Wednesday, January 30, 2019
On January 14 of 2014, I began to experience incre...
The Daily Messenger: On January 14 of 2014, I began to experience incre...: On January 14 of 2014, I began to experience increasingly painful lower abdominal stomach cramps that showered me with lacerating pains from...
German Man Sues Over "Woman-Only" Parking Spots
In
a shocking display of male ignorance - daring to call out 'unequal'
treatment of sexes (however many of them there are today) - a German
town’s effort to emasculate itslef has seen it hauled to court by a man who claims its ‘woman-only’ parking spaces are discriminatory.
RT reports
that Dominik Bayer, 25, from North Rhine-Westphalia, appeared at a
hearing at the Administrative Court in Munich, Bavaria, on Wednesday
saying:
Bayer argued that he is fighting for “equal rights for men and women” because the signs were not only discriminatory against men, they were also offensive to women by implying they “are weaker,” reports Spiegel.
First they separate you and write books about you and degrade you. In this case badges such as yellow stars are not necessary as there is clear identification of men who are White.
Next step is to put socially unacceptable men into camps for reeducation. They will make a big deal about how the camps are actually nice and very pleasant. But that is for show.
After that is gassing and death.
.
SOURCE ZH
 |
| No white males allowed to park. Ever. Complain and get thrown in jail. |
“I feel discriminated against as a man.”
Bayer argued that he is fighting for “equal rights for men and women” because the signs were not only discriminatory against men, they were also offensive to women by implying they “are weaker,” reports Spiegel.
 |
| Only white males are being cited. Muslim men, who use the spots, are not cited. |
Next step is to put socially unacceptable men into camps for reeducation. They will make a big deal about how the camps are actually nice and very pleasant. But that is for show.
After that is gassing and death.
.
“We did it purely for the reasons we don't have to share with anyone,” said Hans Bittl, head of the legal department in Eichstätt.But, Bayer countered that men can also be victims of violent crimes:
“The city does not come to mind that even men can become victims of violence... There are also small and weaker men.”A compromise was found in the end that meant the town officials were ordered to change the wording of the signs to make it clear that the reservation is only a recommendation, and not a legal rule.
SOURCE ZH
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
The fascists HATE white kids
Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann refused to
apologize for standing his ground as a native american "Vietnam veteran"
approached him banging a drum.
"I mean, in hindsight, I wish we could've walked away and avoided the whole thing. But I can't say that I'm sorry for listening to him and standing there," Sandmann told "NBC Today" co-host Savannah Guthrie in an interview which has received harsh criticism from both the left and the right.
Democrats hate those kind of people, period.
For such tolerant people, they have ZERO tolerance for their fellow countrymen, who hold different beliefs. It will not work out well for them in the end.
The Native American "Vietnam Vet" Nathan Phillips, meanwhile, has been outed for never serving in Vietnam despite repeatedly claiming to have done so, in a case of stolen valor.
Skeptics of Phillips' claim were vindicated following a correction in the Washington Post that reads: "Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips said he served in the U.S. Marines but was never deployed to Vietnam."
Shipley adds that Phillips never served as a "recon ranger" as he has previously claimed.
As the Gateway Pundit's Cassandra Fairbanks notes, Phillips raised over $6,000 for a documentary about his life in which he claimed to be a Vietnam Veteran.
Meanwhile, the memes are flowing:
"I mean, in hindsight, I wish we could've walked away and avoided the whole thing. But I can't say that I'm sorry for listening to him and standing there," Sandmann told "NBC Today" co-host Savannah Guthrie in an interview which has received harsh criticism from both the left and the right.
Wednesday's interview evoked strong reactions - with liberals condemning NBC for interviewing Sandmann, and conservatives knocking the network for asking loaded questions.“As far as standing there, I had every right to do so. My position is that I was not disrespectful to Mr. Phillips. I respect him. I’d like to talk to him...But I can't say that I'm sorry for listening to him and standing there.” Nick Sandmann on if he owes anyone an apology pic.twitter.com/iiVqPtltjf— TODAY (@TODAYshow) January 23, 2019
Do you think Pepe the Frog is available for Thursday’s show? Can Dylann Roof do a segment from prison? Heart-to-heart with some Fentanyl traffickers?— Eric Garland (@ericgarland) January 22, 2019
This is a despicable & leading question.— Benny (@bennyjohnson) January 22, 2019
TODAY SHOW: “You’re wrong. Why don’t you see your faults? Apologize.”
Nick: “Um, I just stood there.”
God Bless this kid for standing his ground against the SJW outrage mob that is the establishment media https://t.co/lyslqAsjpC
hat kid is wise and knows his rights, is educated, polite, and Christian, not to mention a white male.Why is Guthrie putting words in his mouth?— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 23, 2019
Listen to how she emphasizes “your own fault”
This is not the right way to treat a child. Shame on NBC https://t.co/P5VN6XoFm7
Democrats hate those kind of people, period.
For such tolerant people, they have ZERO tolerance for their fellow countrymen, who hold different beliefs. It will not work out well for them in the end.
The Native American "Vietnam Vet" Nathan Phillips, meanwhile, has been outed for never serving in Vietnam despite repeatedly claiming to have done so, in a case of stolen valor.
Skeptics of Phillips' claim were vindicated following a correction in the Washington Post that reads: "Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips said he served in the U.S. Marines but was never deployed to Vietnam."
According to retired Navy Seal Don Shipley - whose YouTube channel is devoted to exposing stolen valor, Phillips' records reveal that he was a refrigerator technician who went AWOL several times, and who was never deployed outside of the United States.Nathan Phillips 'war hero' narrative is crumbling.— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) January 22, 2019
From WaPo: "Correction:...Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam."https://t.co/pDOOnuyCKq
Shipley adds that Phillips never served as a "recon ranger" as he has previously claimed.
As the Gateway Pundit's Cassandra Fairbanks notes, Phillips raised over $6,000 for a documentary about his life in which he claimed to be a Vietnam Veteran.
Meanwhile, the memes are flowing:
They know where you are, how fast you drive, and they can hear all communication in the car. Supercool for police.
To Own an EV, you HAVE TO BE RICH. VERY RICH.
FROM THE INTERNET
Police in Switzerland in canton Basel bought Teslas. Obviously with poor evaluation. They regret this decision deeply, because only after bought them, they found out it doesn't meet police requirement.
E.g. a Tesla is a Laptop on wheels, so a hacker can take over control. More gas please, empty the battery or fill it up. A Tesla is connected with the company who gets every little data. The Tesla Company can take over the electronic themselves.
How to disconnect? Not possible.
They know where you are, how fast you drive, and they can hear all communication in the car. Super cool for police.
And in Switzerland with snow and temperatures below 0° Celsius, the charging takes more time, battery is empty in short time, doors can't be opened electronically. Great for gangsters in wintertime.
Now they have the problem: How to get a communication system not connected with Tesla Company or easily available for hackers.
I was going to buy a Tesla until I realized that it was really a data collection device.
FROM THE INTERNET
Police in Switzerland in canton Basel bought Teslas. Obviously with poor evaluation. They regret this decision deeply, because only after bought them, they found out it doesn't meet police requirement.
E.g. a Tesla is a Laptop on wheels, so a hacker can take over control. More gas please, empty the battery or fill it up. A Tesla is connected with the company who gets every little data. The Tesla Company can take over the electronic themselves.
How to disconnect? Not possible.
They know where you are, how fast you drive, and they can hear all communication in the car. Super cool for police.
And in Switzerland with snow and temperatures below 0° Celsius, the charging takes more time, battery is empty in short time, doors can't be opened electronically. Great for gangsters in wintertime.
Now they have the problem: How to get a communication system not connected with Tesla Company or easily available for hackers.
I was going to buy a Tesla until I realized that it was really a data collection device.
Then when it came out that the software was basically Linex (which is
actully a very robust operating system for lots of devices) but could
also be easily hacked, I changed my mind.
I cringe at the thought of a car testifying against me in traffic court because I wanted to go from 0 to 60 in three seconds in a 50mph speed zone, and has a reputation of frying the owner if something goes wrong on the highway.
BTW, what does happen to the batteries when they get old?
Porsche is a great performance car all the way around, but I'll stick with good old high octane and just enough electronic options to keep things interesting but without having to worry about my ride turning "states evidence".
I can fuel up my car for 350 miles in 5 minutes.
The Porsche Taycan is widely considered to be the "mainstream" luxury automobile market's most potent threat to the Tesla Model S. The specs for the vehicle look to be extremely impressive, not just from an EV standpoint, but from any type of "street legal" standpoint. It is said to accelerate from 0 to 62 mph in 3.5 seconds and it’ll have a top speed of over 155 mph. Its range will come in at 310 miles and it will be chargeable up to 250 miles in just over 20 minutes at a Porsche high-voltage supercharger.
Oh, and it also happens to rather impressive.
There has been an air of intrigue surrounding the Taycan since it was announced in late 2015 and it'll finally be going on sale at the end of the year this year. As we get closer to that date, we're also getting our first look at potential demand, which seems to be far exceeding Porsche's expectations.
BGR is reporting that demand is so strong that Porsche is actually doubling production to meet it. The article reveals that Porsche is going to manufacture 40,000 units per year, which is twice its initial plan of 20,000 vehicles.
I cringe at the thought of a car testifying against me in traffic court because I wanted to go from 0 to 60 in three seconds in a 50mph speed zone, and has a reputation of frying the owner if something goes wrong on the highway.
BTW, what does happen to the batteries when they get old?
Porsche is a great performance car all the way around, but I'll stick with good old high octane and just enough electronic options to keep things interesting but without having to worry about my ride turning "states evidence".
I can fuel up my car for 350 miles in 5 minutes.
The Porsche Taycan is widely considered to be the "mainstream" luxury automobile market's most potent threat to the Tesla Model S. The specs for the vehicle look to be extremely impressive, not just from an EV standpoint, but from any type of "street legal" standpoint. It is said to accelerate from 0 to 62 mph in 3.5 seconds and it’ll have a top speed of over 155 mph. Its range will come in at 310 miles and it will be chargeable up to 250 miles in just over 20 minutes at a Porsche high-voltage supercharger.
Oh, and it also happens to rather impressive.
There has been an air of intrigue surrounding the Taycan since it was announced in late 2015 and it'll finally be going on sale at the end of the year this year. As we get closer to that date, we're also getting our first look at potential demand, which seems to be far exceeding Porsche's expectations.
BGR is reporting that demand is so strong that Porsche is actually doubling production to meet it. The article reveals that Porsche is going to manufacture 40,000 units per year, which is twice its initial plan of 20,000 vehicles.
Monday, January 21, 2019
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
Monday, January 14, 2019
Sunday, January 13, 2019
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
Sunday, January 6, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)