Information CONFIRMED by the former head of the French intelligence office for Territorial Surveillance, Yves Bonett, who spilled the beans to a newspaper of Toulouse, about Mohammed Merah has been an asset for the French Secret Service. The smoking gun whistle blower who confirms my suspicions that the murderous events in Montauban and Toulouse were an Illuminati inside job.
SOURCES:
http://www.france24.com/en/20120327-mediawatch-mohamed-merah-secret-service-informant-dcri
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&tl=en&twu=1&u=http://www.ilfoglio.it/soloqui/12819
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=fr&tl=en&twu=1&u=http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2012/03/27/1316372-les-considerations-mediatiques-l-ont-emporte-sur-tout-le-reste.html
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.francetv.fr%2F2012%2Fle-pen-met-la-pression-sur-sarkozy-dans-lenquete-sur-merah-116578
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alterinfo.net%2FLes-liens-de-Mohamed-Merah-avec-les-services-secrets-francais-audio-48_a73721.html
http://www.thelocal.fr/2953/20120327/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_jO0bAeh3k
http://www.youtube.com/user/undercoveralien
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Friday, March 23, 2012
Once upon a time, we had straight forward and honest leadership in the world...
Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day".
- President Theordore Roosevelt April 19, 1906
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."
- President Woodrow Wilson, before his death in 1924
- President Theordore Roosevelt April 19, 1906
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."
- President Woodrow Wilson, before his death in 1924
Is nothing off limits? Now Google (in reality, intel agencies) plans to spy on background noise in your phone
Adverts could soon be tailored according to the background noise around you when using your smartphone, if a patent application by Google becomes reality.
The search engine giant has filed for a patent called ‘Advertising based on environmental conditions’.
As that title implies, it’s not just background sounds that could be used to determine what adverts you seen on your mobile phone. The patent also describes using ‘temperature, humidity, light and air composition’ to produced targeted adverts
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2118673/Google-patents-advertising-tailored-background-sounds-phone-calls.html
The search engine giant has filed for a patent called ‘Advertising based on environmental conditions’.
As that title implies, it’s not just background sounds that could be used to determine what adverts you seen on your mobile phone. The patent also describes using ‘temperature, humidity, light and air composition’ to produced targeted adverts
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2118673/Google-patents-advertising-tailored-background-sounds-phone-calls.html
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Helping the homeless is now a crime in most cities in the USA
Helping people who really need a hand has become illegal. I break this law several times a month, very often giving every cent in my walllet.
Because...
In them, I see me. For we are those around us. Many, who are blessed with success and are vetted, never have to worry about a roof or a meal.
We do. Every day.
Many, who were raised with entitlement programming, see unfortunates as low-life scum bags who should be ignore.
As we are. Every day.
The truth is, pain and suffering is very often the fate of those lost in poor choices, and these days, very often the victim of a Beast system that wants a chaotic failing economic reality where only the vetted satanic slaves are given a piece of the success pie.
For the rest of us, it's slave wages, being spit upon, and hated. As are the homeless.
I see so many families out there without a home or any means to get any kind of paying work that will provide rent and food and gas and all the other "on the grid" stuff necessary to function in the Beast system. For those of us freejacks, all we have to look forward to is second hand clothes, fasting, and an endless series of days with no future in the Beast system.
Passing laws that make it illegal to assist those in need only indicates how evil the management system of the Beast system really is - and it's straight out of the Satanic bible. Really, you can look it up. Those on the bottom rungs of life are considered worthless and useless eaters who should be done away with.
It's how the soulless thing, feel, and function. Among themselves, it's all sharing, good wages, and prosperity. Outside of that and below that, it's go F yourself and get out of our way or else. I know this because this is how I am treated by network assets that allow me to slave for them for about 4 dollars an hour, after you deduct the expense of gas to get to their worlds of slave labor.
Because...
In them, I see me. For we are those around us. Many, who are blessed with success and are vetted, never have to worry about a roof or a meal.
We do. Every day.
Many, who were raised with entitlement programming, see unfortunates as low-life scum bags who should be ignore.
As we are. Every day.
The truth is, pain and suffering is very often the fate of those lost in poor choices, and these days, very often the victim of a Beast system that wants a chaotic failing economic reality where only the vetted satanic slaves are given a piece of the success pie.
For the rest of us, it's slave wages, being spit upon, and hated. As are the homeless.
I see so many families out there without a home or any means to get any kind of paying work that will provide rent and food and gas and all the other "on the grid" stuff necessary to function in the Beast system. For those of us freejacks, all we have to look forward to is second hand clothes, fasting, and an endless series of days with no future in the Beast system.
