All CIA assets - stone, corsi, goodman

Nov 5 2019

Corsi and Klayman Lawsuit #Fail 

Crowdsource is Crowdstrike both CIA fronts. Well poisoning, controlled opposition.

In our last post Insane in the Ukraine Part 3 – Sheep Dipping the Truther we told you about Dr Jerome Corsi, Jason Goodman’s mentor who was called out by a Rockefeller for his ties to a certain small country.
Larry Klayman is a frequent Jason Goodman guest, famous for losing a defamation suit over inappropriate touching of his children and suing his own mother.
Corsi was a target of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. He teamed up with Klayman to sue Mueller for $350 million $1.6 billion. Then they went on Crowdsource the Truth with a “Citizens Grand Jury” to “criminally indict” Mueller. This is obviously a LARP, since there is no such thing in US jurisprudence as a Citizens Grand Jury and civilians do not have the power to indict people no matter how many lawsuits they file.
Well, the judge has ruled – and thrown the case out of Court. Dismissed with prejudice means they can’t re-file – a total loss.

Full ruling here:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JEROME CORSI,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT MUELLER,

et al.

,

Defendants

.

Civil Action No. 18-

02885 (ESH)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Jerome Corsi brings

this action against the Department of Justice

; the Federal

Bureau of Investigation;

the National Security Agency

; the Central Intelligence Agency

(collectively, “the government”)

; and Robert Mueller

, in both his individual capacity and his

official capacity as Special Counsel

. Before the Court are defendants’ three motions to dismiss

and plaintiff’s

motion for leave to file a second amended complaint

in order

to add a

First

Amendment retaliation count

against Mueller in his personal capacity

. For the reasons stated

herein, the

motions to dismiss will be granted, and the

motion to file a second amended

complaint

will be denied.

BACKGROUND

I.

FACTS

According to the amended complaint, Corsi

is an “investigative conservative journalist

and author,”

“a strong supporter of President Trump

,” and has research

ed Hillary Clinton’s use

of a private email server to conduct government business while Secretary of State. (

Am. Compl.

¶¶ 15

–16, 27, ECF No. 15.)

The amended complaint

alleges that Corsi’s

research

and political

affiliations

prompted the government and Mueller, then

-Special

Counsel, to attempt “to coerce,

Case 1:18-cv-02885-ESH Document 60 Filed 10/31/19 Page 1 of 42

2

extort, threaten and/or blackmail Plaintiff

Corsi into testifying falsely” before the grand jury

convened to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election.

(

Id.

¶

¶ 20

–

22.)

Specifically, Corsi claims that “Defendant Mueller and his prosecutorial staff” sought to

force Corsi to testify before the grand jury

that Corsi “acted as a liaison between Roger Stone

and Wikileaks leader Julian Assange concerning the public release of emails obtained from the

DNC’s servers.” (

Id.

¶ 23.) Corsi allegedly told Mueller that the desired testimony would be

false. (

Id.

¶ 22.) Corsi claims that, despite this, “Defendant Mueller . . . threatened to indict

Plaintiff Corsi and effec

tively put him in federal prison for the rest of his life” if he did not

provide the testimony Mueller wanted. (

Id.

¶ 22.)

Corsi further alleges that “Mueller and his staff have leaked grand jury information to the

press concerning Plaintiff

Corsi

.” (

Id.

¶ 25.

) Corsi cites two news articles that, he alleges,

“contain[] confidential information regarding the grand jury proceedings about Plaintiff Corsi

that could only possibly have come from Defendant Mueller.” (

Id.

¶ 26;

see also id.

¶¶ 26 n.3,

28 n.4.)

Corsi also claims that the government and Mueller “have engaged in ongoing illegal,

unconstitutional surveillance on Plaintiff Corsi

. . . at the dir

ection of Defendant Mueller.

” (

Id.

¶

30.)

To support this, he alleges

that

(1) the government “[n]ecessarily”

discovered the identity of

his stepson by “intercepting [his] text and other messages

;” (2) by using a software that

“prevent[s] the electronic surveillance of telephone conversations,” he “

has evidence of repeated

attempts by government authorities to intercept electronically [his] telephone conversations

;” and

(3) he “routinely speaks with pers

ons located overseas in regions that are surveilled under

PRISM.”

1

(

Id.

¶ ¶ 31, 33.) Finally, he claims that the government and Mueller interfered with

1

PRISM is a program established by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,

50 U.S.C. § 1881a, et. seq. (“FISA”)

, that allows the government to “use[

] selectors

—like e

-mail

addresses

—to collect online communications of non-

U.S. persons located abroad.”

