Revealing that which is concealed. Learning about anything that resembles real freedom. A journey of self-discovery shared with the world.
Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them - Ephesians 5-11
Join me and let's follow that high road...
Do you realize that if someone is a radical Christian he is probably
building a hospital, feeding the homeless, doing street witnessing in
his spare time and raising his kids to be good citizens?
Christ Immanuel was "merely" God Incarnate two millennia ago.
America is God's prophesied Zion, the New Israel, and each is
beholden only to God Almighty, the Creator of the universe, direct,
ruled only by Truth and Justice, "a nation of priests."
Those who lie and cheat, kill and steal, and protect the Synagogue of
Satan and the Anti-Christ's Beast Fifth Column all know run the
FedScam, funded Hitler, staged the Holohoax, killed John and Martin to
keep us as papal cats-paw in Indochina and to restart their
unconstitutional money scheme, did Ruby Ridge, Waco, OKC, and 9/11, and
are staging the hoax and psyop mass shootings in order to disarm the
sovereign People, are traitors against God, the Constitution, and the
People and must be removed or excised from Our Holy Land after full
expropriation.
Comic genius on left, lesbian witch cackling with satanic glee
To the left, a shot from Charlie
Chaplin’s The Great Dictator; to the right, Hillary’s acceptance speech
was a carefully scripted triumph over the democratic process… as
demonstrated by her playing with the balloons like the world is her toy.
In a fair election, my best estimate is that Donald Trump would win in a landslide.
But this election will not be fair. In fact, few of them are.
For Trump’s part, there is no doubt that he has been this year’s
sensation. A newcomer to politics, he has thrown out all the
conventional rules, played by his own, and found a captivated country
hanging onto his every word. Love him, hate him, or somewhere in
between… no one can look away from the spectacle.
After a war within the party and the convenient disposal of 16
conventional GOP contenders, Trump is now the official Republican
candidate and he is in a strong position. Coming out of the relatively
calm Republican National Convention and going into the tumultuous DNC,
Trump has enjoyed soaring poll numbers while Hillary has been losing
ground fast to the scandals and corruption revealed by Wikileaks and
other related mouthpieces.
But the fat lady has not sung. Hijacking the Party, Keeping Dissent Under Wraps
Hillary’s coronation last night as she formally accepted her party’s
nomination could hardly have been more forced. The entire Democratic
convention has been stage-managed to downplay the overwhelming noise from Bernie supporter who are outraged and feel betrayed by Hillary.
The entire convention has had a certain air to it, a quality that reveals the desperation for power, and the crisp sense of danger that brings with it.
To a casual observer, things might look typical enough, with a few
sore losers and pipe dreamers wishing for an ideal country run by decent
and fair people that either don’t exist or haven’t figured out how to
win an election. But things are not typical – the paradigm is shifting.
Politics realigns every 30 years or so, or at least that is the maxim
that has held in political science. Only, the last shift has been 30 or
40 years overdue.
There is a reason for that, and the establishment has been fighting
to stop the change for the past generation. They have faked out the
cycle and kept the population under their thumb (when was the last time
you saw a “real” presidential election that wasn’t a means to keeping
the status quo?)
But delaying the inevitable won’t hold. Why Trump Should Win…
As Michael Moore argued,
Trump has been preaching the gospel of restoring America’s
manufacturing, and is working to woo and turn to “red” the “blue” Rust
Belt states where Americans once had strong middle class jobs,
especially in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. According to
Moore’s numbers (which are cited to motivate support for Hillary and
opposition to Trump), if Trump captures those key states in addition to
the red states that Mitt Romney, a weak candidate, won in 2012, then
Trump should win the electoral college:
I
believe Trump is going to focus much of his attention on the four blue
states in the rustbelt of the upper Great Lakes – Michigan, Ohio,
Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Four traditionally Democratic states – but
each of them have elected a Republican governor since 2010 (only
Pennsylvania has now finally elected a Democrat). In the Michigan
primary in March, more Michiganders came out to vote for the Republicans
(1.32 million) that the Democrats (1.19 million). Trump is ahead of
Hillary in the latest polls in Pennsylvania and tied with her in Ohio.
Tied? How can the race be this close after everything Trump has said and
done? Well maybe it’s because he’s said (correctly) that the
Clintons’ support of NAFTA helped to destroy the industrial states of
the Upper Midwest.
In fact, Moore is right. Nobody wants any more Flint, Michigans (where the water is contaminated and poverty seems to be airborne and contagious), least of all Michael Moore.
Trump’s appeal is much broader than just his sensational antics and
controversial statements. He is resonating with America because he is
speaking to the wounds of those struggling to cling to what’s left of
the middle class American Dream.
And the strength of Trump’s position there is buttressed by the cold
fact that the Clinton’s strong support for NAFTA played a major role in
the downward spiral of the Rust Belt, and many other parts of the United
States.
Trump’s appeal to bringing jobs back to America has to sound like not only a good campaign strategy, but an actual sound idea. Things have reached a point where nearly every American –
regardless of how little they pay attention to news and world affairs –
is feeling the damage that has been done. NAFTA, GATT, the WTO
and an entire shift into pseudo-governing structures of globalism that
have eaten away at the sovereignty of the United States and devoured the
prosperity of its people have taken a serious toll on our way of life.
And we have all been programmed to take it lying down.
The steady flow of funny money, artificially pumped out by the
Federal Reserve has kept many from noticing it, but the real world
effects are still hitting people on the street. Not only does the dollar
not go as far as it used to, but everything in life is increasing in
cost, and getting watered down in value and substance. Society is acting
out one big charade, and pretending not to notice the outrage, dissent
and anger seeping through the cracks and edges. Inevitable and determined to win at all costs
Rather than let that burst on her watch, and during the only
opportunity she has left in this lifetime, Hillary Clinton and her
minions have rearranged all the deck chairs in her favor to force a win.
It certainly hasn’t come from the grassroots. Where necessary, the
Democratic party has fudged primaries and stolen them outright. The
mainstream media has been scripted around her as an anointed figure who
is untouchable and beyond reproach. They have stifled exposure of Bernie
and would have done so to any other rival… if only any others had dared
to enter the race.
Instead, the campaign to elect Hillary became an unrelenting junta to force her into office in spite of the will of the people,
the rules of the game or the ever-expanding negative image of the
former First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State whose corruption and
ties to bad deeds are both legendary and sufficiently documented to
warrant life without parole.
There was a never a realistic chance that Hillary would be prosecuted
or even reprimanded over her email scandals, because the fix was in a
long time ago. Those who would theoretically hold her into account were
appointed by her husband, or by President Obama, and their cooperation
was assured in private.
Though many have argued that you can’t put lipstick on a pig, that is
exactly what has taken place. 2016 is more of a farce than ever… and
there is still another round to go. Only One Persons Stands Between Her and the Presidency Can anyone else see that the most rigged and stolen
election of all time is shaping up? If the Democratic party doesn’t want
Hillary, what makes anyone think the entire country wants anything to
do with her?
Before you answer that openly, make a strong educated guess about who
the next president is going to be… and how many bodies she will have to
climb over to get there.
What Wikileaks exposed with Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC, and
what the emails have revealed about Hillary and the Clinton Foundation
are surely only the tip of the iceberg. The stories of the delegates who
were silenced or kicked out of the convention, and many other deceitful
acts to destroy dissent and keep up appearances suggest some of the
rest of the story… and it is anything but democratic or “of the people” –
though very likely the whole of it will never be known.
There is something very, very wrong going on and it is time that
everyone – regardless of ideology, party affiliation or politics – needs
to face up to. Preliminary evidence indicates strongly that there has
been a very carefully orchestrated coup taking place… and if successful,
it will have only one logical conclusion:
Total
power, at any price, with a facade of support and momentum that just
isn’t there from anyone other than a handful of elite billionaires, and a
cadre of clients with addresses that are either foreign or based on
Wall Street.
If you missed the convention coverage, then you have got to see Hillary playing with the balloons after her speech. When the audience is filled with nasty, hate filled lesbian witches...well, you get the picture.
There really is no wondering who she is concerned about… herself, of course, and serving the coven of which she is beholden. That's what nasty whore's do, play with themselves and steal from their johns
“Most
terrorists are false flag terrorists, or are created by our own
security services. In the United States, every single terrorist incident
we have had has been a false flag, or has been an informant pushed on
by the FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders
against FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become
a lunatic asylum.”
Such FBI involvement leads one to ask whether there are forces in and
behind the US government that are manufacturing violence in order to
justify continued anti-gun agitation. Authoritarian governments and those who back them don’t want
people to have guns because without guns, it is much easier to force
people to obey. When people are not armed, genocide becomes a more viable and convenient option.
Government killed hundreds of millions in the 20th century. The 21st
century may equally bloody, especially if guns continue to be
confiscated.
In the US, many citizens have fought back against gun
confiscation. But if Hillary wins the presidency, discussions about gun
control will become moot. Guns will be confiscated. Lott explains it this way:
Until
2008, Washington, D.C., had a complete handgun ban. It was also a
felony to put a bullet in the chamber of a gun. In effect, this was a
complete ban on guns. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S.
Supreme Court struck down these laws.
But the constituency of the Supreme Court is changing. Stephen Breyer
and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are Bill Clinton appointees. Sonia Sotomayor
was appointed by Obama as was Elana Kagan.
“When
Hillary wins in November, she will appoint [Antonin] Scalia’s successor
and the Supreme Court will overturn the Heller decision. Make no
mistake about it, gun bans will return.”
Only one more appointee is needed. Conclusion: Hillary herself will not have to “pull the trigger” on gun confiscations. She will let the Supreme Court do it for her.
Notice the date...2018! This article and cover was from 1988
Strangely, it resembles bitcoin, another E currency in play. Which is why they allow it. And notice, the phoenix, rising from the ashes of dead Fed Reserve Notes. Make moves into gold and silver, while you can. And while it is STILL AVAILABLE FOR SALE.
Last week, a new website was launched which establishes a marketplace whereby white people can pay reparations to "people of color" for their years of oppression. The
site was started by Natasha Marin, a conceptual artist, who says that
the website began as a social media experiment on Facebook on July 15,
2016. The about page of the website clarifies how people should utilize
the site:
I invite People of Color
to ask for what we need to feel better, be happier, be more productive
by posting in this space. These may be both material and immaterial
requests.
I invite people who identify as White to offer services or contributions to People of Color in need of time, energy, substantive care, and support.
Just so there isn't any confusion, Natasha provides examples:
POC 1: I need a massage. This week. White Person 1: [posts Groupon with code for redemption]
POC2: I need therapy. I can spend $10 a session. White Person 2: [posts contact information to a therapist who they have made arrangements with.]
POC 3: I need groceries. White Person 3:
"I'll get them for you. PM me and I'll send an Amazon Fresh or Safeway
delivery. You just pick out what you want. I have a $200 limit."
POC 4: I'm too upset to make dinner. I live in Seattle. White Person 4:
"Come over to my house for dinner, bring a friend if you like. PM me
and I'll send you the address, or can I order delivery to you? What kind
of food do you like?"
POC 5: I need a quiet place to work on _________. White Person 5:
"I have an office, spare room, house, that will be unoccupied on the
following dates, would you like to use that space? I can send pictures
..."
POC 6: I want to scream and cuss at someone. White Person 6: "I volunteer as tribute. How do we set this up?"
POC 7: I want to escape this cruel world in a
*Specific Videogame* but can't afford it on Steam right now. This is not
a crisis, I just don't trust people easily and want to see if this
works. White Person 7: Thank you for giving me the
chance to do something concrete and relatively easy. I was quietly
hating myself for doing nothing.
Lest you think this is a joke, below are a couple of examples from
the website of people requesting and offering reparations payments.
The request below comes from Lily who would like someone to buy her the new World of Warcraft game dropping on August 30th.
Meagan, on the other hand, chose to make an unsolicited offer of "Empathic Listening." She is apparently trained in "Emotional Freedom Technique and Nonviolent Communication" and even though she is not a "licensed therapist" she has a lot of experience "holding space in this way."
While we're not exactly sure what any of that means, we're pretty sure
that Lily is SOL, in an emotionally supportive, non-violent way, on the
World of Warcraft game, at least as far as Meaghan is concerned.
And last, but certainly not least, we have an example of a reparation
request paid in full (well maybe, we haven't yet calculated the exact
amount due per capita) to Andy who requested studio time to work on his album "White Boys" where he can "vent out my frustration on, well, white boys."
WOW. And these pigs want to be funded to sell hate?
Yeah, well work hard and have some talent, no one rides for free
DUMBs. Deep underground military bases.
We all know there’s an extensive network of them which has been
significantly expanded since 9/11 and the creation of Homeland Security... ...and we’re all just supposed to put our fingers in our ears and go “la la la” and pretend like they don’t exist.
The
tunneling project is a joint venture involving the National Security
Agency, CIA, FBI, MiB, Homeland Security & a few other groups that
are buried in the Congressional Intelligence Committees with some weird
acronyms no one really understands. Much of the info on this comes from
private citizens in the county, public officials, as well as Coast to
Coast with George Noory & Art Bell. These shows have given
incredibly good information on the topic for the last several months,
beginning in late 2003…
According to the information available, there are several reasons for the project:
1) Homeland Security needs an system of rapid deployment in the South, free of traffic;
2) certain gov't agencies want an easy connection route with other gov't installations in the South;
3) there is a move on in the intelligence community to begin more
efficient use of the underground rail system already in place at
Lockheed in Marietta;
4) Paulding is a central location for the complete project that will
eventually connect installations in Anniston, AL; Macon, GA; Lockheed in
Marietta; Lookout Mtn, TN; Greenville-Spartanburg, SC; &
Raleigh-Durham, NC;
5) the Yorkville area of Paulding has been designated as the prime
location for these hubs to come together because of geological
preference;
6) the addition of new Walmart facilities in NW GA give spur hubs
& depots easy access to large areas that can be partitioned off for
moving of very large equipment & large numbers of people in case of
national emergency. (source)
Kinda like the CIA kept pretending Area 51 didn’t exist for decades until it was finally, quietly admitted it in 2013.
The answer lies in the environmental regulations implemented to
protect the Delta Smelt, a 5-7cm fish and endangered resident of the
California Delta. Regulations designed to protect the non-native
species have prevented pumping of water from the California Delta in
Northern California leaving many reservoirs in Southern California
empty. So rather than take advantage of a solid rainy
season the State of California has opted to squander the opportunity to
refill its water infrastructure and pump the water through the San
Francisco bay and into the Pacific Ocean instead. As background, the majority of California’s precipitation falls in the northern part of the state.
Historically, that precipitation flowed through various rivers and
accumulated in the California Delta between Sacramento and San
Francisco. The water was then pumped from the California Delta into
various state and federal water projects to supply water to farmers,
residential and commercial interests in the southern part of the state.
In recent years, however, pumping from the Delta has been limited or
outright restricted in favor of protecting various environmental
concerns, including the Delta Smelt population. When not pumped into
the canal systems, the water that accumulates in the Delta is simply
flushed into the Pacific Ocean. In fact, nearly 50% of
California’s annual fresh water supply is flushed into the Pacific Ocean
each year despite “severe drought” conditions.
Emptying reservoirs, then screaming DROUGHT, is the height of both stupidity and cruelty to the residents of the state.
Submitted by Jeffrey Snider via Alhambra Investment Partners, Some people have impeccable
timing. Even if by accident, there are occasions when what they say or
write comes out in almost perfect sequence. At the end of August 2014, UC Berkeley economist J. Bradford DeLong wrote an article
for Project Syndicate that argued in favor of proper categorization.
The lack of recovery was so drastic that the economist community and
indeed the world at large needed to come to terms with what was actually
taking place; and that was not anything like what was being described
especially at that time. To have such a Keynesian of
prominence make such an indictment like that may seem somewhat
surprising, as it has been they who have most objected to classifying
this economy as anything but robust. Some of it is surely
political, or at least loyalty to the good standing
monetarist/Keynesians (neo-Keynesian, saltwater-ists, or whatever they
call themselves these days) at the Federal Reserve, where no economist
shall direct any disparaging comments toward the palace. But to DeLong,
the issue had never been about recession at all:
Cumulative
output losses relative to the 1995-2007 trends now stand at 78% of
annual GDP for the US, and at 60% for the eurozone. That is an
extraordinarily large amount of foregone prosperity – and a far worse
outcome than was expected. In 2007, nobody foresaw the decline in growth
rates and potential output that statistical and policymaking agencies
are now baking into their estimates.
By 2011, it was clear – at least to me –
that the Great Recession was no longer an accurate moniker. It was time
to begin calling this episode “the Lesser Depression.”
As I wrote above, the timing was
perfect at the front edge of the “rising dollar.” The economy of greater
eurodollar shortage and inflexibility has served, in this context, to
demonstrate the claim. Rather than sail off into the Hollywood sunset as
Bernanke and then Yellen assured us, the economy instead went the other
way, and not just here. Further, subsequent data revisions have shown
that it was folly all along to believe that 2014 was anything other than
the anomaly; and a fictional one beside. The idea of calling it the
“Lesser Depression” makes good sense because the similarities with the
Great Recession are in some ways unbelievably close. What made
the Great Depression was not just its collapse but how it lingered
interminably for more than a decade. What makes this the Lesser
Depression is that same time problem, only following a much smaller
contraction at its start. When comparing them, the real difference is
the scale of collapse at the front, leaving what followed each as
remarkably, undeniably similar. This is where Ben Bernanke’s forced reputation intrudes; he will claim, has claimed, that it was his efforts that made all the difference. Indeed, that is one reason, as DeLong wrote in August 2014,
it
was dubbed the “Great Recession.” And, with the business cycle’s shift
onto an upward trajectory in late 2009, the world breathed a collective a
sigh of relief. We would not, it was believed, have to move on to the
next label, which would inevitably contain the dreaded D-word.
