXtw13— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) October 28, 2020
The Biden camp is smearing Navy veteran Tony Bobulinski's evidence as Russian disinformation because he blew the whistle on their secret business deals with the Chinese.— Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) October 28, 2020
He says that's "disgusting." pic.twitter.com/SvEDrB0v3D
Democrats and corporate media accused Trump of being compromised by Russia.— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 28, 2020
In reality, Hunter Biden personally represented a top communist Chinese official in China’s purchase of a 14% stake in Rosneft, Russia’s state-owned energy company, per a Biden family whistleblower.
-Joe Biden gave "an emphatic no" to "putting proper governance in place."
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) October 28, 2020
- "I think Joe Biden and his family are compromised..."
TUCKER: If Biden is elected, how does this constrain his ability to deal with China?— August Takala (@AugustTakala) October 28, 2020
BOBULINSKI: I think Joe Biden and the Biden family are compromised. I've held a [security] clearance ... I just don't see, given the history here, how Joe can't be influenced. pic.twitter.com/2moTCX87yY
- A former Seal Team is protecting his family:
Tony Bobulinski: “I have a former Seal Team protecting my family... I’m not at home right now.” pic.twitter.com/BoAC5xFxC6— Kyle Morris (@RealKyleMorris) October 28, 2020
Watch the entire interview below:
This is just like the Russian collusion story except with verified evidence and on-the-record sources.— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) October 28, 2020
Meanwhile on the latest episode of 'enemies of the state':
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) October 28, 2020
Why isn't he and two hundred others so listed under arrest for TREASON against the USA?
As the evidence mounts Joe Biden was directly involved in taking cash from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) there is a growing chorus of voices raising the possibility that Biden could be blackmailed by the Chinese into doing their bidding in the future. As terrifying as that possibility is it should not be our chief worry. Our primary concern should be not that Biden might be turned. It should be that he has already been turned, and he is already doing Beijing’s bidding.
The reality is that in the world of intelligence sources are rarely blackmailed into doing anything. Instead, they are slowly recruited, manipulated, and bought. Ultimately, they are completely in the pocket of whoever is targeting them and doing their bidding. That process may well have begun years ago with Joe Biden, and he may have begun acting on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party when he was still Vice-President of the United States.
Consider the confluence of events surrounding China’s seizure of the South China Sea and the almost inexplicable refusal of the United States of America to push back against that aggressive and illegal action.
In 2012 Filipino authorities detained Chinese fishermen illegally operating inside the territorial waters of the Philippines. This action was in the vicinity of the Scarborough Shoals. It was also inside the area designated by the Chinese Communist Party as being its territory. Pursuant to this historically unsustainable claim 85% of the South China Sea “belongs” to Beijing.
In response to the legitimate action of the Filipino authorities, the Chinese flooded the area around Scarborough Shoal with Chinese vessels. The Shoal is only 124 nautical miles from the principal Philippine island of Luzon and 550 nautical miles from China’s Hainan Island. It is strategically located in proximity to the entrance to both Manila and Subic Bays. The presence of Chinese forces at this location was, therefore, a direct threat to the national security of the Philippines.
Shortly following this confrontation between China and the Philippines, the United States brokered an agreement for both sides to withdraw their vessels from the area. Manila complied. Beijing ignored the accord. The Obama Administration dropped the matter.
The Chinese remain in control of the area to this day.
In Manila, American inaction was seen as a betrayal. The long-standing American alliance with the Philippines had been tested and found worthless. The cascading impact of this failure to stand with Manila continues to impact our relations with the Philippines to this day.
An emboldened China moved to exploit the clearly evident American weakness. Within months the Chinese were expanding into the Senkaku Island in the East China Sea and infringing on Japanese territorial waters.
In the South China Sea, Scarborough Shoal proved only the beginning. The Chinese streamed vessels into vast expanses of ocean claimed by the Philippines and ignored Manila’s demands that they withdraw.
Then the Chinese got serious. What began as incursions by Chinese ships transformed into something else entirely. In December 2013, the Chinese began building islands in the South China Sea – literally creating dry land where none had existed. These islands became military bases. The Chinese deployed forces including aircraft and missiles. One of the world’s most strategic waterways through which passes a huge amount of critical trade was systematically incorporated into the Chinese Communist state.
