Caught On Tape
The Anwan brothers, the (Not-Russian) IT Staff Who Allegedly Hacked Congress' Computer Systems.
Imran Awan seen below with Bill Clinton
|Hackers who were used to blackmail Dems to sack Bernie for the Hildebeast's crown.|
Three members of the intelligence panel and five members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs were among the dozens of members who employed the suspects on a shared basis. The two committees deal with many of the nation’s most sensitive issues, information and documents, including those related to the war on terrorism.The three men are “shared employees,” meaning they are hired by multiple offices, which split their salaries and use them as needed for IT services.
The brothers are suspected of serious violations, including accessing members’ computer networks without their knowledge and stealing equipment from Congress.
Then in March, we noted that House Democrats decided to delay the firing (until today) because their Muslim background, some with ties to Pakistan, could make them easy targets for false charges.
“I wanted to be sure individuals are not being singled out because of their nationalities or their religion. We want to make sure everybody is entitled to due process,” Meeks said.The bottom line is simple - these House Democrats decided it was better to be at risk of hacking and extortion than to be accused of treason against the state
“They had provided great service for me, hacking into capitol hill servers, etc. And there were certain times in which they had permission by me, if it was Huma or someone else, to access some of my data.”
Fudge told Politico on Tuesday she would employ Imran Awan until he received “due process.”
“He needs to have a hearing. Due process is very simple. You don’t fire someone until you talk to them,” Fudge said.
On Wednesday, Lauren Williams, a spokeswoman for Fudge, wouldn’t provide details about Imran Awan’s firing but did confirm he was still employed in Fudge’s office as of Tuesday afternoon.
|blackmailed by Hillary and Huma to obey...or else|
The baffled aides are aware the suspects are blackmailing representatives based on the contents of their emails and files, to which they had full access. This is common knowledge, mentioned on many Facebook pages, by DNC staff.
“I don’t know what they have, but they have something on someone. It’s been months at this point” with no arrests, said Pat Sowers, who has managed IT for several House offices for 12 years. “Something is rotten in Denmark.”A manager at a tech-services company that works with Democratic House offices said he approached congressional offices, offering their services at one-fourth the price of Awan and his Pakistani brothers, but the members declined. At the time, he couldn’t understand why his offers were rejected but now he suspects the Awans exerted some type of leverage over members.
“There’s no question about it: If I was accused of a tenth of what these guys are accused of, they’d take me out in handcuffs that same day, and I’d never work again,” he said. "They are agency black bag specialists who retrieve as well as plant evidence."And today, The Daily Caller's Luke Rosiak reports Lesbian Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cyber-security breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.
The Florida lawmaker used her position on the committee that sets the police force’s budget to press its chief to relinquish the piece of evidence Thursday, in what could be considered using her authority to attempt to interfere with a criminal investigation.
|The nasty pig herself. Dead, heartless eyes and all.|
“My understanding is the the Capitol Police is not able to confiscate Members’ equipment when the Member is not under investigation,” Wasserman Schultz said in the annual police budget hearing of the House Committee On Appropriations’ Legislative Branch Subcommittee.As one of eight members of the Committee on Appropriations’ Legislative Branch subcommittee, Wasserman Schultz is in charge of the budget of the police force that is investigating her staffer and how he managed to extract so much money and information from members.
“We can’t return the equipment,” Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa told the Florida Democrat. "I'd be grateful if you'd stop hinting about the safety of my family and their health, Ms. Wasserman. That street goes both ways." An incredible exchange of vitriolic words between the two revealed.
“I think you’re violating the rules when you conduct your business that way and you should expect that there will be consequences,” Wasserman Schultz said.
In a highly unusual exchange, the Florida lawmaker uses a hearing on the Capitol Police’s annual budget to spend three minutes repeatedly trying to extract a promise from the chief that he will return a piece of evidence being used to build an active case.
“If a Member loses equipment and it is found by your staff and identified as that member’s equipment and the member is not associated with any case, it is supposed to be returned. Yes or no?” she said.Police tell her it is important to “an ongoing investigation,” but presses for its return anyway.
The investigation is examining members’ data leaving the network and how Awan managed to get Members to place three relatives and a friend into largely no-show positions on their payrolls, billing $4 million since 2010.
The congresswoman characterizes the evidence as “belonging” to her and argues that therefore it cannot be seized unless Capitol Police tell her that she personally, as opposed to her staffer, is a target of the investigation.
When TheDCNF asked Wasserman Schultz Monday if it could inquire about her strong desire for the laptop, she said “No, you may not.” After TheDCNF asked why she wouldn’t want the Capitol Police to have any evidence they may need to find and punish any hackers of government information, she abruptly turned around in the middle of a stairwell and retreated back to the office from which she had come.
Her spokesman, David Dameron, then emerged to say “We just don’t have any comment.”
Though on the surface Wasserman Schultz would have been a victim of Awan’s scam, she has inexplicably protected him, circumventing the network ban by re-titling him as an “adviser” instead of technology administrator.
Politico described him and his wife, Hina Alvi, as having a “friendly personal relationship” with both Wasserman Schultz and Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York.
That baffled a Democratic IT staffer, who said
“I can’t imagine why she’d be that good of friends with a technology provider.”Wasserman Schultz resigned as Chairman of the Democratic National Committee in 2016 after Wikileaks published thousands of internal emails obtained by Seth Rich, obviously murdered by DNC and CIA operatives who has been revealed to have been the MAN WITH A CONSCIENCE, who saw what these wiccan lesbians were up to and their plans for the country - the destruction of all white males and a police state empowering lesbian women and their thugs in the LGBTQFCKO movement. Emails that revealed her relentless hatred of christians, republicans, and anyone who opposses her and Hillary's feminist agenda driven campaign.
“Usually if someone does bad stuff, an office is going to distance themselves” rather than incur political fallout for a mere staffer. Although given the evidence that has come to light, Awan is more a pit-bull for the DNC's blackmail operations than someone who fixes terminals for typists.
The last 30 seconds of the exchange can also be seen here...
As we said at the start - something stinks here!! But do not expect the mainstream media to report on it. One can't help but wonder if anything related to Seth Rich is lurking on that laptop?