All the world’s central banks
did exactly that. Congratulating themselves on a job well-done, they
moved on to the cyclical recovery and the universal accolades that would
surely follow. By 2011, however, as DeLong also notes, it had become clear something
was very wrong. Policymakers have spent the last five years trying to
deny to themselves as much as anyone in the public that wasn’t true.
Deep down, however, they must have known or at least allowed themselves
in their whatever brief moments of clarity outside their dense bubble to worry that they really could have it all wrong. That was the whole point of
QE3, Draghi’s promise, QQE, etc. They would go so far, so big, and so
long that they would leave nothing to chance, all doubts erased by sheer
size and determination. If the economy didn’t want to follow
the script then they would call down the monetary thunder and make it.
That was the narrative setting for 2014, and the small improvement from
2013 was their mountain of a molehill “proving” it. While I personally believe the actions of central bankers from 2011 to 2014 was unforgivable
(there really is no excuse, they should have known better; it was their
job and self-appointed sacred duty to know better) you can make a case
that it was all understandable and perhaps legitimate. After 2014,
however, that ship sailed. What has happened in 2015 and 2016 has been
to wholly repudiate cyclicality down to the simplest terms. Janet Yellen
really cannot claim to be expecting recovery when it was on such shaky
ground to begin with and then that ground falling out from underneath
her in the trembling earthquake of the “rising dollar” she tries to
pretend the FOMC can’t see or hear (“global turmoil”). As noted yesterday,
the bond market is making this act of willful blindness that much more
impossible especially in light of the comparison to the 1930s; yet
central bankers carry on because they can. They can play
themselves into fools in public and in private, but it doesn’t matter
because they are still politically insulated. They have called a
depression a recovery for years on end, but there are no repercussions
for having done so; indeed, their dutiful media still reports everything
they say as fact and everything they do as “stimulus.” At her regular press conferences nobody in the press bothers to ask Chairman Yellen the simplest yet most poignant question of all; why is she still looking for a recovery through constant “accommodation” seven years after the recession officially ended? The answer is equally simple and straight forward – Brad DeLong was right; it was never a recession. The monetary tools of QE and ZIRP are meant as temporary measures.
The turn to QE2, as then the third and the fourth, was supposedly a
reflection of the severity of the recession, but that also was a false
assumption. Monetary policy is meant to cushion the blow as the economy
is pushed to heal, in what none other than Brad DeLong (with Larry
Summers) wrote in 1988
was an intentional, determined attempt to, “fill in troughs without
shaving off the peaks.” The idea is to use monetary (and fiscal) policy
to buy time so that no matter how bad it never gets too bad – like 1929. Rather than buy time, however,
monetary policy has instead squandered it by thinking that “shaving off
the peaks” was something that had been avoided not just as a
circumstance but even as a possibility. If this all is a
“Lesser Depression”, mimicking the lack of recovery in the 1930’s so
well, then that, too, must be made accountable. How could the global
economy fall into depression when such an outcome was held out for
decades as totally impossible? For that to have happened could have only meant the rules of the game changed
on them without their notice. That is an entirely new class of
negligence, gross misconduct that is costing the world lost economy
beyond all comprehension. A comprehensive survey of our predicament isn’t universally bad, however. There are small fissures of hope taking the form of political revolt and populism, as I wrote earlier today. There was Brexit and now:
The
light at the end of this tunnel is in the growing body of evidence that
we are not yet Japan. The lost decades of the Japanese economy are both
parts monetary criminality (“stimulus” after “stimulus” after
“stimulus” with nothing ever being stimulated) but also political status
quo to further entrench bad economics. Just this week, the Republican
National Committee unveiled its commitment to restoring some type of
Glass-Steagall. I have no idea how committed they really are, or exactly
through what mechanism it might work, and I don’t really care. More
important to me is the symbolism of even saying that they will do it and
that banking (really money) is no longer a sacred political cow;
recognizing just how far that is from TBTF.
In some ways it astounding it
has taken this long; in other ways, in terms of glacial political
shifts, it is amazing in only two presidential cycles just how far it
has come. The last Republican President was committed to Too
Big To Fail. That idea was birthed under cyclicality, where the Great
Recession would be kept to a recession if Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson
got what they wanted and the awful ramifications of depression avoided
by bailouts, monetarism, and the status quo. But we got the
ramifications of depression anyway, showing yet again it was all a lie. As much progress as this dramatic change may be, we aren’t nearly there yet. Central bankers are not anywhere close to having been brought to heel, and they have proved time and again they will not themselves stop. That actually creates something of a vacuum, a window actually for the most unpleasant opportunity:
The
real danger of 2016 and immediately beyond, then, is this race; those
that are catching up to the real problem and trying to find a real
solution not of inflation or deflation but of stable money will need
time to find and then implement it (this is where the lost opportunity
of 2008 is so tragic). Against them are those who would impede
intellectual growth (as what did happen in 2008). But as confidence in
the old order falls and the strong populist desire to look elsewhere
begins to take its place, into that messy void is still the potentially
disruptive force of bad economics. Where do all these curves meet? In
other words, what is the point at which shrinking faith, desperate
central banks, and growing economic despair all conspire to push us into
the darker reaches?
That is the real difference in 2016 – desperate central banks.