Passing laws that make it illegal to assist those in need only indicates how evil the management system of the Beast system really is - and it's straight out of the Satanic bible. Really, you can look it up. Those on the bottom rungs of life are considered worthless and useless eaters who should be done away with.
It's how the soulless thing, feel, and function. Among themselves, it's all sharing, good wages, and prosperity. Outside of that and below that, it's go F yourself and get out of our way or else. I know this because this is how I am treated by network assets that allow me to slave for them for about 4 dollars an hour, after you deduct the expense of gas to get to their worlds of slave labor.
Your HDTV is watching you
Ten years ago, I wrote an article detailing the emerging technology in flat screen and plasma TVs that had within them, microphone and buried cameras/electic eyes, which were motioned activated. That article got lots of laughs from everyone, but it was out there and so were the products that had them. I explained that these TVs were tied into cable providers, essentially acting as an always on seeing/hearing device for the intelligence agencies.
Since that time, it has emerged that yes, not only does the technology exist, but Sony. LG, and Samsung have it installed in their systems, including other features.
This makes those large flat screen babies big bonanza spy devices for the spook agencies and in every home.
As the following article by someone else details, it's explained away as a limited hangout (agency term.) You are being watched, but it's only for advertisement purposes. Honest. Really. It's only to sell you junk for Walmart.
Riiiiiiiiiight.
So, I guess it's okay for your living room to be hooked in to the network (so are the CIA and everyone else, think cloud services) and that everything that happens in your home is being filmed and recorded 24/7 and there is no way you can disable the thing, once installed. And if only for ad tracking, why do they need to listen and watch.
This reminds me of laptops, which are always on video and audio recording devices that have been proven in the last few years as being abused by school districts, businesses (Aaron brothers surveills its customers that it sells or rents to, fact.), and federal agencies (FBI, etc - search google and see the court cases where this has come to the surface.)
You feel okay with that? Your TV and agencies and persons unknown watching every little thing you say and do in your house and YOU ARE PAYING FOR THEM TO DO IT, TOO. You pay for the TV and the cable service.
What a real windfall of survelliance for the spy agencies. You pay to be watched by them.
--------
Samsung’s 2012 top-of-the-line plasmas and LED HDTVs offer new features never before available within a television including a built-in, internally wired HD camera, twin microphones, face tracking and speech recognition. While these features give you unprecedented control over an HDTV, the devices themselves, more similar than ever to a personal computer, may allow hackers or even Samsung to see and hear you and your family, and collect extremely personal data.
While Web cameras and Internet connectivity are not new to HDTVs, their complete integration is, and it’s the always connected camera and microphones, combined with the option of third-party apps (not to mention Samsung’s own software) gives us cause for concern regarding the privacy of TV buyers and their friends and families.
Samsung has not released a privacy policy clarifying what data it is collecting and sharing with regard to the new TV sets. And while there is no current evidence of any particular security hole or untoward behavior by Samsung’s app partners, Samsung has only stated that it “assumes no responsibility, and shall not be liable” in the event that a product or service is not “appropriate.”
Samsung demoed these features to the press earlier this month. The camera and microphones are built into the top if the screen bezel in the 2012 8000-series plasmas and are permanently attached to the top of the 7500- and 8000ES-series LED TVs.
A Samsung representative showed how, once set up and connected to the Internet, these models will automatically talk to the Samsung cloud and enable viewers to use new and exciting apps.
These Samsung TVs locate and make note of registered viewers via sophisticated face recognition software. This means if you tell the TV whose faces belong to which users in your family, it personalizes the experience to each recognized family member. If you have friends over, it could log these faces as well.
In addition, the TV listens and responds to specific voice commands. To use the feature, the microphone is active. What concerns us is the integration of both an active camera and microphone. A Samsung representative tells us you can deactivate the voice feature; however this is done via software, not a hard switch like the one you use to turn a room light on or off.
And unlike other TVs, which have cameras and microphones as add-on accessories connected by a single, easily removable USB cable, you can’t just unplug these sensors.
During our demo, unless the face recognition learning feature was activated, there was no indication as to whether the camera (such as a red light) and audio mics are on. And as far as the microphone is concerned the is no way to physically disconnect it or be assured it is not picking up your voice when you don’t intend it to do so.
Samsung does provide the ability to manually reposition the TV’s camera away from viewers. The LED TV models allow you to manually point it upward, facing the ceiling; the plasma’s camera can be re-aimed to capture objects in the rear of the TV according a Samsung spokesperson.
