The story of Nimrod
by Don Bradley 10-13-26
Written December 24, 2019 and updated today, just as Feast of Trumpets winds down.
Nimrod is the beasty boy of Revelations 9-11. But how did this reprobate become such an evil stinker? Well, it all began with his grandfather Ham, Noah's son, who did some unlawful things with his Canaanite wife while in the ark. It's true.
Dad forbade fornication on the ark. Two broke this rule. The dog and Ham. The dog was cursed for all this days to be led around the neck by a leash, for all time. As we see today. Ham...became simply CURSED. He became a mere plaything of his Canaanite bride of 7 days and for ALL his days. He was p**** whipped. What she said, he did, like a good little modern cuck slave boy. Ham's entire bloodline is where we get Nephilim hybrids, giants, the black races, all of it. And Nimrod was a blend between a black man – in those days slightly retarded, but cunning and vicious – and a Canaanite woman, vain in the extreme. In point of fact, Nimrod's father was the very first black man in the world – cush. Ham's bloodline did not intermingle with Noath's two other sons and their offspring. Not ever. Not until AFTER the tower of Babel event.
Everyone with me so far?
Now
let's pick up the story of Nimrod, the world's first tyrant and
anti-Christ, after the Flood. The
book of Jasher gives
us a very interesting insight into Nimrod's kingdom and personality.
The story begins with his father Cush. We read:
l
"And Cush, the son of Ham, the son of Noah, took a wife in those
days, in his old age, and she bare a son, and they called his
name Nimrod, saying, At that time the sons of men began to
rebel and transgress against God, and the child grew up, and his
father loved him exceedingly, for he was the son of his old
age.
2
"And the garments of skin, which God made for Adam and his wife,
when they went out of the garden, were given to Cush. For after the
death of Adam and his wife, the garments were given to Enoch, the son
of Jared, and when Enoch was taken up to God, he gave them to
Methuselah, his son. And at the death of Methuselah, Noah took them
and brought them to the ark, and they were with him until he went out
of the ark. And in their going out, Ham stole those garments from
Noah his father, and he took them and hid them from his brothers. And
when Ham begat his firstborn Cush, he gave him the garments in
secret, and they were with Cush many days. And Cush also concealed
them from his sons and brothers, and when Cush had begotten Nimrod,
he gave him those garments through his love for him, and Nimrod grew
up, and when he was twenty years old he put on those garments.
3
"And Nimrod became strong when he put on the garments, and God
gave him might and strength, and he was a mighty hunter in the earth.
. . . And when Nimrod was forty years old, at that time there was war
between his brethren and the children of Japheth, so that they were
in the power of his enemies. . . . And when Nimrod had joyfully
returned from battle, after having conquered his enemies, all his
brethren . . . assembled to make him king over them, and they placed
the regal crown upon his head.
This
explains why Noah cursed Ham and all his generations, which seems
unreasonable when reading Genesis without this context of WHY. It
also reveals the lineage of these mystical and magical clothes and
their effect upon those souls who come from the bloodline of Satan.
For we see the patriarchs who wear them do mighty works, serve YHVH
in all things, and are examples of decency and righteousness to us
all. But, when those whose hearts and souls are soured as Cain's was,
they magnify the errors of the evil within, and we have Nimrod as the
first to possess these clothes.
We
then read in Jasher and in Genesis the horrific changes in the human
condition and government that begin from the moment this original
theft finally lands into the hands of Satan's offspring and main
change agent of evil, Nimrod.
It
is also interesting to note, that the dates surrounding Abram and
Nimrod are also the very same dates we find ourselves in in our time,
but BC, before Christ. 1948, 2008, etc. For in their time, Nimrod
rose to great power, ruled the earth, and sought to overthrow the
kingdom of YHVH having convinced the members of his kingdom to join
with him in a blood oath to make war with heaven supplant himself as
ruler over heaven and earth.
