Revealing that which is concealed. Learning about anything that resembles real freedom. A journey of self-discovery shared with the world. Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them - Ephesians 5-11 Join me and let's follow that high road...
Tuesday, April 30, 2019
Boeing Changes Its Story, Admits 'Software Glitch' Disabled Critical Alerts On 737 MAX
Well then, Boeing is responsible for these downed airplanes and their dead passengers.
Go to abeldanger https://www.abeldanger.org/illegal-modifications-buap-capture-end/ to explore the BUAP/BHUAP rabbit hole - uninterruptible autopilot = weaponized planes. Who benefits from ruining Boeing's reputation and covering up assassination in a mass air tragedy?
In a clarification that only created more confusion, Boeing said Monday that an alert intended to notify pilots when the plane might be receiving erroneous data from one of the 737 MAX 8's 'angle of attack' sensors wasn't disabled intentionally, as WSJ reported on Sunday, but that the feature had been disabled because of a previously undisclosed software glitch.
What's confusing is that Boeing had confirmed WSJ's story that the aerospace company had neglected to tell the FAA and Southwest, the biggest customer for the 737 MAX 8, that the alert feature had been disabled because it had been made a new 'optional' safety feature. The alerts would have warned pilots that the plane's MCAS system might be about to misfire.
However, the airline appears to have changed its story, offering little clarification as to why. During Boeing's shareholder meeting in Chicago on Monday, CEO Dennis Muilenburg repeated the company's claim that the alerts were a 'non-essential' feature, however, given the fact that the misfire of Boeing's MCAS system (which Muilenburg also insisted wasn't an 'anti-stall' system, as it has been regularly described in media reports, but instead characterized it as a safety system) is widely suspected to have caused the crashes of Lion Air and an Ethiopian Airlines flights that together killed nearly 350 people makes this claim difficult to believe.
The company said that it didn't intentionally deactivate the alerts,
and that they had only been disabled because of the software issue.
Boeing is now saying that its engineers, as well as safety regulators at the FAA, either missed or overlooked the software glitch that rendered these alerts inoperable, presumably even on planes where the extra safety features had been paid for. The alerts had been standard on earlier models.
Go to abeldanger https://www.abeldanger.org/illegal-modifications-buap-capture-end/ to explore the BUAP/BHUAP rabbit hole - uninterruptible autopilot = weaponized planes. Who benefits from ruining Boeing's reputation and covering up assassination in a mass air tragedy?
In a clarification that only created more confusion, Boeing said Monday that an alert intended to notify pilots when the plane might be receiving erroneous data from one of the 737 MAX 8's 'angle of attack' sensors wasn't disabled intentionally, as WSJ reported on Sunday, but that the feature had been disabled because of a previously undisclosed software glitch.
What's confusing is that Boeing had confirmed WSJ's story that the aerospace company had neglected to tell the FAA and Southwest, the biggest customer for the 737 MAX 8, that the alert feature had been disabled because it had been made a new 'optional' safety feature. The alerts would have warned pilots that the plane's MCAS system might be about to misfire.
However, the airline appears to have changed its story, offering little clarification as to why. During Boeing's shareholder meeting in Chicago on Monday, CEO Dennis Muilenburg repeated the company's claim that the alerts were a 'non-essential' feature, however, given the fact that the misfire of Boeing's MCAS system (which Muilenburg also insisted wasn't an 'anti-stall' system, as it has been regularly described in media reports, but instead characterized it as a safety system) is widely suspected to have caused the crashes of Lion Air and an Ethiopian Airlines flights that together killed nearly 350 people makes this claim difficult to believe.
Boeing is now saying that its engineers, as well as safety regulators at the FAA, either missed or overlooked the software glitch that rendered these alerts inoperable, presumably even on planes where the extra safety features had been paid for. The alerts had been standard on earlier models.
The Monday statement suggests Boeing engineers and management, as well as U.S. air-safety regulators, either missed or overlooked one more software design problem when the model was certified two years ago. Before Monday, neither Boeing nor the Federal Aviation Administration had disclosed that an additional software glitch—rather than an intentional plan by the plane maker—rendered so-called angle of attack alerts inoperable on most MAX aircraft. The alerts warn pilots when there is a disagreement between two separate sensors measuring the angle of a plane’s nose.Ultimately, Boeing's admission of this glitch could make winning FAA approval to allow the planes to return to the skies even more difficult, and it's also bound to make international regulators more wary of Boeing's updated flight software, which the company has said is being designed to make MCAS less powerful, and more quickly identify when a plane's sensors are feeding it erroneous data.
Boeing’s disclosure comes as the plane maker scrambles to win FAA and international approval of a software fix for MCAS, making it less potent and less likely to misfire. In addition to the challenges already facing the MAX fleet, revelations of the additional software difficulties are likely to be scrutinized by airlines, passengers and regulators world-wide as Boeing strives to restore their trust and return the MAX fleet to service.
The alerts, intended to tell cockpit crews if sensors are transmitting errant data, had been standard on earlier 737 models. Officials at airlines around the globe, including Southwest Airlines Co., the largest 737 MAX customer, assumed the alerts remained standard until details emerged in the wake of the Lion Air crash. At that point, the industry and FAA inspectors monitoring Southwest realized the alerts hadn’t operated on most MAX aircraft, including Southwest jets.
Your modern car with GPS is hackable, has been hacked, and will be hacked, come one day
Most people do not know that their GPS system is actually a radio transceiver that not only gather coordinates, but also relays control and command information to the ECU, which controls all digital aspects of the car.
The more digital the car, say like the BMW and Tesla, which are nearly 100% digital, to even the door handles to get out IN AN EMERGENCY.
With a cell phone, this is what you can do, with the GPS code of the car
- Your car's battery can be drained
- The engine can be turned off while in motion
- It can also be sped up to maximum speed
- Lights, doors, radio, cell phone can all be turned off or one,
- etc etc etc
All the above can happen whether you, the driver, are driving the car or it is parked in your driveway. The more digital the car, the greater the control.
Any government agency or police force has this software. They also do not publicize this ability. Who would buy modern cars if someone with a badge decided you needed to go away, like Michael Hastings went away, right into a tree at over 100mph?
We live in an era where digital technology for airplanes, like the QRS11 death chip, can take down any plane in the world. The same exists for modern cars, if they were made after 2004.
That accounts for most cars on the road, nowadays.
hacker going by the name L&M says he has hacked into more than thousands of accounts belonging to users of GPS tracking apps, giving him the ability to monitor tens of thousands of vehicles - and even turn off the engines for some of them, while they're in motion, according to Motherboard.
He has admitted to hacking into more than 7,000 iTrack accounts and more than 20,000 ProTrack accounts, two apps that companies use to monitor and manage fleets of vehicles through GPS tracking devices. He has tracked vehicles worldwide, even in countries like South Africa, Morocco, India, and the Philippines. The software on some cars can be used to turn off the engines of vehicles moving at 12 miles per hour or less.
L&M reverse engineered the ProTrack and iTrack Android apps to find out that all customers are given a default password of 123456 when they sign up. After finding "millions of usernames" the hacker then blasted them all with the default password. He wound up getting access to thousands of accounts as a result.
And don't think or say, because your GPS screen doesn't work or you don't use it, it means you are safe. THESE THINGS ARE ALWAYS ON, RELAYING YOUR INFORMATION AT ALL TIMES TO THE NSA AND CIA.
They have these scanners, that look like light poles-but the do not emit light-on every major freeway and highway going both in or out of town. These scanners constantly communicate to GPS systems in all cars. Your ECU is designed to ONLY WORK if the GPS transceiver is working.
So you see, it is on. Doesn't matter if you use the thing or not. Or if your disk reader is broken. One has nothing to do with the other. The ECU is the master controller of all digital based car systems, ON ALL CARS BUILT SINCE 2004.
You simply cannot undo it. Car won't run then. that's a fact.
If the ECU stops getting that transceiver ping, no starting the car. Ever.
Don Bradley
FROM THE INTERNET
It’s too late.
Your car already records just about everything you do in real time (samples once a second) and tracks it by location:
When you put it in gear
what your speed is
When you open a door
When you close a door (and which one it is)
When you apply breaks
ALL your contacts (if you link your phone via Blue Tooth)
A comprehensive record of EVERY call you have ever made from inside your car.
How many of you realize that many modern cars have no mechanical linkage between the steering wheel and the front wheels - it’s ‘drive by wire’ (same as commercial jets)?
Your car can be commandeered at any time, and is the most comprehensive surveillance device ever used against you.
-----------Your car already records just about everything you do in real time (samples once a second) and tracks it by location:
When you put it in gear
what your speed is
When you open a door
When you close a door (and which one it is)
When you apply breaks
ALL your contacts (if you link your phone via Blue Tooth)
A comprehensive record of EVERY call you have ever made from inside your car.
How many of you realize that many modern cars have no mechanical linkage between the steering wheel and the front wheels - it’s ‘drive by wire’ (same as commercial jets)?
Your car can be commandeered at any time, and is the most comprehensive surveillance device ever used against you.
And that boys and girls is why I drive a 20 year old car with no onboard GPS crap in it.
-------------
DARPA can do more than turn off the engine on cars. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKpYh1IZGkg
Depends on how many computer controls your car has, I'd keep that 80s pickup truck if you can.
---------
The CIA has been assassinating people this way for years.
------------
-------------
Sunday, April 28, 2019
New Zealander Receives 14 Years for Sharing Mosque Shooting Video
Between this and the Assange snatch, freedom of speech in the so-called democracies is pretty much over. The guy shared a video available on Youtube online, broke no laws, but they created an ex-post-facto law to take him down. For 14 years.
14 years for watching and uploading a youtube video that was EVERYWHERE. For a day.
Until the tranny PM of that country deemed it illegal to do so and then started arresting anyone who downloaded the video, in their country.
Not for rape, or murder, or selling heroin to kids, but for watching a youtube video, that turned out to be FAKE, of all things.
That's why it was banned. Because it was a fake video and even one viewing reveals the thing to be so obviously fake. I know this because I DOWNLOADED THE VIDEO.
If I lived in the country, I'd be in prison right now for the crime of watching a video.
Let that sink in.
Because they are getting away with this. And what's next? That will make you guilty of something that isn't criminal nor harms no one in the slightest?
BTW, here is the complete video unretouched, if you want it.
https://kiwifarms.net/data/video/694/694847-518a3baf6096388726e4e9ac7ca0336f.mp4
DB
----------
A businessman from Christchurch, New Zealand pleaded guilty to two charges of distributing footage of the Al Noor Mosque attack, according to the New Zealand Herald.
Philip Neville Arps was convicted on both charges, one of which was for sharing raw footage from accused shooter Brenton Tarrant's rampage to approximately 30 people on Facebook.
FROM THE INTERNET
Clare Bronfman might face 27 month in prison for her involvement in the Nxivm-Skandal. Which involved child trafficing, human sacrifice, branding witches with sigils and moving among several countries. At best she might do six months.
In contrast to that slap on the wrist
Germans face a sentence of up to five years in prison for expressing the wrong opinion about 1933-1945.
And sharing a certain video in NZ will be punished by 14 years in prison.
Satanists run this world.
--------------
Saturday, April 27, 2019
California Demands Restaurants Charge Customers 1% 'Climate Change' Fee
That's one way to shove a programming agenda deep in your subconscious and earn some illicit coin while in the process.
Global Warming or whatever it is they are calling it this week has been well-proven in this site for the total mind control scam that it is. It's about Agenda 21/30. If you don't know what that is, then how can you possibly understand what is going on around you?
Any establishment that does this, either by choice or force, loses my business. Bet they don't announce the fee, it just appears there as some kind of service charge.
DB
----------------------------
Global Warming or whatever it is they are calling it this week has been well-proven in this site for the total mind control scam that it is. It's about Agenda 21/30. If you don't know what that is, then how can you possibly understand what is going on around you?
Any establishment that does this, either by choice or force, loses my business. Bet they don't announce the fee, it just appears there as some kind of service charge.
DB
----------------------------
As
the state with one of the highest costs of living, largely due to its
'green' regulations on vehicle emissions and other initiatives that have
earned it the nickname 'taxifornia', the last thing most Californians
want to do is pay even more in unnecessary surcharges, fees and taxes.
Yet that's exactly what one militant climate-change advocacy group is asking them to do.
According to CBS Sacramento, a group called the Perennial Farming Initiative is asking restaurateurs to sign up for passing an "optional" 1% surcharge along to their patrons. The money will be funneled to the California Air Resource Board, and spent on plans to implement "carbon plans on farms and ranches."
The plan, called the Restore California Renewable Restaurants,
ultimately aims to take carbon emissions out of the air and transplant
them into the soil, where they can help plants grow.
But unsurprisingly, people in liberal-leaning Sacramento appeared to be split on the plan.
Still, for all the talk about how the 1% charge is 'insignificant', one resident pointed out that California is already 'pretty freaking expensive', and that asking people to keep paying new fees and surcharges in a state with one of the highest tax burdens in the country is tantamount to asking them to spend money that they don't have.
source zerohedge
Yet that's exactly what one militant climate-change advocacy group is asking them to do.
According to CBS Sacramento, a group called the Perennial Farming Initiative is asking restaurateurs to sign up for passing an "optional" 1% surcharge along to their patrons. The money will be funneled to the California Air Resource Board, and spent on plans to implement "carbon plans on farms and ranches."
But unsurprisingly, people in liberal-leaning Sacramento appeared to be split on the plan.
"There’s always going to be the people who say, why is this on the bill? I don’t want to pay it. I don’t care what it’s for. I don’t want to pay it," Christopher Barnum-Dann, the owner of Localis, said.Though the group argued that the 1% surcharge would be insignificant to most people, and diners relying on a fixed income can avoid it by simply preparing their meals at home.
"We’re not asking our fixed-income people to pay that on their property tax. We’re asking that of someone who had made a choice to go out and spend money," another resident, John Peters, said.Also, because the program is intended to be 'optional', diners who don't want to contribute to saving the environment can simply ask the have it taken off the bill (that is, if they even notice it's there).
Still, for all the talk about how the 1% charge is 'insignificant', one resident pointed out that California is already 'pretty freaking expensive', and that asking people to keep paying new fees and surcharges in a state with one of the highest tax burdens in the country is tantamount to asking them to spend money that they don't have.
"Well I live in California and I don’t know if you know this or not it’s pretty freaking expensive here. One percent to somebody who doesn’t make that much money ain’t a lot but it’s a lot more than they have," resident Mike Mattingly said.Undeterred by these complaints, the campaign's organizers are pressing ahead: They hope to have 200 restaurants signed up by the end of the year. Ultimately, one organizer said that if they can get 40,000 of the state's nearly 90,000 restaurants to sign up, they'd be pulling in "a decent chunk of money".
source zerohedge
Tesla blew through a stop sign in South Florida, killing woman
A woman is dead after a Tesla blew through a stop sign in South Florida last week, according to the Miami Herald.
The crash happened at 9:30 PM on a narrow two lane highway that leads
from Florida City to Key Largo. The accident also seriously injured a
man standing next to the woman who died, according to the Florida
Highway Patrol.
22-year-old Benavides Leon Naibel died after the impact of the crash threw her about 20 feet into the woods at the intersection. 27-year-old Angulo Dillion, who was with her, is in serious condition.
Driver, unable to stop or control his Tesla, obviously didn't see my Tesla Instructional Video 42.
It's obvious that the Tesla AI is determining the Social Credit Score of its owners, and if it dips too low-or the CIA and or NSA deem the person "a danger to the NWO satanic network" - has disabled the driver's ability to do anything other than watch his own termination unfold, ala Michael Hastings.
22-year-old Benavides Leon Naibel died after the impact of the crash threw her about 20 feet into the woods at the intersection. 27-year-old Angulo Dillion, who was with her, is in serious condition.
Driver, unable to stop or control his Tesla, obviously didn't see my Tesla Instructional Video 42.
It's obvious that the Tesla AI is determining the Social Credit Score of its owners, and if it dips too low-or the CIA and or NSA deem the person "a danger to the NWO satanic network" - has disabled the driver's ability to do anything other than watch his own termination unfold, ala Michael Hastings.
Will The Senior-Level FBI Agents, Who Placed Spies In The Trump Campaign, Ever Be Held Accountable?
Authored by Mike Whitney via The Unz Review,
Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign?
Yes
Did the FBI place spies in the Trump campaign?
Yes
Do we know the names of the spies and how they operated?
Yes
Were the spies trying to entrap Trump campaign assistants in order to gather information on Trump?
Yes
Did the spies try to elicit information from Trump campaign assistants in order to justify a wider investigation and more extensive surveillance?
Yes
Were the spies placed in the Trump campaign based on improperly obtained FISA warrants?
Yes
Did the FBI agents procure these warrants based on false or misleading information?
Yes
Could the FBI establish “probable cause” that Trump had committed a crime or “colluded” with Russia?
No
So the ‘spying’ was illegal?
Yes
Have many of the people who authorized the spying, already been identified in criminal referrals presented to the Department of Justice?
Yes
Have the media explained the importance of these criminal referrals or the impact that spying has on free elections?
No
Is the DOJ’s Inspector General currently investigating whether senior-level agents in the FBI committed crimes by improperly obtaining warrants to spy on members of the Trump team?
Yes
Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign to give Hillary Clinton an unfair advantage in the presidential race?
Yes
Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign to gather incriminating information on Trump that could be used to blackmail, intimidate or impeach him in the future?
Yes
Does spying pose a threat to our elections and to our democracy?
Yes
Do many people know that there were spies placed in the Trump campaign?
Yes
Have these people effectively used that information to their advantage?
No
Have they launched any type of public relations offensive that would draw more attention to the critical issue of spying on a political campaign?
No
Have they saturated the airwaves with the truth about “spying” the same way their rivals have spread their disinformation about “collusion”?
No
Do they understand that the country is currently embroiled in a fratricidal, scorched earth political civil war in which one side is determined to prevail at all cost?
No
Do they understand that the people who authorized the spying and who perpetrated the coup will do everything in their power to prevent that information from getting out?
No
Does it look like senior-level agents at the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSA and the Obama White House knew that there were spies in the Trump campaign?
Yes
Did these same senior-level agents at the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSA and the Obama White House cooperate in a plan to undermine and delegitimize the Trump presidency?
Yes
Did they use false or misleading information to infer the president was an agent of a foreign power?
Yes
Did they know this false and misleading information was unreliable, unverified raw intelligence that was paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton?
Yes
Was there a conspiracy to remove Trump from office or to sabotage his presidency through the dissemination of false information?
Yes
Does the use of spies, wiretapping, “unmasking”, strategically-leaked information to the media, and other forms of electronic surveillance suggest that there are organized elements within the permanent bureaucracy which no longer accept the democratic process?
Yes
Is it fair to say that these people are the enemies of free elections?
Yes
Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign?
Yes
Yes
Do we know the names of the spies and how they operated?
Yes
Were the spies trying to entrap Trump campaign assistants in order to gather information on Trump?
Yes
Did the spies try to elicit information from Trump campaign assistants in order to justify a wider investigation and more extensive surveillance?
Yes
Were the spies placed in the Trump campaign based on improperly obtained FISA warrants?
Yes
Did the FBI agents procure these warrants based on false or misleading information?
Yes
Could the FBI establish “probable cause” that Trump had committed a crime or “colluded” with Russia?
No
So the ‘spying’ was illegal?
Yes
Have many of the people who authorized the spying, already been identified in criminal referrals presented to the Department of Justice?
Yes
Have the media explained the importance of these criminal referrals or the impact that spying has on free elections?
No
Is the DOJ’s Inspector General currently investigating whether senior-level agents in the FBI committed crimes by improperly obtaining warrants to spy on members of the Trump team?
Yes
Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign to give Hillary Clinton an unfair advantage in the presidential race?
Yes
Did the FBI spy on the Trump campaign to gather incriminating information on Trump that could be used to blackmail, intimidate or impeach him in the future?
Yes
Does spying pose a threat to our elections and to our democracy?
Yes
Do many people know that there were spies placed in the Trump campaign?
Yes
Have these people effectively used that information to their advantage?
No
Have they launched any type of public relations offensive that would draw more attention to the critical issue of spying on a political campaign?
No
Have they saturated the airwaves with the truth about “spying” the same way their rivals have spread their disinformation about “collusion”?
No
Do they understand that the country is currently embroiled in a fratricidal, scorched earth political civil war in which one side is determined to prevail at all cost?
No
Do they understand that the people who authorized the spying and who perpetrated the coup will do everything in their power to prevent that information from getting out?
No
Does it look like senior-level agents at the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSA and the Obama White House knew that there were spies in the Trump campaign?
Yes
Did these same senior-level agents at the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the NSA and the Obama White House cooperate in a plan to undermine and delegitimize the Trump presidency?
Yes
Did they use false or misleading information to infer the president was an agent of a foreign power?
Yes
Did they know this false and misleading information was unreliable, unverified raw intelligence that was paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton?
Yes
Was there a conspiracy to remove Trump from office or to sabotage his presidency through the dissemination of false information?
Yes
Does the use of spies, wiretapping, “unmasking”, strategically-leaked information to the media, and other forms of electronic surveillance suggest that there are organized elements within the permanent bureaucracy which no longer accept the democratic process?
Yes
Is it fair to say that these people are the enemies of free elections?
Yes
Friday, April 26, 2019
CA Logic: Raise Gas Taxes 50 cents a gallon, Then Demand An Investigation Into Why Gas Prices Are High
High gas prices so illegal aliens can get a free ride. Virtue signalling crackheads seem to have taken over what was a really nice place to live. |
The main reason, as was discovered two years ago, was that the reason they REALLY raised the gas prices as a tax in California 50 cents a gallon was to pay for ALL THE ILLEGAL ALIENS flooding into the state. Fact.
They lied to us and said it was for road maintenance. But the review of the state's CAFR and BOM revealed THAT ALL THE MONEY WENT TO FUNDING ILLEGAL ALIEN SUPPORT. BY THE BILLIONS.
Gas voucher cards are issued to all illegal aliens with voter registration. So, they don't even have to pay for gas, they just used the credit card and voila, they drive for free. Tax payers don't get a free gas card, but in California, fence hoppers get them the moment they walk into the gimme office.
YES BILLIONS.
It's why voters tried to repeal the tax last November. But being a satanic blue state, the liberal dyke heads knocked it down.
So our high gas prices go directly to funding free food, housing, schools, BUT NOT FOR CITIZENS WHO LIVE HERE AND PAY TAXES. Nope. Not for you whitey, you get to be homeless.
Nice scam and a big punch in the face to the tax payers.
I was just today in Arizona, whose gas prices were $1.50 per gallon cheaper. Do the math. This is big money and Californians don't see penny one of it.
When you add in the 2.85% tax and carbon tax THEY ADDED IN ON TOP OF THAT, the average family hit on income is over $2000.00 per year. That's what each of us pay, so illegal aliens can get a free ride for breaking the law and landing on our soil. This doesn't count the already existing high gas taxes in place for years. Our gasoline tax rate stands at 59%.
The screwing doesn't end there. In other other news, California wants to put an electronic monitoring device in everyone's cars so they can be taxed by how many miles they drive (and also tracked and ticketed if they violate the speed limit ...) And they will do it, too. Just as sure as they created sanctuary cities, flooded with metros with cheap heroin and meth to kill off the homeless they created by laws that forbid the hiring of anglos and demand the hiring of people of color, especially illegals.
This is just a tiny peek into the sick minds of the CA satanists. As long as the citizens keep electing filthy satanic leftists the shitshow will continue unabated. It's all very simple.
Don Bradley
--------------------------------
Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com,
California is home to some of the most power-hungry politicians on Earth. These people actually hiked the gasoline tax, and are now demanding an investigation into why gas prices are higher in California than elsewhere in the United States. It would be sad if it wasn’t so insane.
California Governor Gavin Newson is demanding an investigation into why the state’s gas prices are so high. But as Reason points out, it’s not all that difficult to see what that California politicians are the culprit. In fact, the reason the gas prices are high is that Newsom (and other politicians) raised taxes on gasoline.
