Revealing that which is concealed. Learning about anything that resembles real freedom. A journey of self-discovery shared with the world. Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them - Ephesians 5-11 Join me and let's follow that high road...
Saturday, November 30, 2019
Thursday, November 28, 2019
Lincoln’s Thanksgiving Proclamation
The Daily Messenger: Lincoln’s Thanksgiving Proclamation:
Thanksgiving, the holiday, has NOT A THING TO DO with Indians, or Euro settlers and genocide. That's all a bunch of bull, as much as any of the propaganda of the 20th century has been.
Lincoln had just been re elected in the midst of a terrible civil war. He was grateful. He fully expected to be kicked out and replaced by his timid former general McClellan. So, he made it a day of thanks.
OF GIVING THANKS FOR OUR BLESSINGS.
All the rest you hear about is total nonsense taught by the hate whitey campaign, sweeping over the world.
DB
The year that is drawing toward its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God. …
No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by the whole American people.
I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility and union.
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United States to be affixed.
Done at the City of Washington, this Third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence of the Unites States the Eighty-eighth.
Thanksgiving, the holiday, has NOT A THING TO DO with Indians, or Euro settlers and genocide. That's all a bunch of bull, as much as any of the propaganda of the 20th century has been.
Lincoln had just been re elected in the midst of a terrible civil war. He was grateful. He fully expected to be kicked out and replaced by his timid former general McClellan. So, he made it a day of thanks.
OF GIVING THANKS FOR OUR BLESSINGS.
All the rest you hear about is total nonsense taught by the hate whitey campaign, sweeping over the world.
DB
The year that is drawing toward its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God. …
No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by the whole American people.
I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility and union.
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United States to be affixed.
Done at the City of Washington, this Third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence of the Unites States the Eighty-eighth.
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Monday, November 25, 2019
GHW Bush & JFK Hit Part 5
The Mysterious Mr. de Mohrenschildt
October 14, 2013
George de Mohrenschildt
"Must have angered a lot of people" In 1976, more than a decade after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a letter arrived at the CIA, addressed to its director, the Hon. George Bush.
The letter was from a desperate-sounding man in
Dallas, who spoke regretfully of having been indiscreet in talking about Lee
Harvey Oswald and begged Poppy for help:
The writer signed himself "G. de Mohrenschildt."
by Edvard Munch
The CIA staff assumed the letter writer to be a crank.
Just to be sure, however, they asked their boss:
Bush responded by memo, seemingly self-typed:
Not recall? Once again, Poppy Bush was having
memory problems. And not about trivial matters.
George de Mohrenschildt was not just the
uncle of a roommate, but a longtime personal associate. Yet Poppy could not
recall - or more precisely, claimed not to recall - the nature of de
Mohrenschildt’s relationship with the man believed to have assassinated the
thirty-fifth president.
This would have been an unusual lapse on anyone’s part. But for the head of an American spy agency to exhibit such a blasé attitude, in such an important matter, was over the edge.
At that very moment, several federal
investigations were looking into CIA abuses - including the agency’s role in
assassinations of foreign leaders. These investigations were heading toward
what would become a reopened inquiry into Kennedy’s death.
Could it be that the lapse was not casual, and
the acknowledgment of a distant relationship was a way to forestall inquiry
into a closer one?
Writing back to his old friend, Poppy assured the Mohrenschildt that his fears were entirely unfounded. Yet half a year later, de Mohrenschildt was dead. The cause was officially determined to be suicide with a shotgun. Investigators combing through de Mohrenschildt’s effects came upon his tattered address book, largely full of entries made in the 1950’s.
Among them, though apparently eliciting no
further inquiries on the part of the police, was an old entry for the
current CIA director, with the Midland address where he had lived in the
early days of Zapata:
De Mohrenschildt and the
Oswalds
When Poppy told his staff that his old friend de Mohrenschildt "knew Oswald," that was an understatement. From 1962 through the spring of 1963, de Mohrenschildt was by far the principal influence on Oswald, the older man who guided every step of his life.
De Mohrenschildt had helped Oswald find jobs and
apartments, had taken him to meetings and social gatherings, and generally
had assisted with the most minute aspects of life for Lee Oswald, his
Russian wife, Marina, and their baby.
Lee Harvey Oswald, 1961 Marina Oswald De Mohrenschildt’s relationship with Oswald has tantalized and perplexed investigators and researchers for decades.
In 1964, de Mohrenschildt and his wife Jeanne
testified to the Warren Commission, which spent more time with them than any
other witness - possibly excepting Oswald’s widow, Marina.
The Commission, though, focused on George de
Mohrenschildt as a colorful, if eccentric, character, steering away every
time de Mohrenschildt recounted yet another name from a staggering list of
influential friends and associates. In the end, the commission simply
concluded in its final report that these must all be coincidences and
nothing more.
The de Mohrenschildts, the Commission said,
apparently had nothing to do with the assassination.
George and Jeanne de
Mohrenschildt
Even the Warren Commission counsel who questioned George de Mohrenschildt appeared to acknowledge that the Russian émigré was what might euphemistically be called an "international businessman."
For most of his adult life, de Mohrenschildt had
traveled the world ostensibly seeking business opportunities involving a
variety of natural resources - some, such as oil and uranium, of great
strategic value.
The timing of his overseas ventures was
remarkable. Invariably, when he was passing through town, a covert or even
overt operation appeared to be unfolding - an invasion, a coup, that sort of
thing.
For example, in 1961, as exiled Cubans and their
CIA support team prepared for
the Bay of Pigs invasion in Guatemala,
George de Mohrenschildt and his wife passed through Guatemala City on what
they told friends was a month-long walking tour of the Central American
isthmus.