They were (mostly) content to sit back in 2015 under expectations they
formed from 2014. It was a big mistake in so many ways, not the least of
which was growing suspicion from markets, even the stock markets (bank
stocks as prime examples). They have rallied somewhat this year, with
the ECB and now Bank of Japan leading – but all still in hope, not
actual results. If this is a depression, and that is where all the
evidence points, from GDP to labor to consumers, then this burst of
desperation will have the same effect; nothing. Then what? The narrative basis of my
column was the German hyperinflationary episode of 1922 and 1923. I am
not claiming that is the next step awaiting central bank bungling inside
of the current depression, merely pointing out the commonalities of the
situations that can lead to bigger, more intense problems of all kinds
of bad possibilities.
In
other words, German monetary officials, particularly Reichsbank head
Rudolf von Havenstein and Minister of Finance Karl Helfferich, denied
that Germany had an inflation problem at all – right up until the end.
Minister Helfferich declared that Germany had better gold coverage after
the war than before it, despite that more than quadrupling of currency
volume. One economics professor, Julius Wolf, wrote in 1922 that, “in
proportion to the need, less money circulates in Germany now than before
the war.” As much as the easy-to-see Versailles excuse played a part,
there can be no doubt that beyond 1921 the German people themselves began
to recognize that authorities had no idea what they were doing; worse,
they came to see that even though policymakers were inept and
incompetent, officials themselves would never admit as much and thus
nothing would prevent Germany from its fate. That awakening meant an increase in danger that French occupation could never have unleashed on its own. [emphasis added]
Confidence is truly a big part
of economics (small “e”); that is why orthodox Economists (capital “E”)
spend so much time with asset prices, infatuating themselves with
bubbles while also convincing themselves they aren’t that. It
isn’t something that can be conjured out of nothing, manipulated like a
regression variable (raise stocks X, confidence increases Y, economy
grows Z). But it can work in the other direction, such as when
policymakers claim the “wealth effect” and then watch the economy
instead sink. The real danger in terms of money and economy might be
when the world wakes up to what I wrote above; policymakers have been calling a depression a recovery for nearly a decade.
The implications of that might be where this possible event horizon
sits; that central banks have exhausted themselves and we still got
depression anyway. I’d like to think that logic
and reality will prevail; that distaste for being told how great the
world is has become sufficiently revolting and obviously false to stir
the world’s populace to end the imbalances. But that,
again, will take time, perhaps a good deal of time; until then, whenever
it hopefully is, central banks continue to operate with impunity even
though the risks of their intemperance rise exponentially as time
further accumulates and their claims fall further from reality.
It’s not a good set of circumstances, especially since all QE did
everywhere it was tried was show that confidence in it was sorely,
disastrously misplaced.
JACKSONVILLE,
FL - A 68-year-old Vietnam veteran was violently attacked and called a
"white motherf**ker" because he said he supported Donald Trump for
president.
The attacker, who police described as a 6ft+ tall, 25 to 35-year-old,
210 to 230 pound black male, reportedly asked veteran Charlie Daniels
who he was supporting for president after overhearing him speaking with a
gas station attendant about why he planned to vote for Trump.
The man behind him became irate, using racial slurs and
expletives, authorities said. Daniels said the abusive man left the
store first, but waited for him outside and picked up where he left off. "He said, 'Hey, I need to talk to you.' I said, 'Partner, I don’t want
to talk to nobody. Look, that stuff is over with. I was just voicing an
opinion. So were you,' and I said, 'Come on, let me get some gas,'"
Daniels said. "He reached over, grabbed me by (the) arm, turned me
around and came down with his left hand. (He) knocked me down, and when I
hit the ground, he said, 'What do you think about Trump now you white
mother (expletive).' And then he started kicking me.”
...Daniels defends his support of Trump.
"First of all, I’m a Vietnam vet and I’d like to see us the country get
back on straight and normal and get our military back to where it used
to be," Daniels said. "He said, 'I don’t give a (expletive) about you
being a vet.'"
Daniels said the attack was a hate crime:
“I hope he goes to jail. I want him to make restitution for
all my injuries and the pain I’m going through right now," Daniels said.
"I don’t see why it’s not a hate crime with all the words he was
saying. It was all about me being a white man and supporting Trump. If
that’s not hate, then I don’t know what is."
The assault was captured by the gas station's surveillance cameras and was given to police but was not released to the media.
If the races were reversed in this case, the story would be on every
major news station 24/7 for months, possibly up until the very day of
the election.
Instead, as this doesn't suit the leftist media's narrative, the story is being completely ignored.
This story needs to go viral and the video of his assault must be
released to the public. The reality of the persecution Trump supporters
are facing must be shown for all to see.
Hannah
Cohen, 18, was on her way home from St Jude’s Hospital when a scanner
went off and led to incident that left her ‘physically and emotionally’
injured
A brain tumor had left Hannah blind in one eye, deaf in one ear and
partially paralyzed, so when the guards grabbed each of her arms it
startled her, she said.
Photograph: Courtesy of Shirley CohenA disabled teenage cancer patient was injured during a violent arrest
by security agents at Memphis international airport, her family has
alleged in a lawsuit filed against the Transport Security
Administration.
Hannah Cohen, 18, at the time of her arrest on 30 June 2015, and her
mother had been on their way home to Chattanooga from St Jude’s hospital
in Memphis, where Hannah underwent her final treatment for a brain
tumor.
Hannah and her mother, Shirley, told the Guardian that the pair had
made the trip hundreds of times, and knew the airport security routine
well. Shirley would usually go through the scanner first and wait for
Hannah on the other side, since Hannah’s tumor, and numerous surgeries
and treatments since she was two years old, had left her easily confused
and frightened in unfamiliar situations.
According to the complaint, the warning alarm was triggered when
Hannah passed through the body scanners. Hannah attributed the alarm to
her shirt’s design.
“My shirt – it had sequins,” Hannah told the Guardian, laboring to speak. According to the complaint:
“You could see on the screen what it was pointing out,” Shirley said.
She stood to the side, watching, wearing an immobilization boot on a
broken foot.
Agents told Hannah they needed to take her to a “sterile area” where
they could search her further. She was afraid, Shirley said, and offered
to take off the sequined shirt as she was wearing another underneath,
but a female agent laughed at her.
Seeing the scene begin to unfold, Shirley hobbled to a supervisor
standing nearby. “She is a St Jude’s patient, and she can get confused,”
she said. “Please be gentle. If I could just help her, it will make
things easier.”
But soon, a voice on the public address system requested more agents to report to the checkpoint, Shirley said. “That’s when thearmed guardscame.”
The brain tumor had left Hannah blind in one eye, deaf in one ear and
partially paralyzed, so when the guards grabbed each of her arms, it
startled her, she said. “I tried to push away,” she said. “I tried to
get away.”
The guards slammed Hannah to the ground, her mother said, smashing
her face into the floor, which the complaint alleges left her
“physically and emotionally” injured.
Shirley had just picked up her phone from the conveyor belt, and she
snapped a photo of Hannah on the floor: handcuffed, weeping and
bleeding.
“Another guard pushed me back 20ft, in my boot, and told me I
couldn’t be nearby,” said Shirley, a professor of nursing at a
university in Chattanooga.
“I felt so helpless. I sat down on a bench facing away so I couldn’t see what they were doing to my daughter.”
The lawsuit alleges that the TSA did not give Hannah adequate
accommodation to screen her, and discriminated against her because of
her disability. It names the TSA and the Memphis-Shelby County airport
authority and seeks damages that include medical expenses and for
personal injury, both physical and emotional. It calls for a “reasonable
sum not exceeding $100,000 and costs”, and an undisclosed punitive
amount.
The TSA has not yet responded to the complaint.
Hannah disappeared behind a door, then went to a hospital, and
finally to the Shelby County jail. After 24 hours apart, the mother and
daughter were reunited in the parking lot of the jail.
Shirley said she held her daughter, who sobbed, “I’m sorry, Mama.”
The next morning – now two days without their belongings, which had
made the flight home – the pair appeared before a local judge, who asked
the accused to explain herself.
When Hannah responded, the judge said: “You’re going to have to speak up.”
That’s when Hannah looked up and her hair fell back from her face,
revealing her unseeing eye, surrounded by cuts and contusions.
“The judge’s eyes got big and round,” Shirley said.
After inquiring if the pair were from Memphis, the judge recommended they get legal representation.
The charges were all dropped two days later, and the court refunded the $250 in costs the family had paid.
The TSA did not immediately return a request for comment. But a TSA
spokeswoman, Sari Koshetz, said in a statement that “passengers can call
ahead of time to learn more about the screening process for their
particular needs or medical situation”.
“Why should I do that when we’ve been going through that airport for 17 years?” Shirley said.
“These people think they are God. They think they can do anything
they want,” she said. “Well, in this country we have the Americans with
Disabilities Act. And if they will do this to a disabled girl, does that
mean they’ll do it to an 80-year-old grandmother? It’s time for
justice.”
Submitted Vincent Lanci, as posted originally on Marketslant The Mechanics of Silver Manipulation
JPMorgan Chase on Wednesday won the dismissal of three private
antitrust lawsuits, including from hedge fund manager Daniel Shak,
accusing the largest U.S. bank of rigging a market for silver futures
contracts traded on COMEX. The lawsuits accused JPMorgan of having in
late 2010 and early 2011 placed artificial bids (i.e., spoofing) onto the trading floor, harassed employees at metals market COMEX to obtain prices it wanted (i.e., intimidation) and made misrepresentations to a committee that set settlement prices. (i.e., manipulating settlements).
What follows is how JPM manipulated the silver markets by selling the
Silver contango during illiquid hours, then used their deep pockets to
push settlements, then waited until margin calls made the large locals
puke their positions. JPM in effect stretched the relationship between
forward rates and futures spreads until they made no sense anymore. Not
unlike a company trading at 50x earnings. It cannot last long. But it only has to last long enough until the guy with the position opposite you has to liquidate. That
guy does not have access to cheap money, political influence or the
most physical silver in the world in a single vault at his disposal to
create a squeeze. From Reuters:
U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan, however, said
the plaintiffs, who also included traders Mark Grumet and Thomas Wacker,
did not show that JPMorgan made "uneconomic" bids, or intended to rig
the market at counterparties' expense. He also questioned the
plaintiffs' use of Silver Indicative Forward Mid Rates ("SIFO") as a
benchmark for determining proper levels for the spreads in their
lawsuits.
Analysis: The demand was fabricated
The market was only partially backwardated. Spot was below the next 6
expirations. Translation: there was no massive demand for immediate
delivery. There was only demand in months where the last remaining MEN
who took risk trading their own money had positions. JPM's own book was
likely short and had to get liquidity to cover their positions. We knew
Shak from our floor days, and were trading spreads off-floor when this
happened. They should not have lost this case. Comex traders do not
trade physical spot. Spot was under the backwardation. Smoking gun? No,
but damning circumstantial evidence in the least. Reuters Again:
Given the (lawsuits') failure both to explain why SIFO should track
silver futures spreads, and to concretely plead that it did so
consistently, a mere general correlation between these two is not
sufficient to make SIFO a reliable benchmark such that deviations from
it support a claim of irrational pricing animated by anticompetitive
aims," Engelmayer wrote.
Analysis: a poor job was done explaining the role of SIFO in spread pricing.
SIFO represents the spread between expirations of FORWARD physical
contracts in silver. The futures spread markets are derivative of the
SIFO spreads. SIFO represents the cost-of-carry for physical silver and
is used in determining lease/borrow rates over periods of time. These
are in-turn extrapolated and the dominant factor in determining futures
spreads on COMEX. Comex spreads are a direct function of SIFO. Without
SIFO there are no spreads. And since SIFO was a much bigger market than
the Comex spread market. The pricing mechanism was not fully
transparent. It was in the hands of a few dominant cartel-like players,
as it had been for 30 years.and every time JPM sold 1 year silver and bt
4 month silver it was using their deeper pockets to push the locals to
liquidate. Add that they probably asked clients with silver in storage
to pull it off the lease market, and you have a “tail wags dog short
squeeze.”