“Independent analysis suggests that an unaccounted-for price differential exists in California’s gas prices and that this price differential may stem in part from inappropriate industry practices,” wrote Newsom in his letter to the CEC.California currently imposes the second-highest gas taxes in the country. A state excise tax currently adds $.417 per gallon (almost 42 cents per gallon), and that rate that will increase to $.473 (47 cents per gallon) come July. But that’s not all. On top of that tax, the state imposes a 2.25 percent gasoline sales tax. There’s more. California has also added a low-carbon fuel standard and a cap-and-trade scheme for carbon emissions which together already increase the state’s gas prices by $.24 per gallon above the national average, according to a 2017 state government report.
“These are all important reasons for the Commission to help shed light on what’s going on in our gasoline market.”
The worst part is that Newsom isn’t the only problem causer asking for blame to shifted to “inappropriate industry practices” as opposed to their gas tax hikes. In January, 19 state legislators (17 of whom had voted in favor of that 2017 gas tax increase, while the other two had only entered office in 2018) sent a letter to State Attorney General Xavier Becerra, in which they demanded that the state’s Department of Justice (DOJ) investigate the “unexplained gasoline surcharge” that was estimated to cost Californian families $1,700 a year.
Yeah. It’s a real head-scratcher.
Gay liberals rob tax payers so the invaders can get paid to take our jobs and push us out onto the streets. Why do you think over 5 million Americans, almost all Anglo-Americans, are homeless? No one hires the white guy, anywhere, anymore. |
Thursday, April 25, 2019
The Burning Of Notre Dame And The Destruction Of Christian Europe
Authored by Guy Milliere via The Gatestone Institute,
The fire that destroyed much of the Notre Dame Cathedral in the heart of Paris is a tragedy that is irreparable. Even if the cathedral is rebuilt, it will never be what it was before. (Photo by Veronique de Viguerie/Getty Images)
The fire that destroyed much of the Notre Dame Cathedral in the heart of Paris is a tragedy that is irreparable. Even
if the cathedral is rebuilt, it will never be what it was before.
Stained glass windows and major architectural elements have been
severely damaged and the oak frame totally destroyed. The spire that rose from the cathedral was a unique piece of art. It was drawn by the architect who restored the edifice in the nineteenth century, Eugène Viollet-le-Duc, who had based his work on 12th century documents.
In addition to the fire, the water needed to extinguish the flames penetrated the limestone of the walls and façade, and weakened them, making them brittle. The roof is non-existent: the nave, the transept and the choir now lie in open air, vulnerable to bad weather. They cannot even be protected until the structure has been examined thoroughly, a task that will take weeks. Three major elements of the structure (the north transept pinion, the pinion located between the two towers and the vault) are also on the verge of collapse.
Notre Dame is more than 800 years old. It survived the turbulence of the Middle Ages, the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution, two World Wars and the Nazi occupation of Paris. It did not survive what France is becoming in the 21st century.
The cause of the fire has so far been attributed to "an accident," "a short circuit," and most recently "a computer glitch."
If the fire really was an accident, it is almost impossible to explain how it started. Benjamin Mouton, Notre Dame's former chief architect, explained that the rules were exceptionally strict and that no electric cable or appliance, and no source of heat, could be placed in the attic. He added that an extremely sophisticated alarm system was in place. The company that installed the scaffolding did not use any welding and specialized in this type of work. The fire broke out more than an hour after the workers' departure and none of them was present. It spread so quickly that the firefighters who rushed to the spot as soon as they could get there were shocked. Remi Fromont, the chief architect of the French Historical Monuments said: "The fire could not start from any element present where it started. A real calorific load is necessary to launch such a disaster".
A long, difficult and complex investigation will be conducted.
The possibility that the fire was the result of arson cannot be dismissed. Barely an hour after the flames began to rise above Notre Dame -- at a time when no explanation could be provided by anyone -- the French authorities rushed to say that the fire was an "accident" and that "arson has been ruled out." The remarks sounded like all the official statements made by the French government after attacks in France during the last decade.
In November 2015, on the night of the massacre at the Bataclan Theater in Paris, in which jihadists murdered 90 people, the French Department of the Interior said that the government did not know anything, except that a gunfight had occurred. The truth came out only after ISIS claimed responsibility for the slaughter.
In Nice, after the truck-attack in July 2016, the French government insisted for several days that the terrorist who crushed 86 people to death was a "man with a nervous breakdown".
In 2018, Sarah Halimi's murderer, who recited verses from the Quran while torturing his victim, was declared "mentally disturbed" and held in a psychiatric institution immediately after his arrest. He will most likely never face a court. On April 8, Alain Finkielkraut and 38 other intellectuals published a text saying that her murderer must not escape justice. The text had no effect.
The fire at Notre Dame took place less than three years after a "commando unit" of jihadi women, later arrested, tried to destroy the cathedral by detonating cylinders of natural gas. Three days before last week's fire, on April 12, the leader of the jihadis, Ines Madani, a young French convert to Islam, was sentenced to eight years in prison for creating a terrorist group affiliated with the Islamic State.
The Notre Dame fire also occurred at a time when attacks against churches in France and Europe have been multiplying. More than 800 churches were attackedin France during the year 2018 alone. Many suffered serious damage: broken, beheaded statues, smashed tabernacles, feces thrown on the walls. In several churches, fires were lit. On March 5, the Basilica of St. Denis, where all but three of the Kings of France are buried, was vandalized by a Pakistani refugee. Several stained-glass windows were broken, and the basilica's organ, a national treasure built between 1834 and 1841, was nearly wrecked. Twelve days later, on March 17, a fire broke out at Saint Sulpice, the largest church in Paris, causing serious damage. After days of silence, the police finally admitted that the cause had been arson.
For months, jihadist organizations have been issuing statements calling for the destruction of churches and Christian monuments in Europe. Notre Dame was repeatedly named as a primary target. Despite all that, the Cathedral was not adequately protected. A couple of young men, who entered the Cathedral at night, climbed on the roof last November and shot a video that they then put on YouTube.
Many messages were posted by people with Muslim names on social media -- Twitter, Facebook, the website of Al Jazeera -- expressing a joy to see an important Christian symbol destroyed. Hafsa Askar, a migrant from Morocco and the vice president of the National Union of Students of France (UNEF), the main student organization in France, published a tweet saying, "People are crying on little pieces of wood... it's a delusion of white trash".
French President Emmanuel Macron, who had never even mentioned the attacks on Saint Denis or Saint Sulpice, quickly went to Notre Dame and declared, "Notre Dame is our history, our literature, our imagination". He totally left out cathedral's religious dimension.
The next evening, he said that Notre Dame would be rebuilt in five years: it was a bold statement. Many commentators interpreted his words as dictated by his will desperately to try to regain the confidence of the French people after five monthsof demonstrations, riots and destruction stemming from his ineffective handling of the "Yellow Vests" uprising. (On March 16, much of the Champs-Élysées was damaged by rioters; repairs have barely begun.) All experts agree that it will almost certainly take far longer than five years to rebuild Notre Dame.
Macron strangely added that the cathedral would be "more beautiful" than before -- as if a badly damaged monument could be more beautiful after restoration. Macron went on to say that the reconstruction would be a "contemporary architectural gesture". The remark raised concern, if not panic, among defenders of historic monuments, who now fear that he may want to add modern architectural elements to a jewel of Gothic architecture. Again, he totally left out the cathedral's religious dimension.
Macron's attitude is not surprising. From the moment he became president, he has kept himself away from any Christian ceremony. Most of the presidents who preceded him did the same. France is a country where a dogmatic secularismreigns supreme. A political leader who dares to call himself a Christian is immediately criticized in the media and can only harm a budding political career. Nathalie Loiseau -- the former director of France's National School of Administration and the leading candidate on the electoral list of Macron's party, "Republic on the Move," for the May 2019 European Parliament elections -- was recently photographed exiting a church after mass, which led to a media debate on whether her church attendance is a "problem."
The results of French secularism are visible. Christianity has been almost completely wiped out from public life. Churches are empty. The number of priests is decreasing and the priests that are active in France are either very old or come from Africa or Latin America. The dominant religion in France is now Islam. Every year, churches are demolished to make way for parking lots or shopping centers. Mosques are being built all over, and they are full. Radical imams proselytize. The murder, three years ago, of Jacques Hamel, an 85-year-old priest who was slaughtered by two Islamists while he was saying mass in a church where only five people (three of them old nuns) were present, is telling.