Privacy concerns
We began to wonder exactly what data Samsung collects from its new “eyes and ears” and how it and other companies intend use it, which raises the following questions:
* Can Samsung or Samsung-authorized companies watch you watching your Samsung TV?
* Do the televisions send a user ID or the TV’s serial number to the Samsung cloud whenever it has an Internet connection?
* Does Samsung cross reference a user ID or facial scan to your warranty registration information, such as name, address etc.?
* Can a person or company listen to you, at will, via the microphone and Internet connection?
* Does Samsung’s cloud store all this information? How secure is this extremely personal data?
* Can a hacker intercept this data or view you via the built in camera?
* Can a third-party app program do any of the above?
* Exactly what information does the TV send to Samsung or other parties?
* Does Samsung intend to sell data collected by its Smart TV owners, such as who, what and when one is viewing?
Companies desiring to provide highly targeted advertisements to you via the TV screen or external marketing would find this data extremely valuable. “Hey, you look a little tired, how about some Ambien? I’m seeing a little grey, have you tried Grecian Formula? Joe, it looks like you packed on a few pounds recently, here’s information from Weight Watchers. Hey kids, you look bored, look at these TOYS!”
http://hdguru.com/is-your-new-hdtv-watching-you/7643/
Since that time, it has emerged that yes, not only does the technology exist, but Sony. LG, and Samsung have it installed in their systems, including other features.
This makes those large flat screen babies big bonanza spy devices for the spook agencies and in every home.
As the following article by someone else details, it's explained away as a limited hangout (agency term.) You are being watched, but it's only for advertisement purposes. Honest. Really. It's only to sell you junk for Walmart.
Riiiiiiiiiight.
So, I guess it's okay for your living room to be hooked in to the network (so are the CIA and everyone else, think cloud services) and that everything that happens in your home is being filmed and recorded 24/7 and there is no way you can disable the thing, once installed. And if only for ad tracking, why do they need to listen and watch.
This reminds me of laptops, which are always on video and audio recording devices that have been proven in the last few years as being abused by school districts, businesses (Aaron brothers surveills its customers that it sells or rents to, fact.), and federal agencies (FBI, etc - search google and see the court cases where this has come to the surface.)
You feel okay with that? Your TV and agencies and persons unknown watching every little thing you say and do in your house and YOU ARE PAYING FOR THEM TO DO IT, TOO. You pay for the TV and the cable service.
What a real windfall of survelliance for the spy agencies. You pay to be watched by them.
--------
Samsung’s 2012 top-of-the-line plasmas and LED HDTVs offer new features never before available within a television including a built-in, internally wired HD camera, twin microphones, face tracking and speech recognition. While these features give you unprecedented control over an HDTV, the devices themselves, more similar than ever to a personal computer, may allow hackers or even Samsung to see and hear you and your family, and collect extremely personal data.
While Web cameras and Internet connectivity are not new to HDTVs, their complete integration is, and it’s the always connected camera and microphones, combined with the option of third-party apps (not to mention Samsung’s own software) gives us cause for concern regarding the privacy of TV buyers and their friends and families.
Samsung has not released a privacy policy clarifying what data it is collecting and sharing with regard to the new TV sets. And while there is no current evidence of any particular security hole or untoward behavior by Samsung’s app partners, Samsung has only stated that it “assumes no responsibility, and shall not be liable” in the event that a product or service is not “appropriate.”
Samsung demoed these features to the press earlier this month. The camera and microphones are built into the top if the screen bezel in the 2012 8000-series plasmas and are permanently attached to the top of the 7500- and 8000ES-series LED TVs.
A Samsung representative showed how, once set up and connected to the Internet, these models will automatically talk to the Samsung cloud and enable viewers to use new and exciting apps.
These Samsung TVs locate and make note of registered viewers via sophisticated face recognition software. This means if you tell the TV whose faces belong to which users in your family, it personalizes the experience to each recognized family member. If you have friends over, it could log these faces as well.
In addition, the TV listens and responds to specific voice commands. To use the feature, the microphone is active. What concerns us is the integration of both an active camera and microphone. A Samsung representative tells us you can deactivate the voice feature; however this is done via software, not a hard switch like the one you use to turn a room light on or off.
And unlike other TVs, which have cameras and microphones as add-on accessories connected by a single, easily removable USB cable, you can’t just unplug these sensors.
