Psychologist: Big Tech Will Use "Subliminal Methods" To Shift 15 Million Votes On Election Day

We see through your fake Hillary and this skank 2.0 hasn't a chance, even with your Diebold machine rigging.

big Tech: Your trial balloon was a waste of time. You can only do what you did last time, albeit haphazardly, which was to rig the voting machines. Do that and we'll be very unhappy.

Not a chance in hell you can convince anyone to vote for those crazies; do I need say the Democrats? Not in a million years; you can kill the rallies; you can't kill the yard signs & motivation to keep winning. You want to take the financial hit for this risk, be our guest?

Next objective, put you and mainstream media out of our your misery, Click-click-boom bitches.

anonymous


Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,
Psychologist Robert Epstein says that Big Tech is planning to use “subliminal methods” in the upcoming election that could shift up to 15 million votes and cost Trump the presidency.

mind control central, wholly owned by the CIA

After the 2016 presidential election, Epstein surmised that search engine bias shifted 2-3 million votes in Hillary Clinton’s favor, and he warns that the number in 2020 could be five times that amount.

The author says that Google and other social media giants “can shift opinions and votes in numerous ways that people can’t detect” via “a wide variety of subliminal methods of persuasion that can, in minutes, shift the voting preferences of 20 percent or more of undecided voters without anyone having the slightest idea they’ve been manipulated.”
A leak of Google emails to the Wall Street Journal back in 2018 already exposed how Google engineers had sought to investigate how they could manipulate a user’s “ephemeral experiences” to change their mind on the Trump travel ban.

“Ephemeral experiences are those fleeting ones we have every day when we view online content that’s generated on-the-fly and isn’t stored anywhere: newsfeeds, search suggestions, search results, and so on,” writes Epstein.
“No authority can go back in time to see what search suggestions or search results you were shown, but dozens of randomized, controlled, double-blind experiments I’ve conducted show that such content can dramatically shift opinions and voting preferences. See the problem?”

Google, Twitter and Facebook have complete control over what is seen and what is allowed to go viral, Epstein emphasizes, making it completely pointless to produce political ads if you cannot prevent algorithmic manipulation.

“If our own tech companies all favor the same presidential candidate this year—and that seems likely—I calculate that they can easily shift 15 million votes to that candidate without people knowing and without leaving a paper trail,” warns Epstein.

He also notes how the the “technological elite” Eisenhower warned about in his 1961 farewell address is now in control, underscored by the fact that “95 percent of donations from tech companies and their employees go to Democrats.”
Epstein says the only way to prevent all this is aggressive monitoring of algorithmic manipulation.

“When bias is detected that has the potential to shift votes, it needs to be reported immediately to the media, the Federal Election Commission, members of Congress, and other authorities,” he writes.
“That will force the tech execs to back off; if they don’t, they’ll be risking humiliation, fines, and, quite possibly, criminal prosecution.”

Despite highlighting the issue for years, Republicans have done next to nothing to address social media censorship and algorithm manipulation. Numerous major boosters of President Trump during the 2016 election have also been completely banned on social media.

Pointing out that the margin of victory in many nationwide races is as little as 5 per cent, Epstein cautions, “Republicans, in general, are likely to lose.”
Epstein also emphasized that given his knowledge about what Big Tech are planning, he is “not suicidal.”
This is particularly noteworthy given that the psychologist previously suggested that his wife’s fatal car crash may not have been accidental.

Robert Epstein: We're Living in Unseen Dictatorship, 2020 is Big Tech Takeover Turning Point  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5mN6bYLew8

Dr. Robert Epstein discusses his groundbreaking work confirming President Eisenhower's prophetic speech in his 1961 farewell address warning of the rise of a technological elite that could rule the government in an undetectable fashion, what some call friendly fascism, totalitarian democracy, technocracy, or unseen dictatorship.

His research demonstrates how Google and Big Tech can invisibly shift tens of millions of votes in elections in the U.S. and around the world. He fears for his own personal safety because of the power that Google not only wields but exercises.

