Revealing that which is concealed. Learning about anything that resembles real freedom. A journey of self-discovery shared with the world.
Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them - Ephesians 5-11
Join me and let's follow that high road...
'man camp' in Midland, Texas that was constructed in 2012 to temporarily house workers in the oil industry
Shon
Crabtree, 42, lives across the street from the Federal Government's
newest unaccompanied illegal alien detention facility and is clearly
disgruntled
'I'm worried about some of
them escaping and coming to my house and holding my family hostage until
they get what they want or taking a vehicle. We are scared."
The illegal aliens, are mainly from Central America
DailyMail.com
visited the camp where there is a small wooden 4 ft. fence that
surrounds the property with federal police vehicles positioned outside
of the facility on the roadway 24 hours a day
According
to their website, Cotton Logistics opened their Midland facility in
2012 and has 700 beds. The man camps are built like all-inclusive hotels
with five-star hospitality, wireless internet and cable TV
Officials
say that there are now more than 140,000 illegal aliens being held in
federal custody - more than three times the largest number of children
held under the previous administration
It's communism. They MUST destroy our land and rebuild it in the image of China. That's what this is really all about.
As it happens, satanists want what the commies want - a destroyed Christian country to rebuild, ala Phoenix, in the image of Lucifer, which is also communism.
It's why they work together, to push this over.
Nothing will happen to bish. Not for real.
Don
by CJ
Welcome to the NEW and IMPROVED institutional racism. You can't make this stuff up. UNFUCKING REAL.
Wake County Public School System, which serves the greater Raleigh,
North Carolina area, held an equity-themed teachers’ conference with
sessions on “whiteness,” “microaggressions,” “racial mapping,” and
“disrupting texts,” encouraging educators to form “equity teams” in
schools and push the new party line: “antiracism.”
The February 2020 conference, attended by more than 200 North
Carolina public school teachers, began with a “land acknowledgement,” a
ritual recognition suggesting that white North Carolinians are
colonizers on stolen Native American land. Next, the superintendent of
Wake County Public Schools, Cathy Moore, introduced the day’s program
and shuffled teachers to breakout sessions across eight rooms. Freelance
reporter A.P. Dillon obtained the documents from the sessions through a public records request and provided them to City Journal.
At the first session, “Whiteness in Ed Spaces,” school administrators
provided two handouts on the “norms of whiteness.” These documents
claimed that “(white) cultural values” include “denial,” “fear,”
“blame,” “control,” “punishment,” “scarcity,” and “one-dimensional
thinking.” According to notes from the session, the teachers argued that
“whiteness perpetuates the system” of injustice and that the district’s
“whitewashed curriculum” was “doing real harm to our students and
educators.” The group encouraged white teachers to “challenge the
dominant ideology” of whiteness and “disrupt” white culture in the
classroom through a series of “transformational interventions.”
Parents, according to the teachers, should be considered an
impediment to social justice. When one teacher asked, “How do you deal
with parent pushback?” the answer was clear: ignore parental concerns
and push the ideology of antiracism directly to students. “You can’t let
parents deter you from the work,” the teachers said. “White parents’
children are benefiting from the system” of whiteness and are “not
learning at home about diversity (LGBTQ, race, etc.).” Therefore,
teachers have an obligation to subvert parental wishes and beliefs. Any
“pushback,” the teachers explained, is merely because white parents fear
“that they are going to lose something” and find it “hard to let go of
power [and] privilege.”
This isn’t an aberration. In fact, the district’s official Equity in
Action plan encourages teachers to override parents in the pursuit of
antiracism. “Equity leaders [should] have the confidence to take risks
and make difficult decisions that are rooted in their values,” the
document reads. “Even in the face of opposition, equity leaders can draw
on a heartfelt conviction for what is best for students and families.”
In other words, the school should displace the family as the ultimate
arbiter of political morality.
The equity plan outlines this new ideology in chart format,
announcing the district’s commitment to a series of fashionable
pedagogies, including “color consciousness,” “white identity
development,” “critical race theory,” “intersections of power and
privilege,” and “anti-racist identity and action.”
The equity program in the Wake County Public School System is a
massive enterprise. Founded in 2013, the district’s Office of Equity
Affairs has now amassed a $1 million annual budget and hosts an ongoing
sequence of school trainings, curriculum-development sessions, and
teacher events. In 2019, for example, the office hosted a series of
“courageous conversations” about race and a five-night discussion
program about the podcast Seeing White, which asks listeners to
consider how “whiteness” contributes to “police shootings of unarmed
African Americans,” “acts of domestic terrorism,” and “unending racial
inequity in schools, housing, criminal justice, and hiring.”
A letter from House Intelligence Committee members
demands answers from the DNI about illegal breaches of the wall guarding
against CIA and NSA domestic activity.
by glenn greenwald
Then-Vice
President Joseph Biden (L) with former Central Intelligence Agency
Director Leon Panetta (R) at CIA headquarters in McLean, Virginia.
(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
A report declassified last Wednesday by the
Department of Homeland Security is raising serious concerns about the
possibly illegal involvement by the intelligence community in U.S.
domestic political affairs.
Entitled “Domestic Violent Extremism Poses Heightened Threat in 2021,” the March 1 Report
from the Director of National Intelligence states that it was prepared
“in consultation with the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland
Security—and was drafted by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC),
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), with contributions from the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).”