This
is no accident, because in our time we are expecting just such an
Assyrian to come, take over the NWO and ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, and
make war upon the saints, the elect, and as is already happening,
Yeshua and all his holy works. We know this because through his
apostle John, Yeshua gave us Revelations with clear signs in the
heavens and on earth so we could mark and take note of just what we
could expect, and more importantly, the mystical goings on in heaven
behind the events on earth, such as scrolls, trumpets, bowls, horses,
and other time markers. Put together, revelations reveals much to the
discerning, Holy Spirit inspired heart.
Although
the Bible does not mention these fine details in the Scriptural
narrative, nevertheless, Terah,
Abram's father, was the commander-in-chief of Nimrod's army! He
was a very important man in the post-Flood world, and in the
government of Nimrod. This occurred when Nimrod was about forty years
of age. The account goes on:
".
. . . And Nimrod dwelt in Shinar . . . and his kingdom became very
great . . . and
Nimrod reigned in the earth over all the sons of
Noah, and they were all under his power
and counsel [he was the first World Ruler]. And all the earth was of
one tongue
and
words of union, but Nimrod did not go in the ways of YHVH. . . . And
Terah - the father of Ambram - the son of Nahor, prince of Nimrod's
host, was in those days very great in the sight of the king and his
subjects, and the king and princes loved him, and they elevated him
very high.
"And
Terah took a wife and her name was Ambhelo the daughter of Cornebo;
and the wife of Terah conceived and bare him a son in those days.
Terah was SEVENTY YEARS OLD when he begat him, and Terah called the
name of his son ABRAM, because the king had raised him in those days,
and dignified him above all his princes" (Jasher 7:44-51).
It
is also interesting to note, that under Nimrod's reign, the wars of
the middle east were endless and everywhere. In addition, the demonic
and horrific systems of government by Nephilim people's sprang up
with seemingly endless abandon. Sodom, the 5 cities of the plain,
among dozens of others. Having in common, human sacrifice of infants,
idol worship of Baal, necromancy as the state religion, and
witchcraft as practiced by the citizens. With the preceding,
lawlessness, banditry, disregard of human life in every form, etc,
etc, etc.
Sound
familiar?
For
me, with what I know and understand, I do fully appreciate that for
many peoples, in many lands, Christmas is about the celebration of
the birth of Yeshua and for them, their love is true and sincere. I
am not trying to destroy that love or the reverence and gratitude
that goes with it. I love listening to choirs sing praise of Yeshua.
The energy and light around such displays are unequaled at any other
time of the year.
And
I give thanks and praise for the Great Sacrifice that was the birth
of our redeemer, the Lamb of the Most High Elohim.
But
every single custom associated with Christmas, in our time, has its
origins from the time of Nimrod and is wholly satanic being and
government and precepts. Every. Single. Custom. Bar none. In point of
fact, each
custom is discussed in the bible, and every time, it is revealed to
us that these customs are in worship and service to Baal, the idol of
Satan on earth. I often wonder HOW did all these theologians, over
the decades not see this and understand this, and yet continue to
practice these things in the church? How could they ignore such
awareness?
And
Santa? An anagram for SATAN? Are you kidding me? Really? No one sees
this?
Here
is the rub. When our Father, YHVH, reveals to you the truth of the
matter and flat out tells you in a dozens places and point by point,
that to do these customs, is an act of abomination to him for these
acts are in service to Lucifer...what are we to do? Ignore that and
keep doing them, justifying it with some BS thing essentially saying
"well, I am loving your son, so don't worry about it
God?"
Does
this mean you are no longer saved? Of course not. The epistle of
John, chapter 2 makes it clear, like no other book in the bible, of
the sanctity of your salvation, regardless of what may come. But know
that once we are aware of the truth of things, and yet to
persist in defiance of his holy edicts, this
lessens our light
closes doors to a deeper relationship
and opens us up to influence to demonic attack, as he warned us that it would.
And speaking of
Christmas, which really means celebrating the DEATH OF CHRIST. For
that is what a mass is. Here is another clue for you all. They took
the second s off mass in the late 18th century because the little
stinkers were tired of all the accusations about THE DEATH OF CHRIST
thing.
