The whole and real point of all this GMO silliness is to corrupt creation, everywhere possible. To offend the Most High Adonai, YHVH. That's all there is to it.
Don
----------------
genetically modified trees being planted in the georgia pine belt..
from the you can't manufacture stupid this badly department unless you try real hard dept:
Genetically modified seedlings from biotechnology company Living Carbon have been planted in a low-lying tract of southern Georgia's pine belt. According to a paper that has yet to be peer reviewed, these trees are engineered to grow 50 percent faster than non-modified ones over five months in the greenhouse. The
sounds suspect right out of the gate. genetically modified trees have been tried before, and first off, you don't get very far modifying our heavenly fathers creations, before there are problems. always are problems, and nothing but. for the surrounding ecology.
this is an outright lie, this next sentence. Monsanto has been planting genetically modified trees all across the world, for the last few decades. They have in fact, replaced much of the Taiga forest, with genetically modified trees. Guess what? They don't grow, and they have destroyed this important natural area.
To understand why trees are important, in case you grew up in the modern day education system, which taught you next to nothing, trees fix minerals in the ground, DEEP in the ground, for other species to have their life support. This includes mosses, lichens, minerals and catalysts to support the natural decay of living plant matter once it dies, in its natural life cycle. Aside from that, these variables support the immaculate and gigantic kingdom of fungi, and all that goes along with it. You'd be surprised how heavily the insect kingdom relies on the above, alone. Then you have smaller critters, like squirrels and rodents, which are also heavily reliant on the symbiotic relationships established therein and thereof, the aforementioned above; Elements, of nature, as it was intended to be left alone..
Moving forward, Genetically modified trees do not grow properly, they grow too fast, and they don't grow dense enough, and they don't re-mineralize their environments, they STRIP it bare, instead – pushing these minerals which are precious for soil ecology, health and longevity, into the trees, giving artificial growth. It's not good wood, that results. It may look like wood, but it's in some respects, highly similar to the human experience of microwaving food. You put something in that looks like food, and out comes a genetically modified scramble of death. In this case, the analogy is incomplete, because you put in what looks like a tree, it gets real big, and you have all this wood that you might build with, sure – but it's not going to be good solid wood to build with, it wont age properly, it won't make good firewood, and it destroys the ground in the meantime, and other species all around it.
Okay then, moving on.. They then go on to talk about the Flavr Savr tomato, which was an UTTER disaster. I'm old enough to have seen this bad boy hit the store shelves, and I will tell you it was an utter flop... It wasn't really about the tomato itself, you see – it was about the change in laws that the tomato's backers paved, the way for ALL manner of other horrible things entering the food supply.
A brief history though on GMO foods, they started a long long long time earlier, in what people refer to as roughly the year 1974. They introduced GM food, first with corn, into the food supply, and started monitoring local hospitals for adverse reactions. If you think these people are stupid, they're not, but evil they most certainly are. They have the entire infrastructure in their pockets, and they act accordingly in the shadows. That includes the pharmaceutical cartels, the medical cartels, the law makers, the politicians, their families, standing presidents, and all of the things you could imagine that are not mentioned here, like the media. The result is most people are dragged along by their arse hairs, thinking this is a good idea, yolked right into the next trap, blindly as it were. Later in this article we will see a quote from a guy who is like rah rah rah lets plant these trees, I'm a 7th generation farmer, la la la.. Well if this quote was true, it would be shocking, because a 7th generation farmer wouldn't say such a thing, ever. They respect the land they live on and depend on, to deliver their craft to others and to survive.. Moving on
New York Times reports:
The poplars may be the first genetically modified trees planted in the United States outside of a research trial or a commercial fruit orchard. Just as the introduction of the Flavr Savr tomato in 1994 introduced a new industry of genetically modified food crops, the tree planters on Monday hope to transform forestry.
Living Carbon, a San Francisco-based biotechnology company that produced the poplars, intends for its trees to be a large-scale solution to climate change. “We've had people tell us it's impossible,” Maddie Hall, the company's co-founder and chief executive, said of her dream to deploy genetic engineering on behalf of the climate.
of course, its from San Francisco, one of the most evil centers of all evils, in these days. If it wasn't there, it'd be coming from Palo Alto, or somewhere near by.
also of course she said the magic words, in their evil soup "for the climate." you want to plant trees for the climate? then fcking plant trees.. don't plant this garbage frankenstein abomination to try and make a lot of money in the lumber industry, and then claim you're trying to save the environment. Be honest, something most people simply cannot seem to do, to save their own lives... You want to make a lot of money, and that's all you really care about. Okay then, moving on..
