Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Things are getting ugly...

Bitcoin lost 600 Billion in valuation - that's stolen wealth from retail investors, not big financial houses, in the the last few weeks. It will lose more. As was foretold.

Pre-echo market dumps measuring in the trillions already shaking through the markets on a daily basis, now. Entire Hedge funds, investor consortiums, and retail investors have been wiped out by the hundreds daily, with loss stories in VIX, XIV, and other ETNs that are being discontinued by that most vicious of reverse splitting issuer, CREDIT SUISSE.
Credit Suisse, the most evil ETF wealth stealers in the game

Instead of rising, gold and silver - the real measure of the dollar, pound, and Euro, is steadily tanking, even while these currencies are at their lowest values in ages. One can't be, while the other cannot be - at the same time. This reveals that there ARE NO SAFE HAVENS FOR CAPITAL, when the house is being set on fire.


And the point?

Be mindful of these facts, prepare if practicable, and do what can be done to weather what may be a super storm on all fronts.  The more Trump improves the daily life of Americans, the quicker the satanists will do all within their power to make it worse. It's what they do, create 3rd world shitholes, where once prosperity was the order of the day.

You are warned.

Charts like this reveal the ugly. For financials, these are SELL PEAKS, not buys.


Satanic Left - Overlords of slavery in modern times, Amazon, whole foods,


February 6, 2018 by CH
 
This news report exposing the inhumane treatment of Whole Foods employees since Baron Bezos bought the SWPL chain is further evidence that we live in a new age of robber barons using their monopolistic bargaining power to basically run slave labor sweatshops here on American soil as well as abroad.
The popular Texas-based niche grocery chain was bought by Amazon last year for a hefty $13.7 billion price tag, but employees are ruing the day the online retailer made the purchase, according to Business Insider (BI).
Employees feel hard pressed by the new policies Bezos’s management team put in place at Whole Foods. The pressure put upon them by updated stocking procedures and “pop quizzes” is causing some to have “nightmares” about work.
“I wake up in the middle of the night from nightmares,” a Whole Foods staffer told BI. “The stress has created such a tense working environment. Seeing someone cry at work is becoming normal.”
One of the problems for employees is the new order to shelf (OTS) stocking system put in place by Amazon bosses. The system is apparently breaking down morale.
According to Amazon, OTS is geared to deliver smaller amounts of product to stores in order to keep it fresh and to help the company track inventory better. But OTS requires employees to stock shelves far more often and to keep a closer eye on stockroom supplies to prevent shortages.
[…]
Multiple employees said these tests had “crushed” morale in stores because workers are terrified of getting “walked” and missing some small detail.
“You are so concerned about passing this military-like test that you actually start to lose your department’s operational conditions,” an employee said.
Another worker explained: “We think of it as punishment. They think of it as a way to correct errors.”
Remember when the Left used to advocate for the working man and against Big Business? Yeah, I don’t either. It’s been so long all I know of the Left is that they’re globalist bug-shills for MegaTech, international finance, and race replacement. In the Left’s collective consciousness, allying with predatory billionaire monopolists is worth it to stick the knife deeper in Whitey’s back.
But given that leftoids LOVE LOVE LOVE our modren day capitalist oligarchs because the omnipotent fat cats can be counted on to stream anti-White poz 24/7 into the eyeballs of Heritage America and to fund open borders advocacy NGOs, it’s full speed ahead with the violations of workers’ rights and basic humanity. “WTF I love robber barons now!”
The Left isn’t unprincipled; its core principle is power, by any hypocritical contradiction necessary. We won’t crush the Left by reminding them that they once, a long time ago, championed the oppressed worker. They’ll just shrug that off with a snarky riposte fed to them by John Oliver and carry on virtue shrieking until their enemies are silenced and their livelihoods destroyed. The Left will only be crushed by crushing them….ousting them from power.
The Left hasn’t forgotten that open borders means in practice population churn, social disintegration, consumerist escape, rapacious multibillionaires importing scabs to displace American workers and gut their wages, and rapacious multimillionaire politicians importing ringers to displace American voters and gut their electoral power.
The Left hasn’t forgotten that open borders amounts to greedy fat cat CEOs running an arbitrage scheme on American native workers in which the former have all the leverage provided by millions of third world peasants willing to work for pennies in bezosian slave labor camps while the latter have to bend over and accept rock bottom wages, shitty workplace conditions, and low morale.
They haven’t forgotten any of it.
They have chosen to ignore it.
In service to their overarching desire to snuff out White Heritage America and morally preen on its smoldering ruin.
Still, BI also learned that with [Bezos’] OTS system, Whole Foods might be on track to saving $300 million in costs by 2020.
Cheer up, SWPL shitlibs, with those cost savings you can afford a Whole Foods artisanal cheese block as you scurry out the store trying not to look any of the employees in the eye.


Israel began warning thousands of African migrants on Sunday that they must leave by the end of March, officials said, under a plan that could see them jailed if they refuse.

When Israel does it, not a word of protest or even official censure...when anyone else does it, they are racist pigs who bring out the fascist libtards in the west by the gazillions. WHY?

Edomite J00z aren’t monsters because of antisemitism.
Edomite J00z are monsters because THEY’RE MONSTERS.


Authored by Middle East Eye via TheAntiMedia.org,
Israel began warning thousands of African migrants on Sunday that they must leave by the end of March, officials said, under a plan that could see them jailed if they refuse.
On 3 January, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced implementation of a plan to deport about 38,000 migrants who had entered the country illegally, mainly Eritreans and Sudanese.
The controversial plan gives them until the end of next month to leave voluntarily or face jail and eventual expulsion.
Immigration authority spokeswoman Sabine Haddad told AFP that officials began issuing migrants letters on Sunday advising them that they had 60 days in which to leave the country voluntarily.
For now, the notices are being given only to men without families, officials said.
Israeli newspaper Haaretz said “anyone recognised as a victim of slavery or human trafficking, and those who had requested asylum by the end of 2017 but haven’t gotten a response” would also be exempt for now.
It added that this left the number subject to near-term deportation at “between 15,000 and 20,000 people.”
The authority is offering those who agree to leave a grant of $3,500, a flight ticket and help with obtaining travel documents.
Should they not leave by the deadline, the grant would be reduced and “enforcement measures” would be taken against them and anyone employing them, the authority says.
Israel refers to the tens of thousands of African migrants who entered the country illegally from neighbouring Egypt as “infiltrators”.
Israeli officials tacitly recognise that it is too dangerous to return Sudanese and Eritreans to their troubled homelands, but local media say the notices do not specify where departing migrants would be sent.
Aid workers and media have named Uganda and Rwanda, although both countries deny being a destination for migrants being expelled involuntarily.
Public opposition to the plan has been slow to build, but some Israeli airline pilots have reportedly said they will not fly forced deportees.
Academics have published a petition and Israeli Holocaust survivors wrote an open letter to Netanyahu last month pleading with him to reconsider.
Netanyahu on Sunday accused US Jewish billionaire George Soros of being behind the campaign against the forced deportations, Haaretz also reported.

“George Soros is also funding the protests. Obama deported two million infiltrators and they didn’t say anything,” he said at the weekly Cabinet meeting.
The UN refugee agency has called on Israel to scrap the plan, calling it incoherent and unsafe.
A 2016 UN commission of inquiry into Eritrea’s regime found “widespread and systematic” crimes against humanity, and said an estimated 5,000 people flee the country each month.
The International Criminal Court has indicted Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide linked to his regime’s counter-insurgency tactics in the Darfur conflict.
All CIA front companies, and admitted as such in congressional hearings.

Saturday, February 3, 2018

Part 1 Alberto Rivera (Ex Jesuit Priest)

Marion Maréchal Le Pen explains why feminists are hypocrites in brillian...

BREAKING: THE MEMO Is Out - Here's What's In It

The FBI payed for the PissGate dossier ...  they weren't kidding, this is ugly ...


From The Washington Examiner:
* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the initial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.
* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.
* The four FISA surveillance applications were signed by, in various combinations, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Dana Boente, and Rod Rosenstein.
* The FBI authorized payments to Steele for work on the dossier. The FBI terminated its agreement with Steele in late October when it learned, by reading an article in Mother Jones, that Steele was talking to the media.
* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.
* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.
Read the whole 4 page memo with 2 page intro here:
 

Women of the west are doomed and its too late

Jihadists and SJWs, same cloth, hiding under masks.

Illegals hate Americans. Hate them. While receiving thousands of dollars in free aid the moment they arrive. Residents who are born here GET NOTHING, and are homeless-over 4 million. Notice how you don't see homeless illegals? There's a reason for that.

Jihadis routinely crucify any westerner they come across in their home lands. That's how they see you. And women are such easy prey to them.


If “refugee Jihadists” ever dared to do the same at home — in Algeria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia — with Muslim girls as they do to women of the countries they invade, they would be buried alive. 

As governement and the satanic libtards SIDE WITH THE RAPISTS AND KILLERS, no women can expect protection of men, without those same men risking long term prison sentences, as is happening in Europe. The lesson is learned...you women...you're on your own now. It's what you wanted, and the devils who hate you are here and more are coming to do what they will to you. And these bastards don't differentiate between witch or christian, gay or straight, and they don't care. Your bleeding heart affected little drama for the cameras don't mean a thing to them. They only see an enemy who needs humiliation and eventually, death.



Originally appeared at: WorldTribune.com
Germany, the world is laughing at you
This is an excellent and thoughtful essay by Alexander Maistrovoy, a Russian jewish emigre author.  It examines in more detail the glaring questions raised in our short piece from Sunday, 'Refugees' Harass Women in Russian Nightclub, Are Promptly Beaten and Sent to Prison, which went viral and generated a huge number of comments.  A very intelligent read.  Highly recommended.

In my correspondence regarding the events in Cologne, an editor of a Russian newspaper asked me a natural, but discouraging question; “Where were the German men?”, he inquired of me, perplexed.
Indeed, for us who grew up in Soviet Russia, it would be inconceivable that some drunk young people could publicly mock and harass girls on New Year’s Eve in the very center of Moscow or Saint Petersburg. If they dared to do this, they wouldn’t survive until the morning, they would become “martyrs” and would have their way with 72 virgins in a completely different realm.
Ethical codes, embedded in us on a genetic level, would demand that we intervene on behalf of the women. Especially, in a situation where normal adult men were more numerous than the rapists, and the rapists themselves were not terrorists, cyborgs or aliens, but mere street punks.
As it turned out in Germany, Sweden, Austria — these codes were fatally violated. A great number of strong healthy men, having heard the girls screaming and crying, and having seen the crimes being committed, didn’t do anything to save the victims. In rare cases, the girls were defended by migrants from Eastern Europe or Third World countries.
But this is only the first question in a long line of simple questions. We could expect that women, having learned about the abuse of girls the next day, would be in a fury. Since there is an inherent instinct in every normal woman to rescue a child or to protect a girl from an abuse, rape or harassment.
Again, genetic codes didn’t work.
We heard women blaming the victims and defending the rapists. We heard Henriette Reker, the mayor of Cologne, who claimed that “there’s always the possibility of keeping a certain distance of more than an arm’s length”; Claudia Roth from the Green Party, who accused an “organized mob” on the Internet of“calling for a hunt on non-white people”. We learned about dozens of female journalists who concealed the truth because the rapists were “refugees”. Feminists? We didn’t hear their voices. As we haven’t heard their voices in Sweden, Norway and England, where thousands of girls had long ago been turned into “white meat”.
Instead, all we hear is a subtle mumble, like that of the expert Irmgard Kopetzky, who states that “sexual violence is an issue for people of all ethnic origins”.“Figures show the majority of people carrying out sex attacks in Germany do not come from an immigrant background”, according to her.
Andrea den Boer, from the University of Kent, sees roots of the problem in that“the sex ratio alteration in the young adult population looking also to be abnormal at about 114 boys of that age for every 100 girls (SIC)”. Really?
In China, Armenia, Azerbaijan there are also many more boys than girls. Has anyone heard about something similar happening in Beijing, Erevan or Baku? Why, during the revolutions in Romania, Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, were there no cases of gang rape of girls during demonstrations, as it happened in Tahrir Square?
The wider Pandora’s box is opened, the more questions arise. What about politicians? Have any of them, left or right, called it the way they saw it? No.
“Sexual harassment is not automatically binding to migration and immigration,” Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven told in Davos. Sure! According to the report by Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (BRÅ) 20 years before, in 1996, the highest rates of rape convictions were for individuals born in North Africa and Iraq. They were convicted of rape at rates of 17.5 times the native Swedish rate respectively.
We are speaking about a commonplace situation, typical for the patriarchal Muslim world — for Iraqis, Afghans or Somalis — where a non-Muslim woman is nothing more than a sexual object, an easy and natural prey, a whore.
Coptic women in Egypt are constantly subject to harassment just because they are Christians. The Civil war in Lebanon took place not least because of the mass rape of Christian women by Palestinians. How much more for European women accustomed to their free dress code and not protected by families.
If “refugees” ever dared to do the same at home — in Algeria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia — with Muslim girls, they would be buried alive. There are strict and oppressive laws of clan vengeance and no one dares to harass a woman from another clan or tribe without bearing an inevitable cruel punishment. European women have no protection from their families or even the state, with the latter taking the side of the perpetrator. That is why they are doomed.
Why are western politicians paralyzed by fear? Why do only leaders of Eastern Europe dare to tell the truth, such as: Miloš Zeman and Bohuslav Sobotka, the President and Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico, Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orbán? The issue is not about right or left ideology. Zeman, Sobotka and Fico are Socialists. The issue is about a healthy, normal perception of the world based on genuine European values.
Why did it occur that they were the only leaders who could give both a courageous and adequate response to the reality of this situation? These small countries, squeezed between millstones of formerly great empires, having survived Soviet despotism, now know the value of freedom and dignity. They were vaccinated against universalist ideologies. Yet it is curious that Czech Republic and Slovakia are the only countries that accept genuine refugees facing a terrible fate — Christians and Yazidis from Iraq, but not mature and aggressive young men heading to Europe for an easy life and “white meat”.
What has happened to the world, when men, women, politicians, and the elite betray their daughters and children in order to please newcomers with their baser instincts and a cult of male power?
The answer is sad — the culture of postmodernism has managed to do what couldn’t be achieved even by the Communist propaganda machine. It has degraded the instinct of self-preservation, natural reactions embedded in humans on a genetic level, the ability to feel compassion and protect a victim – a woman, a girl, a child. An abstract ideology has suppressed the mind and senses.
I left USSR as a hater of Soviet totalitarianism. Now I realize that the cultural totalitarianism of political correctness has turned out to be much more poisonous.
The Soviet regime dictated harsh rules and established censorship. However people remained normal human beings. They laughed at authorities, composed jokes about Brezhnev, made satirical films in spite of the censorship, and learned to read newspapers between the lines. This primarily referred to the intelligentsia.
Cultural totalitarianism succeeded much more. It affirmed a relentless self-censorship, turned people into sterile zombies, and exterminated basic senses of responsibility and dignity. It changed the very nature of man, and indeed, it was a unique experiment on their own people.
… There is a small carnivorous animal in Siberia – a stoat. It hunts rabbits and hares, which are significantly heavier, faster and stronger. It doesn’t creep, doesn’t sit in ambush and doesn’t catch its prey on the run. It performs a hypnotic dance of death in front of it — with wriggles, acrobatic leaps and somersaults. The stoat dazzles the prey and, gradually approaching it, then it grabs its throat. The rabbit dies from shock. Why does the prey allow the stoat to dazzle and kill it without resisting? Biologists are unable to solve the riddle of the stoat’s hypnotic dance.
Western elites have foredoomed their own people by means of somersaults and acrobatic tricks with the same fate of the unfortunate rabbit.
The hypnotic dance of death is gaining momentum…




Why RT-Russia Times-founder was murdered and it is constantly attacked and banned in the west.

Why You Should Never Watch RT -- Ever!

Plurality of views must be prevented in order to stop the war against war.
Required watching
The author is a well-known UK pundit who writes frequently on Russia.  He is currently running a crowdfunding to raise money to fund his legal costs for his court case against Oliver Kamm, a writer for the Times newspaper, who he has sued for libel and harassment. If you like this article, please consider supporting this writer. He is one of the best out there on Russia.
For more info about that see:  The Times, RT and Oliver Kamm, an Obsessed Neocon Stalker and Creepy London Times Moron Cyber-Stalks Leading UK Russia Expert (Video)
We first ran this article in October 2014, one month after RI was launched. It is a brilliant explanation of the value of RT, and one of our most popular articles ever. It is also more topical than ever with the ongoing repression of RT in the land of the free, the USA.

As RT UK launches, attacks on the channel in the British media have stepped up…
The latest is a piece by Mr. Cyril Waugh-Monger, a very important newspaper columnist for the NeoCon Daily, a patron of the Senator Joe McCarthy Appreciation Society and author of 'Why the Iraq War was a Brilliant Idea' and 'The Humanitarian Case for Bombing Syria.'
Dear socially inferior person reading this article. My name is Cyril Waugh-Monger (I'm called 'Mr Terribly Pompous Neo-Con' by my friends) and I’m here to tell you why on no account should you watch RT and why you should be making complaints to Ofcom about this dreadful channel so that in the interests of 'free speech' and 'democracy' we can get it off air.

1. RT doesn’t peddle Russophobia

Outrageously, RT doesn’t compare Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler. It doesn‘t join in with the demonization of Russia and its leader. How can we have a channel which is watched by people in Britain, which doesn’t do that? We neocons say that demonization of Russia and its leader is compulsory. How dare RT not do as we say!
RT is more vocally in support of Russia than western media

2. RT is sometimes rude to bankers

There’s a man on RT called Max Keiser and he is often very rude to bankers. Why, he has even called for them to face the death penalty. Such disrespect to our financial elites is shocking and should not be allowed in a free society.
Former CEO of HSX Holdings/Hollywood Stock Exchange and host of RT''s 'Keiser Report' Max Keiser

3. Its coverage of the MH17 crash

Shockingly, RT commentators didn’t rush to blame Vladimir Putin for the air disaster within seconds of the news breaking. Some even said that we should wait for the forensic evidence before any statements apportioning guilt were made. Others said that we couldn’t rule out that the plane was downed by an another aircraft. This failure to come and say loud and clear “Putin personally shot down the plane with a missile he made and fired with his own hands” within minutes of the crash is clear evidence of RT’s bias and why it must be taken off the air.
Segment of the shot down plane

4. RT’s ‘pundits’ include people who aren’t neocons and ‘liberal interventionists’

This is truly scandalous: RT gives airtime to people who don’t support the West’s policy of endless war and who opposed airstrikes on Syria last year. Why, it’s even broadcast interviews with the convener of the Stop the War coalition – and has a regular weekly show fronted by George Galloway! This is unconscionable. Only people who support Western foreign policy should be allowed to express their views on international affairs on television, not 'cranks' and 'fanatics' who oppose attacking a sovereign state in the Middle East on deceitful grounds every couple of years. Why, if RT had been around in 2003, it would no doubt have given airtime to anti-war ‘conspiracy theorists’ who would have told viewers that Iraq had no WMDs – and claimed, fantastically – that Bush and Blair were making it all up.
British politician, broadcaster, and writer George Galloway often speaks out against western foreign policy

5. RT provides airtime to genuine socialists and genuine conservatives

This is really terrible: RT interviews people who oppose neo-liberalism and globalization, from both the left and the right. It’s given the microphone to socialists, communists, greens, and 'extremists' on the right, like Ron Paul. These people should not be allowed to express their views on television; they are 'cranks' and should be totally marginalized. Only those who support the hegemonic consensus should be allowed on TV. It's very important that in order to protect free speech and democracy, alternative opinions are not heard.
Former Republican presidential candidate, Representative Ron Paul

6. RT pundits have ‘extremist’ links

I monitor the people who appear on RT very, very closely and I can tell you that there was once a case of an RT interviewee who had a link on his website to another website which had a link to another website which had a link to another website – which denied the Holocaust and said that little green men from Mars were ruling the US.
After considerable research, I also found that another RT pundit once attended a conference where a fellow invitee had once sat at a restaurant table, a few days after another person who had actually praised Adolf Hitler, Chairman Mao, and Josef Stalin in a magazine article published in North Korea in 1962.

7. RT is anti-semitic

Ok, I’ve got no evidence of this, but I’ll bung it in anyway as it sounds good.

8. RT has broadcast documentaries on the wars in Yugoslavia which don’t blame the Serbs for everything

This is totally unacceptable.
An elderly woman carries her belongings November 22 in Sarajevo's war shattered airport settlement. (Reuters)

9. RT has had ‘experts’ on its programs who have made some very strong criticisms of Israel

This too is totally unacceptable. Anyone with a theory or definition that differs from Western minded politicians is demonized for voicing their opinion.
Israel's annexed Golan Heights is hosting pop up hospitals to tend to ISIS fighters

10. RT pundits have often ridiculed leading American policymakers

For instance, when the US Secretary of State John Kerry said that “you just don't in the 21st century” invade another country on “completely trumped up pretext,” some people on RT had the audacity to say “What about Iraq?” This lack of respect towards a leading American politician is appalling, and in a free society ought not to be allowed. The correct procedure whenever a leading US political figure speaks is to tug one’s forelock.

11. RT’s coverage of the conflict in Syria

In 2011-13, we had so-called ‘experts’ on Syria telling us on RT that some of the freedom-fighting pro-democracy rebels were actually fanatical terrorists who were guilty of committing atrocities. This was obviously a clear lie. Islamist terrorists like ISIS have only been active in Syria since 2014 and of course, it’s all the fault of President Assad and Russia.
Intense shelling destroys buildings in the Damascus suburb of Jobar October 28

12. RT interviews lots of people whose views I do not share

It ought not to be allowed! Aren’t we supposed to live in a democracy?

13. The most important reason: RT is a threat

More and more people are watching it – which is why me and my little group of neocons and ‘liberal interventionists’ are so worried and stepping up our attacks on the station and denigrating those people who appear on it.
The next big war is going to be much harder for us to ‘sell’ to the plebs, because we are no longer in control of the narrative as we were in 2003, before the Iraq war. Oh, what happy days those were!
Don’t watch RT because we really don’t want you to 'question more.' We want you to question less. It's much easier for us that way.

President Lincoln...before JFK...and very much like President Trump

'Refugees' Jihadists Harass Women in Russian Nightclub, Are Promptly Beaten and Sent to Prison

Comments from the web

These 'refugees' were turning up in Austria and trying to buy packs of cigarettes with €500 notes? They aren't refugees, they have been explicitly released from Turkish holding camps. The idea is to flood nations of Europe and weaken the societies, so they can be taken over.......by Corporations [TTIP]
This is designed to get people rioting, so they can bring in Martial Law, as they have in France and Brussels. The people will have no rights what so ever then.

 They were deported after their asylum was rejected and they make a bee line for the nightclub? Strange? A real refugee would be worried about the next meal and shelter, saving whatever little he had (usual refugees have nothing much)...
Not to mention that a real refugee, and even a migrant in search of a better life, would definitely never dream of annoying the locals in the country he prays will accept him/her. Humble and discreet and thankful for any little kindness is the typical attitude.
Ergo, these are not refugees. And they are not migrants in search of work either.
So what are they? And what do they want?