He thinks 2020 will be a turning point which will determine whether nations retain their democracies or whether we'll see a sweep of candidates put in office by Big Tech companies that could lead us toward a Chinese-style dystopian system shaped by "social credits" or other such totalitarian elements.

MessiahMews Blogs: DICKHEAD PAN JUST INTRODUCED SENATE RESOLUTION 58 ...

MessiahMews Blogs: DICKHEAD PAN JUST INTRODUCED SENATE RESOLUTION 58 ...: I've been telling you all for YEARS that they are coming for adults.  That Healthy People 2020 plan that Dr. Sherry Tenpenny also warne...

Blatant Election Rigging: Twitter Wants To Make Sure We Never Have Another freely elected President the satanists do not control

These election rigging fascist leftists. Isn't this what they have been bitching about for two years with their made up stories about Trump and Russia? And here they go and blatantly laugh about rigging this election, skewing public information and discourse and shadow banning and outright deplatforming everyone that exposes their little RIGHT IN OUR FACES agenda.

DB

Authored by Michael Snyder via The End of The American Dream blog,
Just in time for the 2020 election, Twitter has come up with a new “policy” that is obviously intended to neuter the effectiveness of President Trump’s Twitter account.
Right now, Trump has 61.4 million followers on Twitter, and his tweets regularly make headlines all over the world.  Trump has been devastatingly effective on Twitter for years, and his social media strategy was one of the keys to his victory in 2016.  Needless to say, the radical leftists that run Twitter were absolutely horrified by Trump’s upset victory, and they want to do whatever they can to make sure that such a thing never happens again.

They started by deleting, shadowbanning and greatly suppressing the accounts of prominent conservatives.  Personally, my own account has been shadowbanned for a very long time.  I have over 16,000 followers, but if you check out my account you will notice that I barely get any retweets at all these days.  However, a few years ago there was a ton of interaction with my tweets.  An expert looked into it and found that just like so many other prominent conservatives, I had been shadowbanned.
But all of the censorship that we have seen so far is apparently not enough for the control freaks at Twitter, and so now they are going after President Trump himself.
On Thursday, Twitter announced a brand new policy which is obviously aimed at the White House.  The following comes from Twitter’s official blog post about this new policy…

With this in mind, there are certain cases where it may be in the public’s interest to have access to certain Tweets, even if they would otherwise be in violation of our rules. On the rare occasions when this happens, we’ll place a notice – a screen you have to click or tap through before you see the Tweet – to provide additional context and clarity. We’ll also take steps to make sure the Tweet is not algorithmically elevated on our service, to strike the right balance between enabling free expression, fostering accountability, and reducing the potential harm caused by these Tweets.
Who does this apply to?
We will only consider applying this notice on Tweets from accounts that meet the following criteria. The account must:

• Be or represent a government official, be running for public office, or be considered for a government position (i.e., next in line, awaiting confirmation, named successor to an appointed position);
  
• Have more than 100,000 followers; and
  
• Be verified.
  

That said, there are cases, such as direct threats of violence or calls to commit violence against an individual, that are unlikely to be considered in the public interest.

They are trying to make this sound like a “neutral” policy that will apply evenly to all government officials, but if you believe that then there is a bridge not too far from Twitter headquarters that I would like to sell you.
In essence, Twitter is telling us that they are going to start suppressing President Trump’s tweets.  And if other conservative government officials get out of line, they will be censored too.
This is happening right out in the open, and Twitter is brazenly admitting that any tweets that they slap with this “notice” will “feature less prominently on Twitter”…

When a Tweet has this notice placed on it, it will feature less prominently on Twitter, and not appear in:

• Safe search
  
• Timeline when switched to Top Tweets
  
• Live events pages
  
• Recommended Tweet push notifications
  
• Notifications tab
  
• Explore
  

This notice won’t be applied to any Tweets sent before today and, given the conditions outlined above, it’s unlikely you’ll encounter it often. We cannot predict the first time it will be used, but we wanted to give you more information about this new notice before you come across it on Twitter.

And when Twitter decides that something will “feature less prominently”, it might as well not even be there at all.  I know that very well, because this is what has been happening to my tweets for years.
I might as well be tweeting into a black hole.
And is it just a coincidence that this new “policy” was announced about 24 hours after President Trump publicly accused Twitter of censoring him?…

The move, announced Thursday, came barely 24 hours after President Donald Trump accused the social media platform’s leaders of censoring him in a bid to limit the circulation of his ideas.

Of course Twitter is far from alone.
All over the Internet, social media companies are making an all-out effort to influence the outcome of the 2020 election.
For example, the day before Twitter announced their new policy, Reddit “quarantined” one of the most popular pro-Trump subreddits…

On Wednesday, Reddit “quarantined” a popular pro-Donald Trump forum on its site. Although the move was prompted because the “r/The_Donald” subreddit was hosting violent threats and violating other site policies, it’s likely to add to Republicans’ complaints that social media companies are biased against conservatives.
Reddit put the message board, which is a popular place for Trump fans to gather and stir up support, in a sort of virtual detention due to what the company called “significant issues with reporting and addressing violations” of its content policy.

Could you imagine what would have happened if the big social media companies had blatantly tried to rig elections against Barack Obama?
There would have been rioting in the streets and Democrats would have been steaming mad.
So why are conservatives taking this censorship with so much apathy?
During the last election cycle, a number of candidates that were boldly speaking out against social media censorship ran for Congress, but almost all of them lost.
As a result, right now there are only a few members of Congress that are actively trying to do something about this.
We are literally losing our country, and only a very small minority of the people care enough to get involved.
At this point the major social media companies are not even attempting to hide their blatant election-rigging anymore, and it looks like they may totally get away with it.

YouTube no longer allows me to download any videos of any kind of content, whatsoever...

Youtube...sigh.

First it was shadow banning.

Then it was making sure any kind of monetization would never happen back in 2010.

Then keeping my video stats so low as to be rediculous, even reversing numbers as I reloaded the page.

Then it was kicking my subscribers off

Then it was disabling my ability to embed videos anywhere else

and Now, It is disabling my ability to download videos, so i can get material before it is deleted, which happens A LOT.

Ahh...the satanic network really hates the light, the Light of Yeshua. They do, they do indeed.

I pray our heavenly Father...(the rest is private, as we are commanded to pray in secret, that He will answer us openly.) So many "Christians" break this commandment, spoken by Yeshua HIMSELF, that I wonder at the temerity of this kind of blasphemy. How do you all live with this kind of defiance? Yeah, I've heard the rap, all too many times, but you are wrong, ALL OF YOU. But I digress.

They simply hate Yeshua and the Elect.

the leftist scorecard lately is

Satanic kindergarten teacher, poisoning the minds of children

attempt to kill GOP at baseball game -- fail
Hijack the last election -- fail
Kavanaugh nomination -- fail
try to implode the economy -- fail
run bogus stories about Trump  -- fail
UN backed onslaught to southern border -- fail
Fake packages to themselves designed to be caught  -- fail
Shoot up GOP offices while making sure it gets almost zero MSM coverage -- fail

Simpsons Truth In Plain Sight vaccine plague by Illuminati

Now, Water Gone in Key Largo? MSM Big Fake out, Key Largo Videos Say...

DO NOT SIGN THE REFUSAL TO VACCINATE FORM!

PARENTS

AGAINST

MANDATORY

VACCINES

---

---

**Formerly ForOhioans**

---

---

SISTER SITES
AntiCorruption Society
People for Safe Technology

---

---

DO NOT SIGN THE REFUSAL TO VACCINATE FORM!

---

February 9, 2014

Table of Contents

*THE REFUSAL TO VACCINATE FORM

*TWELVE REASONS PARENTS CANNOT SIGN THIS FORM

*For Californians

*SUGGESTED RESPONSE (OR WHAT I WOULD DO)

*THE VACCINATION NOTICE

The following is not legal advice. It is merely sharing ideas, understandings and suggestions regarding ways of dealing with vaccine recommendations by the CDC and vaccine mandates by the STATE.

*THE REFUSAL TO VACCINATE FORM

The "Refusal to Vaccinate" form was created by the American Academy of Pediatric's 'legal department' as a response to the growing number of toxic vaccines recommended by them and the growing number of parents who are becoming educated on this issue. According to the CDC our children should now receive 37 doses of vaccine between 0-16 years. [See Vaccine Schedule]
Recently in the STATE OF CALIFORNIA a statute was implemented (AB 2109) that requires their own form filled out and submitted to get a vaccine exemption.

The following strategy now being used to overcome vaccine awareness is the most diabolical strategy possible! It is unlikely that physicians have any idea what they are asking their patients to sign . . . or to sign away. It is essentially a signed confession. So please read and understand why you can't sign it and why it is really something other than what if appears to be.

Here are 12 reasons why no parent can sign this form unless they are interested in being statutorily charged with neglect or intentionally causing harm. Repeating more boldly: This form, if signed, could be used to have your child(ren) removed from your custody! It is a form designed to stand up in court! Why else would they ask for the parent's signature to be "witnessed"?

---

*TWELVE REASONS PARENTS CANNOT SIGN THIS FORM

#1
The form attaches a child ID # that will be identifiable in the electronic records system across the country. Everyone from the school to the NSA will be able to determine who is and who is not vaccinated.

#2
The scientific term for HPV vaccine is listed to discourage parents from making the connection to the dangerous vaccine for HPV called Gardasil. [See Open Letter From a Grandmother to Her Daughters About Gardasil]

#3
Do not place any marks in any of these boxes. The physician's records will indicate which vaccines your child has received. It would be best to put a large X through the entire section.

#4
The CDC Vaccine Information Statement is pure unadulterated propaganda. The real information about vaccines was exposed in 30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards See info about the CDC - #9.

#5
Again the parent is misled to think the truth about vaccine risks is on the CDC web site.The doctor has the vaccine package inserts right in his/her office. Why is it not offered and explained to the parent? The physicians may have read them or not. However, the physicians are certainly aware that if the parents read the 'official risks' put out by the drug corporations, they would refuse the vaccines. Full disclosure is almost NEVER a part of the process.

#6
"I understand the following: The risks and benefits of the recommended vaccine(s)." This of course would be agreeing to a false statement. You cannot understand the risks without reading and understanding the package inserts.

#7
Parents are falsely told that without vaccines their children could suffer dire illnesses but are not told the dire illnesses/injuries the vaccines themselves could cause . . . including death. [See 30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts Show Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards]

#8
This refers to the "herd immunity myth" of 1933, which has been proven unscientific over and over and over again. Simply put: if other children have been vaccinated - and the vaccines work - they won't contract a disease from your child.

#9
Entities are listed as "strongly recommending" the vaccine schedule. Again however, parents are NOT given full disclosure as to exactly who/what the entities are and what their motivations might be. Listed on the Refusal to Vaccinate form are the following entities and a brief description of their motivation:

• The 'physician' - is rewarded for administering vaccines by higher reimbursements for his fees. His vaccine "rates" are checked to determine whether or not he/she is entitled to more money. Physicians, public health workers, and drug companies have all been given immunity from any possible lawsuits that may arise as a result of vaccine-caused injury or illness. In other words, if a vaccine harms your child or causes autism you cannot sue any of them.
• The American Academy of Pediatrics which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF ILLINOIS - that receives lots of money from drug corporations for advertising in their Journal, etc. This organization relies heavily on what they believe to be a "government" health advocacy agency known as the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
• The American Academy of Family Physicians which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF KANSAS - that also receives lots of money from drug corporations for advertising in their Journal, etc.This organization also relies heavily on what they believe to be a "government" health advocacy agency known as the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
• The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) which is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF GEORGIA. The CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT. Repeat: the CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT! It is a private for-profit corporation that is chartered under the umbrella of the private for-profit UNITED STATES corporation with extremely close ties to the pharmaceutical companies.[See: Our Government is a Company, the Clearfield Doctrine and The Great American Adventure - Secrets of America by Judge Dale

Bottom line: all of the above "entities" make more money if they vaccinate our children and even more if our children get sick from the vaccines . . . including the pediatricians themselves.

#10
This is the broadest and most nefarious part of this so-called form.
"Nevertheless, I have decided at this time to decline . . . I know that failure to follow the recommendations about vaccination may endanger the health or life of my child and others . . . I therefore agree to tell all health care professionals in all settings what vaccines my child has not received because he or she may need to be isolated or may require immediate medical evaluation and tests that might not be necessary if my child had been vaccinated."
This is not only deceptive and untruthful [see numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8] it is asking you to confess that you know you are harming your child (and others) and don't care. It is asking you to agree to inform any/all people who consider themselves to be healthcare "professionals" (not defined) of your child's vaccination record. You are also agreeing to permitting undefined healthcare professionals to keep your child in isolation due to unproven or unknown exposure to a myriad of undefined communicable diseases - with or without testing.

#11
This is an admission that you understand this contractual document - and its significance - 'in its entirety'. This means that you accept the false information sited as factual, chose NOT to do what you now know to be good for your child and others (are negligent), obligate yourself to embarrass and confuse your child by tracking and reporting on the vaccines you protected your child from, and give permission for your child to be tested or removed from your care and put in isolation for any 'supposed' exposure to any 'undefined' communicable disease by anyone calling themselves a healthcare worker. [Ohio Revised Code 3701.13]

In short, the form wants you to attest to the following . . . in writing and in the presence of a witness::

1. You understand you are signing a contract with performance requirements
2. You accept false information as factual and don't care
3. You don't care if your child or others are harmed by your decision
4. You agree to volunteer to all pretend healthcare workers your child's vaccine record
5. You agree to allow others to test or isolate your child for unproven exposure to a disease

#12
Here is the kicker. You are asked to sign, initial and date this document in front of a witness who also dated their signature. This is called an unconscionable adhesion contract: "a legally binding agreement between two parties to do a certain thing, in which one side has all the bargaining power and uses it to write the contract primarily to his or her advantage."

Let's think . . . how much money is made by forcing all children in American to be 'fully' vaccinated? Billions or is it trillions?

---

*For Californians

Here is the form that is being used in California as is should be filled out:
**California Personal Beliefs and Exemption Form**

Note: only the child's name is filled out and the form refers to an attached VACCINATION NOTICE (see below). The LEGISLATORS and employees of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA have absolutely no authority to require parents go to a health care provider. They are not qualified to make that determination and have absolutely no authority (or training) to establish those parameters.

---

*SUGGESTED RESPONSE (OR WHAT I WOULD DO)

STEP ONE

• Inform the nurse or doctor that as the Refusal to Vaccinate form is an adhesion contract with performance requirements, you must take it home and read it more thoroughly. No one can force you to sign a contract. It is very important that you don't allow yourself to get bullied into signing this form on the spot.
• Ask for the vaccine package inserts to take with you. Explain that you always get a list of side effects from the pharmacist when you pick up a prescription - before your take it. Say you need those inserts to make an informed decision. If they ask you to accept a 'handout' say no. Just politely repeat your request. If they still say no, just let it go.
• On your next visit to the pediatrician or family practitioner, inform him or her that you are not interested in signing the Refusal to Vaccinate form because after due consideration you have decided that it would not be in your child's best interests . . . which it would not!

STEP TWO

*THE VACCINATION NOTICE