The new islands were even formally declared by the Chinese to be part of the province of Hainan.
Where was Joe? Where was the Obama administration’s supposed foreign policy expert and its point man on China?
was the administration’s lead man in the so-called “Pivot to Asia.”
Part of that charter theoretically included combatting Chinese
In December 2013, the same month the Chinese launched their South China island-building operations, then Vice-President Biden arrived in China aboard Air Force Two. With him on the plane was his son Hunter, already well known to the Chinese from a wide range of previous contacts. Joe and Hunter walked down the stairs from the plane together and received an official state welcome.
Then Joe went off to meetings with Chinese officials and Hunter went off to a meeting where he was given $1 billion from the State Bank of China. That amount, — investment capital in a joint enterprise Hunter entered into with the Chinese Communists — would shortly thereafter be upped to $1.5 billion.
During Joe’s meetings, which were held in the midst of the expanding Chinese seizure of large portions of the world’s most important waterways, his focus was on trade issues. The entire South China Sea situation was largely ignored. At the conclusion of his visit to China, amidst ongoing Chinese aggression, Joe had this to say.
“Wholesome competition and strong competition is fundamentally different than conflict. In fact, we see considerable common interest on the security side. A secure and peaceful Asia Pacific enables economic growth for the entire region.”Joe Biden via VOA News
The Chinese continued their island-building operations in the South China Sea
until October 2015. At that time — having largely completed their
occupation of the area — the construction of new islands stopped.
Diplomatic discussions between the United States and China regarding the
matter continued without result. No action was ever taken by the
United States to push back on Chinese militarization of the South China
Sea. According to at least one source, when President Obama considered
sending the U.S. Navy into the area Joe talked him out of it.
You can choose to look at the sequence of events described and see what you want. You can ignore the flood of Chinese money going into Hunter Biden’s pockets and the mounting evidence that large portions of that went to his father and conclude that Joe Biden’s refusal to stand up to the Chinese Communists has nothing to do with being bought.
You can also choose to conclude that Biden’s inaction in the face of naked aggression and abandonment of a key ally is something more than just weakness. Irrespective of who you are, I think you have to ask yourself what would once have been considered an unthinkable question.
Did Joe Biden give China, specifically the CCP, the South China Sea, and was he paid to do so?
An email thread involving Hunter Biden, his business partner Eric Schwerin, Beau Bide, former Senator Ted Kaufman, and Deputy Counsel for then-Vice President Joe Biden Alexander Mackler contains reference to the late Senator John McCain as an “asshole” and “cranky old man.”
The news comes shortly after Cindy McCain – Senator McCain’s widow – endorsed Joe Biden’s campaign. Biden himself said the endorsement was “because of what (Trump) talks about how my son [Beau] and John and others who are heroes.”
On December 4th of 2014, Schwerin forwarded the news that the late Arizona Senator McCain has “blocked” one of then-President Barack Obama’s picks for a high-level diplomacy position.
“Sen. John McCain is blocking the confirmation of President Barack Obama’s nominee to be America’s second-highest ranked diplomat. McCain says Tony Blinken, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, is “totally unqualified” to serve as Secretary of State John Kerry’s understudy. McCain also criticizing Blinken Thursday for comments he made more than two years ago touting Iraq’s security, prosperity and democracy.”
Eric email the two Bidens, Joe Biden’s Deputy Counsel, and former Senator Kaufman, who replaced Biden when he departed the Senate for the White House, that McCain’s move “caused [him] to despise John McCain even more than [he] already did”:
A few hours later, Mackler responded by calling McCain an “asshole”:
And minutes later, Schwerin followed up again by labeling McCain “such a cranky old man”:
These unearthed emails follow McCain’s widow publicly endorsing Biden for president.
Democrats are terrified that the Supreme Court will return to deciding cases based on the clear meaning of the Constitution and the laws duly passed by Congress, rather than usurping power to ram through a leftist agenda in the name of preserving “rights” the Founders had never conceived of. Yet Americans aren’t exactly keen on handing unlimited power to nine super-legislators in black robes.
In order to prevent a restoration of the Supreme Court’s proper role in America’s constitutional republic, Democrats have to hide their true intentions. They have to convince Americans that originalism does not mean a return to the Constitution’s rules of fair play but rather something else. No Democrat has proved quite as shameless as Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) in this regard.
