Monday, January 7, 2013
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Saturday, January 5, 2013
A diamond in the rough....
A good man with a good heart...
Picked up the guitar at 3 1/2 years of age...
Was composing classical music sonatas and symphonic pieces at age 8...
When he was 10, he was writing computer code in 3 languages and built his first computer at age 9...
at 11, he studied graduate school level chemistry and physics for giggles. We have two boxes of formulas he solved (usually in under 20 minutes)that graduate students struggle with.
He speaks, writes and reads 3 languages fluently. Plus 3 computer languages.
When he was 12, he took up surfing with a passion and quickly became the best surfer in the family...
Since the 6th grade, this guy has always earned straight As in school. He is now the resident physics tutor at his high school for other students. since he was 16. He will graduate soon with absolute top honors in every class of his school. In the last two months, he has been interviewed by reps from MIT, Cal Tech, Princeton, and Stanford is on the way. Doubtless, he won't be attending any of those schools, though.
This is our buggle boy Nater. He was raised with love, without violence or lies, and was and is always given attention, the truth, and a highway to spirit each and every day. In spite of being poor of means and wearing clothes full of holes, he has risen above all this, the diamond that he is.
Picked up the guitar at 3 1/2 years of age...
Was composing classical music sonatas and symphonic pieces at age 8...
When he was 10, he was writing computer code in 3 languages and built his first computer at age 9...
at 11, he studied graduate school level chemistry and physics for giggles. We have two boxes of formulas he solved (usually in under 20 minutes)that graduate students struggle with.
He speaks, writes and reads 3 languages fluently. Plus 3 computer languages.
When he was 12, he took up surfing with a passion and quickly became the best surfer in the family...
Since the 6th grade, this guy has always earned straight As in school. He is now the resident physics tutor at his high school for other students. since he was 16. He will graduate soon with absolute top honors in every class of his school. In the last two months, he has been interviewed by reps from MIT, Cal Tech, Princeton, and Stanford is on the way. Doubtless, he won't be attending any of those schools, though.
This is our buggle boy Nater. He was raised with love, without violence or lies, and was and is always given attention, the truth, and a highway to spirit each and every day. In spite of being poor of means and wearing clothes full of holes, he has risen above all this, the diamond that he is.
What is happening to people?
found on Craigslist...I understand, bro. As I just recently experienced exactly this at the Post Office the other day. EXACTLY.
DB
-------------
Let me preface by saying I've never posted anything on this section or any other section of Craigslist but I'm feeling very compelled to do so right now.
I just got back from a trip to Wegmans and am in awe at the current state/behaivor/mindset of "people". As I'm walking in, I go to grab a cart and notice three guys (late teens/early 20's) all standing together but on their cell phones texting and blocking the majortiy of carts. So I sidestep them and grab a cart from the sole lane they weren't blocking. I get my cart and proceed but I can't help but notice the people lined up to return bottles/cans. I'm not knocking them (I'm pro-recycle) but it looked like they literally crawled out of a dumpster and needed the deposit money to get through the night. I asked myself "why don't they just stop consuming this sugarwater and use the money for a necessity?" Then I realized Coke and Pepsi are a necessity for the majority of people in this country. I should also point out that each one was overweight (if not obese).
I get inside and start doing some shopping. The procuce section was the most "normal". I grabbed some apples, a few bananas, and some strawberries since it's that time of year. As I left the produce section, it started getting depressing. I see a kid poking his finger through a package of ground beef and laughing his cute little head off. I don't blame the kid (I did that once too when I was his age but my mother grabbed my hand and basically let me know if it ever happened again, I'd lose my hand). However, I DO blame his mother for not caring the least about her son destroying multiple packs of meat. She was actually entertained by his behaivor. So I grabbed some chicken breast and continued on. As I'm passing the "organic food" section, I hear two guys laughing hysterically so I walk back a few steps to see if George Carlin had risen from the dead doing one of his stand-up acts. Nope...wasn't him. The two guys were "tickling" each other. In laymans terms, they were a couple of gay guys. I'm not anti-gay, but it was just weird watching them be so flamoyant in public. Being "out" seems to be the "in" these days.
I get to the cereal isle and see a guy pushing around one of those carts that resembles a car for the kids to sit in. His gf/wife was about 10 feet away yelling out loudly which cereal he wanted. He had his back turned to her pushing the cart the opposite direction with the two kids screaming their heads off as he's looking at his cell phone. I stop at this point waiting for him to pass me but he's in the middle of the isle and knocks into my cart. One of the kids then throws a canned fruit. The guy stops looking at his phone and gives me this annoyed look as if it's my fault im in his lane. A fuse started to light up inside me. As he starts to move his cart back to the right side of the lane, I throw my shoulder into him and knock him off balance. He says "hey" but in a very non-threatening way, so I glace back and he looks away. His overweight gf didn't seem too pleased with me. I grabbed some Wegmans brand cereal with almonds (it's really good).
On to the next isle to get some pasta and sauce. I see a mom that resembles my math teacher in high school. Is it her? Can't be...nope, wasn't her but I instantly smile since I was very fond of my math teacher. She smiles back. Her daughter was next to her..I'd say she was 15 or 16. Lip peirced, glazed eyes, and of course TEXTING. The whole time, this girl is rolling her eyes and being dramatic. About what? Who knows. Most likely something to do with a text. I glance at her and she glances back at me really quickly and then looks back at her cell phone. For that split second when I was able to see her eyes, I felt a weight on my shoulders. This girl, along with the majority of people in the store, had severe mental issues.
What happened to these people? Is it the fluoridated tap water? The anti-depression medications? The fast food consumed on a daily basis? The chemicals in diet sodas and chewing gum? The constant need for people to feel "connected" by using a cell phone but really aren't connected to anything? Movies? Music? Reality televison? Lately, the majority of people I see look dead inside. Battered...beaten...tormented. SLAVES. I then ask myself, "What will these people do when civil unrest and social breakdowns occur in the not so distant future? It's going to be an ugly sight. Well, thank you for reading my thoughts (for anyone that made it to the end). Just the ramblings of a 30 year old male who's losing hope on "people".
Location: Everywhere
DB
-------------
Let me preface by saying I've never posted anything on this section or any other section of Craigslist but I'm feeling very compelled to do so right now.