On another occasion, the de Mohrenschildts
appeared in Mexico on oil business just as a Soviet leader arrived on a
similar mission - and even happened to meet the Communist official. In a
third instance, they landed in Haiti shortly before an unsuccessful coup
against its president that had U.S. fingerprints on it.
A Russian-born society figure was a friend both of the family of President Kennedy and his assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald.
A series of strange coincidences providing the
only known link between the two families before Oswald fired the shot
killing Mr. Kennedy in Dallas a year ago was described in testimony before
The Warren Commission by George S. de Mohrenschildt.
He was actually much more intriguing - and mystifying.
As Norman Mailer noted in his book
Oswald’s Tale, de Mohrenschildt possessed,
A Name Never Dropped
During all these examinations, and notwithstanding de Mohrenschildt’s offhand recitation of scores of friends and colleagues, obscure and recognizable, he scrupulously never mentioned that he knew Poppy Bush.
Nor did investigators uncover the fact that in
the spring of 1963, immediately after his final communication with Oswald,
de Mohrenschildt had traveled to New York and Washington for meetings with
CIA and military intelligence officials.
He even had met with a top aide to Vice
President Johnson. And the commission certainly did not learn that one
meeting in New York included Thomas Devine, then Bush’s business colleague
in Zapata Offshore, who was doing double duty for the CIA.
Had the Warren Commission’s investigators comprehensively explored the matter, they would have found a phenomenal and baroque back-story that contextualizes de Mohrenschildt within the extended petroleum-intelligence orbit in which the Bushes operated. Getting America Into World War I The de Mohrenschildts were major players in the global oil business since the beginning of the twentieth century, and their paths crossed with the Rockefellers and other key pillars of the petroleum establishment.
George de Mohrenschildt’s uncle and father ran
the Swedish Nobel Brothers Oil Company’s operations
in Baku, in Russian Azerbaijan on the
southwestern coast of the Caspian Sea.
This was no small matter. In the early days of
the twentieth century, the region held roughly half of the world’s known oil
supply. By the start of World War I, every major oil interest in the world,
including the Rockefellers’ Standard Oil, was scrambling for a piece of
Baku’s treasure or intriguing to suppress its competitive potential. (Today,
ninety years later, they are at it again.)
In 1915, the czar’s government dispatched a second uncle of George de Mohrenschildt, the handsome young diplomat Ferdinand von Mohrenschildt, to Washington to plead for American intervention in the war - an intervention that might rescue the czarist forces then being crushed by the invading German army.
President Woodrow Wilson had been
reelected partly on the basis of having kept America out of the war.
But as with all leaders, he was surrounded by
men with their own agendas. A relatively close-knit group embodying the
nexus of private capital and intelligence-gathering inhabited the highest
levels of the Wilson administration.
Secretary of State Robert Lansing was the
uncle of a diplomat-spy by the name of Allen Dulles.
Wilson’s closest adviser, "Colonel" Edward
House, was a Texan and an ally of the ancestors of James A. Baker III,
who would become Poppy Bush’s top lieutenant. Czarist Russia then owed fifty
million dollars to a Rockefeller-headed syndicate.
Keeping an eye on such matters was the U.S.
ambassador to Russia, a close friend of George Herbert Walker’s from St.
Louis.
Allen Dulles
during WW I
Once the United States did enter the war, Prescott Bush’s father, Samuel Bush, was put in charge of small arms production.
The Percy Rockefeller-headed Remington Arms
Company got the lion’s share of the U.S. contracts. It sold millions of
dollars worth of rifles to czarist forces, while it also profited handsomely
from deals with the Germans.
In 1917, Ferdinand von Mohrenschildt’s mission to bring America into the world war was successful on a number of levels. Newspaper clippings of the time show him to be an instant hit on the Newport, Rhode Island, millionaires’ circuit. He was often in the company of Mrs. J. Borden Harriman, of the family then befriending Prescott Bush and about to hire Prescott’s future father-in-law, George Herbert Walker.
Not long after that, Ferdinand married the
step-granddaughter of President Woodrow Wilson.
Prescott Bush Prescott Bush,
Dorothy Walker Bush
In quick succession, the United States entered World War I, and the newlywed Ferdinand unexpectedly died.
The von Mohrenschildt family fled Russia along
with the rest of the aristocracy. Emanuel Nobel sold half of the Baku
holdings to Standard Oil of New Jersey, with John D. Rockefeller Jr.
personally authorizing the payment of $11.5 million.
Over the next couple of decades, members of the
defeated White Russian movement, which opposed the Bolsheviks and fought the
Red Army from the 1917 October Revolution until 1923, would find shelter in
the United States, a country that shared the anti-Communist movement’s
ideological sentiments.
What the von Mohrenschildts
escaped.
Bush and de Mohrenschildt Families - Deeply Intertwined In 1920, Ferdinand’s nephew Dimitri von Mohrenschildt, the older brother of George, arrived in the United States and entered Yale University.
His admission was likely smoothed by the
connections of the Harriman family, which soon persuaded the Bolshevik
Russian government to allow them to reactivate the Baku oilfields.
At that point, the Harriman operation was being
directed by the brilliant international moneyman George Herbert Walker, the
grandfather of Poppy Bush.
Baku Oil Rigs
by Konstantin Bogaevsky
The Soviets had expropriated the assets of the Russian ruling class, not least the oil fields.
Though ultimately willing to cooperate with some
Western companies, the Communists had created an army of angry White Russian
opponents, who vowed to exact revenge and regain their holdings. This group,
trading on an American fascination with titles, was soon ensconced in (and
often intermarried with) the East Coast establishment.