In 1905, the French parliament passed a law decreeing that all the properties of the Catholic Church in France were confiscated. Churches and cathedrals became property of the State. Since then, successive governments have spent little money to maintain them. Those churches that have not been vandalized are in poor condition, and most cathedrals are in poor condition, too. Even before the devastating fire, the Archdiocese of Paris stated that "it can't afford all the repairs" that Notre Dame needed, "estimated at $185 million." According to CBS News, in a March 20, 2018 report:
Following the fire, the French government decided to start collecting donationsfrom private individuals, businesses and organizations for reconstruction; more than one billion euros have poured in. French billionaires promised to pay large sums: the Pinault family (the main owners of the retail conglomerate Kering) promised 100 million euros, the Arnault family (owners of LVMH, the world's largest luxury-goods company), 200 million euros, the Bettencourt family (owners of L'Oréal), also 200 million. Many on the French "left" immediately said that wealthy families had too much money, and that these millions would be better used helping the poor than taking care of old stones.
For the foreseeable future, the heart of Paris will bear the terrible scars of a fire that devastated far more than a cathedral. The fire destroyed an essential part of what is left of the almost-lost soul of France and what France could accomplish when the French believed in something higher than their own day-to-day existence.
Some hope that the sight of the destroyed cathedral will inspire many French people to follow the example of those who prayed on the night of the disaster. Michel Aupetit, Archbishop of Paris, said on April 17, two days after the fire, that he was sure France would know a "spiritual awakening".
Others, not as optimistic, see in the ashes of the cathedral a symbol of the destruction of Christianity in France. The art historian Jean Clair said that he sees in the destruction of Notre Dame an additional sign of an "irreversible decadence" of France, and of the final collapse of the Judeo-Christian roots of Europe.
An American columnist, Dennis Prager, wrote:
-
Barely an hour after the flames began to rise above Notre Dame -- at a time when no explanation could be provided by anyone -- the French authorities rushed to say that the fire was an "accident" and that "arson has been ruled out."
The remarks sounded like all the official statements made by the French
government after attacks in France during the last decade.
-
The Notre Dame fire also occurred at a time when attacks against churches in France and Europe have been multiplying. More than 800 churches were attacked in France during the year 2018 alone.
-
Churches in France are empty. The number of priests
is decreasing and the priests that are active in France are either very
old or come from Africa or Latin America. The dominant religion in France is now Islam. Every
year, churches are demolished to make way for parking lots or shopping
centers. Mosques are being built all over, and they are full.
The fire that destroyed much of the Notre Dame Cathedral in the heart of Paris is a tragedy that is irreparable. Even if the cathedral is rebuilt, it will never be what it was before. (Photo by Veronique de Viguerie/Getty Images)
In addition to the fire, the water needed to extinguish the flames penetrated the limestone of the walls and façade, and weakened them, making them brittle. The roof is non-existent: the nave, the transept and the choir now lie in open air, vulnerable to bad weather. They cannot even be protected until the structure has been examined thoroughly, a task that will take weeks. Three major elements of the structure (the north transept pinion, the pinion located between the two towers and the vault) are also on the verge of collapse.
Notre Dame is more than 800 years old. It survived the turbulence of the Middle Ages, the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution, two World Wars and the Nazi occupation of Paris. It did not survive what France is becoming in the 21st century.
The cause of the fire has so far been attributed to "an accident," "a short circuit," and most recently "a computer glitch."
If the fire really was an accident, it is almost impossible to explain how it started. Benjamin Mouton, Notre Dame's former chief architect, explained that the rules were exceptionally strict and that no electric cable or appliance, and no source of heat, could be placed in the attic. He added that an extremely sophisticated alarm system was in place. The company that installed the scaffolding did not use any welding and specialized in this type of work. The fire broke out more than an hour after the workers' departure and none of them was present. It spread so quickly that the firefighters who rushed to the spot as soon as they could get there were shocked. Remi Fromont, the chief architect of the French Historical Monuments said: "The fire could not start from any element present where it started. A real calorific load is necessary to launch such a disaster".
A long, difficult and complex investigation will be conducted.
The possibility that the fire was the result of arson cannot be dismissed. Barely an hour after the flames began to rise above Notre Dame -- at a time when no explanation could be provided by anyone -- the French authorities rushed to say that the fire was an "accident" and that "arson has been ruled out." The remarks sounded like all the official statements made by the French government after attacks in France during the last decade.
In November 2015, on the night of the massacre at the Bataclan Theater in Paris, in which jihadists murdered 90 people, the French Department of the Interior said that the government did not know anything, except that a gunfight had occurred. The truth came out only after ISIS claimed responsibility for the slaughter.
In Nice, after the truck-attack in July 2016, the French government insisted for several days that the terrorist who crushed 86 people to death was a "man with a nervous breakdown".
In 2018, Sarah Halimi's murderer, who recited verses from the Quran while torturing his victim, was declared "mentally disturbed" and held in a psychiatric institution immediately after his arrest. He will most likely never face a court. On April 8, Alain Finkielkraut and 38 other intellectuals published a text saying that her murderer must not escape justice. The text had no effect.
The fire at Notre Dame took place less than three years after a "commando unit" of jihadi women, later arrested, tried to destroy the cathedral by detonating cylinders of natural gas. Three days before last week's fire, on April 12, the leader of the jihadis, Ines Madani, a young French convert to Islam, was sentenced to eight years in prison for creating a terrorist group affiliated with the Islamic State.
The Notre Dame fire also occurred at a time when attacks against churches in France and Europe have been multiplying. More than 800 churches were attackedin France during the year 2018 alone. Many suffered serious damage: broken, beheaded statues, smashed tabernacles, feces thrown on the walls. In several churches, fires were lit. On March 5, the Basilica of St. Denis, where all but three of the Kings of France are buried, was vandalized by a Pakistani refugee. Several stained-glass windows were broken, and the basilica's organ, a national treasure built between 1834 and 1841, was nearly wrecked. Twelve days later, on March 17, a fire broke out at Saint Sulpice, the largest church in Paris, causing serious damage. After days of silence, the police finally admitted that the cause had been arson.
For months, jihadist organizations have been issuing statements calling for the destruction of churches and Christian monuments in Europe. Notre Dame was repeatedly named as a primary target. Despite all that, the Cathedral was not adequately protected. A couple of young men, who entered the Cathedral at night, climbed on the roof last November and shot a video that they then put on YouTube.
Many messages were posted by people with Muslim names on social media -- Twitter, Facebook, the website of Al Jazeera -- expressing a joy to see an important Christian symbol destroyed. Hafsa Askar, a migrant from Morocco and the vice president of the National Union of Students of France (UNEF), the main student organization in France, published a tweet saying, "People are crying on little pieces of wood... it's a delusion of white trash".
French President Emmanuel Macron, who had never even mentioned the attacks on Saint Denis or Saint Sulpice, quickly went to Notre Dame and declared, "Notre Dame is our history, our literature, our imagination". He totally left out cathedral's religious dimension.
The next evening, he said that Notre Dame would be rebuilt in five years: it was a bold statement. Many commentators interpreted his words as dictated by his will desperately to try to regain the confidence of the French people after five monthsof demonstrations, riots and destruction stemming from his ineffective handling of the "Yellow Vests" uprising. (On March 16, much of the Champs-Élysées was damaged by rioters; repairs have barely begun.) All experts agree that it will almost certainly take far longer than five years to rebuild Notre Dame.
Macron strangely added that the cathedral would be "more beautiful" than before -- as if a badly damaged monument could be more beautiful after restoration. Macron went on to say that the reconstruction would be a "contemporary architectural gesture". The remark raised concern, if not panic, among defenders of historic monuments, who now fear that he may want to add modern architectural elements to a jewel of Gothic architecture. Again, he totally left out the cathedral's religious dimension.
Macron's attitude is not surprising. From the moment he became president, he has kept himself away from any Christian ceremony. Most of the presidents who preceded him did the same. France is a country where a dogmatic secularismreigns supreme. A political leader who dares to call himself a Christian is immediately criticized in the media and can only harm a budding political career. Nathalie Loiseau -- the former director of France's National School of Administration and the leading candidate on the electoral list of Macron's party, "Republic on the Move," for the May 2019 European Parliament elections -- was recently photographed exiting a church after mass, which led to a media debate on whether her church attendance is a "problem."