I just got back from a trip to Wegmans and am in awe at the current state/behaivor/mindset of "people". As I'm walking in, I go to grab a cart and notice three guys (late teens/early 20's) all standing together but on their cell phones texting and blocking the majortiy of carts. So I sidestep them and grab a cart from the sole lane they weren't blocking. I get my cart and proceed but I can't help but notice the people lined up to return bottles/cans. I'm not knocking them (I'm pro-recycle) but it looked like they literally crawled out of a dumpster and needed the deposit money to get through the night. I asked myself "why don't they just stop consuming this sugarwater and use the money for a necessity?" Then I realized Coke and Pepsi are a necessity for the majority of people in this country. I should also point out that each one was overweight (if not obese).
I get inside and start doing some shopping. The procuce section was the most "normal". I grabbed some apples, a few bananas, and some strawberries since it's that time of year. As I left the produce section, it started getting depressing. I see a kid poking his finger through a package of ground beef and laughing his cute little head off. I don't blame the kid (I did that once too when I was his age but my mother grabbed my hand and basically let me know if it ever happened again, I'd lose my hand). However, I DO blame his mother for not caring the least about her son destroying multiple packs of meat. She was actually entertained by his behaivor. So I grabbed some chicken breast and continued on. As I'm passing the "organic food" section, I hear two guys laughing hysterically so I walk back a few steps to see if George Carlin had risen from the dead doing one of his stand-up acts. Nope...wasn't him. The two guys were "tickling" each other. In laymans terms, they were a couple of gay guys. I'm not anti-gay, but it was just weird watching them be so flamoyant in public. Being "out" seems to be the "in" these days.
I get to the cereal isle and see a guy pushing around one of those carts that resembles a car for the kids to sit in. His gf/wife was about 10 feet away yelling out loudly which cereal he wanted. He had his back turned to her pushing the cart the opposite direction with the two kids screaming their heads off as he's looking at his cell phone. I stop at this point waiting for him to pass me but he's in the middle of the isle and knocks into my cart. One of the kids then throws a canned fruit. The guy stops looking at his phone and gives me this annoyed look as if it's my fault im in his lane. A fuse started to light up inside me. As he starts to move his cart back to the right side of the lane, I throw my shoulder into him and knock him off balance. He says "hey" but in a very non-threatening way, so I glace back and he looks away. His overweight gf didn't seem too pleased with me. I grabbed some Wegmans brand cereal with almonds (it's really good).
On to the next isle to get some pasta and sauce. I see a mom that resembles my math teacher in high school. Is it her? Can't be...nope, wasn't her but I instantly smile since I was very fond of my math teacher. She smiles back. Her daughter was next to her..I'd say she was 15 or 16. Lip peirced, glazed eyes, and of course TEXTING. The whole time, this girl is rolling her eyes and being dramatic. About what? Who knows. Most likely something to do with a text. I glance at her and she glances back at me really quickly and then looks back at her cell phone. For that split second when I was able to see her eyes, I felt a weight on my shoulders. This girl, along with the majority of people in the store, had severe mental issues.
What happened to these people? Is it the fluoridated tap water? The anti-depression medications? The fast food consumed on a daily basis? The chemicals in diet sodas and chewing gum? The constant need for people to feel "connected" by using a cell phone but really aren't connected to anything? Movies? Music? Reality televison? Lately, the majority of people I see look dead inside. Battered...beaten...tormented. SLAVES. I then ask myself, "What will these people do when civil unrest and social breakdowns occur in the not so distant future? It's going to be an ugly sight. Well, thank you for reading my thoughts (for anyone that made it to the end). Just the ramblings of a 30 year old male who's losing hope on "people".
Location: Everywhere
Friday, January 4, 2013
President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation.
John F. Kennedy
vs
The Federal Reserve
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.
"United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.
President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt:
1) war (Viet Nam); and,
2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Executive Order 11110
AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963
Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:
Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:
EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;
EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;
EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;
EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;
EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617
The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110.
The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors".
The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again, according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:
"Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)".
The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them".
Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!
No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".
Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.
The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:"
Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".
In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963,
Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly said:
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight."
In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a true Profile of Courage.
This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne
What is the Federal Reserve Bank?
What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it?
by Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999
The FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed to implement a country's fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.
There have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional banking."
Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed. Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.
In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved. Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well.
Since the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates were "fractionally" backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued.
Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury.
This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.
The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.
The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period of time. The country began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion.
Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against the loans.
Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available. The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.
The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the marbles.
Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the depression of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don't we?
Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years?
Do you think they will do it again?
Just as an aside at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that? The market collapses.
Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases?
Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle?
Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians. President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.
Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.
This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.
The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. "Reserve" would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. "System" was used in lieu of the word "bank" so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created.
In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York.
Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money.
Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig." Yes, that's right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.
Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing. You may have heard the term "monetizing the debt," which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million ó the government does borrow every dollar it spends ó they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.
The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it's just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let's use another example.
Today's banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today's banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.
Let's say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn't actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED.
It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn't it? How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don't want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.
Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was good.
So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.
If "We the People" don't take some action now, there may come a time when "We the People" are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.
Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.
Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.
Thomas Jefferson said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, "Can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our country?"
"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt."
John P. Curran
Source: http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.html
vs
The Federal Reserve
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.
"United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.
President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt:
1) war (Viet Nam); and,
2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Executive Order 11110
AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963
Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:
Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:
EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;
EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;
EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;
EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;
EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617
The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110.
The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors".
The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again, according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:
"Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)".
The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them".
Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!
No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".
Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.
The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:"
Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".
In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963,
Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly said:
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight."
In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a true Profile of Courage.
This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne
What is the Federal Reserve Bank?
What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it?
by Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999
The FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed to implement a country's fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.
There have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional banking."
Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed. Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.
In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved. Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well.
Since the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates were "fractionally" backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued.
Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury.
This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.
The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.
The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period of time. The country began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion.
Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against the loans.
Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available. The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.
The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the marbles.
Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the depression of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don't we?
Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years?
Do you think they will do it again?
Just as an aside at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that? The market collapses.
Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases?
Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle?
Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians. President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.
Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.
This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.
The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. "Reserve" would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. "System" was used in lieu of the word "bank" so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created.
In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York.
Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money.
Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig." Yes, that's right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.
Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing. You may have heard the term "monetizing the debt," which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million ó the government does borrow every dollar it spends ó they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.
The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it's just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let's use another example.
Today's banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today's banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.
Let's say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn't actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED.
It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn't it? How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don't want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.
Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was good.
So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.
If "We the People" don't take some action now, there may come a time when "We the People" are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.
Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.
Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.
Thomas Jefferson said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, "Can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our country?"