In the hours leading up to Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation on the Supreme Court, Markey attempted a massive Orwellian lie about the meaning of originalism.
“Originalism is racist. Originalism is sexist. Originalism is homophobic. Originalism is just a fancy word for discrimination,” Markey tweeted.
Originalism is racist. Originalism is sexist. Originalism is homophobic. Originalism is just a fancy word for discrimination.
— Ed Markey (@SenMarkey) October 26, 2020
This is gaslighting at its finest, and I’d bet most Americans are too smart to get snookered by it.
Most Democrats would not attack originalism in this brazen of a fashion, but much of their complaints about Amy Coney Barrett’s judicial philosophy boil down to exactly this argument.
Democrats see the Supreme Court as a kind of super-legislature, using the Constitution as a tool to drag history forward. They look back on Roe v. Wade (1973) and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) as positive steps toward progress rather than gross abuses of the Supreme Court’s power. Democrats supported the Court inventing new “rights” out of whole cloth because those rights involved abortion and same-sex marriage. The end justified the extremely unrepresentative means.
Democrats love to complain about how the American system is undemocratic. Donald Trump won the presidency without the popular vote. Each person’s vote matters more in small states. The Senate doesn’t represent the will of the aggregate of the American people, so #AbolishTheSenate!
Yet the Founders had good reasons for balancing the way Americans are represented in the different parts of the federal government. The democratic will of the people has the final say, but it is mediated through different institutions. Congress, which the Founders made the most powerful branch of government, directly represents the people at the district and state levels. The president, who enacts the laws Congress made, must win the vote of individual states, not just a bare majority of the country.
For all their talk about democracy, Democrats actually want the least democratic branch of government to unilaterally make the law by reinterpreting the Constitution. They don’t want states to make their own laws on abortion. They don’t even want Congress to make laws on abortion. Instead, they want the Supreme Court to declare a fundamental right to abortion — precisely because Supreme Court justices cannot be voted out of office.
Laws on the state or federal level would better represent the actual will of the people, but Democrats want the Supreme Court to effectively make law because the Supreme Court does not have to face the voters every two, four, or six years. Those pesky evangelical Christians who don’t want their taxes to fund abortion or who want to be able to opt-out of celebrating same-sex marriage can vote out congressmen, senators, and presidents, but they can’t vote out Supreme Court justices.
This accountability to voters requires legislators to compromise on various issues and to balance the broad interests of the electorate as a whole. Representation not only makes the lawmakers accountable to the voters but it also requires them to work with people on the other side of contentious issues. Unilateral Supreme Court dictats have no such limitation.
The Democrats want the Supreme Court’s rulings on abortion and same-sex marriage not just to have the status of law but of constitutional amendments, without those rulings having to go through the onerous process of amendment the Founders actually wrote into the Constitution. Democrats want their key issues to be enshrined in law and off-limits to any reform.
Therefore, Democrats want to brand every attempt to restrain judicial activism as some form of hateful discrimination against some minority or another. Because originalism means the Supreme Court should not unilaterally amend the Constitution in favor of Democrats’ preferences on race-based voting rules, originalism is “racist.” Because originalism means the Court should not create the right to abortion, originalism is “sexist.” Because originalism means the Court should not create same-sex marriage, originalism is “homophobic.”
This is out-and-out nonsense. Originalism does not entail a position on issues like voting rules, abortion, or same-sex marriage. Instead, originalism dictates that Supreme Court justices should follow the Constitution and the laws Congress passed in order to decide cases, rather than rewriting the Constitution to achieve the result justices prefer.
If the Supreme Court rules against abortion, Congress or the state legislatures can pass laws in response. In fact, that is how the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 came to pass. Both Republicans and Democrats were outraged at the Court’s decision in Employment Division v. Smith (1990), which upheld Oregon’s refusal to give unemployment benefits to two Native Americans fired from their jobs after taking peyote in a religious ceremony. Congress and the president passed a law specifically to reverse this abrogation of religious freedom, and subsequent Supreme Court cases have built on this interpretation of the First Amendment.
Originalism is not racist, sexist, or homophobic. Originalism is also not anti-racist, anti-sexist, or anti-homophobic. Originalism is about following the rules of the game, not allowing nine robed super-legislators to unilaterally rewrite them according to their own whims.
The Supreme Court’s newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett, put it well in her acceptance speech Monday night.
“It is the job of a senator to pursue her policy preferences. In fact, it would be a dereliction of duty for her to put policy goals aside,” Barrett explained. “By contrast, it is the job of a judge to resist her policy preferences. it would be a dereliction of duty for her to give in to them. Federal judges do not stand for election. Thus, they have no basis for claiming that their preferences reflect those of the people.”
She argued that the judicial branch is distinct from Congress and the presidency because of this “separation of duty from political preference.”
“A judge declares independence not only from Congress and the president but also from the private beliefs that might otherwise move her,” Barrett argued. “The oath that I have solemnly taken tonight means at its core that I will do my job without any fear or favor and that I will do so independently of both the political branches and of my own preferences.”
Nothing in Amy Coney Barrett’s brief Supreme Court acceptance speech was racist, sexist, or homophobic, but the speech perfectly encapsulated the spirit of originalism.
Barrett’s acceptance speech gives the lie to Markey’s asinine accusations against originalism, and it sets the record straight on this fundamental issue. Those who support originalism are not trying to sneak in their policy preferences through a backdoor. Instead, they are trying to prevent the Supreme Court from abusing its power the way the Court did in Roe and Obergefell.
The fact that Democrats cannot stand this return to judicial normalcy should terrify the American people. Democrats are openly scheming to pack the Supreme Court, adding more justices in an attempt to preserve the Court’s abuses of power. Democrats don’t just want the Court to rule in favor of their issues, they want it to circumvent the legislative and amendment processes plainly laid out in the Constitution in the rush to far-left policy goals.
Americans must reject this vision of unilateral judicial activism.
Repress (use force to extinguish alternate views), Suppress (prevent normal expression), Depress (force 'the other' into submission by collapsing the Overton Window)... that appears the modus operandi of the mainstream media as we enter the vinegar strokes of this 'unusual' presidential election.
Nowhere was this strategy better exhibited than on CNN this week when Christiane Amanpour sparred with Liz Harrington over the Hunter Biden scandal revelations. Amanpour disparaged Harrington as liberals do: "You actually sound like you're on a Fox News show."
Translation: you're spreading crazy conservative conspiracies...
Amanpour then embarrassed herself further as the CNN anchor accused the Trump campaign of "spreading Russian disinformation"...
“Pretty audacious of CNN -- who spread actual Russian disinformation w/the leak of the dossier set up briefing in Trump tower to subvert the peaceful transition of power -- to accuse anyone else of spreading Russian disinformation. And the emails about the "big guy" are real, btw.”
“Why don’t you want to report this? This is one of the most powerful families in Washington,” she asked.
“And you’re okay with our interests being sold out to profit Joe Biden and his family, while we’re suffering during a pandemic from communist China?”
Watch the full clip here...
Glenn Greenwald - one of the few 'reporters' left - noticed the sham:
"The only silver lining in all of this is that media outlets are so desperate to help Biden win that they're not even pretending anymore. No pretense. There's great clarity in that. "
So, with the unquestionable Amanpour having embarrassed herself, here's another reporter - WSJ's Kimberley Strassel - showing the world what 'reporting' actually should look like...
Why Hinter matters. pic.twitter.com/j7YAGQL6yS— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) October 27, 2020
YES. Yet another series of Trump Marshal raids taking down pedo rings. Silence from the MSM.
Because they are ALL PEDOS AT THE TOP.
A monthlong mission in Ohio recently turned up 45 missing children and led to 179 arrests, authorities said.
In an operation dubbed Autumn Hope, the US Marshals Service in Ohio and Virginia tracked the children, including a “high-risk” 15-year-old girl from Cleveland who was linked to suspected human trafficking, authorities said Monday.
Twenty other children were also located as authorities checked on their well-being.
During one of the missing children recoveries, a loaded gun was recovered. A 15-year-old boy had two warrants and is suspected in multiple shootings and a murder, authorities said.
Two other juveniles were found in West Virginia during a traffic stop, leading to the arrest of an adult male who was charged with concealment/removal of a minor child in Jackson County.