The New York newspapers of the day were full of
reports of dinners and teas hosted by Prince This and Count That at
the top of Manhattan hotels.
Dimitri von Mohrenschildt plunged into this milieu. After graduating from Yale, he was offered a position teaching the young scions of the new oil aristocracy at the exclusive Loomis School near Hartford, Connecticut, where John D. Rockefeller III was a student (and his brother Winthrop soon would be).
There, Dimitri became friendly with Roland
and Winifred "Betty" Cartwright Holhan Hooker, who were
prominent local citizens.
Roland Hooker was enormously well connected; his
father had been the mayor of Hartford, his family members were close friends
of the Bouviers (Jackie Kennedy’s father’s family), and his sister was
married to Prince Melikov, a former officer in the Imperial Russian Army.
While Dimitri von Mohrenschildt clearly enjoyed the high-society glamour, in reality his life was heading underground.
Dimitri’s lengthy covert résumé would include
serving in the Office of Strategic Services wartime spy agency and later
cofounding Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. In 1941, Dimitri also
founded a magazine, the Russian Review, and later became a professor at
Dartmouth.
When the Hooker marriage unraveled, Dimitri began seeing Betty Hooker. In the summer of 1936, immigration records show that Dimitri traveled to Europe, followed a week later by Betty Hooker with her young daughter and adolescent son. Betty’s son, Edward Gordon Hooker, entered prep school at Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts.
There, he shared a small cottage with George H.
W. "Poppy" Bush. Bush and Hooker became inseparable. They worked together on
Pot Pourri, the student yearbook, whose photos show a handsome young Poppy
Bush and an even more handsome Hooker.
The friendship would continue in 1942, when both
Bush and Hooker, barely eighteen, enlisted in the Navy and served as pilots
in the Pacific. Afterward, they would be together at Yale. When Hooker
married, Poppy Bush served as an usher.
The relationship between Bush and Hooker lasted
for three decades, until 1967, when Hooker died of an apparent heart attack.
He was just forty-three.
Six years after Hooker’s death, Poppy Bush would
serve as surrogate father, giving away Hooker’s daughter at her wedding to
Ames Braga, scion of a Castro-expropriated Cuban sugar dynasty.
Another Careful Disconnect The relationship couldn’t have been much closer.
Yet Bush never mentions Hooker in his memoirs or
published recollections, even though he finds room for scores of more
marginal figures. Certainly his family was aware of Hooker.
Poppy’s prep school living arrangements would have mattered to Prescott Bush. The Bush clan is famously gregarious, and like many wealthy families, it puts great stock in the establishment of social networks that translate into influence and advantage. Prescott took a strong interest in meeting his children’s friends and the friends’ parents, as expressed in family correspondence and memoirs.
Moreover, as a prominent Connecticut family with
deep colonial roots, the Hookers would have had great appeal for Prescott
Bush, an up-and-coming Connecticut resident with political aspirations and a
great interest in the genealogy of America’s upper classes.
In 1937, Betty Hooker and Dimitri von Mohrenschildt married.
By then, Dimitri had been hired by Henry Luce as
a stringer for Time magazine. Prescott would likely have been keen to know
his son’s roommate’s stepfather - this intriguing Russian anti-Communist
aristocrat, with a background in the oil business and a degree from Yale,
working for Prescott’s
Skull and Bones friend Luce.
Meanwhile, Dimitri’s younger brother, George, had been living with their family in exile in Poland, where he finished high school and then joined a military academy and the cavalry. In May 1938, George arrived from Europe and moved in with his brother and new sister-in-law in their Park Avenue apartment.
Young George de Mohrenschildt came to America
armed with the doctoral dissertation that reflected the future trajectory of
his life: "The Economic Influence of the United States on Latin America."
The oil south of the border was certainly of
interest to Wall Street figures such as Prescott Bush and his colleagues,
who were deeply involved in financing petroleum exploration in new areas.
From Émigré to Spy The White Russian émigrés in the United States were motivated by both ideology and economics to serve as shock troops in the growing cold war conflict being managed by Prescott’s friends and associates.
No one understood this better than Allen Dulles,
the Wall Street lawyer, diplomat, and spy-master-in ascension.
Even in the period between the two world wars,
Dulles was already molding Russian émigrés into intelligence operatives. He
moved back and forth between government service and Wall Street lawyering
with the firm Sullivan and Cromwell, whose clients included United Fruit and
Brown Brothers Harriman.
The latter was at that time led by Averell and
Roland Harriman and Prescott Bush.
W. Averell Harriman
Whether in government or out, Dulles’s interests and associates were largely the same.
He seemed to enjoy the clandestine work more
than the legal work.
As Peter Grose notes in Gentleman Spy:
The Life of Allen Dulles, he worked during the 1940 presidential
campaign to bring Russian, Polish, and Czechoslovak émigrés into the
Republican camp.
Dimitri von Mohrenschildt was a star player in
this game on a somewhat exalted level.
He found sponsorship for a role as an academic
and publisher specializing in anti-Bolshevik materials, and later became
involved in more ambitious propaganda work with Radio Liberty and Radio Free
Europe.
Younger brother George was more willing to get
his hands dirty.
He took a job in the New York office of a French
perfume company called Chevalier Garde, named for the Czar’s most elite
troops, the Imperial Horse Guards. His bosses were powerful czarist Russian
émigrés, well connected at the highest levels of Manhattan society, who
worked during World War II in army intelligence and the OSS.
One of them, Prince Serge Obolensky, had
escaped Soviet Russia after a year of hiding and became a much-married New
York society figure whose wives included Alice Astor.