"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt."
John P. Curran
Source: http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.html
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Heroin is made from opium poppies. The Taliban had all but eradicated opium growers in Afghanistan before the US invasion.
 |
| to control the herion trade, that's why. |
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Property Values Being Destroyed intentionally by Federal agencies
This is all about pushing people out of rural areas and enslaving them onto urban slave conditions.
'Tsunami bomb' tested off New Zealand coast
 |
| but we were told it was an earthquake... |
The tests were carried out in waters around New Caledonia and Auckland during the Second World War and showed that the weapon was feasible and a series of 10 large offshore blasts could potentially create a 33-foot tsunami capable of inundating a small city.
The top secret operation, code-named "Project Seal", tested the doomsday device as a possible rival to the nuclear bomb. About 3,700 bombs were exploded during the tests, first in New Caledonia and later at Whangaparaoa Peninsula, near Auckland.
The plans came to light during research by a New Zealand author and film-maker, Ray Waru, who examined military files buried in the national archives.
"Presumably if the atomic bomb had not worked as well as it did, we might have been tsunami-ing people," said Mr Waru.
"It was absolutely astonishing. First that anyone would come up with the idea of developing a weapon of mass destruction based on a tsunami ... and also that New Zealand seems to have successfully developed it to the degree that it might have worked." The project was launched in June 1944 after a US naval officer, E A Gibson, noticed that blasting operations to clear coral reefs around Pacific islands sometimes produced a large wave, raising the possibility of creating a "tsunami bomb".
Mr Waru said the initial testing was positive but the project was eventually shelved in early 1945, though New Zealand authorities continued to produce reports on the experiments into the 1950s. Experts concluded that single explosions were not powerful enough and a successful tsunami bomb would require about 2 million kilograms of explosive arrayed in a line about five miles from shore.
"If you put it in a James Bond movie it would be viewed as fantasy but it was a real thing," he said.
"I only came across it because they were still vetting the report, so there it was sitting on somebody's desk [in the archives]."
Forty years after the joint testing, New Zealand faced a dramatic breakdown in its security ties with the US after it banned the entry of nuclear-armed ships from entering its territory during the 1980s. The dispute led to the US downgrading its relationship with New Zealand from an "ally" to a "friend".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/9774217/Tsunami-bomb-tested-off-New-Zealand-coast.html
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
J. Krishnamurti, Theosophy, and the fabrication of the “new age” movement
I recently attended a Mummery Book 1 enactment, wherein the protagonist, Raymond Darling, is walking through the woods one day, and without warning, comes across a religion that is devoted to him as its symbol. Which of course he finds shocking & bizarre.
However, this is not altogether different from the horrifying real-life experience of best-selling author J. Krishnamurti (1895-1986). As a child he was discovered by a powerful and well-funded “new age” organization, chosen as their future “messiah”, carefully groomed for this role, and began to innocently play this role with good intentions until age 34, when he abandoned this bizarre situation and – perhaps in an overreaction – became a vocal critic of organized religion and religious authority for the rest of his life.
This story is interesting to me because a) it explains J. Krishnamurti’s famous anti-guru stance and b) it demonstrates the kinds of powerful forces that can create fake religions and which laid the foundation for the modern “new age” movement.
In 1929, at the age of thirty-four, Krishnamurti severed himself from the Theosophical Society, after a spiritual experience that completely changed his life, and renounced his role of coming messiah….
While Krishnamurti was being proclaimed by the Theosophical Society, money and gifts of land and property were showered on him.
(In other words, he was getting bribed big-time to go along with this.)
When he resigned from the Society and denied his role, he returned these gifts to the donors and began his new life without knowing whether he would have any followers or any money…
J. Krishnamurti with Annie Besant, president of the Theosophical Society, in 1926. This photo might have been taken in old Krotona - a Theosophical colony located in present-day Beachwood Canyon in Hollywood. (image source)
Krishnamurti… did not want people to follow him blindly and obediently… Especially, he did not want disciples who might create another religion around him, build up a hierarchy and assume authority. 3
And Krishnamurti’s story was a bizarre one. At one point earlier on, after delivering a public lecture, Krishnamurti was informed by the head of the Theosophical Society (Annie Besant) that a powerful black magician was in fact speaking through him at the lecture. Krishnamurti was astounded, and said that if she really thought that, he’d never give another public lecture. The black magician was never afterwards mentioned. I happened to be sleeping at the Castle that night and K [Krishnamurti's nickname] himself told me of this incident. 4 In fact, it was commonly believed at the time that other forces were communicating through Krishnamurti, but they were always described in Theosophical literature as being “ascended masters”.
The Asian Indian guru Meher Baba was once asked what he thought of Krishnamurti, while Krishnamurti was still under the control of the Theosophical Society and being promoted as the messiah for the new age. (Later, Meher Baba had more positive things to say of him.)
Krishnamurti a new world teacher? God forbid. You cannot compare the Sadguru Ramakrishna of Calcutta with Krishnamurti. Ramakrishna was Rama and Krishna personified. 5 Krishnamurti is living in all majesty and splendor, pomp and power, and moving about England in aristocratic, fashionable circles, playing tennis and golf, leading a most comfortable life. He does not have the slightest idea, not even a wisp, of the real Truth.
So it is also with these funny, showy Theosophists. Their greatness lies only in editorship, writing and speaking with high-sounding words about planes, powers, colors, secret doctrine, society and caste. Truth is far, far beyond this. 6
Many years after the Theosophical Society moved its headquarters out of Hollywood, the film Mulholland Drive (2001) was released. The film director in the movie, not unlike the young Krishnamurti, is able to live in splendor and move in fashionable circles so long as he follows the directions of the "cowboy". I'm told the "cowboy" scene was shot right on the main grounds of old Krotona (the old Theosophical headquarters). Some have asked if David Lynch is implying a connection between Hollywood ("holy wood"), occultism, Theosophy, and doing as you are told. Certainly the film has an enormous amount of occult undertones - all negative - and some feel it is a direct commentary on how Hollywood operates. 8
A few years later, Meher Baba was asked again about Theosophy and its two leaders at the time, Besant and Leadbeater. He replied that they were somewhat advanced souls, but that without the aid of a genuine master, “hostile forces are created, resulting in delusion.” 7
It may be interesting to note that the Theosophical Society and its members have exerted an enormous influence on the world. I told you the society was powerful and well funded; its members included many in the banking industry, the industrialists Henry Ford & Thomas Edison, and “Wizard of Oz” author L. Frank Baum. (9) Vice President Henry A. Wallace, who served under FDR from 1933-45, and who insisted on adding the “all-seeing eye” to the dollar bill, is said to have been a member, and was closely associated with another Theosophist named Nicholas Roerich. 10
In The Mummery Book, Raymond Darling is - among other things - the innocent and attractive symbol for the childish followers to project their religious illusions onto, while the evil Evelyn Disk pulls all the strings, controls the religion from behind the scenes, and hands Raymond his script to follow. When Raymond finally refuses to cooperate, he is punished and exiled.
And of course Theosophy laid the foundation for Shirley Maclaine and the more recent wave of the “new age” movement. Perhaps other well-funded aspects of the “new age” movement are as smoothly promoted, as entirely fabricated, and as carefully controlled as was Krishnamurti’s “messiah” status. I do not know. But I believe taking “new age” fascinations with a grain of salt may be healthy.
Questions:
If you had been raised from childhood by a new-age organization to be a fake “messiah” for the world… could this cause you to have bad feelings for organized religion and religious authority figures? I can’t imagine how upsetting that must have been for J. Krishnamurti, nor how difficult it must have been for him to escape that situation.
Why do you think they chose Krishnamurti for this role? The person who chose him said that he had a pure and innocent aura. Do you think innocent children could be, in a way, easy to manipulate, if the right conditioning is applied? Do innocent people tend to assume that everyone has good intentions – especially people interested in “spirituality”?
Does it bother you that an entire worldwide spiritual movement could potentially be fabricated by 1) a few wealthy people pulling strings, combined with 2) masses of people looking for religious consolations?
"(J. Krishnamurti) is not as advanced as some think. He does good, and will come to me one day. I will help him." - Meher Baba 11
Just before he left the Theosophical Society, Krishnamurti told his followers, “Some of you think I can give you a drink that will set you free.” Is there a part of you that would like a glamorous, famous person to give you a drink and tell you it will set you free? Thanks to the recent Mummery Book enactment I attended, I’m now more in touch with my own subconscious desire for this.
Although Krishnamurti criticized gurus and spiritual teachers for the rest of his life – for understandable reasons – in a sense wasn’t he still being a guru for others? (Later it was publicized that he had an inner circle of close disciples, in addition to all the people who attended his lectures and read his books.) But is there anything inherently wrong with being a teacher?
What actually was wrong about what the Theosophists did to and with Krishnamurti?
What does Meher Baba mean about using “high-sounding words about planes, powers, colors, secret doctrines”? How many new age teachers today exert an enormous influence over huge numbers of people, using these very sorts of attractions?
What might Meher Baba mean when he says that without a genuine master as a guide, “hostile forces” can be created? (especially when fooling around with psychic energies, the projections and illusions of large numbers of people, and perhaps black magic?)
Would you accept all kinds of wealth, fame, luxury, adoring fans, prestige, powerful friends, and career success beyond your wildest dreams, if it meant knowingly agreeing to deceive people and harm them spiritually? This question seems to be one that Krishnamurti asked himself.
Does Krishnamurti’s story, or Raymond Darling’s story, have a relevance today?
If you woke up one day and realized you were surrounded by ignorant, childish, TV-minded people, who are all merely following scripts written for them by others, would you have the courage to do what Krishnamurti did, and leave your attachments behind for the sake of truth?
The modern “everyman” of consumer society is a propagandized individual, participating in illusions and, effectively, self-destructing. The modern “everyman” is being created by the power system of the world, because it is in the interests of that power system for there to be consumer egos who are… stupefied.
- Not-Two Is Peace 12
Regards,
BoT Student
P.S. For more information about Theosophy, I recommend searching online for the Lucifer Publishing Company, founded by Annie Besant’s successor, Alice Bailey. Today, renamed the Lucis Trust, it enjoys “Consultative Status” with the United Nations and is connected with the most powerful corporations, foundations, councils, and men and women in the world. And just like Evelyn Disk, these people are said to be members of the “illuminati”, who can interpret life’s mysteries for us, comfort us, entertain us, and hand us our life’s script to follow.
http://botstudent.org/2012/05/21/krishnamurti-theosophy/
 |
| Age 34 |
However, this is not altogether different from the horrifying real-life experience of best-selling author J. Krishnamurti (1895-1986). As a child he was discovered by a powerful and well-funded “new age” organization, chosen as their future “messiah”, carefully groomed for this role, and began to innocently play this role with good intentions until age 34, when he abandoned this bizarre situation and – perhaps in an overreaction – became a vocal critic of organized religion and religious authority for the rest of his life.
This story is interesting to me because a) it explains J. Krishnamurti’s famous anti-guru stance and b) it demonstrates the kinds of powerful forces that can create fake religions and which laid the foundation for the modern “new age” movement.
In 1929, at the age of thirty-four, Krishnamurti severed himself from the Theosophical Society, after a spiritual experience that completely changed his life, and renounced his role of coming messiah….
While Krishnamurti was being proclaimed by the Theosophical Society, money and gifts of land and property were showered on him.
(In other words, he was getting bribed big-time to go along with this.)
When he resigned from the Society and denied his role, he returned these gifts to the donors and began his new life without knowing whether he would have any followers or any money…
J. Krishnamurti with Annie Besant, president of the Theosophical Society, in 1926. This photo might have been taken in old Krotona - a Theosophical colony located in present-day Beachwood Canyon in Hollywood. (image source)
Krishnamurti… did not want people to follow him blindly and obediently… Especially, he did not want disciples who might create another religion around him, build up a hierarchy and assume authority. 3
And Krishnamurti’s story was a bizarre one. At one point earlier on, after delivering a public lecture, Krishnamurti was informed by the head of the Theosophical Society (Annie Besant) that a powerful black magician was in fact speaking through him at the lecture. Krishnamurti was astounded, and said that if she really thought that, he’d never give another public lecture. The black magician was never afterwards mentioned. I happened to be sleeping at the Castle that night and K [Krishnamurti's nickname] himself told me of this incident. 4 In fact, it was commonly believed at the time that other forces were communicating through Krishnamurti, but they were always described in Theosophical literature as being “ascended masters”.
The Asian Indian guru Meher Baba was once asked what he thought of Krishnamurti, while Krishnamurti was still under the control of the Theosophical Society and being promoted as the messiah for the new age. (Later, Meher Baba had more positive things to say of him.)