Montgomery

Case 1:18-cv-02885-ESH Document 60 Filed 10/31/19 Page 2 of 42

3

his business relationships with his book publisher

( Post Hill Press

) and his book seller (

Amazon

),

by threatening them with subpoena

s or other legal action, and with Dr. David Jones, Alex Jones,

and InfoWars

, by falsely claiming that they were “paying him hush money to keep him quiet

about their actions.” (

Id.

¶¶ 6

0–63.)

Despite the

alleged pressure put on him by defendants

, Corsi states

that he testified

truthfully before the grand jury. (

See id.

¶ 2

9;

see also

Pl.’s Opp’n to Mueller’s Mot. at 2, ECF

No. 40 (“

Plaintiff Corsi chose to exercise his First Amendment (and moral) right to give a

truthful account of the events of the Russian collusion investigation.”)

.) And although he alleges

that Mueller threatened to indict him, he has never been

indicted.

(Hr’g Tr. at 35:

4–35:5, Oct. 2,

2019, ECF No. 58 (“Tr.”).) Moreover, Mueller’s investigation

concluded

on March 22, 2019,

the grand jury has been dismissed

, and Mueller

has resigned as Special Counsel. (

See

Pl.’s

Opp’n to Mueller’s Mot. at 4; Mueller’s Mot. to Dismiss at 2

, ECF No. 27 (“Mueller’s Mot.”)

.

)

II.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Corsi initiated this action

on December 9, 2018, against the government and Mueller. On

January 21, 2019, he filed an amended complaint, three defendants

—Jeff Bezos, the

Washington

Post

, and a

Wa

shington Post

reporter

. Count One alleges that Mueller and the government

violated the Fourth Amendment and Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50

U.S.C. § 1881a, et. seq. (

“FISA”

), as amended by the USA FREEDOM Act

, by conducting

illegal electronic surveillance of Corsi

. (Am. Compl. ¶¶

30, 42–48.)

He

alleges that Mueller is

personally liable for these violations under

Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents

, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),

v. Comey

, 300 F. Supp. 3d 158, 167 n. 2 (D.D.C. 2018) (citation omitted). But Section

702

explicitly prohibits the government from targetin

g any person located within the United States or

targeting U.S. citizens abroad.

Id.

;

see also Klayman v. Nat’l Sec. Agency

, 280 F. Supp. 3d 39,

44–45 (D.D.C. 2017) (describing the PRISM program).

Case 1:18-cv-02885-ESH Document 60 Filed 10/31/19 Page 3 of 42

4

and he seeks “compensatory and actual damages, punitive damages, equitable relief, reasonable

attorneys’ fees, pre

-judgment interest, [and] post

-interest and costs.” (

Id.

¶¶ 47

–48.)

Count

Two, brought only against Mueller, alleges a violation of Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure

6(e)(2).

(

Id.

¶¶ 49

–53.)

He specifically requests “preliminary injunctive relief as well as

permanent injunctive relief.” (

Id.

¶ 53.)

Count Three charges

Mueller and the government with

abuse of process for their alleged attempts to coerce Corsi into falsely testifying.

(

Id.

¶¶ 54–58.)

Count Four

alleges that all defendants tortuously interfered with Corsi’s business relationships

with his publisher

, book distributor, David and Alex Jones, and InfoWars, for which he seeks

damages

. (

Id.

¶¶ 59–65.)

Finally, Count Five asserts a defamation claim against Bezos, the

Washington Post

, and the

Washington Post

reporter, which alleges that the latter two def

endants,

at the direction of Bezos, made defamatory statements about Corsi “to various news and media

outlets

.” (

Id.

¶¶ 66

–72.

) These statements, Corsi alleges, concerned the nature of payments he

was receiving from Dr. David Jones, Alex Jones, and InfoW

ars. (

Id.

¶ 67.) Corsi

claims that, as

a result, he lost the $15,000 per

month he was receiving from InfoWars and the Jonses. (

Id.

¶ 69.)

In his prayer for relief, Corsi seeks “equitable, declaratory, and injunctive relief;”

and

general and punitive damages in excess of $1,600,000,000. (

Notice of Errata

, Ex. 1

, ECF No.

16-

1 (correcting amended complaint).

) Since filing his amended complaint, Cor

si has

voluntarily dismissed Bezos, the

Washington Post

, and the

Washington Post

reporter.

(Notice of

Voluntary Dismissal, ECF No. 56.)

Thus, Counts One through Four

are the only remaining

counts

, and only the government and Mueller

are named

as defendants.

The government and Mueller have moved to dismiss Corsi’s amended complaint

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6). (

See generally

Case 1:18-cv-02885-ESH Document 60 Filed 10/31/19 Page 4 of 42

Meanwhile, Roger Stone’s Wikileaks trial is just gearing up with jury selection beginning.

https://burners.me/2019/11/05/corsi-and-klayman-lawsuit-fail/