For an excellent, thought-provoking essay on this issue, see our article which appeared a few days after this one:  Russians Bewildered by Cologne Rapes: 'Where Were the German Men?!'


We can't speak for Europe, but in Russia, molesting women in public places is not advisable.
A group of approximately 50 "refugees" who were deported from Norway for bad behavior decided to partake in a bit of groping at a Murmansk nightclub.
Being Russia, the results were predictable:
The refugees allegedly groped and harassed women in a similar manner as the assaults in Cologne on New Year’s Eve. A group of male Russians took them aside to “educate” them that “Cologne is 2,500 kilometers south of here.”
The refugees tried to flee but were quickly captured by the Russians. They then took them out to the street and gave them a beating they will remember. Police arrived to break up the fight but locals report that they threw a few punches at the refugees before arresting 33 of them. Eighteen refugees were in such bad condition they had to be taken to hospital.
We don't want to romanticize vigilante justice, but in a civilized society, assaulting women (or anyone, for that matter) should have swift, painful consequences. Ball's in your court, Europe.
 
 

Anyone is free to republish, copy, and redistribute the text in this content (but not the images or videos) in any medium or format, with the right to remix, transform, and build upon it, even commercially, as long as they provide a backlink and credit to Russia Insider. It is not necessary to notify Russia Insider. Licensed Creative Commons.

The effects of social pressure and conditioning...until you accept the abnormal as normal

Raising children in the west gets harder all the time

Friday, February 2, 2018

The Memo that Hillary paid for to use the FBI and Obama admin to undermine the Trump campaign, before and after the election

They call this sedition and treason

1. mccabe sat on thecunt emails on huma laptop
2. secret society is real
3. lynch-comey-strzok collusion to exculpate thecunt in her email crime
4. FISA warrant issued from baseless evidence, sources and payment parties withheld by FBI from FISC judges
5. conclusion: fbi-doj-gaymulatto-thecunt conspiracy to influence election and subvert democracy
From what I’ve read of the publicly released memo, I was right on at least points 2, 4 and 5; thecunt loyalists in the FBI, DOJ, and gay mulatto admin spied on a political opponent using baseless “evidence” gathered by a firm hired by the DNC and by former British spy Steele who was being paid by the FBI for his services. The upcoming IG report should prove me right on points 1 and 3. (Rumor has it McCabe will be the one to sing for his freedom.)
That’s nothing less than the politicization of our law enforcement and intelligence agencies; a massive act of collusion between a presidential candidate and various unaccountable deep state actors in our three-letter agencies to spy on her opponent in the hopes of affecting an election outcome, or of undermining an incoming administration.
Bigger than Watergate would be an understatement. This is the Mother of All Political Scandals.
Others agree:

The entire “Russian collusion” hoax narrative is a political hit job by thecunt and her Stalinist lackeys in the Creep State. Is it time to officially declare the US a banana republic? Or are we Ingsoc now?

Via @Volbeck, “The FBI cries out in pain as it spies on you.”

Gummy Worm Comey is such an arrogant prick. Glad to see him get BTFO here, in the most shivvy manner possible (calling Phoney Comey what he is: a hillary hit man and treasonous eel).
The Hill reports the FISA memo is a “deep state bombshell”:
The Nunes memo is out, and it is a stunning rebuke of the prevailing Democrat narrative on Trump-Russia collusion. It shows, beyond reasonable doubt, that extreme abuses of authority and bad faith were instrumental in getting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to approve a counterintelligence warrant that circumvents normal 4th Amendment processes for an American citizen.
[…]
There can no longer be any doubt — oppo research was used to weaponize the intelligence collection process on behalf of one American political party against the other during a presidential election.
[…]
Their motivation for such an abuse appears to be that some or all of them shared the feelings of Steele, a British national, who according to the memo told the FBI he was “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.” The preponderance of the evidence now shows us Steele was not the only one who felt this way.
[…]
But we now have clear evidence that yes, Trump associates were targets of intelligence surveillance, using a flimsy partisan pretext that only makes sense if those advancing it from the corridors of government power were filled with a judgment-clouding hatred for all things Trump.
#CullTheDeepState
This seems like an appropriate time to quote Scripture at Comey,
But justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream” Amos 5:24

 https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2018/02/02/the-memo/#comments

The lesbian couple REFUSED to go to a baker who would make their cake, and is forcing this baker to do it through the courts, proving they WANTED a confrontation. This is more of that militant "you will accept us as normal" attitude that is actually building more resentment towards the LGBTQ community as revealed in recent polls.