Krishnamurti a new world teacher? God forbid. You cannot compare the Sadguru Ramakrishna of Calcutta with Krishnamurti. Ramakrishna was Rama and Krishna personified. 5 Krishnamurti is living in all majesty and splendor, pomp and power, and moving about England in aristocratic, fashionable circles, playing tennis and golf, leading a most comfortable life. He does not have the slightest idea, not even a wisp, of the real Truth.
So it is also with these funny, showy Theosophists. Their greatness lies only in editorship, writing and speaking with high-sounding words about planes, powers, colors, secret doctrine, society and caste. Truth is far, far beyond this. 6
Many years after the Theosophical Society moved its headquarters out of Hollywood, the film Mulholland Drive (2001) was released. The film director in the movie, not unlike the young Krishnamurti, is able to live in splendor and move in fashionable circles so long as he follows the directions of the "cowboy". I'm told the "cowboy" scene was shot right on the main grounds of old Krotona (the old Theosophical headquarters). Some have asked if David Lynch is implying a connection between Hollywood ("holy wood"), occultism, Theosophy, and doing as you are told. Certainly the film has an enormous amount of occult undertones - all negative - and some feel it is a direct commentary on how Hollywood operates. 8
A few years later, Meher Baba was asked again about Theosophy and its two leaders at the time, Besant and Leadbeater. He replied that they were somewhat advanced souls, but that without the aid of a genuine master, “hostile forces are created, resulting in delusion.” 7
It may be interesting to note that the Theosophical Society and its members have exerted an enormous influence on the world. I told you the society was powerful and well funded; its members included many in the banking industry, the industrialists Henry Ford & Thomas Edison, and “Wizard of Oz” author L. Frank Baum. (9) Vice President Henry A. Wallace, who served under FDR from 1933-45, and who insisted on adding the “all-seeing eye” to the dollar bill, is said to have been a member, and was closely associated with another Theosophist named Nicholas Roerich. 10
In The Mummery Book, Raymond Darling is - among other things - the innocent and attractive symbol for the childish followers to project their religious illusions onto, while the evil Evelyn Disk pulls all the strings, controls the religion from behind the scenes, and hands Raymond his script to follow. When Raymond finally refuses to cooperate, he is punished and exiled.
And of course Theosophy laid the foundation for Shirley Maclaine and the more recent wave of the “new age” movement. Perhaps other well-funded aspects of the “new age” movement are as smoothly promoted, as entirely fabricated, and as carefully controlled as was Krishnamurti’s “messiah” status. I do not know. But I believe taking “new age” fascinations with a grain of salt may be healthy.
Questions:
If you had been raised from childhood by a new-age organization to be a fake “messiah” for the world… could this cause you to have bad feelings for organized religion and religious authority figures? I can’t imagine how upsetting that must have been for J. Krishnamurti, nor how difficult it must have been for him to escape that situation.
Why do you think they chose Krishnamurti for this role? The person who chose him said that he had a pure and innocent aura. Do you think innocent children could be, in a way, easy to manipulate, if the right conditioning is applied? Do innocent people tend to assume that everyone has good intentions – especially people interested in “spirituality”?
Does it bother you that an entire worldwide spiritual movement could potentially be fabricated by 1) a few wealthy people pulling strings, combined with 2) masses of people looking for religious consolations?
"(J. Krishnamurti) is not as advanced as some think. He does good, and will come to me one day. I will help him." - Meher Baba 11
Just before he left the Theosophical Society, Krishnamurti told his followers, “Some of you think I can give you a drink that will set you free.” Is there a part of you that would like a glamorous, famous person to give you a drink and tell you it will set you free? Thanks to the recent Mummery Book enactment I attended, I’m now more in touch with my own subconscious desire for this.
Although Krishnamurti criticized gurus and spiritual teachers for the rest of his life – for understandable reasons – in a sense wasn’t he still being a guru for others? (Later it was publicized that he had an inner circle of close disciples, in addition to all the people who attended his lectures and read his books.) But is there anything inherently wrong with being a teacher?
What actually was wrong about what the Theosophists did to and with Krishnamurti?
What does Meher Baba mean about using “high-sounding words about planes, powers, colors, secret doctrines”? How many new age teachers today exert an enormous influence over huge numbers of people, using these very sorts of attractions?
What might Meher Baba mean when he says that without a genuine master as a guide, “hostile forces” can be created? (especially when fooling around with psychic energies, the projections and illusions of large numbers of people, and perhaps black magic?)
Would you accept all kinds of wealth, fame, luxury, adoring fans, prestige, powerful friends, and career success beyond your wildest dreams, if it meant knowingly agreeing to deceive people and harm them spiritually? This question seems to be one that Krishnamurti asked himself.
Does Krishnamurti’s story, or Raymond Darling’s story, have a relevance today?
If you woke up one day and realized you were surrounded by ignorant, childish, TV-minded people, who are all merely following scripts written for them by others, would you have the courage to do what Krishnamurti did, and leave your attachments behind for the sake of truth?
The modern “everyman” of consumer society is a propagandized individual, participating in illusions and, effectively, self-destructing. The modern “everyman” is being created by the power system of the world, because it is in the interests of that power system for there to be consumer egos who are… stupefied.
- Not-Two Is Peace 12
Regards,
BoT Student
P.S. For more information about Theosophy, I recommend searching online for the Lucifer Publishing Company, founded by Annie Besant’s successor, Alice Bailey. Today, renamed the Lucis Trust, it enjoys “Consultative Status” with the United Nations and is connected with the most powerful corporations, foundations, councils, and men and women in the world. And just like Evelyn Disk, these people are said to be members of the “illuminati”, who can interpret life’s mysteries for us, comfort us, entertain us, and hand us our life’s script to follow.
http://botstudent.org/2012/05/21/krishnamurti-theosophy/
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
We reported about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) in episode 16 of our audio reports. We worked for them as their systems administrators for almost two years. As a high-level administrator inside the organization, I witnessed a stunning degree of mismanagement and I was privy to everything; including the stuff that nobody was supposed to see.
Our tendency to act as old fashioned journalists in exposing corruption eventually got us completely banned from the organization. Now, discussions about us are officially discouraged by the management of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, as if we were the targets of a cult shunning.