Its
primary point is this: “The IC [intelligence community] assesses that
domestic violent extremists (DVEs) who are motivated by a range of
ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the
United States pose an elevated threat to the Homeland in 2021.” While
asserting that “the most lethal” of these threats is posed by “racially
or ethnically motivated violent extremists (RMVEs) and militia violent
extremists (MVEs),” it makes clear that its target encompasses a wide
range of groups from the left (Antifa, animal rights and environmental
activists, pro-choice extremists and anarchists: “those who oppose
capitalism and all forms of globalization”) to the right (sovereign
citizen movements, anti-abortion activists and those deemed motivated by
racial or ethnic hatreds).
The U.S. security state apparatus
regards the agenda of “domestic violent extremists” as “derived from
anti-government or anti-authority sentiment,” which includes “opposition
to perceived economic, racial or social hierarchies.” In sum, to the
Department of Homeland Security, an “extremist” is anyone who opposes
the current prevailing ruling class and system for distributing power.
Anyone they believe is prepared to use violence, intimidation or
coercion in pursuit of these causes then becomes a “domestic violent
extremist,” subject to a vast array of surveillance, monitoring and
other forms of legal restrictions:
Department of Homeland Security report, Mar.1, 2021
It
goes without saying that violence of any kind — including that which is
politically motivated — is a serious crime under U.S. law, and it is
the proper role of the U.S. Government to investigate and prevent it.
But there are real and important legal and institutional limits on the
authority of the intelligence community to involve itself in domestic
law enforcement, or other forms of domestic political activity, that
seem threatened here, if not outright violated.
In particular, the
Report’s acknowledgement that it was compiled by institutions including
“the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), with contributions from the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Defense Intelligence Agency
(DIA)” has alarmed numerous members of the House Intelligence Committee.
On Thursday, all ten minority members of that Committee wrote a
previously unreported letter to Director of National Intelligence Avril
Haines “to raise serious concerns about the production of this document
by the Intelligence Community (IC) and to seek clarification of the
facts related to its production.”
Among the issues raised was that
the DHS Report was not subject to the standard rigors of an
intelligence community finding, yet continually makes sweeping claims
that it prefixes with the authoritative phrase “the IC assesses.” The
Committee members found this “to be misleading,” adding: we “urge you to
clarify which elements in the IC concurred with this judgement and the
intelligence basis, if any, for that concurrence.” In other words,
Haines claims that these dubious assertions about various threats faced
by Americans are the findings of the intelligence community when that is
not true: just like the originally false claim widely spread by the media
that “all seventeen intelligence agencies” endorsed the 2016 election
findings about Russian interference when, in fact, it was only a few
which had done so. Haines’ claims have support only from a few agencies
as well.
But the more substantive danger is the role played by the
CIA and other intelligence agencies in the domestic politics of the
U.S., all in the name of fighting “domestic terrorism” (similar dangers
were previously created by the Bush and Obama administrations in the
name of fighting “international terrorism”). As the committee members’
letter details:
The
Intelligence Committee members, citing the fact that the intelligence
community is “subject to longstanding prohibitions against domestic
activities,” then demanded answers to a series of questions based on
this substantive concern:
Involvement
of the intelligence community in the domestic activities of U.S.
citizens is one of the most dangerous breaches of civil liberties and
democratic order the U.S. Government can perpetrate. It was after World
War II when the CIA, the NSA and other security state agencies that
wield immense and unlimited powers in the dark were created in the name
of fighting the Cold War. Legal and institutional prohibitions on
wielding that massive machinery against the American public were central
to the always-dubious claim that this security behemoth that operates
completely in the dark was compatible with democracy. As the ACLU noted,
“in its 1947 charter, the CIA was prohibited from spying against
Americans, in part because President Truman was afraid that the agency
would engage in political abuse.”
Since
then, Truman’s fear has been realized over and over. Some of the worst
post-WW2 civil liberties abuses have been the result of breaches by the
CIA and other agencies of this prohibition. As the ACLU documents,
the CIA in the 1960s was caught infiltrating and manipulating numerous
domestic political activist groups. Under the auspices of the War on
Terror, entire new bureaucracies (such as the Department of Homeland
Security) and new legal regimes (such as the Patriot Act and the FISA
Amendments Act) were designed to erode these long-standing limitations
by dramatically increasing surveillance powers aimed at U.S. citizens.
And by design, the infiltration of these security state agencies in U.S.
domestic politics has dramatically escalated.
As the first War on Terror was escalating, The Washington Post — under the headline “CIA Is Expanding Domestic Operations” — reported
in October, 2002, that “The Central Intelligence Agency is expanding
its domestic presence, placing agents with nearly all of the FBI's 56
terrorism task forces in U.S. cities.” The Post added that in the name of that War on Terror:
FBI
Director Robert S. Mueller III recently described the new arrangement
as his answer to MI5, Britain's internal security service. Unlike the
CIA, MI5 is empowered to collect intelligence within Britain and to act
to disrupt domestic threats to British national security. "It goes some
distance to accomplishing what the MI5 does," Mueller told a
House-Senate intelligence panel last week in describing the new CIA role
in the FBI task forces.
In the years following, two NSA whistleblowers — William Binney and Edward Snowden — both cited their horror over the turning of the surveillance machinery against American citizens
as the reason for their decision to denounce their agency. One of the
aspects that most disturbed me about the Russiagate conspiracy theory
from the start was that it was created and disseminated by the CIA and
related agencies with the intent, first, to alter the outcome of the
2016 election, and then to undermine the elected president with whom they were at war. Shortly before Trump’s inauguration, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) went on The Rachel Maddow Show
to warn — or more accurately: threaten — Trump that the CIA would
destroy his presidency if he continued to criticize or otherwise oppose
them:
