 |
 
Official NASA photographs confirm all Apollo
Moon missions were faked.
_______________________________________________________________
Over 45
years on from events that never took place, there are still many gullible
people who believe that men went to the Moon and back in 1968, and 6
months later landed on it, so here is the evidence which proves
otherwise.
In the
1970's many people worldwide had serious doubt that the Moon landings were
for real, but there was no material available upon which to base an
investigation, other than the few photo's in a limited number of
fictional/fantasy books which endorsed Apollo.
In 1995
the INTERNET brought about the full expose of NASA's 25 year scam, as
people worldwide now had full access to NASA's web site pictures, and
could see for themselves how the pictures had been doctored with false
backgrounds. Before 1995 it was not possible to see these pictures, and
that was because most of them had not even been made, (see APOLLO FAKE
site). However all are now available.
There
has been a lot of "faking" in the past, remember the Cottingley fairy
photographs? Many war photo's were faked for propaganda purposes, and lets
face it women have been "faking it" for years, albeit in their partners
company, unlike NASA who involve the whole world. Anyone "faking" it can
only do it for so long before being uncovered, 45 years is way past the
mark, which only makes the saga appear more ridiculous than what it did
back in 1968.
Look at
this picture of the LM, taken from the fake Apollo 17 mission. Notice
curved light marking at the rear, with small pot crater above it. Notice
dark crater to the right of picture, and abrupt straight line evident
between the foreground and rear background mountains.
Now
look at the picture right and see the SAME identical landmarks. Where is
the LM in this photo, has it been nicked by joy riders on the Moon? No
NASA simply used the same pasted backdrop on most pictures from the 17th
mission. The curved light marking, and abrupt line are there again,
signifying that backdrop has been pasted onto picture. NASA constantly
used this same backdrop scene and then claimed that each picture was taken
elsewhere on Moon.
Picture
on left, shows SAME background again, with a frustrated astroNOT looking
for his lost lunar module. NASA constantly used this same background scene
even though astroNOTS traveled many miles from base in four separate
directions.
The
picture on right shows the SAME background again, and still no sign of the
lunar module. The astroNOT in picture appears to be transfixed on a large
boulder. With impaired vision from his supposedly gold tinted visor, he
has probably mistook the large boulder for his lost lunar module. Lets be
serious shall we. The foreground in this photograph was taken at some
remote desert location. The shadows are genuine shadows from daylight sun
here on Earth.
This
photograph appears in Patrick Moore's book "Mission to the Planets", and
Mr. Moore claims that Armstrong took the picture as he was approaching the
Moon, with SHADOW of the space craft visible on the Moon's surface. Mr.
Moore also claims that the large crater in this picture, (Maskelyne) is 19
miles in diameter. If that be so then that is one helluva big space ship
hovering above the Moon. NASA now claim that it is not a shadow, but the
rear booster of command module in view of camera. Each time someone brings
up a serious anomaly, NASA reply with the most absurd
comments.
This
color picture on right shows a Moon surveyor probe at some remote desert
location here on planet Earth, probably Devon Island in the Canadian
Arctic, where they are now preparing to fake a manned Mars mission. Why
would NASA ship the probe to a remote location in order to take this
picture, and why are there numerous Moon boot footprints all around it? Do
NASA technicians wear Moon boots all the time? The sandy surface also
shows signs of "brushing", evidently to remove other footprints not
consistent with a Moon boot print.
Now can
you see why NASA shipped the above probe to that remote location. This is
the SAME probe, albeit picture was taken from a different
angle.
The
height of probe is at least twice that of the astroNOT, and yet picture
was taken at the same height level as probe. This would mean that the
other astroNOT was either 18 feet tall, or he carried a large pair of
steps with him to the Moon.
Picture
right shows astroNOT John Young from the so called Apollo 16 mission on
Moon. In the surface sand, moist ash, or whatever it was they used, there
are other footprints. The footprints, (arrowed), have been made by pointed
"winkle picker shoes", (quite common back in the 1960's), or possibly
lady's stiletto shoes.
The
footprints therefore either belong to the photographer who accidently
walked across the fake "Moonset", or Mr. Young took his Mrs with him to
the Moon.
It
looks as though astroNOT in this pic is about to topple over, he's
certainly not upright, probably drunk to much Moonshine. NASA should
breathalyze its astroNOTS on future missions to the Moon, question is when
will that be in another 45 years?
What's
more ridiculous is that there is no shadow at all from the flag and pole,
evidently it was added, (pasted), after the photo was
taken.
Picture
shown right, and the one below, are supposed to be separate Moon missions,
ie 12 and 14. However the primary, and secondary horizon lines are
practically identical, as to is the fake, (scooped out), crater behind the
flag. Notice in both pictures the astroNOT is having to hold the flag,
unlike previous picture where it was pasted on.
This is
supposed to be A. Shepard. How do we know? It could be anyone inside that
space suit, incidentally Shepard was removed from ALL space missions with
meniares disease before Apollo 8.
Notice
the discarded condom between astroNot and LM shadow. These people must
have been practicing "safe sex" long before it became fashionable, or it
could be they were simply f*****g about. I think it is the
latter.
 