The California Family Council is helping organize a prayer rally next week for a Kern County Christian Baker, who’s bakery could be closed if she doesn’t start baking wedding cakes for same-sex wedding ceremonies. The State of California is taking Cathy Miller to court demanding she either design wedding cakes promoting messages she disagrees with or to stop creating wedding cakes altogether. This case is similar to the one heard before the Supreme Court last month (Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission), involving a Christian Colorado cake artist who was charged with illegal discrimination for politely declining to design a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.
Miller, owner of Tastries Bakery in Bakerfield, will be joined on the steps of the Kern County court house by her pastor Roger Spradlin from Valley Baptist Church, and Jonathan Keller, CEO of the California Family Council, to pray that the judge protects Miller’s constitutional rights to free speech and freedom of religion.
Miller is a cake artist, but first and foremost, she is a devout Christian. Miller’s relationship with Jesus Christ impacts every area of her life, including her work as owner of Tastries Bakery. When two women entered her shop in August 2017 and asked Miller to design a wedding cake for their same-sex marriage, she declined their request and respectfully recommended another local baker who’d be happy to create their cake.
According to Miller’s FCDF legal team, her answer was guided by three fundamental principles:
  • All people are created in God’s image;
  • God gave Miller her artistic talents to use for His glory, and she cannot use them to express a message or celebrate an event that violates God’s teachings; and
  • God designed marriage as a lifelong union of one man and one woman.
Because of these truths, Miller knew she could not design a custom cake for a same-sex wedding. But she also knew that God loves all people. So Miller told the couple that she would gladly sell them anything else in her store or create a cake for them for another occasion. This is consistent with her policy of declining to create other cakes, such as those with anti-family and suggestive themes. Miller’s decision not to design other cakes had never caused a problem until that day.
Miller’s decision to honor God’s design for marriage and live by her conscience has cost her dearly. The two women filed a complaint with California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), alleging that Miller had violated the state’s anti-discrimination law, the Unruh Act, by supposedly discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation. Shortly after, the DFEH launched a formal investigation of Miller and last month filed a surprise motion for a temporary restraining order to force her to create custom wedding cakes celebrating same-sex marriages. She now faces the loss of her bakery—wedding cakes make up approximately 40 percent of her business.
Fortunately, the superior court judge denied the government’s request because he had not yet heard Miller’s version of the story and there was no urgency justifying such an emergency order because the same-sex couple wanted a wedding cake last August. The judge also acknowledged that the case could affect Miller’s constitutional rights.The judge then ordered the government to show cause on why the court should issue an injunction against Miller.
On February 2, right after the prayer rally, the judge will hear arguments over whether to grant the government’s punishing request. Her attorney, Charles LiMandri, Chief Counsel of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF), said he will be arguing three main points:
  • Miller did not discriminate based on sexual orientation and did not violate the Unruh Act. In fact, Miller is willing to serve all people regardless of their sexual orientation. She just cannot promote every message requested of her;
  • Miller cannot be forced to celebrate messages or events that violate her sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage; and
  • Miller’s free speech and conscience rights are protected under the U.S. and California constitutions.
The stakes are high. If Miller is forced to create custom artwork that celebrates activities that conflict with her core convictions, others will be similarly compelled to create various forms of expression that violate their conscience. But the First Amendment ensures that we all are free to live and work by our religious beliefs. Miller is asking that these cherished freedoms be preserved—not only for her but for all Californians.
Supporters are invited to join the “Cathy Miller Prayer Rally” at the Kern County Liberty Bell outside the Kern County Superior Court at 12 p.m. Friday, February 2. Prayers will be offered for Miller and her family, for the attorneys involved in the case, for the superior court judge, and for our nation. FCDF is defending Miller in the courtroom, but the implications extend beyond Bakersfield, California. This case could have lasting repercussions for all Californians.
For more information about the “Cathy Miller Prayer Rally,” call the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund at 858-759-9948.
To learn more about Cathy Miller’s case and how to support her fight for freedom visit: https://www.fcdflegal.org/cases/cathy/

Please Join the Cathy Miller Prayer Rally – Friday Feb. 2

Come Support a Kern County Christian Baker’s Fight for Faith and Freedom

When: 12 p.m. Friday, February 2
Where: At the Liberty Bell outside Kern County Superior Court: 1415 Truxtun Ave, Bakersfield


Unsafe moon landing

Millennials Are Becoming Witches DUH

Rock N Roll Witch Makes Strange Prediction In Video (2017)

The Fallen Angels/Aliens Have ARRIVED (2018)

Yeshua, Messiah and King, chosen Lamb of YHVH

 
Trusting in Yeshua, whose blood covers us

Psalm 22
16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have in closed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.



It's Called The 5G BEAST SYSTEM For A Reason (2018)

Jim Caviezel: ‘Passion of the Christ’ Sequel Will Be ‘Biggest Film in Hi...

Our Spiritual World: Dead Sea Scrolls

Thursday, February 1, 2018

[The CFPB] Funneled a large portion of the more than $5 billion in penalties collected from defendants to community organizers aligned with Democrats — “a slush fund by another name,” said a consultant who worked with CFPB on its Civil Penalty Fund and requested anonymity.

A scheme by the publisher of Newsweek and the International Business Times to buy fraudulent traffic in order to help secure a major ad contract from a US government agency has come to light in a new report released by independent ad fraud researchers.
According to the report, IBTimes.com won a major video and display advertising contract from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) - a federal oversight agency created six years ago as the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren. Social Puncher, a consulting firm that investigates online ad fraud, notes in its report that "ads purchased by the CFPB were displayed to an audience that includes a significant amount of "cheap junk traffic with a share of bots" - effectively defrauding the agency.


a
socialpuncher.com

When it comes to IBT’s fraudulent traffic practices, Social Puncher’s findings align with reporting from BuzzFeed News on IBT India, and with separate data gathered by Pixalate, an ad fraud detection company, and DoubleVerify, a digital media measurement company. (Social Puncher and BuzzFeed News previously collaborated on ad fraud investigations, but worked separately in this case.)
Based on what it described as a detailed investigation, DoubleVerify this week classified IBT’s US, UK, India, and Singapore sites as “as having fraud or sophisticated invalid traffic,” according COO Matt McLaughlin. DoubleVerify is now blocking all ad impressions on these sites on behalf of customers.
In response to questions from BuzzFeed News, Newsweek Media Group, the parent company of IBT, acknowledged it purchases audiences from ad networks that sell pop-up and pop-under traffic. It said this traffic represents a “small percentage of traffic on our sites” and denied any fraudulent activity. -Buzzfeed
“We use third-party platforms to verify and filter this traffic to ensure it is of the highest quality. This verification process prevents poor-quality traffic being redirected to our sites and we consistently score highly on various third-party ad verification platforms,” the company said. It declined to name the third-party verification partners it works with.
The CFPB, now headed by Trump appointee Mick Mulvaney, told BuzzFeed News that the bureau is looking into the allegations.
We take allegations of fraud very seriously. Acting Director Mulvaney is actively looking into the work done by GMMB, and these allegations [of ad fraud by IBTimes.com] will be investigated as part of that process,” the spokesperson said.