His brother-in-law Vincent Astor was secretly
asked by FDR in 1940 to set up civilian espionage offices in Manhattan at
Rockefeller Center.
Astor was soon joined in this effort by Allen
Dulles.
and Jacqueline Kennedy
Onassis
1975
The next stop for George de Mohrenschildt was a home furnishings company.
His boss there was a high-ranking French
intelligence official, and together they monitored and blocked attempts by
the Axis war machine to procure badly needed petroleum supplies in the
Americas.
Young de Mohrenschildt then traveled to the
southwest, where he exhibited still more impressive connections.
Ostensibly there to work on oil derricks, he
landed a meeting with the chairman of the board of Humble Oil, the Texas
subsidiary of Standard Oil of New Jersey, predecessor to Exxon.
Prince Serge Obolensky
circa 1943
The jobs kept becoming more interesting. By the midforties, de Mohrenschildt was working in Venezuela for Pantepec Oil, the firm of William F. Buckley’s family.
Pantepec later had abundant connections with the
newly created CIA and was deeply involved in foreign intrigue for decades.
The Buckley boys, like the Bushes, had been
in Skull and Bones, and Bill Buckley,
whose conservative intellectual magazine National Review was often
politically helpful to Poppy Bush, would in later years admit to a stint
working for the CIA himself.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
George de Mohrenschildt’s foreign trips - and some of his domestic wanderings as well - drew the interest of various American law enforcement agencies.
These incidents appear to have been deliberate
provocations, such as his working on "sketches" outside a U.S. Coast Guard
station. In many of these cases de Mohrenschildt would be briefly questioned
or investigated, the result of which was a dossier not unlike that of Lee
Harvey Oswald’s.
These files were full of declared doubts about
his loyalties and speculation at various times that he might be a Russian,
Japanese, French, or German spy. A classic opportunist, he might have been
any or all of these.
But he also could have simply been an American
spy who was creating a cover story.
|
Facebook Bans All Content On Vaccine Awareness, Including Facts About Vaccine Ingredients
2020...the year truth is banned on any and all types of media. Only the lies are allowed and reinforced. When you have to ban free speech, its because it is exposing evil. And for no other reason.
DON
Authored by Mike Adams via NaturalNews.com,
Just as we warned would happen, the tech giants are now moving aggressively to ban all speech that contradicts whatever “official” position is decided to be “the truth” by the corrupt establishment. This week, Facebook announced it would block all content on Facebook that questions the official dogma on vaccines, which falsely insists that vaccines have never harmed anyone (a hilarious lie), that vaccines contain only safe ingredients (a blatant deception) and that vaccines always work on everyone (another laughable lie).
Facebook is achieving this by labeling vaccine awareness information “misinformation” or “hoaxes.” At the top of the list is the assertion that vaccines are linked to autism — something that even the CDC’s own top whistleblower scientist reveals to be true, yet the vaccine industry claims it’s all a hoax (in order to cover of the crimes of medical violence against children that are being committed by the vaccine pushers).
Notably, tech giants are now banning vaccine truth information by
labeling it “misinformation” in exactly the same way they ban
conservative content by labeling it “hate speech.” They simply invent a
false category to justify the ban, all while crushing the free speech of
users (and ultimately leading to the vaccine maiming of millions of
innocent children). Under this twisted system of speech policing, they
can ban any content they don’t like by simply labeling it “false” or
“hateful,” even if it’s true and important.
Don’t like infanticide and the killing of human infants after they are born? That’s “hate speech against women,” Facebook will soon declare. And you’ll be banned from talking about abortion.
Concerned about fluoride and how it harms developing brains and lowers the IQs of children? That will be labeled a “hoax” by Facebook, even though it is scientifically verified through multiple studies to be true.
Of course, “authoritative information” means whatever propaganda the vaccine deep state is pushing at the moment. The vaccine industry is steeped in conflicts of interest and a long history of suppressing scientists and whistleblowers who attempt to warn the public about the toxic effects of vaccine ingredients such as Thimerosal (containing mercury), aluminum adjuvants, MSG, formaldehyde and other neurotoxins that are openly admitted by the CDC to be ingredients used in vaccines administered to children.
Just recently, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons denounced mandatory vaccines, citing “no rigorous safety studies” and warning about vaccine industry corruption of science. Their statement includes the following:
It’s no longer difficult to imagine Facebook banning all conversations about nutrition, citing the absurd FDA position that there is no such thing as a nutrient which can prevent, cure or treat any disease or health condition. That’s the actual “authoritative” FDA position, so by the same logic that Facebook has applied to the vaccine debate, they could simply ban all posts about vitamin D, vitamin D, resveratrol, astaxanthin or any other supplement.
Imagine being banned from Facebook for saying that vitamin C boosts your immune function. That’s exactly what’s coming.
Even worse, Facebook could declare that “authoritative sources” have concluded President Trump colluded with the Russians. Any human opinion that contradicted that “authoritative source” would be banned on Facebook.
Thus, truth become a “hoax,” but lies become the “official truth.” Facebook becomes the Ministry of Truth (or more accurately, the Ministry of Lies), and all voices of truth and reason are silenced in the name of protecting corrupt, harmful industries that sacrifice children for profit.
This is what it has all come to now, which is why people are leaving Facebook in huge numbers.
Before long, Facebook won’t even allow any human opinions at all, and the “social media” site will be nothing but AI robots spewing official propaganda that meets the definition of “authoritative” information from the globalist establishment.
From the Internet
DON
Authored by Mike Adams via NaturalNews.com,
Just as we warned would happen, the tech giants are now moving aggressively to ban all speech that contradicts whatever “official” position is decided to be “the truth” by the corrupt establishment. This week, Facebook announced it would block all content on Facebook that questions the official dogma on vaccines, which falsely insists that vaccines have never harmed anyone (a hilarious lie), that vaccines contain only safe ingredients (a blatant deception) and that vaccines always work on everyone (another laughable lie).
The devil |
Facebook is achieving this by labeling vaccine awareness information “misinformation” or “hoaxes.” At the top of the list is the assertion that vaccines are linked to autism — something that even the CDC’s own top whistleblower scientist reveals to be true, yet the vaccine industry claims it’s all a hoax (in order to cover of the crimes of medical violence against children that are being committed by the vaccine pushers).
Don’t like infanticide and the killing of human infants after they are born? That’s “hate speech against women,” Facebook will soon declare. And you’ll be banned from talking about abortion.
Concerned about fluoride and how it harms developing brains and lowers the IQs of children? That will be labeled a “hoax” by Facebook, even though it is scientifically verified through multiple studies to be true.
The censorship trick: Limiting content to “authoritative information”
“Monika Bickert, Facebook’s vice president for global policy management, said the social media network would reduce the distribution of false data and provide users with authoritative information about vaccinations,” reports AFP, via Breitbart.Of course, “authoritative information” means whatever propaganda the vaccine deep state is pushing at the moment. The vaccine industry is steeped in conflicts of interest and a long history of suppressing scientists and whistleblowers who attempt to warn the public about the toxic effects of vaccine ingredients such as Thimerosal (containing mercury), aluminum adjuvants, MSG, formaldehyde and other neurotoxins that are openly admitted by the CDC to be ingredients used in vaccines administered to children.
Just recently, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons denounced mandatory vaccines, citing “no rigorous safety studies” and warning about vaccine industry corruption of science. Their statement includes the following:
- Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.
- There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.
- Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.
- Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.
This is only the beginning: Facebook will soon ban human opinions on cancer, GMOs, pesticides, fluoride, abortion and politics
The bigger picture in all this goes way beyond the issue of vaccines, of course. With this decision, Facebook is now signaling that it will ban all conversations or content that contradicts “official positions” on any topic. Those topics will very rapidly be expanded to include GMOs, cancer treatments, water fluoridation, politics, elections, abortions, pesticides and nutrition.It’s no longer difficult to imagine Facebook banning all conversations about nutrition, citing the absurd FDA position that there is no such thing as a nutrient which can prevent, cure or treat any disease or health condition. That’s the actual “authoritative” FDA position, so by the same logic that Facebook has applied to the vaccine debate, they could simply ban all posts about vitamin D, vitamin D, resveratrol, astaxanthin or any other supplement.
Imagine being banned from Facebook for saying that vitamin C boosts your immune function. That’s exactly what’s coming.
Even worse, Facebook could declare that “authoritative sources” have concluded President Trump colluded with the Russians. Any human opinion that contradicted that “authoritative source” would be banned on Facebook.
“Authoritative” sources are often the most corrupt and misleading sources run by the globalist pharma establishment
The problem with Facebook relying on so-called “authoritative sources” for censorship is that such sources almost always represent the corrupt globalist, pro-pharma, pro-establishment point of view that’s steeped in fraud, deception and falsehoods. Vaccines, for example, are so dangerous that the U.S. government has now paid out nearly $4 billion in awards to families of vaccine-damaged children, yet any mention of those government statistics which are openly published by HHS (VAERS.HHS.gov) will be falsely labeled a “hoax” by Facebook, since the vaccine industry falsely insists that vaccines have never harmed anyone.Thus, truth become a “hoax,” but lies become the “official truth.” Facebook becomes the Ministry of Truth (or more accurately, the Ministry of Lies), and all voices of truth and reason are silenced in the name of protecting corrupt, harmful industries that sacrifice children for profit.
This is what it has all come to now, which is why people are leaving Facebook in huge numbers.
Before long, Facebook won’t even allow any human opinions at all, and the “social media” site will be nothing but AI robots spewing official propaganda that meets the definition of “authoritative” information from the globalist establishment.
From the Internet
Friday, November 22, 2019
JFK assassination anniversary 11-22-63 11-22-19
GHW Bush & JFK Hit
Reading Time: 12 minutesWhat possible connection could there have been between George H.W. Bush and the assassination of John F. Kennedy? Or between the C.I.A. and the assassination? Or between Bush and the C.I.A.? For some people, apparently, making such connections was as dangerous as letting one live wire touch another. Here, in anticipation of the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination in November, is the first part of a ten-part series of excerpts from WhoWhatWhy editor Russ Baker’s bestseller, Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years. The story is a real-life thriller.Note: Although these excerpts do not contain footnotes, the book itself is heavily footnoted and exhaustively sourced. (The excerpts in Part 1 come from Chapter 2 of the book, and the titles and subtitles have been changed for this publication.)
Poppy’s Secret
When Joseph McBride came upon the document about George H. W. Bush’s double life, he was not looking for it. It was 1985, and McBride, a former Daily Variety writer, was in the library of California State University San Bernardino, researching a book about the movie director Frank Capra. Like many good reporters, McBride took off on a “slight,” if time-consuming, tangent – spending day after day poring over reels of microfilmed documents related to the FBI and the JFK assassination. McBride had been a volunteer on Kennedy’s campaign, and since 1963 had been intrigued by the unanswered questions surrounding that most singular of American tragedies.
A particular memo caught his eye, and he leaned in for a closer look. Practically jumping off the screen was a memorandum from FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, dated November 29, 1963. Under the subject heading “Assassination of President John F. Kennedy,” Hoover reported that, on the day after JFK’s murder, the bureau had provided two individuals with briefings. One was “Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.” The other: “Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency.”
