More information: https://www.orwell.city/2021/11/MAC.html
Dr. Luis Benito explains what he has observed and what could be the possible causes of the phenomenon of the "MACcinated" individuals.
Vaxxed people emit radio frequencies and wifi signals and amplifying them because of the graphene oxide in their blood stream and organs. When one person exposed too much electricity or radio signals his/her blood vessels shape changes from perfect circles to abrupt shapes. It has also been proven that electricity and radio frequencies cause FLU/COVID like symptoms since electricity come in to our lives. Covid as a virus may not exist however threat is real. Vaxxed people emit and broadcast signals.
Try getting an old Android device and search for bluetooth near crowded places. Then go somewhere quiet like nature. You will see unidentified MAC addresses when searching for nearby devices. In one instance, I was able to see 50+ unidentified devices when I searched in a crowded place. There cannot be this much electronic devices, it is simply unnatural. Ivermectin is safe and proven medicine and it cures these FLU/COVID like symptoms. Do not get the poison jab. Get Ivermectin while you still can! ivmpharmacy.com
In body lattice/dot nano antenna self assemble nano tech. Look up ferrofluid and Rice University as iron also has a role to play, lots iron in blood naturally. Also the "parasite" connection as the Hydra vulgarus of nature has been gene modified to transgenic Hydra Linnaeus, hydras are immortal and self-re-assemble even if smashed up. Brain mesh neural interface the plan it appears. Brain to Machine Interface of the transgenic ignorant humans. Why IVERMECTIN an anti parasite works so well. www.drrobertyoung.com report pics of other parasites to for ticking staggered time bomb deopop part of agenda..
I'm going to tell you today the findings of this summer, which go along the lines of what may be behind all this attempt to vaccinate.
Why so much interest in jabbing? What's the reason? I'm going to tell you.
The international organizations that are also investigating this matter
asked me for a brief report on what I had done during the summer. And
I'm going to read it to you as it is. I'm going to make glosses of what
I'm saying. But this is what I've written to them. And the different
teams that are investigating this are seeing what part of it is right
and what part is not. They're translating it into several languages. I
say this because, probably, by the 31st it's going to be made public in
other places or whatever.
It's been hard for me to get here to read it. Do you know why? Because
it does weigh a little bit the fact of taking out of the medical issue.
All this, you know, started as a channel to discuss the evolution of the
pandemic, the affected, the treatments, the virus, how the ICUs were.
Well, and this no longer makes sense. All that's part of the past. And
now, what we're going to is a recognition of a desire, on the part of
the authorities, to take away freedoms from human beings.
I don't care if you think I'm raving or not. But as I have a moral
obligation to report what I have done, I tell you today. And whoever
wants to believe it will believe it, and whoever doesn't will judge,
criticize and compare it. As I say, I've written it, and I have already
sent it to the teams that are studying this subject in different parts
of the world.
If from the medical point of view there's no need to administer any
preventive measure for a disease with the lethality of 2 per thousand,
why so much insistence that everyone should be inoculated? What's the
vaccine going to give me that I don't already have? Well, this
experiment arose from this reflection.
Although there are many consultations, during the summer of 2021, in the
afternoons, I was the only operative. There wasn't even administrative
staff in the afternoons in that building. Under my office, there was
occasionally parked an ambulance from SUMA, from the emergency service,
because they have a base there. Those were the only "interferences" I
detected. Most of the observations were carried out without that
artifact. I started the consultation at 15:00 and had patients listed
every 20 minutes.
Due to COVID measures, it was recommended that they come alone and, if
possible, at the appointed time. Not before or after. Before starting
the consultation, I'd connect the Bluetooth application on my cell phone
and invariably check that there was no device available to contact.
There was no electronic device in range to connect to. When a patient
appeared, often already up the stairs or at the beginning of the
corridor, about 20 meters away from the practice, on my cell phone, I
could see if one or two devices to connect to with Bluetooth appeared.