But she and her colleagues have also found believers — enough to invest $36 million in the four-year-old company.
as stated above, you dont rope people into 36 million dollars of investments, unless they're greedy and think they will get a LOT more out of it. If you need evidence of this, just look at how hard it is to get someone to give you even 50 dollars, unless they think something is in it, for them.
The company's researchers created the greenhouse-tested trees using a bacterium that splices foreign DNA into another organism's genome. But for the trees they planted in Georgia, they turned to an older and cruder technique known as the gene gun method, which essentially blasts foreign genes into the trees' chromosomes.
In a field accustomed to glacial progress and heavy regulation, Living Carbon has moved fast and freely. The gene gun-modified poplars avoided a set of federal regulations of genetically modified organisms that can stall biotech projects for years. (Those regulations have since been revised.) By contrast, a team of scientists who genetically engineered a blight-resistant chestnut tree using the same bacterium method employed earlier by Living Carbon have been awaiting a decision since 2020. [...]
the "gene gun" technology is old, and it's highly effective for changing the entire phenotype of a living being, versus just selective genes like crispr-cas9. it iterates a plant MUCH MUCH faster, than the newer technology does, and has a much higher failure rate, meaning it creates frankenmonsters much more effectively, in fewer generations. The crispr stuff, however creates things that appear more normal, until successive generations are laid out, and then large problems are discovered, but it takes a lot longer to generally see super bad stuff. This is a suicide mission for the georgia pine belt. But this begs the question, "why?" The georgia pine belt is unique in the world. It's home to one of the abies (pine) species that is known as the georgia slash pine. This tree, provides MUCH of the clean turpentine to the world, and the alternative world of natural health and medicine. This may sound weird, but turpentine is one of natures most potent anti-parasitic compounds, period. If you got anything in your GI, or body in general, and you take turpentine (mixed correctly with the proper carriers) it will eradicate most all of those things. Keep in mind your author here is not a doctor, and this does not constitute medical advice, but also keep in mind that your author has done the turpentine thing many times, and it hasn't killed him yet. There are other natural aspects of the georgia pine belt that are important, as well. To quote an article to give you some idea of the biodiversity of the region, > In prehistory – the time after the dinosaurs but before the arrival of humans – the longleaf pine forest ranged over a 150,000-square-mile area from Virginia to South Florida to Southeastern Texas, in an almost unbroken swath estimated at 92 million acres. Today, only about 1.4 percent of that acreage remains in longleaf pines, the result of man’s entering the forest and, motivated by “need and greed,” clear-cutting it to near extinction. > It may have taken almost 200 years, but man appears to be wising up to the value of restoring these forests, not only for the enrichment of his soul, but also for the fattening of his wallet. > For millennia, the longleaf pine stood at the center of a delicate ecosystem that supported insects, animals and plants in ***regions more diverse than even the Amazon.*** > Like a modern super mart, these forests could provide man with everything he needed in life – food, water, shelter, transportation and weapons, even medicines. These tall, straight and sturdy trees made excellent ship’s masts in the 18th and 19th centuries. The railroad boom of the late 1800s created a demand for railroad ties that saw entire forests reduced to stumps. > The longleaf is still prized as a source of utility poles and for lumber. Equally valuable are the residents of a properly managed pine forest – deer, turkey and especially the 8-ounce bob white quail. Georgia’s longleaf pine forest owners are discovering their woods are a powerful lure for hunters and ecotourists who are willing to pay handsomely to cast an eye on big bucks or a covey of quail.
So they broke continuity there and started talking about animals being valuable, which makes me upset, but lets move on... Animals are not commodities. Okay, so... Back to breaking down this terrible article from the NYT.
In contrast to fast-growing pines, hardwoods that grow in bottomlands like these produce wood so slowly that a landowner might get only one harvest in a lifetime, said [Vince Stanley, a seventh-generation farmer who manages more than 25,000 forested acres in Georgia's pine belt]. He hopes Living Carbon's “elite seedlings” will allow him to grow bottomland trees and make money faster. “We're taking a timber rotation of 50 to 60 years and we're cutting that in half,” he said.