The excuse given to the lower level members of AE911truth for this behavior is the fact that we wisely began a process of 'pulling the plug' on their main production server immediately after Justin Keogh (of infamy for ruining 911blogger) hijacked it, after which he promptly began locking-out all of the valid users. Pulling 'the plug' would have been the most responsible action for any decent systems administrator in this given scenario, but we were personally ordered to stand down by Richard, in order to appease this especially destructive member of the organization at all cost, even if it meant utterly destroying a year of our (paid) work in building their custom server. This led to the shouting conversations with Richard that resulted in our resignations. Of course, Justin Keogh was promoted by Richard Gage for trashing our technical infrastructure, causing our resignations and quite a few others, and for producing the current sad state of ae911truth's networking capabilities, and we're not even going to mention "the security" (or lack of) for legal reasons. The result is that they now have spent a fortune managing a web system that can barely handle light web traffic, so they will find themselves in real trouble if they are ever targeted for attack.
We've been told by our insider connections that attempts to discuss us during conferences are usually silenced by the phrase "that's a sensitive subject". We have no doubt about that. We were also personally told by Richard that he willfully allowed this technical catastrophe to happen because Justin Keogh had some "trust issues" with us, which we believe is related more to the fear that we would go public with AE's secret documents and e-mails than any genuine concern about our work.
Meanwhile, AE911Truth's super secretive Board of Directors assigned us a couple of their spooks to manage us as "friends", and to use them to determine what we might go public with. The membership of this board is kept secret too, by the way. It's like something from the movie 'The Star Chamber'.
In a sense, this aspect of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth may be the most troubling one for some individuals, because a non-profit organization (501c3) isn't supposed to have secret agendas or spend its money in a manner that is not disclosed to anyone, including the very people who are donating to the "charity". Out of a sense of (perhaps misplaced) loyalty to people who were formerly our friends, we are avoiding reporting more about this topic.
One of the organization's biggest problems is the provocateurs who are propelled to the top positions. Discord sowing provocateurs were the ones who screamed loudest, above the more humble people of character. (It is worth mentioning that this is the textbook behavior of most governmental infiltrators.) Such people have been promoted to managerial positions because Richard Gage personally made the core principle of the organization to be one of appeasement, which eventually led to the technical meltdown that was cited earlier.
Even identified governmental agents are freely allowed to influence the organization and to gain access to the private data of its members, for the sake of comprehensive appeasement. We personally outed one of those governmental spies (Homeland Security), but Richard's reaction was to encourage us to shut-up. We also have reason to believe that a percentage of donations supporting AE911truth are actually governmental pay-outs that are attributed to people who do not really exist. AE911Truth is likely one of the U.S. Government's best honey pots for attracting the trouble-makers who are in prestigious positions in society. Thus, it is in the interest of domestic spying agencies to ensure that the organization survives with their spooks in high positions. Such help is also likely to be involved in Richard Gage's easy ability to get interviews with major news networks, such as Fox, and even Alex Jones on multiple occasions.
As If The Shame Could Not Get Worse
Richard Gage proudly speaking at the Nation of Islam convention.
On February 25th, 2012, Richard Gage, AIA, and Kevin Ryan from AE911Truth's Board of Directors gave dual presentations at the annual Nation of Islam's "Savior's Day" convention. Kevin naturally pretended to be completely independent of A&E, as if he were not a member of its secretive Board of Directors, and instead he claimed to be representing "The Journal of 9/11 Studies". Oops, we outed somebody else.
Several long-standing members of AE911Truth left the organization when its Board decreed that AE911Truth would be publicly capitulating with the Nation of Islam. The management unashamedly discarded these members, including one of their most renowned experts, David Chandler, for the sake of prostituting the organization for Nation of Islam donations, which are extremely unlikely to ever materialize.
Perhaps there was actually a tiny amount of shame, because unlike all other large appearances by AE911Truth representatives, this event was the only one that was never announced on the front page of its website, or in any of its newsletters. In fact, based upon their public relations, we should assume that it never happened, but it did. The video of the event was never allowed at their own Youtube channel, but it was uploaded by the Nation of Islam.
Understandably, AE911Truth is behaving as if it is ashamed to publicize the event, but its top priority was gaining the financial support of a disgusting group of people, who frankly are not about to help any group with any caucasian members. It is noteworthy that AE911Truth has never attended any Christian venues, despite its supposed mission of trying to reach people in a nation that is approximately 94% Christian.
AE911Truth's new partner, Nation of Islam, is an all-black, racist and anti-semetic organization that claims to be Islamic, but they warp the Koran to fit their own hate-inspired agenda. It encourages the spread of Sharia Law (Islamic law) throughout the world. Under Sharia Law, non-believers ("Dhimmi") become second-class citizens in society, and women are given virtually no rights. Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, spoke the day after Richard and Kevin, during which he boasted about the inevitable extinction of white people. Another speaker talked about how sometimes it is okay to work with the white man, if it is of great enough benefit. One of the basic tenets of AE's new partner is that white people were created by a scientist, 6,600 years ago, who tried to make devils from the germs of the superior black race. It is the black equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan, and it is so despicable that legitimate Muslims do not wish to be associated with them.
The fact that AE911Truth is willing to associate with them, and to sacrifice what remains of its principles for the tiny chance of getting a little more cash is truly disturbing, and it should seal the organization's fate.
The Evidence
Please download this video for re-upload, in case it disappears. If necessary, we will make sure that it is spread far and wide throughout the Bittorrent network, so that it can never disappear. Firefox users can download the 'Download Helper' plugin to download Youtube videos.
If you would like to learn more about AE911Truth, Thomas and I spoke about our dealings with them in episode 16 of our audio show. You can download the MP3, download it via the Bittorrent system, or listen using the player below. You can find more of our shows at our audio archive.
http://healthwyze.org/index.php/tidbits/45-tidbits/590-the-shaky-moral-foundation-that-ae911truth-is-built-upon.html
Our tendency to act as old fashioned journalists in exposing corruption eventually got us completely banned from the organization. Now, discussions about us are officially discouraged by the management of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, as if we were the targets of a cult shunning.
The excuse given to the lower level members of AE911truth for this behavior is the fact that we wisely began a process of 'pulling the plug' on their main production server immediately after Justin Keogh (of infamy for ruining 911blogger) hijacked it, after which he promptly began locking-out all of the valid users. Pulling 'the plug' would have been the most responsible action for any decent systems administrator in this given scenario, but we were personally ordered to stand down by Richard, in order to appease this especially destructive member of the organization at all cost, even if it meant utterly destroying a year of our (paid) work in building their custom server. This led to the shouting conversations with Richard that resulted in our resignations. Of course, Justin Keogh was promoted by Richard Gage for trashing our technical infrastructure, causing our resignations and quite a few others, and for producing the current sad state of ae911truth's networking capabilities, and we're not even going to mention "the security" (or lack of) for legal reasons. The result is that they now have spent a fortune managing a web system that can barely handle light web traffic, so they will find themselves in real trouble if they are ever targeted for attack.