You
see, Dad gave us a sign post, a marker, if you will, so we could know
when this might be. He showed John what the world was doing around
this time of the murder of the witnesses. He purposely used giving
and receiving of gifts as the marker, because it is universally the
biggest part of Christmas in our time. Not the lights, not the tree,
not the satanic yule log of the witches sabbath, but the gift thing.
And as any person honestly admits, it is the getting of gifts is what
makes the holidays the big thingy for them. If they are being honest.
Atheists, agnostics, witches, all celebrate Christmas. Even
Christians.
And
if we go back 42 months from December, we can know what time of year,
any year, when to expect these two miracles speaking prophecies and
witnessing to the whole of the earth. That's right, late June of some
year. It's Pentecost, one of YHVH's festivals where the Holy Spirit
descends and invests.
I
have never in all my research seen the above intel discussed or
written about anywhere in any century. Of course it must be there
somewhere. I can't be the only one. It certainly isn't taught at Xmas
time, however.
It
is now.
This
is what Christmas means to mean me.
It
has been since 2004.
I
don't put up the tree (Jeremiah). I don't put on the Yule log
(witches sabbath event on December 21st.) I don't, I don't, I
don't.
I DO
love my family and friends. And my children and others still get
gifts, but for far different reasons and not on Xmas morning.
And
yet, I love and serve Yeshua with all that I am and always will.
Don
Malachi
1For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith Yahua of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch. 2But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall. 3And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in the day that I shall do this, saith Yahua of hosts.
4Remember ye the law of Moses my servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, with the statutes and judgments.
5Behold,
I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and
dreadful day of Yahua: 6And
he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart
of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth
with a curse.
Most people think Malachi
refers to John the Baptist. and the return of Elisha. Well, John was
the return, but it's not the only time he returns. That means, in
parlance, reincarnation. As is in 400 places of the bible. Read the
book. Make the time. Or get an audio book. No excuses.
No, the
time marker is...GREAT AND DREADFUL DAY OF YAHUA. Now, nowhere is the
birth of Yeshua, in Bethlehem, 2 thousand years ago ever
referred to as the GREAT AND DREADFUL DAY. NO.
On
the contrary. Every time that phrase is used, it refers to the end
times, and the bowls of Wrath. That phrase, whenever it is used,
always refers to end times and end times prophecies. See, we've been
misled. Lied to.
Another
clue is returning the children back to the fathers, which in the New
Testament, one of the prophecies is that there will be conflict in
families.
Luke
51Suppose
ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather
division: 52For
from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three
against two, and two against three. 53The
father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the
father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the
mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the
daughter in law against her mother in law
Especially in
End times, the last generation, which is what history shows. Prior to
the 1960s love in families and loyalty were without question. Now,
every kid hates his parents, for one reason or another - especially
if the parents were kind, enlightened, and served their families with
great love. Many times legit, many times without real cause. The
movie Rebel
Without a Cause
was the kick off of this time stamp, and since that time till now, so
it is. The cause was Yeshua, for purposes difficult to understand for
many.
So that
is TWO time markers in one passage of Malachi. One, letting you know
the start of the last generation which is after world war two,
specifically 1948 and for reasons that will be another article and
that Malachi refers to a time near the end, not the advent of John
the Baptist, which was fulfilled by other prophecies, and even Yeshua
himself, declared it so.
Even
Chuck Missler and hundreds of others missed all this. Why is it, that
all these end times teachers miss all this? So much jumps out at you,
but no one is speaking or writing about it. So many are well
poisoners; others are just repeating what others say, who just repeat
dispensational churchianity.
“Mattress Girl” was my Jane Doe when I broke her story in 2013. She decided to come forward with her name and tell the world. 13 years later we reconnected and she told me she’s still paying for it. The Jane Doe in the Cornell 7 case had that anonymity ripped from her last week.
tarapalmeri.substack.co…