“It's totally a win-win.” [...] The U.S. Forest Service, which plants large numbers of trees every year, has said little about whether it would use engineered trees. To be considered for planting in national forests, which make up nearly a fifth of U.S. forestland, Living Carbon's trees would need to align with existing management plans that typically prioritize forest health and diversity over reducing the amount of atmospheric carbon, said Dana Nelson, a geneticist with the service. “I find it hard to imagine that it would be a good fit on a national forest,” Dr. Nelson said.
well that's encouraging. marginally. but still, once the biodiversity is interrupted, it's interrupted. who's greenlighting this project?
Living Carbon is focusing for now on private land, where it will face fewer hurdles. Later this spring it will plant poplars on abandoned coal mines in Pennsylvania. By next year Ms. Hall and Mr. Mellor hope to be putting millions of trees in the ground.
The report notes that the modified trees are all female, “so they won't produce pollen.”
ahh, now this is a big clue...... they want to reduce the forest to nothing, reducing further the amount of oxygen breathable to the region, among other things. what do I mean? well if you only plant female trees, then you reduce the amount of trees that are in the breeding pool. Trees don't have intercourse, obviously - but they do spread pollen, and this pollen is picked up by animal critters, and animal critters carry it to other trees, and the things we know as pine cones, become fertilized, drop to the ground and grow new trees.
If they add a lot of female trees that are incompatible with the traditional pollen, or even worse is somewhat compatible, the trees will be fertilized by good georgia pine pollen, and then grow their frankentrees, all by themselves...
which will destroy biodiversity, for successive generations. The devils.“They're also being planted alongside native trees like sweet gum, tulip trees and bald cypress, to avoid genetically identical stands of trees known as monocultures; non-engineered poplars are being planted as experimental controls.”
Now, to dig this up:
ah, wait they're talking about poplar.. same situation goes for poplar, just replace pine with poplar above... i'm just waking up here. same situation exactly though, just got the species wrong. moving on.
Okay so we're looking at the next line here, which comes from the abstract in the PDF linked below:
Increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere and the resulting negative impacts on climate change have compelled global efforts to achieve carbon neutrality or negativity. Most such efforts focus on carbon sequestration through chemical or physical approaches. We aim to harness the power of synthetic biology to enhance plants’ natural ability to draw down and sequester carbon, thereby positively affecting climate change
To put that in regular human speak, they want to plant these trees because they're being given a lot of money by the new world order and its devils, in an attempt to PULL carbon dioxide OUT of the environment, and lock most of it in the wood, and vaguely to bury some of it, (very very little,) it in the ground. That's roughly what carbon sequestration does, is it locks carbon somewhere else. PLANTS NEED CARBON DIOXIDE TO GROW.
You see here, now how they are actually planting death bombs, in the forest. That's what this is actually about. They want to kill everything, nearby. Creating a cascade and ripple effect that will negatively affect every living thing, near these areas.
And they use sly language, too. “thereby positively affecting climate change.” what do they mean by this? They literally mean the following: our project, will have an affect on climate change. They don't say weather or not that effect is GOOD or bad, but they do say “positively.” This will only make sense if you've ever been to or around a psychiatrist. Many of the “positive” affects are a particular thing they look for, not necessarily that you're actually doing better, overall, but that ONE thing has changed, in the experiment where they give you pills and suddenly one thing goes away, no matter how bad everything else has gotten, they simply declare it a success, and then rationalize it with “the benefits outweigh the costs.” This is a similar situation with the tree thing. The observed positive affect is the carbon sequestration, and EVERYTHING else that happens is not within their control. Because they are so narrow sighted and stupid, (not all but most) that they do not understand they're not allowed to play God, and have positive results. They're not intelligent enough, there is only one, and that's our heavenly father, who made all of these things, for us, and for all of the animals, and critters, to live in and around.
Man made climate change is a myth, we are not powerful enough to change the overall picture of things, in that regard and respect. The climate change thing is all over the blog, if you want to look for it at the tag navigation post pinned to the top of the blog, for further reading / video watching.
[1]. GMO poplar aims to sequester carbon, and 'affect climate change'
https://www.dailymessenger.is/pdf/evil%20tree%20modification.pdf
https://www.writehere.is/nwo/genetically-modified-trees-being-planted-in-the-georgia-pine-belt