During our demo, unless the face recognition learning feature was activated, there was no indication as to whether the camera (such as a red light) and audio mics are on. And as far as the microphone is concerned the is no way to physically disconnect it or be assured it is not picking up your voice when you don’t intend it to do so.
Samsung does provide the ability to manually reposition the TV’s camera away from viewers. The LED TV models allow you to manually point it upward, facing the ceiling; the plasma’s camera can be re-aimed to capture objects in the rear of the TV according a Samsung spokesperson.
Privacy concerns
We began to wonder exactly what data Samsung collects from its new “eyes and ears” and how it and other companies intend use it, which raises the following questions:
* Can Samsung or Samsung-authorized companies watch you watching your Samsung TV?
* Do the televisions send a user ID or the TV’s serial number to the Samsung cloud whenever it has an Internet connection?
* Does Samsung cross reference a user ID or facial scan to your warranty registration information, such as name, address etc.?
* Can a person or company listen to you, at will, via the microphone and Internet connection?
* Does Samsung’s cloud store all this information? How secure is this extremely personal data?
* Can a hacker intercept this data or view you via the built in camera?
* Can a third-party app program do any of the above?
* Exactly what information does the TV send to Samsung or other parties?
* Does Samsung intend to sell data collected by its Smart TV owners, such as who, what and when one is viewing?
Companies desiring to provide highly targeted advertisements to you via the TV screen or external marketing would find this data extremely valuable. “Hey, you look a little tired, how about some Ambien? I’m seeing a little grey, have you tried Grecian Formula? Joe, it looks like you packed on a few pounds recently, here’s information from Weight Watchers. Hey kids, you look bored, look at these TOYS!”
http://hdguru.com/is-your-new-hdtv-watching-you/7643/
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
USS Forrestal, July 29, 1967 - The worst accident aboard a US Navy surface vessel since WWII
The Navy released John McCain’s military record after a Freedom of Information Act request from the Associated Press. The record is packed with information on McCain’s medals and commendations but little else. The one thing that the McCain campaign does not want to see released is the record of McCain’s antics on board the USS Forestal in 1967. McCain was personally responsible for the deadliest fire in the history of the US Navy. That catastrophe, with 27 dead and over 100 wounded trumps McCain’s record as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam.
WMR has learned additional details regarding the deadly fire aboard the Navy aircraft carrier, the USS Forrestal, on July 19, 1967 in the Gulf of Tonkin. The additional details point to then-Lt. Commander John McCain playing more of a role in triggering the fire and explosions than previously reported.
On January 16, 2006, WMR reported that according to a US Navy sailor who was aboard the Forrestal on the fateful day of the fire, “McCain and the Forrestal’s skipper, Capt. John K. Beling, were warned about the danger of using M-65 1000-lb. bombs manufactured in 1935, which were deemed too dangerous to use during World War II and, later, on B-52 bombers. The fire from the Zuni missle misfire resulted in the heavy 1000 pound bombs being knocked loose from the pylons of McCain’s A-4 aircraft, which were only designed to hold 500-pound bombs.”
WMR further reported, “The unstable bombs had a 60-second cook-off threshold in a fire situation and this warning was known to both Beling and McCain prior to the disaster.” WMR also cited the potential that McCain’s Navy records were used against him by the neo-cons in control of the Pentagon, “The neo-cons, who have had five years to examine every file within the Department of Defense, have likely accessed documents that could prove embarrassing to McCain, who was on board the USS Forrestal on July 29, 1967, and whose A-4 Skyhawk was struck by an air-toground Zuni missile that had misfired from an F-4 Phantom.”
WMR has been informed that crewmen aboard the Forrestal have provided additional information about the Forrestal incident. It is believed by many crewmen and those who have investigated the case that McCain deliberately “wet-started” his A-4E to shake up the guy in the plane behind his A-4. “Wet-starts”, done either deliberately or accidentally, shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft.
In McCain’s case, the “wet-start” apparently “cooked off” and launched the Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that touched off the explosions and massive fire. The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration. “Wet starting” was apparently a common practice among young “hot-dog” pilots.
McCain was quickly transferred to the USS Oriskany (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred). Three months later, McCain was shot down over North Vietnam on October 26, 1967.
As WMR previously reported, at the time of the Forrestal disaster, McCain’s father, Admiral John McCain, Jr., was Commander-in-Chief of US Naval Forces Europe (CINCUSNAVEUR) and was busy covering up the details of the deadly and pre-meditated June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the NSA spy ship, the USS Liberty.
The fact that both McCains were involved in two incidents just weeks apart that resulted in a total death count of 168 on the Forrestal and the Liberty, with an additional injury count of 234 on both ships (with a number of them later dying from their wounds) with an accompanying classified paper trail inside the Pentagon, may be all that was needed to hold a Sword of Damocles over the head of the “family honor”-oriented McCain by the neo-cons.
WMR has also been informed by knowledgeable sources, including an ex-Navy A-4 pilot, the “wet-start game” was a common occurrence. However, it is between “very unlikely” and “impossible” for the Forrestal “wet start” to have been accidental. “Wet starts” were later rendered impossible by automated engine controls.
WMR has learned additional details regarding the deadly fire aboard the Navy aircraft carrier, the USS Forrestal, on July 19, 1967 in the Gulf of Tonkin. The additional details point to then-Lt. Commander John McCain playing more of a role in triggering the fire and explosions than previously reported.
On January 16, 2006, WMR reported that according to a US Navy sailor who was aboard the Forrestal on the fateful day of the fire, “McCain and the Forrestal’s skipper, Capt. John K. Beling, were warned about the danger of using M-65 1000-lb. bombs manufactured in 1935, which were deemed too dangerous to use during World War II and, later, on B-52 bombers. The fire from the Zuni missle misfire resulted in the heavy 1000 pound bombs being knocked loose from the pylons of McCain’s A-4 aircraft, which were only designed to hold 500-pound bombs.”
WMR further reported, “The unstable bombs had a 60-second cook-off threshold in a fire situation and this warning was known to both Beling and McCain prior to the disaster.” WMR also cited the potential that McCain’s Navy records were used against him by the neo-cons in control of the Pentagon, “The neo-cons, who have had five years to examine every file within the Department of Defense, have likely accessed documents that could prove embarrassing to McCain, who was on board the USS Forrestal on July 29, 1967, and whose A-4 Skyhawk was struck by an air-toground Zuni missile that had misfired from an F-4 Phantom.”
WMR has been informed that crewmen aboard the Forrestal have provided additional information about the Forrestal incident. It is believed by many crewmen and those who have investigated the case that McCain deliberately “wet-started” his A-4E to shake up the guy in the plane behind his A-4. “Wet-starts”, done either deliberately or accidentally, shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft.
In McCain’s case, the “wet-start” apparently “cooked off” and launched the Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that touched off the explosions and massive fire. The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration. “Wet starting” was apparently a common practice among young “hot-dog” pilots.
McCain was quickly transferred to the USS Oriskany (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred). Three months later, McCain was shot down over North Vietnam on October 26, 1967.
As WMR previously reported, at the time of the Forrestal disaster, McCain’s father, Admiral John McCain, Jr., was Commander-in-Chief of US Naval Forces Europe (CINCUSNAVEUR) and was busy covering up the details of the deadly and pre-meditated June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the NSA spy ship, the USS Liberty.
The fact that both McCains were involved in two incidents just weeks apart that resulted in a total death count of 168 on the Forrestal and the Liberty, with an additional injury count of 234 on both ships (with a number of them later dying from their wounds) with an accompanying classified paper trail inside the Pentagon, may be all that was needed to hold a Sword of Damocles over the head of the “family honor”-oriented McCain by the neo-cons.
WMR has also been informed by knowledgeable sources, including an ex-Navy A-4 pilot, the “wet-start game” was a common occurrence. However, it is between “very unlikely” and “impossible” for the Forrestal “wet start” to have been accidental. “Wet starts” were later rendered impossible by automated engine controls.
Iran presses ahead with dollar attack – oil bourse will start trading oil in currencies other than the dollar from March 20
...and Iraq and Libya were invaded when they did the same. Also, they initiate this on a witches sabbat.
Making 9 Million Jobless "Vanish": How The Government Manipulates Unemployment Statistics
When we look at broad measures of jobs and population, then the beginning of 2012 was one of the worst months in US history, with a total of 2.3 million people losing jobs or leaving the workforce in a single month. Yet, the official unemployment rate showed a decline from 8.5% to 8.3% in January - and was such cheering news that it set off a stock rally.
How can there be such a stark contrast between the cheerful surface and an underlying reality that is getting worse?