We've been told by our insider connections that attempts to discuss us during conferences are usually silenced by the phrase "that's a sensitive subject". We have no doubt about that. We were also personally told by Richard that he willfully allowed this technical catastrophe to happen because Justin Keogh had some "trust issues" with us, which we believe is related more to the fear that we would go public with AE's secret documents and e-mails than any genuine concern about our work.
Meanwhile, AE911Truth's super secretive Board of Directors assigned us a couple of their spooks to manage us as "friends", and to use them to determine what we might go public with. The membership of this board is kept secret too, by the way. It's like something from the movie 'The Star Chamber'.
In a sense, this aspect of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth may be the most troubling one for some individuals, because a non-profit organization (501c3) isn't supposed to have secret agendas or spend its money in a manner that is not disclosed to anyone, including the very people who are donating to the "charity". Out of a sense of (perhaps misplaced) loyalty to people who were formerly our friends, we are avoiding reporting more about this topic.
One of the organization's biggest problems is the provocateurs who are propelled to the top positions. Discord sowing provocateurs were the ones who screamed loudest, above the more humble people of character. (It is worth mentioning that this is the textbook behavior of most governmental infiltrators.) Such people have been promoted to managerial positions because Richard Gage personally made the core principle of the organization to be one of appeasement, which eventually led to the technical meltdown that was cited earlier.
Even identified governmental agents are freely allowed to influence the organization and to gain access to the private data of its members, for the sake of comprehensive appeasement. We personally outed one of those governmental spies (Homeland Security), but Richard's reaction was to encourage us to shut-up. We also have reason to believe that a percentage of donations supporting AE911truth are actually governmental pay-outs that are attributed to people who do not really exist. AE911Truth is likely one of the U.S. Government's best honey pots for attracting the trouble-makers who are in prestigious positions in society. Thus, it is in the interest of domestic spying agencies to ensure that the organization survives with their spooks in high positions. Such help is also likely to be involved in Richard Gage's easy ability to get interviews with major news networks, such as Fox, and even Alex Jones on multiple occasions.
As If The Shame Could Not Get Worse
Richard Gage proudly speaking at the Nation of Islam convention.
On February 25th, 2012, Richard Gage, AIA, and Kevin Ryan from AE911Truth's Board of Directors gave dual presentations at the annual Nation of Islam's "Savior's Day" convention. Kevin naturally pretended to be completely independent of A&E, as if he were not a member of its secretive Board of Directors, and instead he claimed to be representing "The Journal of 9/11 Studies". Oops, we outed somebody else.
Several long-standing members of AE911Truth left the organization when its Board decreed that AE911Truth would be publicly capitulating with the Nation of Islam. The management unashamedly discarded these members, including one of their most renowned experts, David Chandler, for the sake of prostituting the organization for Nation of Islam donations, which are extremely unlikely to ever materialize.
Perhaps there was actually a tiny amount of shame, because unlike all other large appearances by AE911Truth representatives, this event was the only one that was never announced on the front page of its website, or in any of its newsletters. In fact, based upon their public relations, we should assume that it never happened, but it did. The video of the event was never allowed at their own Youtube channel, but it was uploaded by the Nation of Islam.
Understandably, AE911Truth is behaving as if it is ashamed to publicize the event, but its top priority was gaining the financial support of a disgusting group of people, who frankly are not about to help any group with any caucasian members. It is noteworthy that AE911Truth has never attended any Christian venues, despite its supposed mission of trying to reach people in a nation that is approximately 94% Christian.
AE911Truth's new partner, Nation of Islam, is an all-black, racist and anti-semetic organization that claims to be Islamic, but they warp the Koran to fit their own hate-inspired agenda. It encourages the spread of Sharia Law (Islamic law) throughout the world. Under Sharia Law, non-believers ("Dhimmi") become second-class citizens in society, and women are given virtually no rights. Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, spoke the day after Richard and Kevin, during which he boasted about the inevitable extinction of white people. Another speaker talked about how sometimes it is okay to work with the white man, if it is of great enough benefit. One of the basic tenets of AE's new partner is that white people were created by a scientist, 6,600 years ago, who tried to make devils from the germs of the superior black race. It is the black equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan, and it is so despicable that legitimate Muslims do not wish to be associated with them.
The fact that AE911Truth is willing to associate with them, and to sacrifice what remains of its principles for the tiny chance of getting a little more cash is truly disturbing, and it should seal the organization's fate.
The Evidence
Please download this video for re-upload, in case it disappears. If necessary, we will make sure that it is spread far and wide throughout the Bittorrent network, so that it can never disappear. Firefox users can download the 'Download Helper' plugin to download Youtube videos.
If you would like to learn more about AE911Truth, Thomas and I spoke about our dealings with them in episode 16 of our audio show. You can download the MP3, download it via the Bittorrent system, or listen using the player below. You can find more of our shows at our audio archive.
http://healthwyze.org/index.php/tidbits/45-tidbits/590-the-shaky-moral-foundation-that-ae911truth-is-built-upon.html
Operation Cyclone - creating bad guys for the 2 minute hate
Al Qaeda is a terror group set up by the CIA to cause terror & blame Muslims. Al Qaeda are not Muslims, have killed & continue to kill Muslims all around the world. 9/11 'had' to happen to justify the invasion of Iraq to steal their oil & heroin from Afghanistan to sell to the American people. 'Terror' was also used as justification to increase 'national security' by setting up a police state with the police having almost unlimited power to control their citizens. We are all screwed, WAKE UP!
Al Qaeda is a CIA creation and operational FRONT
It's common knowledge that among the agencies, Bin Ladens NOC name was Tim Osman. He died in 2001 of renal failure, but they kept him alive in the media as the boogie man for the fake war on terror.
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Food Inc
Juicing and Raw Foods: Food Inc: Watch Food Inc HD 720p in Activism & Non-Profit | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Friday, December 28, 2012
THE DARK KNIGHT RISES and SANDY HOOK SHOOTING
The following are screen shots from the summer hit movie, THE DARK KNIGHT RISES, which took in over 1 billion dollars in 6 1/2 weeks (there's that timeline again, time between each witch's sabbat.) As can be seen below, this film, which was shot and filmed in 2011, has these maps of Gotham put out in the movie. Look very closely at the bottom of the map and the name of what should be Manhattan island is now SANDY HOOK ISLAND, a definite change from previous batman movie profiles of landscape.