The results of French secularism are visible. Christianity has been almost completely wiped out from public life. Churches are empty. The number of priests is decreasing and the priests that are active in France are either very old or come from Africa or Latin America. The dominant religion in France is now Islam. Every year, churches are demolished to make way for parking lots or shopping centers. Mosques are being built all over, and they are full. Radical imams proselytize. The murder, three years ago, of Jacques Hamel, an 85-year-old priest who was slaughtered by two Islamists while he was saying mass in a church where only five people (three of them old nuns) were present, is telling.
In 1905, the French parliament passed a law decreeing that all the properties of the Catholic Church in France were confiscated. Churches and cathedrals became property of the State. Since then, successive governments have spent little money to maintain them. Those churches that have not been vandalized are in poor condition, and most cathedrals are in poor condition, too. Even before the devastating fire, the Archdiocese of Paris stated that "it can't afford all the repairs" that Notre Dame needed, "estimated at $185 million." According to CBS News, in a March 20, 2018 report:
"The French government, which owns the cathedral, has pledged around $50 million over the next decade, leaving a bill of $135 million. To raise the rest, Picaud helped launch the Friends of Notre-Dame of Paris Foundation. It works to find private donors both in France and across the Atlantic.On the evening of the fire at Notre Dame, hundreds of French people gathered in front of the burning cathedral to sing Psalms and pray. They seemed suddenly to understand that they were losing something immensely precious.
"'We know Americans are wealthy, so we go where we think we can find money to help restore the cathedral,' Picaud said."
Following the fire, the French government decided to start collecting donationsfrom private individuals, businesses and organizations for reconstruction; more than one billion euros have poured in. French billionaires promised to pay large sums: the Pinault family (the main owners of the retail conglomerate Kering) promised 100 million euros, the Arnault family (owners of LVMH, the world's largest luxury-goods company), 200 million euros, the Bettencourt family (owners of L'Oréal), also 200 million. Many on the French "left" immediately said that wealthy families had too much money, and that these millions would be better used helping the poor than taking care of old stones.
For the foreseeable future, the heart of Paris will bear the terrible scars of a fire that devastated far more than a cathedral. The fire destroyed an essential part of what is left of the almost-lost soul of France and what France could accomplish when the French believed in something higher than their own day-to-day existence.
Some hope that the sight of the destroyed cathedral will inspire many French people to follow the example of those who prayed on the night of the disaster. Michel Aupetit, Archbishop of Paris, said on April 17, two days after the fire, that he was sure France would know a "spiritual awakening".
Others, not as optimistic, see in the ashes of the cathedral a symbol of the destruction of Christianity in France. The art historian Jean Clair said that he sees in the destruction of Notre Dame an additional sign of an "irreversible decadence" of France, and of the final collapse of the Judeo-Christian roots of Europe.
An American columnist, Dennis Prager, wrote:
"The symbolism of the burning of Notre Dame Cathedral, the most renowned building in Western civilization, the iconic symbol of Western Christendom, is hard to miss.Another American author, Rod Dreher, noted:
"It is as if God Himself wanted to warn us in the most unmistakable way that Western Christianity is burning -- and with it, Western civilization."
"This catastrophe in Paris today is a sign to all of us Christians, and a sign to all people in the West, especially those who despise the civilization that built this great temple to its God on an island in the Seine where religious rites have been celebrated since the days of pagan Rome. It is a sign of what we are losing, and what we will not recover, if we don't change course now."For the moment, nothing indicates that France and Western Europe will change course.
DHS Releases 7,000 Illegal Aliens Into US Cities Over Five Day Period
U.S. Projected To Add 1.5M Illegal Aliens To Population This Year (2019)
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/27/u-s-projected-to-add-1-5m-illegal-aliens-to-population-this-year/
US Department of Homeland Security has released approximately 7,000 Illegal Aliens into the interior of the United States over a five-day period ending on Wednesday, according to Breitbart News, citing information they obtained on 'catch and release.'
According to former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R) told Breitbart that the Trump administration could take several steps to immediately end catch and release, including creating more detention facilities where immigration court hearings can be quickly heard.
FROM THE INTERNET
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/27/u-s-projected-to-add-1-5m-illegal-aliens-to-population-this-year/
US Department of Homeland Security has released approximately 7,000 Illegal Aliens into the interior of the United States over a five-day period ending on Wednesday, according to Breitbart News, citing information they obtained on 'catch and release.'
The catch and release process often entails federal immigration officials busing Illegal Aliens into nearby border cities and dropping them off with the promise that they will show up for their immigration and asylum hearings, sometimes years later. The overwhelming majority of illegal aliens are never deported from the country once they are released into the U.S. -Breitbart NewsOver the five-day period, El Paso, TX received 2,800 of the 7,000 Illegal Aliens, while San Antonio, TX received 2,200, Phoenix - 1,200 and San Diego - 800.
The expanded use of catch and release by the Trump administration has forced communities like Yuma, Arizona, to declare a local state of emergency as the city and county is unable to deal with soaring levels of illegal immigration.At this rate, half-a-million Illegal Aliens will be released into American communities by the end of the year. According to the Pew Research Center, there were 10.7 million illegal immigrants in the United States at the end of 2016.
Since December 21, 2018, about 153,000 illegal aliens have been released into the interior of the U.S. This dictates that DHS is releasing about 38,250 illegal aliens into the country every month with close to 10,000 released every week and about 1,400 released every day. -Breitbart News
FROM THE INTERNET
Wednesday, April 24, 2019
Police State Madness: Cops In DUI Vans Drawing Motorists' Blood
If the public meekly accepts this invasive and horrific practice of allowing police to conduct forced blood draws, then forced DNA swabs cannot be far behind.
Via MassPrivateI blog,
Halloween is less than six months away but that has not stopped law enforcement from taking people's blood. In fact, police officers want our blood so bad that they are purchasing blood draw vans, sorry I meant DUI vans like the one pictured below.
Last year, I wrote an article about police officers forcing hospitals to draw a drunk or drugged suspect's blood. But what I could never have imagined is that within a year, police officers would be physically drawing motorists' blood.
A recent article in Pew Charitable Trusts revealed that police in at least nine states, use DUI vans to draw people's blood.
credit: Pewtrust
As the article reveals, the real reason why police officers want our blood is to "save money because they don’t need to pay phlebotomists and hospitals for blood draws."
I cannot possibly discuss all the different things that could go wrong with police officers drawing blood, so I will only focus on two.
When a police officer calls a DUI blood van to forcibly draw a person's blood based on a hunch that they might be on drugs or drunk, we no longer have a Bill of Rights to protect us.
As attorney John Whitehead said, forced blood draws make a mockery of the Fourth Amendment. The act of merely driving on state owned roads should not mean that we give up our rights.
In Massachusetts, judges are starting to question so-called Drug Recognition Expert police officers who claim to have special senses that can detect if a person is impaired.
What sort of country refers to forcibly drawing Americans blood as a "game-changer?"
The International Association of Police Chiefs, which is the mouthpiece of law enforcement, cannot wait for vampire cops to draw motorists. blood.
If the public meekly accepts this invasive and horrific practice of allowing police to conduct forced blood draws, then forced DNA swabs cannot be far behind.
As a teenager, I watched hundreds of horror movies but I never once had nightmares that police would FORCIBLY take blood from Americans! But times have changed and it won't be long before Hollywood makes a law enforcement reality blood draw, TV show.
Here are a few names for their new show.
Instead of calling it Hawaii Five-O why not call it Hawaii Type O or call The First 48, The First Blood Draws. Last but not least, why not rename Blue Bloods the Blood Suckers?
As I said before, allowing police officers to conduct their own blood draws is a monumentally bad idea that will have major civil rights implications for everyone.
Halloween is less than six months away but that has not stopped law enforcement from taking people's blood. In fact, police officers want our blood so bad that they are purchasing blood draw vans, sorry I meant DUI vans like the one pictured below.