To:
Director
Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Department of State
Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Department of State
[We have been] advised that the
Department of State feels some misguided anti-Castro group might
capitalize on the present situation and undertake an unauthorized raid
against Cuba, believing that the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy might herald a change in U.S. policy… [Our] sources know of no
[such] plans… The substance of the foregoing information was orally
furnished to Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency and
Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
McBride shook his head. George H. W. Bush? In the CIA in 1963?
Dealing with Cubans and the JFK assassination? Could this be the same
man who was now vice president of the United States? Even when Bush was
named CIA director in 1976 amid much agency-bashing, his primary asset
had been the fact that he was not a part of the agency during the coups,
attempted coups, and murder plots in Iran, Cuba, Chile, and other hot
spots about which embarrassing information was being disclosed every day
in Senate hearings.Now Ford had named George H. W. Bush to take over the CIA. But Bush seemed wholly unqualified for such a position – especially at a time when the agency was under maximum scrutiny. He had been U.N. ambassador, Republican National Committee chairman, and the U.S. envoy to Beijing, where both Nixon and Henry Kissinger had regarded him as a lightweight and worked around him. What experience did he have in the world of intelligence and spying? How would he restore public confidence in a tarnished spy agency? No one seemed to know. Or did Gerald Ford realize something most others didn’t?
Bush served at the CIA for one year, from early 1976 to early 1977. He worked quietly to reverse the Watergate-era reforms of CIA practices, moving as many operations as possible offshore and beyond accountability. Although a short stint, it nevertheless created an image problem in 1980 when Bush ran unsuccessfully for the Republican presidential nomination against former California governor Ronald Reagan. Some critics warned of the dangerous precedent in elevating someone who had led the CIA, with its legacy of dark secrets and covert plots, blackmail and murder, to preside over the United States government.
“Must be another George Bush”
In 1985, when McBride found the FBI memo apparently relating to Bush’s past, the reporter did not immediately follow up this curious lead. Bush was now a recently reelected vice president (a famously powerless position), and McBride himself was busy with other things. By 1988, however, the true identity of “Mr. George Bush of the CIA” took on new meaning, as George H. W. Bush prepared to assume his role as Reagan’s heir to the presidency. Joe McBride decided to make the leap from entertainment reportage to politics. He picked up the phone and called the White House.
“May I speak with the vice president?” he asked
McBride had to settle for Stephen Hart, a vice presidential spokesman. Hart denied that his boss had been the man mentioned in the memo, quoting Bush directly. “I was in Houston, Texas, at the time and involved in the independent oil drilling business. And I was running for the Senate in late ’63. I don’t have any idea of what he’s talking about.” Hart concluded with this suggestion: “Must be another George Bush.”
McBride found the response troubling – rather detailed for a ritual non-denial. It almost felt like a cover story that Bush was a bit too eager to trot out. He returned to Hart with more questions for Bush:
- Did you do any work with or for the CIA prior to the time you became its director?
- If so, what was the nature of your relationship with the agency, and how long did it last?
- Did you receive a briefing by a member of the FBI on anti-Castro Cuban activities in the aftermath [of] the assassination of President Kennedy?
Undeterred, McBride called the CIA. A spokesman for the agency, Bill Devine, responded: “This is the first time I’ve ever heard this . . . I’ll see what I can find out and call you back.”
The following day, the PR man was tersely formal and opaque: “I can neither confirm nor deny.” It was the standard response the agency gave when it dealt with its sources and methods. Could the agency reveal whether there had been another George Bush in the CIA? Devine replied: “Twenty-seven years ago? I doubt that very much. In any event, we have a standard policy of not confirming that anyone is involved in the CIA.”
“Apparently” George William Bush
But it appears this standard policy was made to be broken. McBride’s revelations appeared in the July 16, 1988, issue of the liberal magazine the Nation, under the headline “The Man Who Wasn’t There, ‘George Bush,’ C.I.A. Operative.” Shortly thereafter, CIA spokeswoman Sharron Basso told the Associated Press that the CIA believed that “the record should be clarified.” She said that the FBI document “apparently” referred to a George William Bush who had worked in 1963 on the night shift at the Langley, Virginia, headquarters, and that “would have been the appropriate place to have received such an FBI report.” George William Bush, she said, had left the CIA in 1964 to join the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Certainly, the article caused George H. W. Bush no major headaches. By the following month, he was triumphantly accepting the GOP’s presidential nomination at its New Orleans convention, unencumbered by tough questions about his past.
CIA can’t find “other” George Bush?
Meanwhile, the CIA’s Basso told reporters that the agency had been unable to locate the “other” George Bush. The assertion was reported by several news outlets, with no comment about the irony of a vaunted intelligence agency – with a staff of thousands and a budget of billions – being unable to locate a former employee within American borders.
Perhaps what the CIA really needed was someone like Joseph McBride. Though not an investigative journalist, McBride had no trouble finding George William Bush. Not only was the man findable; he was still on the U.S. government payroll. By 1988 this George Bush was working as a claims representative for the Social Security Administration. He explained to McBride that he had worked only briefly at the CIA, as a GS-5 probationary civil servant, analyzing documents and photos during the night shift. Moreover, he said, he had never received interagency briefings.
Several years later, in 1991, former Texas Observer editor David Armstrong would track down the other person listed on the Hoover memo, Captain William Edwards. Edwards could confirm that he had been on duty at the Defense Intelligence Agency the day in question. He said he did not remember this briefing, but that he found the memo plausible in reference to a briefing he might have received over the phone while at his desk. While he said he had no idea who the George Bush was who also was briefed, Edward’s rank and experience was certainly far above that of the night clerk George William Bush.