If Shak and the other traders had ability to take delivery:
warehouse, cash&carry liquidity, etc., they wouldn't have had a
problem. They would have taken delivery in spot and then made delivery
on the short contracts in the next months they were short. But due to
inability to play in the spot market, they could not "butterfly" their
positions. Another reason they could not do this: FCMs only give 50%
cash value for physical silver as hedge vs. futures shorts. Think about
that next time you hear EU banks guaranteed 100% face on their Greek
bonds. The physical is worth only 50% collateral to the futures. Banks
like JPM have no issue with that. They borrow from the Fed window at 1%.
Guys like Shak would have had to use their credit cards and sell their
homes to carry that position. Various sources: Silver was being taken delivery from the warehouse. Rebuttal: Define "Take Delivery"
During the time Phibro cornered the silver market in 1995[1]
(likely for Soros), and in 1997 for Warren Buffet they employed "taking
Delivery" as a catalyst to get the market moving. How does one take
delivery?
You physically remove silver from the warehouse and say you took
more than you did- because of the physical work involved a receiver can
take ayt most 6MM oz of Silver daily. Why? Because it's just not that
easy to move silver out of the vault and onto a receiver’s vehicles. So
when you see "30MM oz removed" it's not physically possible. That is
375,000 lbs.
You take delivery, store it nearby and bring it back when you are out of your long futures position
Be long 30MM oz of silver in futures.
Take delivery of 20 MM in physical using borrowed money
Store the metal in a warehouse in RedHook Brooklyn and wait for the news to spook the market.
Tell your pals with long positions to make their own silver unavailable for delivery. as prices will go up soon
You throw a sheet over the silver still in the warehouse and say,
"this is mine, it is no longer here. I'll pick it up tomorrow- - Phibro
was to have employed all 3 methods in 1997 after filling Warren on his
buys.- Andy Hall was a genius when he had order flow to front run
Buy the last 1,000 contracts for the customer as sloppily as you can.
Tell the customer you beat the VWAP, i.e. last price on the board is higher than the average price you bought for client.
There is a word for that. It is called Racketeering Final Word:
In 1994, Phibro played this game except for the spreads. They
exercised out of the money calls on a 4 day weekend. But that squeeze
was short lived. Warren Buffet just rescued Solly and didn’t want any
more DOJ problems.
But in 1997 Warren was the instigator.In 1997 Warren Buffet, actually
stood for delivery. Yet the market did not rally until AFTER the
spreads backwardated all the way to spot.
This trader also remembers that in 1997, Buffet was then asked by the
Gov’t to defer his request for delivery a year. . They pleaded with
him, “The integrity of the market was at stake (Hunt Brother's anyone?);
and The whole Silver mining industry was in jeopardy. (TBTF).” Buffet
happily complied by selling spot at approx. $7.40 and buying a 1 year
future at around $4.50. He netted an ROR of 40% due to negative carry
without selling. Effectively, he lent the producers their silver back to them 40% higher than his cost.
In 2011Blythe Master did a mini-Buffet.
The difference being, the market had ALREADY rallied without
backwardation, and all of a sudden spreads (literally overnight during
Asian and London hours) went into backwardation.
In a real market, the spread activity predicts the physical demand
before the flat price does. You see the spot price start to act
squirrelly to the front month future in the EFP. Immediate demand
drives deferred month pricing.There are exceptions to this. But it is
rare.
I'm sure each one of my arguments for manipulation can be taken apart by some lawyer or “expert”. But that is what lawyers do.
Facts against them? Argue the Law.
Law against them? Argue the facts.
Both against them? Use ad hominum attacks to shoot the messenger. So for the sake of transparency, here is the messenger.
Author's Background and Caveat:
For the record- I was suspended from NYMEX 12+ years ago for
manipulating a settlement without a client complaint. I learned that
behavior from watching the pros do it and get away with it. I was
arrogant enough to think I could. I was a street kid form Philly who had
to drop out of college and learn to survive. Got lucky and had 15 Ivy
league kids working for me at one time. But I lay down with dogs too
long and got a bad case of fleas. A big price was paid for that. And to
save an incompetent compliance officer's job I was punished harshly.
Post suspension, most firms wouldn't touch me even as they burned
themselves time and time again on derivatives risk in Energy and Metals.
I then witnessed the FC Stone downfall fittingly from them cooking
their own books ( Jeff Soman?) years after they threw me under the bus
as their client ( Jeff Soman!). But you have to move forward. Market Structure and Greedy Pols
As time passed I grew to despise manipulators but did not blame them per se. The market structures are the major culprit.
Which in turn means the politicians who are lobbied by the corporations
to alter market structure to protect Corporate interests are the
culprits. In the end it is all about greed. Dodd-Frank was passed
essentially blank. The "bankers will help fill it out. they are the
experts" SMFH.
Then, I got my break. I was on other side of arguably, the biggest
Commodity trade of 2007. My firm saw an arbitrage, borrowed money and
took on the banks. Not only was Echobay right, but our counterparty, BMO
was (ironically) cooking their own books. Their trader was David Lee
and I feel bad for him as he was a victim of a greed cult and lost his
ethics as I had in 2003. Full Circle
In the end I was a material witness in BMO's 2007 Nat Gas EOO scandal
where they tried to blame the counterparties to their rogue trader. BMO
settled the case within days of my deposition involving manipulated
settlements. I havethe transcript of a 9 hour deposition to prove it.
So bring it, if you think my observations are flawed. I'm all about
learning. A million facts do not add up to a single truth, especially
where corporate lawyers are involved.
This isn't the first time I've written on this and won’t be the last.