Last year, I wrote an article about police officers forcing hospitals to draw a drunk or drugged suspect's blood. But what I could never have imagined is that within a year, police officers would be physically drawing motorists' blood.
"A DUI police van equipped with a special chair and table for blood testing pulled up. The man refused to submit to a blood draw. So Phoenix Police Det. Kemp Layden grabbed his laptop and filled out an electronic warrant, or e-warrant, which was transmitted directly to a judge."What makes this story so disturbing is that typically a person must be a certified phlebotomist or healthcare professional who is trained to draw blood from a patient in a safe and sanitary manner. But as you can imagine that is not what is happening.
credit: Pewtrust
"Within 10 minutes, Layden had a search warrant. Another officer drew the man’s blood. A lab report later confirmed he had active THC and a sedative in his blood."I will eat my hat, if law enforcement claims their vans and police departments are sanitary. Alleging that police officers should be treated like healthcare professionals and be allowed to physically draw blood from a person is obscene.
As the article reveals, the real reason why police officers want our blood is to "save money because they don’t need to pay phlebotomists and hospitals for blood draws."
I cannot possibly discuss all the different things that could go wrong with police officers drawing blood, so I will only focus on two.
When a police officer calls a DUI blood van to forcibly draw a person's blood based on a hunch that they might be on drugs or drunk, we no longer have a Bill of Rights to protect us.
As attorney John Whitehead said, forced blood draws make a mockery of the Fourth Amendment. The act of merely driving on state owned roads should not mean that we give up our rights.
In Massachusetts, judges are starting to question so-called Drug Recognition Expert police officers who claim to have special senses that can detect if a person is impaired.
What sort of country refers to forcibly drawing Americans blood as a "game-changer?"
The International Association of Police Chiefs, which is the mouthpiece of law enforcement, cannot wait for vampire cops to draw motorists. blood.
"Together, the blood tests and e-warrants could be a game-changer in law enforcement,” said Buffalo Grove, Illinois, Police Chief Steven Casstevens, the incoming president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police.When law enforcement has judges on-call to issue e-warrants within minutes. It is like having a fellow cop on-call authorizing the shredding of our rights.
“There’s an absolute potential for a dilution of a citizen’s constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure when it’s done that way,” said Donald Ramsell, a Wheaton, Illinois, DUI attorney and Illinois Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers board member. “A judge can just wake up in his bedroom and hit ‘accept’ [on his device] and go back to sleep.”Attorney Ramsell is correct; having judge's on-call to OK, e-warrants without second guessing a police officer's hunch will have major civil rights implications.
If the public meekly accepts this invasive and horrific practice of allowing police to conduct forced blood draws, then forced DNA swabs cannot be far behind.
As a teenager, I watched hundreds of horror movies but I never once had nightmares that police would FORCIBLY take blood from Americans! But times have changed and it won't be long before Hollywood makes a law enforcement reality blood draw, TV show.
Here are a few names for their new show.
Instead of calling it Hawaii Five-O why not call it Hawaii Type O or call The First 48, The First Blood Draws. Last but not least, why not rename Blue Bloods the Blood Suckers?
As I said before, allowing police officers to conduct their own blood draws is a monumentally bad idea that will have major civil rights implications for everyone.
Former USC Soccer Coach Pleads Guilty, Will Cooperate In College Admission Scandal
A
University of Southern California assistant women’s soccer coach
embroiled in the college admissions scandal will plead guilty and
cooperate with prosecutors, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Former coach Laura Janke will plead to one count of racketeering
conspiracy by May 30 and, as a result, will forfeit $134,000 and likely
receive the "low end" of potential jail time. She has also reportedly
agreed to cooperate with prosecutors in the case, according to plea and
cooperation agreements filed in court.
The maximum sentence she was facing was 20 years, but it is likely she will now get 27 to 33 months as a result of the plea. She'll also be on supervised release for a term of 12 months. Janke must also pay any tax penalties related to payments she received. The length of her prison sentence is still going to be determined on how cooperative she is going to be as a witness, prosecutors said.
Another parent who worked with Janke also accepted a plea deal
recently:Toby MacFarlane, a parent charged in the case, will plead
guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest
services mail fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in
Massachusetts. MacFarlane had already telegraphed his intent earlier
this month to enter into plea discussions.
MacFarlane paid $450,000 to have his children admitted to USC as
recruited athletes and, working with Janke, helped create fake profiles
for the children. Janke then built profiles for both of MacFarlane's
kids: one for his daughter in 2013 claiming she was a soccer star and
another in 2017 for his son, claiming he was a basketball player. Both
children eventually wound up going to USC.
Janke was one of four USC officials charged in the case. Prosecutors say she created profiles for a number of William Rick Singer's clients, stocking them with fake honors for their respective sports.
In another example, Janke helped fabricate a bogus athletic profile for the son of media executive Elisabeth Kimmel as an elite pole vaulter, despite him having no record of ever pole vaulting. Janke even used a photo of another individual pole vaulting as part of the submission, prosecutors say. Kimmel has plead not guilty to charges of mail fraud conspiracy and money laundering conspiracy.
Janke's guilty plea stands in contrast with our latest update on the scandal, where we noted that some parents had decided to "punch back" and vigorously defend themselves in court.
“I expect a lot more guilty pleas,” Diane Ferrone, a criminal defense lawyer in New York who isn’t involved in the case, told Bloomberg about a week ago.
16 parents were recently indicted in the scandal about 2 weeks ago. Several weeks before that, we noted that parents charged in the scheme were seeking out "prison life consultants" to find out what life would be like in the big house.
We have been following the admissions scandal at length. As part of our coverage, we detailed how financial speaking gigs and elite high schools helped facilitate the scam for years. We've also covered the fallout from the scandal, like when UCLA's Men's Soccer Coach and former U.S. Men's national team player Jorge Salcedo recently resigned from his position at the university as a result of taking bribes. We also wrote about how students were being encouraged to fake learning disabilities in order to cheat on college entrance exams.
We profiled Harvard test taking whiz Marc Riddell, who was a key piece of the scam, in March. Prior to that, we also reported on the tipster who gave the SEC the lead on the admissions scandal.
source zerohedge
The maximum sentence she was facing was 20 years, but it is likely she will now get 27 to 33 months as a result of the plea. She'll also be on supervised release for a term of 12 months. Janke must also pay any tax penalties related to payments she received. The length of her prison sentence is still going to be determined on how cooperative she is going to be as a witness, prosecutors said.
Senator 1024ths also lied and was admitted to university as "a woman of color" and a tenured "professor" so when do they go after her? |
Janke was one of four USC officials charged in the case. Prosecutors say she created profiles for a number of William Rick Singer's clients, stocking them with fake honors for their respective sports.
In another example, Janke helped fabricate a bogus athletic profile for the son of media executive Elisabeth Kimmel as an elite pole vaulter, despite him having no record of ever pole vaulting. Janke even used a photo of another individual pole vaulting as part of the submission, prosecutors say. Kimmel has plead not guilty to charges of mail fraud conspiracy and money laundering conspiracy.
Janke's guilty plea stands in contrast with our latest update on the scandal, where we noted that some parents had decided to "punch back" and vigorously defend themselves in court.
“I expect a lot more guilty pleas,” Diane Ferrone, a criminal defense lawyer in New York who isn’t involved in the case, told Bloomberg about a week ago.
16 parents were recently indicted in the scandal about 2 weeks ago. Several weeks before that, we noted that parents charged in the scheme were seeking out "prison life consultants" to find out what life would be like in the big house.
We have been following the admissions scandal at length. As part of our coverage, we detailed how financial speaking gigs and elite high schools helped facilitate the scam for years. We've also covered the fallout from the scandal, like when UCLA's Men's Soccer Coach and former U.S. Men's national team player Jorge Salcedo recently resigned from his position at the university as a result of taking bribes. We also wrote about how students were being encouraged to fake learning disabilities in order to cheat on college entrance exams.
We profiled Harvard test taking whiz Marc Riddell, who was a key piece of the scam, in March. Prior to that, we also reported on the tipster who gave the SEC the lead on the admissions scandal.
source zerohedge
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Mexico Cracks Down: Arrests Hundreds Of Illegal Aliens. Which is more than the DHS and BP are doing, which is shipping them all over america with money in their pockets.