As anyone who knows, in early December 2012, an autistic boy allegedly went crazy and shot 27 people. Do you still believe an autistic child can operate a fully automatic gas operated field assault weapon with one shot, one kill precision in less than ten minutes?
You do?
You are then misinformed and insane. The best shooters in the world cannot perform such a feat. Ask anyone in combat or other situations if they can have a near perfect sniper kill record in ten minutes of almost 30 people all screaming and running from you. Try it with just rabbits...you'd be lucky to get one or two...
And an autistic boy did the shooting? What kind of a lunatic could ever believe an autistic child could do anything? They can barely tie their shoes and very often, have no idea of where they are or how anything is or ever came to be.
And, here is your proof the CIA has, as with other school shootings of the past, created yet another event for idiots to disarm this country. And of course, their shills are all saying it's drugs. Drugs or no drugs, no autistic yet alive could do what they are blaming this PATSY for.
You must understand how these things are done by the agency. They put a patsy or patsies into play, who are very often born into multi-generational families of witches (fact, see SPRINGMEIERS research as a starting place) who are then sacrificied for the OP in play. The real shooters do the shooting, the dead patsy is left to take the blame. No one questions this because the media is controlled by the CIA (read up on operation mockingbird for starters.)
You have to get your mind right. See things as they really are, rather than how you would like them to be. You have to dump your programming and start over again, only looking for the truth of things, to get a real sense of how and why this is the way it is in our time.
We live in a satanically controlled world right now and the beast wants more blood, more death, and more suffering for slake his lust. His people have been placed in every position of power from high to low with every possible angle covered. So, when his shills try to get you to think about these truths you uncover, realize that the best men and women who have brought you the truth were either killed or imprisoned and only the shills remain.
Be careful out there, or you won't see the next thing coming. Because it may come for you.
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Monday, December 24, 2012
Wolves in sheep's clothing and Internet disinformation
After the Sandy Hook shooting - and all the shootings in recent years being touted by the MSM - all the internet big bugs are all about how psychotropic mind drugs were really the cause and blah blah blah...
What a load of psyop crap...
Like the chemtrail misinformation game, which blames chemtrails on weather manipulation when it really is about keeping the population sick and sickly and a prolonged and sustained attack on the immune system, the mass shooting disinfo and LIMITED HANGOUT play is to get people to NOT see these things as staged military operations - which in fact they really are - but poor kids or people (and they are always white males, btw) on medication. Nothing could be further from the truth.
These are misdirects. Get you looking at the wrong causes for inexplicable events.
Understand this: Every operation and I MEAN EVERY OPERATION, ever put into play has before any executive or lower action taken has already conceived and in play, a lower or outer shell level set of limited hangouts and fictions ready to go by assets of the agencies so involved in said stage action. It's about controlling the thinking of the event, once it is set into motion. Every single play action since World War I has this as its operational foundation and is the backbone of any operation ever to take place. Control the event and BE DAMN SURE YOU CONTROL THE PERCEPTION OF THE EVENT.
To have this kind of control, you need to make sure your field assets – these would be men and women in the so-called truth movement who are given energy, covert support, and radio time – the same script with the same outcomes and perceptions, just slightly skewed to the dialect and spin of their local country and setting as to believable and acceptable to their stupid band of followers who cannot and will not think critically about such things and basically need to be told what to think.
This works because the majority are still just as programmable as the rest of the masses watching MSM TV. They do not employ critical thinking and want to be given their perceptions without obtaining them for themselves. The herd then is the herd now. And always. The intel communities know this and in fact, count on it.
And, right on cue, after each staged mass murder (to destroy the 2nd amendment of the constitution) here come the network shills ALL SINGING THE SAME DAMN SONG.
Purpose of chemtrails: weather manipulation. Truth: population control and sickness.
Mass shootings: prescription drugs. Truth. Patsies shot and left for dead on site by the real shooters, often employed with patsies who have been heavily brainwashed.
And so on.
Always the same shill outlets and players, all singing from the same page of the same script.
Do your own thinking. Look at ALL THE FACTS. COME TO YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS. See the truth of things, rather than be told the truth by others.
Even me.
DB
What a load of psyop crap...
Like the chemtrail misinformation game, which blames chemtrails on weather manipulation when it really is about keeping the population sick and sickly and a prolonged and sustained attack on the immune system, the mass shooting disinfo and LIMITED HANGOUT play is to get people to NOT see these things as staged military operations - which in fact they really are - but poor kids or people (and they are always white males, btw) on medication. Nothing could be further from the truth.
These are misdirects. Get you looking at the wrong causes for inexplicable events.
Understand this: Every operation and I MEAN EVERY OPERATION, ever put into play has before any executive or lower action taken has already conceived and in play, a lower or outer shell level set of limited hangouts and fictions ready to go by assets of the agencies so involved in said stage action. It's about controlling the thinking of the event, once it is set into motion. Every single play action since World War I has this as its operational foundation and is the backbone of any operation ever to take place. Control the event and BE DAMN SURE YOU CONTROL THE PERCEPTION OF THE EVENT.
To have this kind of control, you need to make sure your field assets – these would be men and women in the so-called truth movement who are given energy, covert support, and radio time – the same script with the same outcomes and perceptions, just slightly skewed to the dialect and spin of their local country and setting as to believable and acceptable to their stupid band of followers who cannot and will not think critically about such things and basically need to be told what to think.
This works because the majority are still just as programmable as the rest of the masses watching MSM TV. They do not employ critical thinking and want to be given their perceptions without obtaining them for themselves. The herd then is the herd now. And always. The intel communities know this and in fact, count on it.
And, right on cue, after each staged mass murder (to destroy the 2nd amendment of the constitution) here come the network shills ALL SINGING THE SAME DAMN SONG.
Purpose of chemtrails: weather manipulation. Truth: population control and sickness.
Mass shootings: prescription drugs. Truth. Patsies shot and left for dead on site by the real shooters, often employed with patsies who have been heavily brainwashed.
And so on.
Always the same shill outlets and players, all singing from the same page of the same script.
Do your own thinking. Look at ALL THE FACTS. COME TO YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS. See the truth of things, rather than be told the truth by others.
Even me.
DB
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)