Early fake pictures were taken
at LRC, Virginia. The latter pictures however, (excluding wide pan shots),
were doctored photo's from KSC shown left. Notice the background hedge's
and tree's. Unfortunately this same site was used to take picture on
right, which they claim is on the Moon. The reflection in visor, shows the
trees, hedges at KSC.
 
In the
Apollo 16 picture above left, the shadow from astroNOT looks somewhat
weird, and so to does the LM shadow. The shadows are not parallel with one
another, and there is no shadow at all from the flag. Look closely at the
fake craters on rear mound, and the fake, (scooped out), crater just
behind the astroNOT.
Now
compare it with the picture above right. NASA must have had a limited
number of backdrops to paste on the fake pictures. This is supposed to be
Station 1, over 2 Kms from the landing site yet background and foreground
are identical. That dam LM is missing again in this picture, hoisted out
of view to give the impression photo was taken elsewhere. Notice pathetic
scooped out crater which looks though it has been done by some energetic
dog in the process of burying a bone. Now we know what they mean when they
refer to the Rover, it's a flaming dog.
Here's
a astroNOT with some kind of scoop. Probably a scoop for picking up
Rover's poop. One thing that puzzles me is that I have not seen any
evidence of Rover's paw prints yet. No doubt they will show up in some
picture I have yet to see.
This
fake picture is from the Apollo 17 site, but notice that "twin peak"
mountain in the left of picture, and mountains to the right of
it.
That
"twin peak" mountain appears in this shot, but somehow the mountains to
the right of it have disappeared altogether. First we had a disappearing
Lunar Module, now we have a whole mountain range which has vacated the
scene. It would appear NASA not only had the technology to land men on the
Moon, but also the technology to move whole mountains as well.
Incredible!
Look at
the background in this picture of the Apollo 17 LM, you've probably seen
it many times before, as it is the most common backdrop which they used in
the fake Apollo 17 photo's.
Notice
the decent ladder attached to suspension leg on the right hand side of
LM.
Here is
another photograph of Apollo 17 LM taken from SAME angle and orientation.
This is confirmed by the decent ladder which is clearly seen on the right
hand side. The top section of LM seems to have taken a TURN for the worse,
and one of the legs in top picture has been amputated, yet appears to have
regrown elsewhere in this pic. Just a minute, what's with that background?
Did they up the LM from its original site and move it elsewhere?
Phew.
Holy
Moon Rock! or should that be Holy Petrified Wood! That mountain in picture
above has swelled to an enormous size, and yet astroNOT on buggy appears
totally oblivious to the fact. What has caused this mountain to swell in
size? Was it geological activity or another classic example of NASA PASTED
BACKDROP.
Incidentally the buggy is 10 feet long,
so the LM cannot be much bigger looking at this picture.
Lord
Nordy ! Those astroNOTS had better get the hell outta there, and move the
LM as they did in the first picture. That rear mountain is sure getting
bigger, and about to engulf the LM at anytime. I can see why the
photographer has "backed off". Forget Viagra, it looks as though NASA had
a secret formula for increasing size way back in the
60's.
This
fake Apollo 15 photo shows how NASA began to incorporate mountains in the
background, as the fake pictures they put forward for the 11/12 and 14
mission, were bland and uninteresting. They assumed it would renew public
interest, as the public had become bored by it all.
An
impressive background scene was built up in various stages, and used as a
wide pan photo for the 17th mission, ie, the Grand
Finale.
This
fake picture is made from 3 pan shots taken for Apollo 15. The small white
hill to the right of, but some distance away from, the LM, is the SAME
hill which appears in the previous picture, and is part of the mountain
backdrop which NASA were creating. Notice large sloping mountain to the
right of the hill, has disappeared in this picture. Looks as though NASA
have been busy with the heavy earth moving equipment again. What's
ridiculous about this picture is that it shows LM to be in WIDE OPEN
SPACE, ie, flat open plain land, however in picture below left, which is
also Apollo 15, the LM is shown to be surrounded by towering mountains and
hills.
 
The two
pictures above 'cap it all'. Picture left shows LM surrounded by high
mountains. This does not match with previous wide pan shot which shows LM
to be situated in wide open plains with NO hills. NASA claim photo on
right is a 'relatively fresh crater' somewhere else on the Moon, yet both
pictures have the SAME BACKDROP. Yes the LM has disappeared yet again in
right hand picture. As for the 'relatively fresh crater' it is indeed
"relatively fresh", because it is the fake crater which NASA created a few
months before picture was composed. That fake crater can be seen on the
APOLLO REALITY 2 site.
 
The two
fake pictures above are from the Apollo 15 files, but notice that sloping
foreground in both pictures is the SAME. This is confirmed by the shallow
indentation, (fake crater), which is arrowed in both pictures. However
notice that both pictures have an entirely different background. Canyon
shown in right hand picture is actually a scene from Devon
Island.
 
We are
constantly told that it was the Americans who got to the Moon first, but I
am not so sure. The picture on left clearly shows the front end of a Lada
car in the right of picture, leading me to believe the Russians got there
first. Meanwhile one of the astroNOTS in the right hand picture appears to
have undergone a sex change whilst on the Moon. He sure has a slim,
somewhat "shapely" waistline, either that or he is wearing a tight fitting
girdle.
Picture
left shows TWO astroNOTS on the Moon, meaning someone else took the
picture. If that's not the case, then it shows how easily it is to paste
another object onto an existing photograph. In the case of NASA they paste
false background scenes onto photographs taken here on planet
Earth.
Even I
can be wrong at times. I assumed that the Rover was a dog, and have been
examining the photo's looking for evidence of paw prints. No such luck,
however I uncovered the picture on right which clearly shows a moggy on
the Moon. The soft ash, or charcoal which they used at LRC to create the
FAKE dusty Moon surface was, of course, ideal for cats. As we all know
cats like a soft, fine soil to do their "turn out" as it makes it easier
for them to scrap it over afterwards. The local cats near to LRC must have
been in 7th heaven finding such a purrfect place in which to do their
thing. NASA staff must have spent a considerable amount of time scraping
the cat poop of the astroNOTS Moon boots.
Anyway
that just about wraps it up for NASA's UTTERLY RIDICULOUS FAKE MOON
PICTURES. For more info on the biggest con, hoax, scam, fraud, call it
what you like, of the 20th century, check out the links
below.
NASASCAM
Start
you investigation here
APOLLO
FAKE
The
person responsible for NASA's fake Apollo Moon
pictures.
APOLLO
REALITY
How,
and where NASA faked the lunar orbiting/landing, and lift off
video's.
APOLLO
INSIDER
USGS
involvement in the faking of Apollo.
APOLLO FRY
UP
How
deadly space radiation makes Moon trip impossible.
APOLLO
TRUTH
The
reason NASA faked the Apollo Moon missions.
APOLLO
LAUGH
You've
just gotta take the Mickey.
APOLLO
FEEDBACK
Read what the
media say about naughty NASA.
APOLLO FACTS
Facts
to be considered about Apollo Moon missions.
APOLLO
DATA
Data
from the Apollo missions which does not add up.
APOLLO VIDEOS
Clear
cut evidence of fakery in NASA videos.
All sites best viewed at 1024 x
768, or 1024 x 600 resolution with medium text
size.
|
|
Sunday, November 23, 2014
The truth of the moon landings is in the alleged photography...