Yeah, the Central American illegals are stiff competition to Mexican illegals. This must be on the orders of the cartels, as they really run that country down there.
Mexican police arrested between 300-500 Central American Illegal Aliens outside the southern city of Pijijiapan, Chiapas, according to DW.
Mexican police an immigration officials rounded up the undocumented Illegal Aliens who had crossed illegally into Mexico in the hopes of illegally sneaking into the United States. The raid is one of the largest targeting a caravan since the exodus began last year, and follows pressure by US authorities on Mexico to curb the flow of illegal aliens.
Which is just for show. Let's face it, the NWO Deep State is busing these Illegal Aliens all over the USA. Every damn day.
Mexican police arrested between 300-500 Central American Illegal Aliens outside the southern city of Pijijiapan, Chiapas, according to DW.
Mexican police an immigration officials rounded up the undocumented Illegal Aliens who had crossed illegally into Mexico in the hopes of illegally sneaking into the United States. The raid is one of the largest targeting a caravan since the exodus began last year, and follows pressure by US authorities on Mexico to curb the flow of illegal aliens.
Which is just for show. Let's face it, the NWO Deep State is busing these Illegal Aliens all over the USA. Every damn day.
Mexico has stepped up Illegal Alien detentions since US President Donald Trump threatened last month to shut the US-Mexico border if the caravans weren't stopped. Several organizations have condemned the rise in arrests, warning that detention facilities were overcrowded.
Those arrested were part of a caravan of around 3,000 Central Americans heading north. Witnesses described authorities wrestling men, women and children into vehicles - where they were then driven to buses.
THis is NOT Hillary Clinton
First, the eyes are wrong. Second, the Hillary II a month ago had the neck of a 40 year old and now, whammo, she has the neck of a woman in her 70s. Still, the eyes are wrong. I've identifed 3 body doubles they have used in the last 5 months.
The Hildebeast has a distinct cackle (to go with her cankles) and voice. None of these hypnotized and MKultra'd doubles has her voice nailed. NONE OF THEM. You can hear it. It's close, but that cackle is hard to copy. They all laugh like normal women. Real beastly women don't laugh, they cackle. I hear both kinds every where I go. Sad to say.
Also, where is that colostomy rig the Hildebeast had to wear, forcing her to wear tent drapery clothes to hide the thing? All these doubles are taller, thinner, and wear the usual fugly pant suit thingy older women wear that kills out the last of any remaining femininity.
There is a reason they are not reporting her death. Because to do so, would be to admit to lying, BY EVERY BODY, over the last 2 and a half years that she was alive, and was in the running for POTUS. And that would mean at least a dozen felonies for all involved. They must have some reason for keeping the fiction going, beyond the 2016 coverup.
The grand druid high priestess is dead. Morte. Finished. Prayers answered, thanks be to YHVH.
Here is the proof.
FROM THE INTERNET
The Hildebeast has a distinct cackle (to go with her cankles) and voice. None of these hypnotized and MKultra'd doubles has her voice nailed. NONE OF THEM. You can hear it. It's close, but that cackle is hard to copy. They all laugh like normal women. Real beastly women don't laugh, they cackle. I hear both kinds every where I go. Sad to say.
Also, where is that colostomy rig the Hildebeast had to wear, forcing her to wear tent drapery clothes to hide the thing? All these doubles are taller, thinner, and wear the usual fugly pant suit thingy older women wear that kills out the last of any remaining femininity.
There is a reason they are not reporting her death. Because to do so, would be to admit to lying, BY EVERY BODY, over the last 2 and a half years that she was alive, and was in the running for POTUS. And that would mean at least a dozen felonies for all involved. They must have some reason for keeping the fiction going, beyond the 2016 coverup.
The grand druid high priestess is dead. Morte. Finished. Prayers answered, thanks be to YHVH.
Here is the proof.
A December 2018 Hillary II, wrong eyes, nose, chin and mainly HER AGE. One glance tells you this is NOT HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON. |
Not her. Nope |
How stupid do they think some of us are? |
One of the body doubles they trotted out in January. They used this one a few times and she hasn't been seen since. |
A completely different woman again. Now much older. This is the one of TWO they are now using, April 2019. They will settle in on one, once they decide which one to use. |
The one and only HILDEBEAST, DOA 9-11-16 |
FROM THE INTERNET
I
find it amazing that Hillary would poke a stick into the Trump
hornet nest. After the past two years, zero chance that Trump would
still comment "The Clintons are good people". Trump is not going to
forget what Hillary and her sycophants including Lynch, Holder, Comey,
and the rest of the Washington DOJ and FBI leadership and bureaucrats
tried to do to him.
If Hillary had any sense at all, would shut her pie hole, lay low, and just fade away with her Clinton Foundation $ millions.
AOC, Tlaib, Omar, Sanders, Kamala, and the rest of the lunatic Left are making sure that Trump gets re-elected in 2020. Hope they never shut up. The next six years of the upcoming whirlwind of legal poop is going to grind and torture Hillary, Slick, and all their toadies. They deserve everything they get - good and hard.
(never happen. you cannot prosecute a dead woman. DB)
----------
If Hillary had any sense at all, would shut her pie hole, lay low, and just fade away with her Clinton Foundation $ millions.
AOC, Tlaib, Omar, Sanders, Kamala, and the rest of the lunatic Left are making sure that Trump gets re-elected in 2020. Hope they never shut up. The next six years of the upcoming whirlwind of legal poop is going to grind and torture Hillary, Slick, and all their toadies. They deserve everything they get - good and hard.
(never happen. you cannot prosecute a dead woman. DB)
----------
There
will be no fading away. There is simply too much criminality going on
across the system. This criminality isn't just people stealing money.
Child trafficking, and worse are at the center of this. There have
been prosecutorial teams working very hard for over a year to get the
evidence locked-down. Part of the problem is the willful ignorance of
the public, and the psychological attacks perpetrated by the media.
The next couple months will result in many people being shocked by what comes out. Most people will have a hard time coming to grips with the depths of evil they are about to be presented with.
(Wikileaks proved these monsters were and are, satanists. How much worse can it be, once "spirit cooking" a dead child came to light? DB)
-----------
The next couple months will result in many people being shocked by what comes out. Most people will have a hard time coming to grips with the depths of evil they are about to be presented with.
(Wikileaks proved these monsters were and are, satanists. How much worse can it be, once "spirit cooking" a dead child came to light? DB)
-----------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
ALL of these unskilled migrants will END UP WORKING IN THE TRADES, where they will SEVERELY UNDERCUT Latinos who are established in this country, just as the Latinos did to whites, many of whom are now SLEEPING IN THE STREETS!
American Latinos might need $15/hour to hang drywall, paint, etc, these new Hondurans will take $10 or less....Employers DO NOT GIVE A RAT"S ASSS, they just pay 'em under the table, so the vibrant new migrants will work 2-3 jobs AND get a BUFFET OF BENEFITS: WIC (for all those babies they're pumping out), EBT foodstamps, Medicaid, Section 8 housing, etc.
-----------
What are you talking about? Blood is thicker than water! All these latinos you speak of are closet racists who believe in La ReConquista! My god you are naive! Both of them will come together to push whites out of their jobs, take over entire neighborhoods and otherwise usurp this country on every level. It's already happening on college campuses, on local school boards, in athletics, etc. Whites are unwilling to stand up for their race while the "latinos" band together. The American nggrs better wake up and be pissed as hell! That's the demographic that will really be up ended. Mexicans are as anti-white as blacks.
----------
What border? United States has no border.
--------
We're doomed; you're correct. There's no recovering from this and anyone under 30 is going to spend the 2nd half of their lives -- if we make it that far -- in abject misery as this country implodes. Good thing they'll have the drugs and assisted suicide to ease their way out before they get chained to a radiator in some former mansion in Greenwich occupied by a cartel CEO.
----------
Soon it will be hot in the desert, and the "poor immigrants dying in the desert" meme will start again.
----------
Our government has been hijacked by anti-Christian Judaism, hence the purposeful slow destruction of a once predominantly Christian nation. They began by undermining the traditional family and then opened the floodgates for this third-world invasion to occur.
-----------
These Illegals are being sent to Republican areas. Texas is almost a blue state because of it.
----------