The true unemployment picture is hidden by essentially splitting jobless Americans up and putting them inside one of three different "boxes": the official unemployment box, the full unemployment box, and the most obscure box, the workforce participation rate box
As we will explore herein, a detailed look at the government's own data base shows that about 9 million people without jobs have been removed from the labor force simply by the government defining them as not being in the labor force anymore. Indeed - effectively all of the decreases in unemployment rate percentages since 2009 have come not from new jobs, but through reducing the workforce participation rate so that millions of jobless people are removed from the labor force by definition.
http://danielamerman.com/articles/2012/WorkC.html
How can there be such a stark contrast between the cheerful surface and an underlying reality that is getting worse?
The true unemployment picture is hidden by essentially splitting jobless Americans up and putting them inside one of three different "boxes": the official unemployment box, the full unemployment box, and the most obscure box, the workforce participation rate box
As we will explore herein, a detailed look at the government's own data base shows that about 9 million people without jobs have been removed from the labor force simply by the government defining them as not being in the labor force anymore. Indeed - effectively all of the decreases in unemployment rate percentages since 2009 have come not from new jobs, but through reducing the workforce participation rate so that millions of jobless people are removed from the labor force by definition.
http://danielamerman.com/articles/2012/WorkC.html
Monday, March 19, 2012
New year's eve in Iran...
Iran gets ready to celebrate its greatest holiday of the year, New Year's Eve, on March 20th, a witches sabbat.
See, every country is part of the Beast system. Some pretend to be enemies, some allies. It's all a big scripted satanic drama for fools to get excited over. The thing to do is...see things as they really are, on a spiritual level, and it all makes sense.
Voting and politics - a busy-busy game to keep the masses occupied and divided. Guys like Ron Paul are just lightening rods to pull out the disenchanted and make them believe a rigged game like politics actually means real change, not that satanic change into the abyss the current administration handed America.
And on and on and on.
WAKE UP!
See, every country is part of the Beast system. Some pretend to be enemies, some allies. It's all a big scripted satanic drama for fools to get excited over. The thing to do is...see things as they really are, on a spiritual level, and it all makes sense.
Voting and politics - a busy-busy game to keep the masses occupied and divided. Guys like Ron Paul are just lightening rods to pull out the disenchanted and make them believe a rigged game like politics actually means real change, not that satanic change into the abyss the current administration handed America.
And on and on and on.
WAKE UP!
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Monday, March 12, 2012
The CIA's Heart Attack Gun
A CIA secret weapon used for assassination shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in the short video below. By educating ourselves and others on vitally important matters like this, we can build a brighter future for us all.
The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.
The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony.
The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.
The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.
The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony.
The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Saturday, March 3, 2012
666: the satanic hand signal among dark siders
 |
| Satanic scumbags |
In the 20th century, with pop culture conditioning of movies from "holy-wood," this became associated with "A-okay" especially during the second world war.
The thumb makes a circle and the three up pointing fingers then make three successive sixes. Ergo, 666. You see famous people use this all the time, but not regular people, in the main.
They are signalling to those in the audience, readership, or media that they are one of the faithful to the dark side - and also as a way of instilling in all the credo they love to quote so much among themselves, "we are everywhere, everyone, and control everything."
That may be...for now.
But we see you. We know what you are. You are Billy's bitches and to us, it only means you have no will of your own and are just another order taking grunt in the army of darkness.
Big deal. Really. So what.
 |
| Cuomo signalling to fellow baby killers |
Friday, March 2, 2012
MessiahMews Blogs: Child Administered 4 Vaccines Without Parental Con...
MessiahMews Blogs: Child Administered 4 Vaccines Without Parental Con...: Please visit the link below to see what could happen to any of us. This situation is happening more and more, so we need to make sure our ch...
Protecting and serving, skinhead style America
CHICAGO (CN) - A family claims Chicago police broke into their house, urinated on their mail, spit in the coffee maker, stomped and slapped them and told them "You've been punk'd," while searching for someone who had not lived there for at least a year.
South Side residents Estella Walker, Ray Robinson Sr., Ray Robinson Jr., George Graham and Cornelius Burns sued the City of Chicago, Officer Sergio Martinez, and other unnamed officers in the Federal Court. Walker is Robinson Sr.'s wife; Burns is their landlord.
The Robinsons say they were watching TV peacefully at home on March 2, 2011. Robinson Sr. is over 50 years old and walks with a cane. Graham is a recovering stroke victim.
"Unbeknownst to plaintiffs, earlier that same day, the Chicago Police Department obtained a search warrant to search for an individual named 'Mike,' a male black, 30 years of age, 6'00" in height, and 230 pounds and the first floor apartment at [their address] to look for contraband, particularly for 'crack cocaine.'"
The family says their first-floor apartment had been vacant for a year before they moved into it, on Feb. 1, 2010.
The family says, "they heard several cars outside screech to a halt and looked out and saw three unmarked cars in front and two in back of the building. Seconds later, seven to eight police officers in plainclothes and one in uniform crashed through two hall doors with a slam bar.
"The officers came in with guns drawn, were wearing plainclothes, and had no identifying information or badges displayed.
"The officers immediately yelled to the plaintiffs to get on the ground. The police were yelling obscenities and all police officers had drawn guns, including a shotgun and at least one automatic rifle.
"The officers were verbally and physically abusive, actually striking the plaintiffs on several occasions, while plaintiffs offered no resistance whatsoever.
"Plaintiffs were never asked for identification by any of the officers.
"Ray Robinson Sr. has diabetes and walks with a cane. Ray Robinson Sr., Ray Robinson Jr., and George Graham, who was recuperating from a stroke, were handcuffed and assaulted. The officers repeatedly yelled 'where are the drugs?,' while striking plaintiffs. ...
"The apparent leader of the police was a short, white, chubby officer wearing a white shirt, with blondish hair. This individual appeared to get more and more agitated as the officers, tearing through the apartment, had found no contraband or any gun. He yelled he was going to 'burn' someone.
"After about an hour of entering and searching through every conceivable hiding place, including drawers, closets, and appliances, a sergeant came into the first floor apartment, walked around, and while leaving, stated (apparently to the other officers): 'You fucked up another one.' [Parentheses in complaint.]
"The officers destroyed the apartment, doing, but not limited to, the following acts:
"a) threw the television off its stand;
"b) took multiple DVD's belonging to plaintiffs;
"c) stole or tore up plaintiffs' 'Link' cards;
"d) threw food from the pantry and refrigerator around the apartment;
"e) the same Latino officer that strip searched Ray Robinson Jr., actually urinated on the plaintiffs' mail;
"f) broke the washer and the air conditioner;
"g) tore up books and clothes;
"h) threatened to charge George Graham with bank robbery;
"i) told George Graham 'you've been punked';
"j) threw a music system on the floor of the apartment;
"k) tore the pipes to the hot water heater off the wall;
"l) tore the hot water heater off the wall;
"m) dumped the contents of every drawer in the unit on the ground;
"n) dumped the contents of the refrigerator on the ground;
"o) tore up photographs in a funeral memorial book, and tore up photographs in an album;
"p) spit into the plaintiffs' coffee maker;
"r) took George Graham's keys and threw them across the street.
"No guns, drugs or contraband were found in the apartment on the first floor and plaintiffs did not resist, interfere or impede the defendants in any way.
"The first floor plaintiffs were cuffed throughout the search.
"No names were displayed on any badges, nor was any identification of individual officers made to any plaintiff.
"The defendants never showed the plaintiffs a search or arrest warrant. They left a copy of the warrant on the floor on their way out of the premises around 3:00 p.m."
The family claims the cops then repeated the process on their landlord, co-plaintiff Burns' second-floor apartment, where they also found nothing, but trashed the place.
They seek punitive damages for unlawful search and seizure and violation of due process.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/03/01/44319.htm
South Side residents Estella Walker, Ray Robinson Sr., Ray Robinson Jr., George Graham and Cornelius Burns sued the City of Chicago, Officer Sergio Martinez, and other unnamed officers in the Federal Court. Walker is Robinson Sr.'s wife; Burns is their landlord.
The Robinsons say they were watching TV peacefully at home on March 2, 2011. Robinson Sr. is over 50 years old and walks with a cane. Graham is a recovering stroke victim.
"Unbeknownst to plaintiffs, earlier that same day, the Chicago Police Department obtained a search warrant to search for an individual named 'Mike,' a male black, 30 years of age, 6'00" in height, and 230 pounds and the first floor apartment at [their address] to look for contraband, particularly for 'crack cocaine.'"
The family says their first-floor apartment had been vacant for a year before they moved into it, on Feb. 1, 2010.
The family says, "they heard several cars outside screech to a halt and looked out and saw three unmarked cars in front and two in back of the building. Seconds later, seven to eight police officers in plainclothes and one in uniform crashed through two hall doors with a slam bar.
"The officers came in with guns drawn, were wearing plainclothes, and had no identifying information or badges displayed.
"The officers immediately yelled to the plaintiffs to get on the ground. The police were yelling obscenities and all police officers had drawn guns, including a shotgun and at least one automatic rifle.
"The officers were verbally and physically abusive, actually striking the plaintiffs on several occasions, while plaintiffs offered no resistance whatsoever.
"Plaintiffs were never asked for identification by any of the officers.
"Ray Robinson Sr. has diabetes and walks with a cane. Ray Robinson Sr., Ray Robinson Jr., and George Graham, who was recuperating from a stroke, were handcuffed and assaulted. The officers repeatedly yelled 'where are the drugs?,' while striking plaintiffs. ...
"The apparent leader of the police was a short, white, chubby officer wearing a white shirt, with blondish hair. This individual appeared to get more and more agitated as the officers, tearing through the apartment, had found no contraband or any gun. He yelled he was going to 'burn' someone.
"After about an hour of entering and searching through every conceivable hiding place, including drawers, closets, and appliances, a sergeant came into the first floor apartment, walked around, and while leaving, stated (apparently to the other officers): 'You fucked up another one.' [Parentheses in complaint.]
"The officers destroyed the apartment, doing, but not limited to, the following acts:
"a) threw the television off its stand;
"b) took multiple DVD's belonging to plaintiffs;
"c) stole or tore up plaintiffs' 'Link' cards;
"d) threw food from the pantry and refrigerator around the apartment;
"e) the same Latino officer that strip searched Ray Robinson Jr., actually urinated on the plaintiffs' mail;
"f) broke the washer and the air conditioner;
"g) tore up books and clothes;
"h) threatened to charge George Graham with bank robbery;
"i) told George Graham 'you've been punked';
"j) threw a music system on the floor of the apartment;
"k) tore the pipes to the hot water heater off the wall;
"l) tore the hot water heater off the wall;
"m) dumped the contents of every drawer in the unit on the ground;
"n) dumped the contents of the refrigerator on the ground;
"o) tore up photographs in a funeral memorial book, and tore up photographs in an album;
"p) spit into the plaintiffs' coffee maker;
"r) took George Graham's keys and threw them across the street.
"No guns, drugs or contraband were found in the apartment on the first floor and plaintiffs did not resist, interfere or impede the defendants in any way.
"The first floor plaintiffs were cuffed throughout the search.
"No names were displayed on any badges, nor was any identification of individual officers made to any plaintiff.
"The defendants never showed the plaintiffs a search or arrest warrant. They left a copy of the warrant on the floor on their way out of the premises around 3:00 p.m."
The family claims the cops then repeated the process on their landlord, co-plaintiff Burns' second-floor apartment, where they also found nothing, but trashed the place.
They seek punitive damages for unlawful search and seizure and violation of due process.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/03/01/44319.htm
FBI can't find its GPS bugs? Right...
The FBI Can’t Find Many of Its GPS Trackers Now That They’re Turned Off
The US Supreme Court had outlawed the warrantless use of GPS trackers so the FBI complied by shutting down all its devices but now is apparently having trouble actually retrieving the hardware. Because the GPS units are turned off. And the FBI has no idea where they are unless they're on.
The Court ruled in U.S. v. Jones that the Federal Bureau use of unwarranted vehicle-based GPS tracking units was illegal on the grounds that the practice violated the 4th Amendment—specifically that the act represented a search and constituted trespassing. The FBI complied and nixed its 3,000 currently active GPS tracking devices but that's where the problem lies.
Turns out the FBI can't locate the devices unless they're active. The Agency so determined to retrieve its toys that it has petitioned the court to briefly turn the devices back on for the sole purpose of finding and retrieving the hardware. I bet they wish they'd just bothered with those warrants now.
Just because it's illegal for the feds to do this, doesn't mean they will stop spying on people. They always have, will, and will do whatever they want, to whomever they want.
The US Supreme Court had outlawed the warrantless use of GPS trackers so the FBI complied by shutting down all its devices but now is apparently having trouble actually retrieving the hardware. Because the GPS units are turned off. And the FBI has no idea where they are unless they're on.
The Court ruled in U.S. v. Jones that the Federal Bureau use of unwarranted vehicle-based GPS tracking units was illegal on the grounds that the practice violated the 4th Amendment—specifically that the act represented a search and constituted trespassing. The FBI complied and nixed its 3,000 currently active GPS tracking devices but that's where the problem lies.
Turns out the FBI can't locate the devices unless they're active. The Agency so determined to retrieve its toys that it has petitioned the court to briefly turn the devices back on for the sole purpose of finding and retrieving the hardware. I bet they wish they'd just bothered with those warrants now.
Just because it's illegal for the feds to do this, doesn't mean they will stop spying on people. They always have, will, and will do whatever they want, to whomever they want.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)