a
Mick Mulvaney
a
socialpuncher.com
The CFPB has come under fire in recent months after it was discovered that the agency established a "secret slush fund" to funnel penalties collected from defendants to Democrat causes.
A consultant who worked with the highly politicized Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) claims the organization funneled a large portion of over $5 billion in collected penalties to "community organizers aligned with Democrats" as part of a giant slush fund, the Post reported in early December.
[The CFPB] Funneled a large portion of the more than $5 billion in penalties collected from defendants to community organizers aligned with Democrats — “a slush fund by another name,” said a consultant who worked with CFPB on its Civil Penalty Fund and requested anonymity.
a
Warren, the lesbian who pretended to be a native American for free college tuition and get special GIMME money before her rise in politics. Because she wrote this for years on Federal forms, she cannot retract, because it is a crime to lie to the Feds or get money using false pretenses about your past. The Cherokee indians have no record of her in ANY of their sub tribes regarding her ancestry-she made it all up for free student loans and special hiring considerations of other whites.

Created six years ago as the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren and slipped into the Dodd Frank bill before it was passed by Congressional Democrats, the CFPB became one of the most powerful agencies in D.C., with the ability to exercise enormous power over the U.S. economy while its budget remained unencumbered by congressional oversight. As one Hill writer put it:
The problem is that this agency and its director were set up to be free from the control of the Congress. Congress’s fundamental obligation to oversee and fund such bureaus or agencies is short-circuited when it comes to the CFPB. In structuring it in the manner written by now-Sen. Warren (D-Mass.), the law abrogated the idea of a government by the people, for the people and of the people.
Instead, it established an autocratic and unaccountable power center for people of Warren’s ideological persuasion — those who view our market economy as an enemy that must be managed by a chosen few. The creation of the CFPB as a rogue agency with a dictatorial leader is one of the most significant acts of malfeasance perpetrated on the American constitutional system since the Sedition Acts of 1798. 

How many Norwegians have illegally entered our nation, committed crimes and burdened our prison and welfare systems? I might ask the same question about Finnish, Swedish, Welsh, Icelanders, Greenlanders and New Zealanders.

Authored by Walter Williams via The Strategic Culture Foundation,
President Donald Trump reportedly asked why the U.S. is "having all these people from shithole countries come here." I think he could have used better language, but it's a question that should be asked and answered.

All other countries, illegal immigration is a huge and long term prison offense. But only the USA is taken to task for defending what every other country on Earth enforces daily. Only WE are the BAD GUYS. Everyone else gets a media pass.
I have a few questions for my fellow Americans to consider.
How many Norwegians have illegally entered our nation, committed crimes and burdened our prison and welfare systems? I might ask the same question about Finnish, Swedish, Welsh, Icelanders, Greenlanders and New Zealanders. The bulk of our immigration problem is with people who enter our country criminally from Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, Africa and the Middle East. It's illegal immigrants from those countries who have committed crimes and burdened our criminal justice and welfare systems. A large number of immigrants who are here illegally — perhaps the majority are law-abiding in other respects — have fled oppressive, brutal and corrupt regimes to seek a better life in America.
In the debate about illegal immigration, there are questions that are not explicitly asked but can be answered with a straight "yes" or "no": Does everyone in the world have a right to live in the U.S.? Do Americans have a right to decide who and under what conditions a person may enter our country? Should we permit foreigners landing at our airports to ignore U.S. border control laws just as some ignore our laws at our southern border? The reason those questions are not asked is that one would be deemed an idiot for saying that everyone in the world has a right to live in our country, that Americans don't have a right to decide who lives in our country and that foreigners landing at our airports have a right to just ignore U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents.
Immigration today, even when legal, is different from the immigration of yesteryear. People who came here in the 19th century and most of the 20th century came here to learn our language, learn our customs and become Americans. Years ago, there was a guarantee that immigrants came here to work, because there was no welfare system; they worked, begged or starved. Today, there is no such assurance. Because of our welfare state, immigrants can come here and live off taxpaying Americans.
There is another difference between today and yesteryear. Today, Americans are taught multiculturalism throughout their primary, secondary and college education. They are taught that one culture is no better or worse than another. To believe otherwise is criticized at best as Eurocentrism and at worst as racism. As a result, some immigrant groups seek to bring to our country the cultural values whose failures have led to the poverty, corruption and human rights violations in their home countries that caused them to flee. As the fallout from President Trump's indelicate remarks demonstrates, too many Americans are afraid and unwilling to ask which immigrant groups have become a burden to our nation and which have made a contribution to the greatness of America.
Very unfortunate for our nation is that we have political groups that seek to use illegal immigration for their own benefit. They've created sanctuary cities and states that openly harbor criminals — people who have broken our laws. The whole concept of sanctuary cities is to give aid, comfort and sympathy to people who have broken our laws. Supporters want to prevent them from having to hide and live in fear of discovery. I'd ask whether, for the sake of equality before the law, we should apply the sanctuary concept to Americans who have broken other laws, such as robbers and tax evaders.
We should not fall prey to people who criticize our efforts to combat illegal immigration and who pompously say, "We're a nation of immigrants!" The debate is not over immigration. The debate is over illegal immigration.
My sentiments on immigrants who are here legally and who want to become Americans are expressed by the sentiments in Emma Lazarus' poem "The New Colossus," which is on a plaque inside the Statue of Liberty and in part says, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
We have more no go zones in the US at anytime in our history. The last time would have been in the civil war. And who does MS13 and the other gangs recruit, from the Dreamer class. How does MS13 survive, extortion, drugs and robbery. There are MS13 among the Dreamers. There was over a million gang members nationwide in 2007, I wonder what it is today when MS13 controls communities nationwide, or how about Chicago with a gang on every block. Call 911, they'll help.

The media is instigating a race war on the behest of communist in the Democratic Party. One has to ask who's racist?

Why do the state and local governments confiscate the assets of citizens but refuse to do so for illegal invaders?
Part of the answer is that states and cities get grants based on how many illegal invaders live there- the formula uses census data that includes them. More illegal invaders, more money from the Feds. 
Trump needs to stop that. Change the formula to subtract funding based on how many children are enrolled in government schools without proof of citizenship.
 100 years ago they came here to work and build America, now they come here with a hand out, demanding the benefits that America offers without contribution.


Flat Earth, the ISS and Augmented Reality

Universities now REVOKING DEGREES from men accused of sexual harrasment

You cannot make this stuff up. Male hate...the satanic matriarchy system...has a put option on men's lives now. All she has to do is say, he bumped into my breast and the man's life is over. 

And no, no courts to prove guilt. the accusation is enough. To ruin your life.

If she wants you fired, all she has to do is go to human resources, turn on some tears and whammo. YOU ARE FIRED.

If she wants you arrested, same thing, but just add rape to the tears. You are in jail.

If she goes public, your Alma mater will revoke your degrees and licenses and your life and reality is finished.

The accusation is enough. More than enough. The white male and sometimes black male, is being destroyed in every conceivable way possible. 

Feminazis got you right where they want you. Until there are severe consequences for false allegations this will continue to be every mans kryptonite. 

Allegations are the new convicted. You recording everything you do yet? Men need to, especially if someone is targeting your life for destruction. And even proof of innocence may not be enough when the courts are in collusion with the agenda of hate.


----------

In response to allegations of "sexual harassment and intimidation” by Steve Wynn, his Alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania, has voted to do something it said it hasn't done in one century: it is removing Wynn’s name from the outdoor plaza by Houston Hall, called "Wynn Commons"; it will also remove Wynn's name from a scholarship he funded.

The group of trustees, alumni, deans and faculty also voted to revoke Wynn’s honorary degree. The UPenn group also revoked a honorary degree granted to Bill Cosby.
Wynn, CEO of Wynn Resorts Ltd., is an alumnus of Philadelphia-based school and a former trustee. He has denied allegations of sexual impropriety.
Full statement below:
A Message to the Penn Community from David L. Cohen, Chair, Penn Board of Trustees
Amy Gutmann, President
Late last week, multiple credible reports emerged in the national press detailing pervasive and decades-long acts of sexual harassment and intimidation by Steve Wynn, former Penn Trustee and College alumnus.
The nature, severity, and extent of these allegations, and the patterns of abusive behavior they describe, involve acts and conduct that are inimical to the core values of our University.
While Mr. Wynn has denied the allegations, the reputational impact of what has been reported is so significant that Mr. Wynn resigned from his position as finance chairman for the Republican National Committee.
Further, the board of directors of Wynn Resorts has formed a special committee to investigate the allegations of sexual misconduct made against him. And gaming regulators in both Nevada and Massachusetts are also investigating.
In the wake of the substantive and detailed press reports, and of consequent actions by fiduciary and regulatory bodies, we felt it was imperative to examine Mr. Wynn's recognized presence on Penn's campus. We hold as a sacred commitment our responsibilities of stewardship of our University's reputation. As chair of the Trustees and president of the University, we have a leadership responsibility and must always think and act on behalf of what is best for Penn and our core values. Perhaps nowhere is the need for clarity of purpose and action more important than in matters with such potential impact on the ethos of our society and our University community.
To that end, we convened a small group composed of trustees, alumni, deans, and faculty who deliberated carefully on the nature of the charges made against Mr. Wynn and the correct course of action the University should take in response. That group made recommendations to the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees, which unanimously accepted them on behalf of the Board, and which will result in the following immediate actions.
  • First, we will remove the name Wynn Commons, named for Mr. Wynn, from the centrally located outdoor plaza bounded by Houston Hall, Claudia Cohen Hall, College Hall, and Irvine Auditorium.
  • Second, Mr. Wynn's name will be removed from a scholarship fund established by a donation from him. The scholarships will continue to be awarded.
  • Third, we will revoke Mr. Wynn's honorary degree.
At the same time we are taking these actions, we will also revoke the honorary degree awarded to Bill Cosby, who has similarly been accused by multiple parties of sexual assault.
It has been a century since the University of Pennsylvania last revoked an honorary degree, and we do not take that decision — or the decision to remove Mr. Wynn's name from the Commons and from the scholarship fund he created — lightly.
We view these as extraordinary and essentially unique circumstances that call for an immediate, decisive, and clearly ethical response. The decision to remove the name Wynn Commons could not be made independently of considering the other ways in which the University had previously recognized Mr. Wynn. It became necessary, therefore, to consider the appropriateness of Mr. Wynn's honorary degree and any other honorifics Penn had previously bestowed. Upon careful consideration, when it became clear that the Wynn name should be removed from visible public recognition on Penn's physical campus, it was no less incumbent on the Trustees to remove that name from the roster of those holding the University's highest symbolic honor. That decision in turn made it also clear that the multiple and highly credible charges involving Bill Cosby warranted the same action.
Our nation is currently undergoing a profound reckoning regarding the role and extent of sexual misconduct in all areas of our society. It is incumbent on all of us to address these issues wherever and whenever we find that they affect our extended community. As a University, we have always been, and will always continue to be, looked to by our alumni and neighbors, our faculty, and most of all by our students, for moral leadership. We must not — we cannot — fail to provide it.

---------------



JC Tweet Translation:

JC Tweet Translation:
Special Agent Andrew McCabe stood tall over the last 8 months [DO NOT TALK], when small people [SHEEP] were trying to tear down an institution we all depend on [COVER]. He served with distinction for two decades [WE OWN YOU & YOUR FAMILY]. I wish Andy well [187]. I also wish continued strength for the rest of the FBI [GENERAL THREAT TO OTHERS]. America needs you [ACTIVATE SLEEPER CELLS].
Q

Hey Demoncrats! Learn some history before condemning it


Obamacare...now, no one has health insurance that covers ANYTHING AT ALL.