Shortly after McBride’s article appeared in the Nation, the magazine ran a follow-up op-ed, in which the author provided evidence that the Central Intelligence Agency had foisted a lie on the American people. The piece appeared while everyone else was focusing on Bush’s coronation at the Louisiana Superdome. As with McBride’s previous story, this disclosure was greeted with the equivalent of a collective media yawn. An opportunity was bungled, not only to learn about the true history of the man who would be president, but also to recognize the “George William Bush” diversion for what it was: one in a long series of calculated distractions and disinformation episodes that run through the Bush family history.
George William Bush Deposes
With the election only two months away, and a growing sense of urgency in some quarters, George William Bush acknowledged under oath – as part of a deposition in a lawsuit brought by a nonprofit group seeking records on Bush’s past – that he was the junior officer on a three- to four-man watch shift at CIA headquarters between September 1963 and February 1964, which was on duty when Kennedy was shot. “I do not recognize the contents of the memorandum as information furnished to me orally or otherwise during the time I was at the CIA,” he said. “In fact, during my time at the CIA, I did not receive any oral communications from any government agency of any nature whatsoever. I did not receive any information relating to the Kennedy assassination during my time at the CIA from the FBI. Based on the above, it is my conclusion that I am not the Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency referred to in the memorandum.” . . .
George H.W. Bush: Spy from the age of 18
Almost a decade would pass between Bush’s election in 1988 and the declassification and release in 1996 of another government document that shed further light on the matter. This declassified document would help to answer some of the questions raised by the ’63 Hoover memo – questions such as, “If George Herbert Walker Bush was already connected with the CIA in 1963, how far back did the relationship go?”
But yet another decade would pass before this second document would be found, read, and revealed to the public. Fast-forward to December 2006, on a day when JFK researcher Jerry Shinley sat, as he did on so many days, glued to his computer, browsing through the digitized database of documents on the Web site of the Mary Ferrell Foundation.
On that December day, Shinley came upon an internal CIA memo that mentioned George H. W. Bush [the Bush designated Director of Central Intelligence (DCI)]. Dated November 29, 1975, it reported, in typically spare terms, the revelation that the man who was about to become the head of the CIA actually had prior ties to the agency. And the connection discussed here, unlike that unearthed by McBride, went back not to 1963, but to 1953 – a full decade earlier. Writing to the chief of the spy section of the analysis and espionage agency, the chief of the “cover and commercial staff” noted:
Through Mr. Gale Allen . . . I learned
that Mr. George Bush, DCI designate has prior knowledge of the now
terminated project WUBRINY/LPDICTUM which was involved in proprietary
commercial operations in Europe. He became aware of this project through
Mr. Thomas J. Devine, a former CIA Staff Employee and later,
oil-wildcatting associate with Mr. Bush. Their joint activities
culminated in the establishment of Zapata Oil [sic] [in 1953] which they
eventually sold. After the sale of Zapata Oil, Mr. Bush went into
politics, and Mr. Devine became a member of the investment firm of
Train, Cabot and Associates, New York . . . The attached memorandum
describes the close relationship between Messrs. Devine and Bush
in 1967-1968 which, according to Mr. Allen, continued while Mr. Bush was
our ambassador to the United Nations.
In typical fashion for the highly compartmentalized and secretive
intelligence organization, the memo did not make clear how Bush knew
Devine, or whether Devine was simply dropping out of the spy business to
become a true entrepreneur. For Devine, who would have been about
twenty-seven years old at the time, to “resign” at such a young age, so
soon after the CIA had spent a great deal of time and money training him
was, at minimum, highly unusual. It would turn out, however, that
Devine had a special relationship allowing him to come and go from the
agency, enabling him to do other things without really leaving its
employ. In fact, CIA history is littered with instances where CIA
officers have tendered their “resignation” as a means of creating
deniability while continuing to work closely with the agency . . .Devine, like the senior George Bush, is now in his eighties and still active in business in New York. When I reached him in the winter of 2007 and told him about recently uncovered CIA memos that related both his agency connections and his longtime ties to Bush, he uttered a dry chuckle, then continued cautiously.
“Tell me who you are working with in the family,” he asked when I informed him I was working on a book about the Bushes. I explained that the book was not exactly an “authorized” biography, and therefore I was not “working” with someone in the family. Moreover, I noted, the Bushes were not known for their responsiveness to journalistic inquiries. “The family policy has been as long as George has been in office, they don’t talk to media,” Devine replied. But he agreed to contact the Bush family seeking clearance. “Well, the answer is, I will inquire. I have your telephone number, and I’ll call you back when I’ve enquired.”
Surprisingly enough, he did call again, two weeks later, having checked in with his old friend in Houston. He explained that he had been told by former president George H.W. Bush not to cooperate. When I spoke to him several months later, he still would not talk about anything – though he did complain that, thanks to an article I had written about him for the Real News Project (www.realnews.org), he was now listed in Wikipedia. And then he did offer a few words:
Thomas Devine: I just broke one of the first rules in this game.
Russ Baker: And what is that?
Thomas Devine: Do not complain.
In fact, Devine had little to complain about. At the time, although I
was aware that he seemed to be confirming that he himself had been in
the ”game,” I did not understand the full extent of his activities in
conjunction with Bush. Nor did I understand the heightened significance
of their relationship during the tumultuous event of 1963, to be
discussed in subsequent chapters.No Business like the Spy Business
Before there was an Office of Strategic Services (July 1942-October 1945) or a Central Intelligence Agency (founded in 1947), corporations and attorneys who represented international businesses often employed associates in their firms as private agents to gather data on competitors and business opportunities abroad. So it was only to be expected that many of the first OSS recruits were taken from the ranks of oil companies, Wall Street banking firms, and Ivy League universities and often equated the interests of their high-powered business partners with the national interest. Such relationships like the one between George H. W. Bush and Thomas Devine thus made perfect sense to the CIA . . .