During my career, I've been victim, observer, perpetrator and now
despiser of market manipulators and the market structure that rewards
corporate greed at the expense of free markets. The little guy can no
longer compete. Watch, homogeneous counterparties will be the death of
the markets. TBTF means too big to exist IMHO Judge Engelmeyer, you got it wrong. Daniel Shak, you deserved better than you got.
- Vincent Lanci, Vlanci@echobay.com
Submitted by Mac Slavo via SHTFPlan.com,
Call it conspiracy theory, coincidence or just bad luck, but any time
someone is in a position to bring down Hillary Clinton by testifying
they wind up dead. In fact, there’s a long history of Clinton-related body counts, with scores of people dying under mysterious circumstances.
Perhaps the most notable is Vince Foster. Foster was a partner at
Clinton’s law firm and knew the inner workings of the Clinton Machine.
Police ruled that death a suicide, though it is often noted that Foster
may have been suicided. Now, another official has found himself on the wrong end of the Clintons. That John Ashe was a former President of the United Nations General Assembly highlights the fact that no one is safe once in their sights.
And as you might have guessed, there are major inconsistencies with Ashe’s death. It was not only conveniently timed because Ashe died just a few days before being set to testify against Clinton in a corruption case, but official reports indicated he died of a heart attack.
The problem, however, is that police on the scene reported Ashe died when his throat was crushed during a work-out accident.
The New York Post’s Page Six reported that after Ashe was found dead Wednesday, the U.N. claimed that he had died from a heart attack.Local
police officers in Dobbs Ferry, New York, later disputed that claim,
saying instead that he died from a workout accident that crushed his
throat.
Adding to the mysterious nature of Ashe’s death was the fact that he had been slated to be in court Monday
with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, from whom he
reportedly received over $1 billion in donations during his term as
president of the U.N. General Assembly.
And then there was this: During the presidency of Bill Clinton, Seng
illegally funneled several hundred thousand dollars to the Democrat
National Committee.
It must be coincidence, right?
If former Secret Service agent Gary Byrne is to be believed, this is business as usual for the Clintons. Excerpt via Zero Hedge:
BYRNE: I
feel so strongly that people need to know the real Hillary Clinton and
how dangerous she is in her behavior. She is not a leader. She is not a
leader.
SEAN: She does not have the temperament?
BYRNE: She doesn’t have the temperament. She didn’t have the temperament to handle the social office when she was First Lady, she does not have the temperament.
SEAN: She’s dishonest.
BYRNE: She’s dishonest, she habitually lies, anybody that can
separate themselves from their politics and review her behavior over
the past 15 years…
1 – James McDougal – Clinton’s convicted Whitewater partner
died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a
key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.
2 – Mary Mahoney – A former
White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in
Georgetown. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her
story of sexual harassment in the White House.
3 – Vince Foster – Former white
House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose
Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of
Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a
plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that
there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound.
At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke
publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.
5 – C. Victor Raiser II and
Montgomery Raiser, Major players in the Clinton fund raising
organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic
National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in
Little Rock, September 1992… Described by Clinton as a “Dear friend and
trusted advisor.”
7- Ed Willey – Clinton fund
raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot
wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his
wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office
in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund
raising events.
8 – Jerry Parks – Head of
Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his
car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park’s son said his
father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to
reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously
removed from his house.
9 – James Bunch – Died from a
gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people
which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in
Texas and Arkansas.
10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.
11- Kathy Ferguson, ex-wife of
Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her
living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even
though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going
somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in
the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating
witness for Paula Jones.
12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas
State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide
ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot
wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.
13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for
Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall
building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.
14 – Florence Martin –
Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry
Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.
15 – Suzanne Coleman –
Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney
General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a
suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s
speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9,
1992. She died in a one car accident.
17 – Danny Casolaro –
Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas
Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the
middle of his investigation.
18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney
investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980
“October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his
Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno three
weeks before his death
19 – Jon Parnell Walker –
Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death
from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August15, 1993. He was
investigating the Morgan Guarantee scandal.
20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce
Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause
of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was
found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
21- Charles Meissner –
Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security
clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.
22 – Dr. Stanley Heard –
Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee,
died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard,
in addition to serving on Clinton’s advisory council personally treated
Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.
23 – Barry Seal – Drug running pilot out of Mena, Arkansas, death was no accident.
24 – Johnny Lawhorn Jr. –
Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car
left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a
utility pole.
25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guarantee. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.
26- Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded.
27 – Kevin Ives and Don Henry –
Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have
stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial
case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on
railroad tracks. Later reports claim the two boys had been slain before
being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their
testimony could come before a Grand Jury.
THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:
28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, July 1988.
29 – Keith McMaskle – Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988
30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
33 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to “natural causes.”
34 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.
35 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON
BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD: 36 – Major William S. Barkley Jr. 37 – Captain
Scott J. Reynolds 38 – Sgt. Brian Hanley 39 – Sgt. Tim Sabel 40 – Major
General William Robertson 41 – Col. William Densberger 42 – Col. Robert
Kelly 43 – Spec. Gary Rhodes 44 – Steve Willis 45 – Robert Williams 46 –
Conway LeBleu 47 – Todd McKeehan
JACKSONVILLE,
FL - A 68-year-old Vietnam veteran was violently attacked and called a
"white motherf**ker" because he said he supported Donald Trump for
president.
America is God's prophesied Zion, the New Israel, and each is beholden only to God Almighty, the Creator of the universe, direct, ruled only by Truth and Justice, "a nation of priests."
Those who lie and cheat, kill and steal, and protect the Synagogue of Satan and the Anti-Christ's Beast Fifth Column all know run the FedScam, funded Hitler, staged the Holohoax, killed John and Martin to keep us as papal cats-paw in Indochina and to restart their unconstitutional money scheme, did Ruby Ridge, Waco, OKC, and 9/11, and are staging the hoax and psyop mass shootings in order to disarm the sovereign People, are traitors against God, the Constitution, and the People and must be removed or excised from Our Holy Land after full expropriation.