One or two or none.
On my phone, I could check to see if the Bluetooth was detecting
something or nothing. And if it was something, it was a device with a
MAC Address (Media Access Control) code. This is a unique identifier
that electronic device manufacturers assign to a card or item that can
be networked.
After attending to the patient's medical requirements, I'd ask him
whether or not he had been vaccinated for COVID. If the answer was
affirmative, it was usually quick and without hesitation. And if it was
negative, it was often accompanied by a certain wariness, if not anger
at the question. A reaction that explained to me that, in general, those
who hadn't wanted to be vaccinated had been subjected to some kind of
adverse social situation. After reassuring the patient, whatever his
response, I'd write down on a sheet of paper the answer he gave me.
None of the 137 patients I asked refused to answer. If the answer was
affirmative, I'd ask them what type of vaccine they had received, when,
and if they had had any adverse reactions. I'd then ask them if they had
any cell phones or electronic devices such as wireless headsets or
tablets on them, and if so, I' ask them to turn it off for a moment.
When they turned it off, on my cell phone, usually, one of the devices
that registered to Bluetooth would disappear.
Out of hundreds Here are the results.
Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and
25 said they hadn't been vaccinated. None of the patients who said they
hadn't been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available
for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell
phone, if they had one. In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had
been vaccinated, 96 of the 112 having switched off their electronic
devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of
my cell phone, which I had already noted in my notes next to the
patient's medical history.
I interpreted that it was a code that the patient himself was carrying
and that, in fact, when he left the office, leaving the building, it
disappeared from my cell phone. With this simple observation throughout
July and August, I've been able to verify that 100% of the patients who
say they aren't vaccinated don't raise any contact device with my cell
phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated
generated a MAC Address on my cell phone. These are the observations
made, and many doubts and questions arise from them.
Among them, the ones that seem to me be the most significant are:
First, does the signal detected on my cell phone come from the
vaccinated person? Well, precisely the isolated environment and not
being interfered with by other signals has meant that there's no other
source of contamination. In fact, when the SUMA ambulance arrived, apart
from other devices such as "SUMA base" and several MAC addresses that I
attributed to ambulance personnel who could be vaccinated, I noticed
that these signals disappeared when the ambulance left. And when there
were suspicions about whether there was some other distorting element,
for example, patient escorts in the corridor, accidental operators in
the corridor that could be the source or origin of other markers, then I
dismissed that case. It's not within the 137 that I have confirmed.
Second, do all cell phones detect Bluetooth devices with equal capability? My answer is no. My experience is that they don't.
Third, does the detectable MAC Address on a person allow interaction
with him? To what extent? At least I'm sure of one thing: it allows me
to know where he is because I knew that someone vaccinated was coming to
my office before he showed up.
The fourth question I asked myself: If the MAC Address is something
personal, individual, and unrepeatable, how is it possible that the five
people who were injected with the contents of the same vial, from the
same distribution of the same batch, don't have 5 different MAC
Addresses? Well, I consulted with some computer technicians, roboticists
and fellow biologists and engineers, experts in computer science, and
nanorobotics. And they advocate the possibility that this code is
generated as a result of the interaction of what's injected with the
genetic material of the patient. Perhaps not so much with their DNA as
with the larger compatibility complex, the HLA's, which are ultimately
derived from the genome.
Six, if the MAC address is generated by the vaccine, why do only 86% of
those who claim to be vaccinated have it? Different answers have been
considered to answer this question.
1. The first one: some of the vials could be placebo.
2. Second: some vials could be denatured.
3. Third: a lack of response. In other words, the expected results are not always obtained when a product is applied.
4. And the fourth, which seems very important to me, is because the
patient lies and says he is vaccinated when he isn't to avoid problems
or controversies.
https://rumble.com/vs4te4-mac-cinated-the-bluetooth-phenomenon.html?mref=lveqv&mrefc=2