By the time George H. W. Bush founded his own company, Zapata Petroleum, it was not difficult to line up backers with long-standing ties to industrial espionage activities. The setup with Devine in the oil business provided Bush with a perfect cover to travel abroad and . . . identify potential CIA recruits among foreign nationals . . .
“Poppy” Bush’s own role with intelligence appears to date back as early as the Second World War, when he joined the Navy at age eighteen. On arrival at his training base in Norfolk, Virginia, in the fall of 1942, Bush was trained not only as a pilot of a torpedo bomber but also as a photographic officer, responsible for crucial, highly sensitive aerial surveillance . . .
After mastering the technique of operating the handheld K-20 aerial camera and film processing, Bush recruited and trained other pilots and crewmen. His own flight team became part bomber unit, part spy unit. The information they obtained about the Japanese navy, as well as crucial intelligence on Japanese land-based defenses, was forwarded to the U.S. Navy’s intelligence center at Pearl Harbor and to the Marine Corps for use in planning amphibious landings in order to reduce casualties.
The so-called Operation Snapshot was so hush-hush that, under naval regulations in effect at the time, even revealing its name would lead to court-martial. According to a book by Robert Stinnett, a fellow flier, Admiral Marc Mitscher hit the “bulkhead” when he saw that Bush’s team had filed a report in which they actually referred by name to their top-secret project. The three people above Bush in his command chain were made to take razor blades to the pages of the report and remove the forbidden language.
The lesson was apparently not lost on Bush. From that moment forward, as every Bush researcher has learned, Bush’s life would honor the principle: no names, no paper trail, no fingerprints. If you wanted to know what Bush had done, you had to have the patience of a sleuth yourself.
Next: Part 2. Viva Zapata
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
I my opinion Facebook is criminally complicit.
-----------
Any death even the slightest bit vaccine associated = pre-meditated murder
Thanks Suckerberg the world will be rid you and your criminally complicit scum forever.
• Bovine cow serum: Extracted from cow skin. When injected causes connective tissue disorders, arthritis and lupus; also shortness of breath, low blood pressure, chest pain and skin reactions.
• Sorbitol: Synthetic sweetener which metabolizes very slowly and aggravates IBS and gastrointestinal issues.
• Gelatin: Derived from the collagen inside animals' skin and bones. Injecting gelatin poses the risk of infection from synthetic growth hormones and BSE infectivity (mad cow disease).
• Sodium chloride: Raises blood pressure and inhibits muscle contraction and growth.
• Egg protein: Vaccines are prepared in eggs (certainly not organic). May contain growth hormones, antibiotics, and salmonella bacteria.
• Thimerosal: A neurotoxic mercury which causes autism: There are 25 mcg in one average flu vaccine, and the EPA safety limit is 5 micrograms, so children who are vaccinated simultaneously with multiple* vaccines receive over 10 times the safety limit of mercury in one day.
• Human albumin: The protein portion of blood from pooled human venous plasma; when injected causes fever, chills, hives, rash, headache, nausea, breathing difficulty, and rapid heart rate. Injecting "pooled blood" can result in a loss of body cell mass and cause immunodeficiency virus infection, or contain SV40, AIDS, cancer or Hepatitis B from drug addicts.
• Formaldehyde: Highly carcinogenic fluid used to embalm corpses. Ranked one of the most hazardous compounds to human health; can cause liver damage, gastrointestinal issues, reproductive deformation, respiratory distress and cancer. Plus, formaldehyde has been known to fail to deactivate the virus the vaccine is intended to cure, thus enabling a live virus to enter your blood and infect your system.
• Phenoxyethanol: A glycol ether/chemical; highly toxic to the nervous system, kidneys, and liver. The FDA warns "can cause shut down of the central nervous system (CNS), vomiting and contact dermatitis" in cosmetics; imagine when injected into your blood.
• Aluminum phosphate: Greatly increases toxicity of mercury, so caution about minimum mercury tolerance is therefore severely underestimated. CDC scientists and all doctors are well aware of this.
• MSG (monosodium glutamate): When injected becomes a neurotoxin, causing CNS disorders and brain damage in children.
++++++++++++++
Measles Live Virus Vaccine: (Attenuvax) Made by Merck. Two injections are given; one at 1 year and another at 4 years old. Contains gelatin, sorbitol, sodium chloride, bovine cow serum, egg protein and human albumin.
Measles and Mumps Live Virus Vaccine: (M-M-Rvax) Made by Merck. Injected into one year old babies. Contains gelatin, sorbitol, sodium chloride, bovine cow serum, and human albumin.
Diptheria, Tetanus and Polio Vaccine: Five injections given between 2 and 6 years of age, plus boosters "recommended" every 10 years. Contains formaldehyde, phenoxyethanol and aluminum phosphate.
DTaP, IPV, HBV and Hib*: (Diphtheria, tetanus, polio, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenza type B) Given to infants 2 to 12 months with boosters less than a year later. Contains aluminum hydroxide, formaldehyde, and bovine cow serum.
Gardasil HPV: Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Made by Merck. Administered to children as young as 9 years of age for a rare sexually transmitted disease. Contains polysorbate 80, sodium chloride, aluminum, and a "denatured" (fragmented and weakened) form of the virus.
-------------