Autumn Hope was conducted by the marshals in conjunction with the Ohio Attorney General’s Office and the Central Ohio Human Trafficking Task Force, as well as the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and state and local agencies in Ohio.
“My thanks to all personnel who have stepped up for this operation,” said Peter C. Tobin, US Marshal for the Southern District of Ohio. “These are the same personnel who hunt down violent fugitives every day. I’m incredibly proud of them and pleased that they were able to apply those same skills to finding missing children. I know Operation Autumn Hope has made a difference in a lot of young lives.”
The US Marshals have conducted similar operations before, including in Ohio.
Last month, they said 35 missing children, between the ages of 13 and 18 from the Cuyahoga County area, were located during Operation Safety Net. Just over 20 percent of the found cases were tied to human trafficking.
That same month, the marshals also announced the arrest of 262 suspects, including 141 gang members, and the recovery of five missing children in Oklahoma.
Thirty-nine children were found in Georgia during Operation Not Forgotten in August and eight missing kids were recovered in Indiana in September as part of Operation Homecoming.
The marshals have found missing children in 75 percent of cases the agency has received — and 72 percent of those cases were recovered within a week, officials said.
Since 2005, the agency has recovered more than 2,000 missing kids.
Hunter Biden Audio Confesses Partnership With China ‘Spy Chief’… Joe Biden Named as Criminal Case Witness
Hunter Biden – in an audio file labelled “Most Genius Shit Ever” – appears to be referencing Patrick Ho, who was a former Secretary for Home Affairs in Hong Kong, as a “spy chief of China” while lamenting how his business partner Ye Jianming of CEFC China Energy had disappeared.
Ho was also involved in the CEFC venture, as originally reported by the New York Post and suppressed by the media and Big Tech firms.
The audio breaks the mainstream media’s narrative that the hard drive is somehow “fake” or does not implicate Hunter or Joe Biden in criminal investigations and/or business deals with the Chinese Communist Party.
The former veep’s son also bemoans longtime business partner Devon Archer naming him and his father Joe as witnesses “in a criminal case” without notifying him.
I get calls from my father to tell me that The New York Times is calling but my old partner Eric, who literally has done me harm for I don’t know how long, is the one taking the calls because my father will not stop sending the calls to Eric. I have another New York Times reporter calling about my representation of Patrick Ho – the fucking spy chief of China who started the company that my partner, who is worth $323 billion, founded and is now missing. The richest man in the world is missing who was my partner. He was missing since I last saw him in his $58 million apartment inside a $4 billion deal to build the fucking largest fucking LNG port in the world. And I am receiving calls from the Southern District of New York from the U.S. Attorney himself. My best friend in business Devon has named me as a witness without telling me in a criminal case and my father without telling me.
The recording adds to the litany of e-mails and stories broken by The National Pulse about the grift of the Biden family, including yesterday’s scoop about the VP’s son using White House access in exchange for resort villa stays and artwork.
Thanks to President Trump's latest executive order, there's got to be a sense of panic across every administrative agency in Washington. Last week, President Trump issued an order bearing the innocuous title "Executive Order on Creating Schedule F In The Excepted Service." Behind that title lurks an earthquake that may finally break the permanent bureaucracy's stranglehold on federal politics and bring more accountability to the American government.
When the Founders ratified the Constitution, they envisioned only three branches of government: the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial Branches. However, as America grew, a bureaucratic class grew along with it.
In theory, the federal bureaucracy is a subset of the Executive Branch. Its purpose is to act as the president's agent in carrying out the laws that Congress passes. Also, in theory, the people working in the federal bureaucracy act strictly without partisanship, performing their work for all Americans' benefit, not for a specific political party's benefit.
In fact, those theories are, as Biden would say, malarkey. Over the past four years, we've learned that agency employees believe themselves to be an unaccountable fourth branch of government. We've also seen that too many employees are highly partisan. Whether in the IRS, the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, or multiple other agencies, they see their highest goal as advancing the Democrat party's interests. This is not surprising, given that, in 2016, 95% of those federal employees who made political donations gave their money to Hillary Clinton.
There's yet another problem with the federal bureaucracy: it acts as an unelected legislature. Congress has repeatedly ceded to administrative agencies the power to dictate how businesses and individuals can function in America. While Congress is answerable to voters (senators must go back to their constituents every six years and House members must go back every two years), the administrative agencies aren't answerable to anybody.
These unfettered administrative agencies, collectively, are the swamp. The swamp's members have attempted a coup against the White House; they have set up an internal resistance against their constitutional boss, President Trump, and they have actively harassed people who don't toe the Democrat party line, whether through the IRS, the BLM, or myriad other alphabet soup agencies.
That's why it's important that President Trump is finally acting against the policy-makers in the federal bureaucracy. His "Executive Order on Creating Schedule F in the Excepted Service" allows a presidential administration to look beyond the checkboxes of "competitive service selection procedures" to determine whether upper-level management employees in the federal service are doing a good job.
According to an article from the Washington Post:
The directive, issued late Wednesday, strips long-held civil service protections from employees whose work involves policymaking, allowing them to be dismissed with little cause or recourse, much like the political appointees who come and go with each administration.
Federal scientists, attorneys, regulators, public health experts and many others in senior roles would lose rights to due process and in some cases, union representation, at agencies across the government. The White House declined to say how many jobs would be swept into a class of employees with fewer civil service rights, but civil service experts and union leaders estimated anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands in a workforce of 2.1 million.
The same WaPo article argues that the executive order makes the bureaucracy a partisan organization rather than a pure and nonpartisan workforce:
Still, the order, coming less than two weeks before the election, represents a stunning effort to reshape large parts of the nonpartisan government, which is supposed to serve as a cadre of subject-matter experts for every administration.
That's a laugh. There's nothing nonpartisan about the swamp. Trump's order finally gives the president — who is, after all, the boss — the power to get rid of employees who actively resist a president's policies. This power matters because the American people have selected their president because of his policies. Those employees who "resist" implementing his policies should be fired.
But here's the deal about this executive order: if Trump is re-elected, the order will eventually go into effect, and Trump will finally be given a free hand to clean out the swamp, getting rid of partisan actors, and keeping in place employees who are dedicated to working for the American people. However, if Biden is elected, he will immediately rescind this executive order. You can then expect the swamp to grow even more powerful in an administration that has as its primary goal expanding the government into every area of American life.
Monday, October 26, 2020
'You'll Bury Everyone Involved': Bobulinski Recorded Biden Operatives Begging Him To Stay Quiet, Set To Release Tues
Former Biden insider Tony Bobulinski allegedly has a recording of Biden family operatives begging him to stay quiet, or he will "bury" the reputations of everyone involved in Hunter's overseas dealings.
According to The Federalist's Sean Davis, Bobulinski will play the tape on Fox News' "Tucker Carlson Tonight" on Tuesday, when Carlson will devote his show 'entirely' to an interview with the Biden whistleblower.
According to a source familiar with the planning, Bobulinski will play recordings of Biden family operatives begging him to stay quiet and claiming Bobulinski's revelations will "bury" the reputations of everyone involved in Hunter's overseas deals.— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 26, 2020
As The Federalist notes:
The Federalist confirmed with sources familiar with the plans that Bobulinski, a retired Navy lieutenant and Biden associate, will be airing tapes of Biden operatives begging Bobulinski to remain quiet as former Vice President Joe Biden nears the finish line to the White House next week.
Bobulinski flipped on the Bidens following a Senate report which revealed that they received a $5 million interest-free loan from a now-bankrupt Chinese energy company.
According to the former Biden insider, he was introduced to Joe Biden by Hunter, and they had an hour-long meeting where they discussed the Biden's business plans with the Chinese, with which he says Joe was "plainly familiar at least at a high level."
Text messages from Bobulinski also reveal an effort to conceal Joe Biden's involvement in Hunter's business dealings, while Tony has also confirmed that the "Big guy" described in a leaked email is none other than Joe Biden himself.
Of course, aside from the corruption allegations, Hunter Biden's laptop allegedly contained child porn, which the FBI sat on for nine months after a Delaware computer repair shop owner turned it over to them, only to approach Congress - and finally Rudy Giuliani, when nobody else would take action.
OAN's @ChanelRion confirms photos and videos on Hunter's laptop are of his niece, Natalie Biden, daughter of Beau Biden, Hunter's deceased brother. She was 14-years-old at the time the pictures and videos were taken. pic.twitter.com/OxOXdM8DB5— Sha (@quip1) October 24, 2020
And while we take no position on the "Q" phenomenon - we would be remiss if we didn't point out that the MSM is panicking to cover up what appears to be yet another elite pedophile who may have had an incestuous relationship with his niece - whose mother (his brother widow) Hunter was 'intimately' familiar with.
These people are openly satanic and debauched.
A mother accusing Hunter Biden of inappropriate contact with her child told Joe Biden she would call the police if Hunter came near the minor again.— Cassandra Scarebanks🎃 (@CassandraRules) October 26, 2020
Joe and his brother, Jim, wanted to silence her.https://t.co/W2eDlQWbuk pic.twitter.com/FpP5eBugYS
Hunter Biden ‘Brought Every Single Person to White House, VP’s House’ That Foreign Business Partner Wanted, Received Resort Villa Stays, Artwork In Exchange
E-mails obtained by The National Pulse appear to reveal Hunter Biden – son of the former Vice President and current Democratic nominee for President Joe Biden – arranging meetings with White House officials including his father for a Mexican businessmen. In return, Hunter appears to have received artwork, stays at resort villas, and potential involvement in business deals.
The individual who provided Hunter with these gifts is Miguel Aleman Magnani.
“I really appreciate you letting me stay at your resort villa… I have brought every single person you have ever asked me to bring to the F’ing WHite House and the Vice President’s house and the inauguration.” – Hunter Biden
Magnani, the grandson of a former Mexican President and son of one of Mexico’s richest men, is the CEO of Mexican airline Interjet.
In an email dated February 24, 2016, Robert “Hunter” Biden contacted Magnani, appearing to lament being ignored by a man he claimed to have given White House access to.
In the email, Hunter reveals he “delivered on every single thing [Magnani] ever asked.”
Favors Hunter complete for Magnani appear to involve bringing “every single person [Magnani] ever asked me to bring to the F’ing WHite House and the Vice President’s house and the inauguration”:
I haven’t heard from you since I got you a mtg for Carlos and your Dad. We have been talking about business deals and partnerships for 7 years. And I really appreciate you letting me stay at your resort villa…but I have brought every single person you have ever asked me to bring to the F’ing WHite House and the Vice President’s house and the inauguration.
In addition to the email revealing Magnani let Hunter “stay at [his] resort villa,” additional correspondence shows “Miguel” gifted Hunter artwork.
An email from January 9th, 2017 shows Rosemont Seneca Partners Senior Advisor Joan Peugh listing one of Hunter’s “outstanding to dos” as “need[ing] to say thank you” in response to a piece of artwork from Miguel.
Hunter’s close relationship with the Mexican businessman extends to being invited to his 50th birthday party, which the email below describes as being postponed:
I have been very pleased with the
incredible response and interest that we have received in relation to my
50th birthday celebration.
Unfortunately due to a stronger force, we must postpone the party for a new date, which we will inform you soon with the hope of being able to count on your presence for the celebration.
Miguel Aleman Magnani
ONCE UPON A CRIME IN MEXICO:
Burisma, a controversial Ukrainian oil company where Hunter served on the Board of Directors, was also in business with Pemex – a state-owned, Mexican petroleum company.
Emails reveal that Burisma, a scandal-ridden and oligarch-led company, was granted the ability to pursue a “Pemex privatization opportunity,” per an email from Hunter on January 27th, 2015 in partnership with Magnani’s family company, the Aleman Group.
The email lays out how the stakeholders in the deal – Hunter, Magnani’s Aleman Group, and other associates of Hunter such as Devon Archer and Jeff Cooper – would need to figure out remuneration if the deal was to materialize.
Hunter also references a meeting in Mexico City on February 27th – just days after then-Vice President Joe Biden was visiting the area to talk with Mexico’s President and a host of high-level advisors. It remains unclear whether or not Joe Biden attended the meeting referenced below:
Once we have the above accomplished we should be in a very good position to make the most of the planned meeting on 2/27 in Mexico City.
Subsequent emails reveal Devon Archer attempting to coordinate the payment side of the deal:
According to your email, bellow you will find information requested, and attached please find passport’s copies for all the attendants:
BIDEN’S LAPTOP MATTERS: